Please wait a minute...
Frontiers in Energy

ISSN 2095-1701

ISSN 2095-1698(Online)

CN 11-6017/TK

邮发代号 80-972

2019 Impact Factor: 2.657

Frontiers in Energy  2021, Vol. 15 Issue (2): 358-366   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0712-1
  本期目录
A thermoelectric generator and water-cooling assisted high conversion efficiency polycrystalline silicon photovoltaic system
Zekun LIU1,2, Shuang YUAN3, Yi YUAN3, Guojian LI4(), Qiang WANG4
1. Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Processing of Materials (Ministry of Education), Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Rolling and Automation, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
3. School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
4. Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Processing of Materials of the Ministry of Education, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
 全文: PDF(830 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Solar energy has been increasing its share in the global energy structure. However, the thermal radiation brought by sunlight will attenuate the efficiency of solar cells. To reduce the temperature of the photovoltaic (PV) cell and improve the utilization efficiency of solar energy, a hybrid system composed of the PV cell, a thermoelectric generator (TEG), and a water-cooled plate (WCP) was manufactured. The WCP cannot only cool the PV cell, but also effectively generate additional electric energy with the TEG using the waste heat of the PV cell. The changes in the efficiency and power density of the hybrid system were obtained by real time monitoring. The thermal and electrical tests were performed at different irradiations and the same experiment temperature of 22°C. At a light intensity of 1000 W/m2, the steady-state temperature of the PV cell decreases from 86.8°C to 54.1°C, and the overall efficiency increases from 15.6% to 21.1%. At a light intensity of 800 W/m2, the steady-state temperature of the PV cell decreases from 70°C to 45.8°C, and the overall efficiency increases from 9.28% to 12.59%. At a light intensity of 400 W/m2, the steady-state temperature of the PV cell decreases from 38.5°C to 31.5°C, and the overall efficiency is approximately 3.8%, basically remain unchanged.

