Please wait a minute...
Frontiers in Energy

ISSN 2