Key wordsphotovoltaic (PV)    thermoelectric generator    conversion efficiency    hybrid energy systems    water-cooled plate (WCP)
收稿日期: 2020-02-25      出版日期: 2021-06-18
Corresponding Author(s): Guojian LI   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2021, 15(2): 358-366.
Zekun LIU, Shuang YUAN, Yi YUAN, Guojian LI, Qiang WANG. A thermoelectric generator and water-cooling assisted high conversion efficiency polycrystalline silicon photovoltaic system. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(2): 358-366.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/10.1007/s11708-020-0712-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/Y2021/V15/I2/358
Fig.1  
Components Parameters Value
PV cell Material type Polycrystalline
Size (mm × mm × mm) 54 × 54 × 2
TEG 1 Product model TEC1-12715
Material type Bi2Te3
Size (mm × mm × mm) 40 × 40 × 3
Number of P-N pairs 127
TEG 2 Product model TEC1-07108
Material type Bi2Te3
Size (mm × mm × mm) 30 × 30 × 3
Number of P-N pairs 71
Water cooled plate Material type Aluminum
Size (mm × mm × mm) 80 × 80 × 10
Water chiller Manufacturer S&A Company
Cooling capacity 800W
Model SW-5000AG
PV cell experimental system test bench Model TRM-JX1
Light power (W) 1000
Infrared thermometer Model Xima AS852B
multimeter Model Keithley 2700
Tab.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Initial temperature/°C) Steady-state temperature/°C
PV 27.0 86.8
PV/WCP 26.5 52.1
PV/TEG (30 × 30)/WCP 27.2 59.5
PV/TEG (40 × 40)/WCP 27.5 54.1
Tab.2  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Light intensity= 800W/m2 Light intensity= 400W/m2
Temperature /°C Power density /(W·m–2) Overall efficiency /% Temperature /°C Power density /(W·m–2) Overall efficiency /%
PV 70.0 74.3 9.3 38.5 15.2 3.8
PV/WCP 45.1 98.5 12.3 30.3 14.5 3.6
PV/TEG/WCP 45.8 94.8+ 1.9 12.1 31.5 14.6+ 0.2 3.7
Tab.3  
Fig.7  
PV type Composite system structure Irradiance
/(W·m–2)
Temperature
/K
Overall efficiency changes/% PV temperature changes /K Reference
Single-crystalline PV/TE/HW 1000 298 3.1 28 20
Perovskite PV-TEG 1000 1.9 25.5 26
Mono-crystalline PV-TEG 0.59 8.48 27
Mono-Si PV-TGS 1250 298.15 1 17.5 28
Mono-Si PV-TGS 1000 298.15 0.8 13 28
GaAs TE-PV 1000 310 3.7 16
Polymer PV-TE 1000 3 29
Poly-silicon PV/TEG/WCP 1000 295 5.44 32.7 This work
Poly-silicon PV/TEG/WCP 800 295 3.3 24.2 This work
Poly-silicon PV/TEG/WCP 400 295 0 7 This work
Tab.4  
1 M S Dresselhaus, G Chen, M Y Tang, et al. New directions for low-dimensional thermoelectric materials. Advanced Materials, 2007, 19(8): 1043–1053
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200600527
2 M Roeb, H Müller-Steinhagen. Concentrating on solar electricity and fuels. Science, 2010, 329(5993): 773–774
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1191137
3 D Kraemer, B Poudel, H P Feng, et al. High-performance flat-panel solar thermoelectric generators with high thermal concentration. Nature Materials, 2011, 10(7): 532–538
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3013
4 Ren21. Renewables 2019 Global Status Report. 2019
5 M Wild, H Gilgen, A Roesch, et al. From dimming to brightening: decadal changes in solar radiation at earth’s surface. Science, 2005, 308(5723): 847–850
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103215
6 K Wilhelm, W Curdt, E Marsch, et al. Sumer solar ultraviolet measurements of emitted radiation. Solar Physics, 1995, 162(1/2): 189–231
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733430
7 A Makki, S Omer, H Sabir. Advancements in hybrid photovoltaic systems for enhanced solar cells performance. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 41: 658–684
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.069
8 S Yoon, V Garboushian. Reduced temperature dependence of high-concentration photovoltaic solar cell open-circuit voltage (Voc) at high concentration levels. In: IEEE 1st World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion-WCPEC (A Joint Conference of PVSC, PVSEC and PSEC), Hawaii, USA, 1994
9 R Pässler. Parameter sets due to fittings of the temperature dependencies of fundamental bandgaps in semiconductors. Physica Status Solidi, 1999, 216(2): 975–1007
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-3951(199912)216:2<975::AID-PSSB975>3.0.CO;2-N
10 S R Raga, F Fabregat-Santiago. Temperature effects in dye-sensitized solar cells. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2013, 15(7): 2328–2336
https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cp43220j
11 X Ju, Z Wang, G Flamant, et al. Numerical analysis and optimization of a spectrum splitting concentration photovoltaic-thermoelectric hybrid system. Solar Energy, 2012, 86(6): 1941–1954
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2012.02.024
12 Y Deng, B Luo, Y Wang, et al. Photoelectrode with light and heat synergy utilization based on CdTe/Bi2Te3 nanorod arrays/nanolayer film. Functional Materials Letters (Singapore), 2013, 6(5): 1340004
https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793604713400043
13 D Li, Y Xuan, E Yin, et al. Conversion efficiency gain for concentrated triple-junction solar cell system through thermal management. Renewable Energy, 2018, 126: 960–968
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.04.027
14 T H Kil, S Kim, D H Jeong, et al. A highly-efficient, concentrating-photovoltaic/ thermoelectric hybrid generator. Nano Energy, 2017, 37: 242–247
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.05.023
15 Y Y Wu, S Y Wu, L Xiao. Performance analysis of photovoltaic-thermoelectric hybrid system with and without glass cover. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 93: 151–159
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.01.013
16 H Karami Lakeh, H Kaatuzian, R Hosseini. A parametrical study on photo-electro-thermal performance of an integrated thermoelectric-photovoltaic cell. Renewable Energy, 2019, 138: 542–550
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.094
17 S Mahmoudinezhad, S Qing, A Rezaniakolaei, et al. Transient model of hybrid concentrated photovoltaic with thermoelectric generator. Energy Procedia, 2017, 142: 564–569
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.088
18 S Mahmoudinezhad, S Ahmadi Atouei, P A Cotfas, et al. Experimental and numerical study on the transient behavior of multijunction solar cell-thermoelectric generator hybrid system. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 184: 448–455
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.01.081
19 E Yin, Q Li, Y Xuan. Optimal design method for concentrating photovoltaic-thermoelectric hybrid system. Applied Energy, 2018, 226: 320–329
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.127
20 P Singh, N M Ravindra. Temperature dependence of solar cell performance—an analysis. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2012, 101: 36–45
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2012.02.019
21 D M Rowe, G Min. Evaluation of thermoelectric modules for power generation. Journal of Power Sources, 1998, 73(2): 193–198
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(97)02801-2
22 A Andreas, T Stoffel. NREL Solar Radiation Research Laboratory (SRRL): Baseline Measurement System (BMS); Golden, Colorado (Data). National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Report No. DA-5500–56488
https://doi.org/10.7799/1052221
23 D Yang, H Yin. Energy conversion efficiency of a novel hybrid solar system for photovoltaic, thermoelectric, and heat utilization. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2011, 26(2): 662–670
https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2011.2112363
24 S Nizetic, A Papadopoulos. The role of exergy in energy and the environment. Springer International Publishing, 2018, 525–543
25 B Sopori, W Chen, J Madjdpour, et al. Calculation of emissivity of Si wafers. Journal of Electronic Materials, 1999, 28(12): 1385–1389
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-999-0126-7
26 L Xu, Y Xiong, A Mei, et al. Efficient perovskite photovoltaic thermoelectric hybrid device. Advanced Energy Materials, 2018, 8(13): 1702937
https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201702937
27 P Motiei, M Yaghoubi, E Goshtashbirad, et al. Two-dimensional unsteady state performance analysis of a hybrid photovoltaic-thermoelectric generator. Renewable Energy, 2018, 119: 551–565
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.11.092
28 S Wu, Y Zhang, L Xiao, et al. Performance comparison investigation on solar photovoltaic-thermoelectric generation and solar photovoltaic-thermoelectric cooling hybrid systems under different conditions. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 2018, 37(6): 533–548
https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2017.1345906
29 J Zhang, Y Xuan, L Yang. Performance estimation of photovoltaic–thermoelectric hybrid systems. Energy, 2014, 78: 895–903
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.10.087
[1] FEP-20099-OF-LZK_suppl_1 Download
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed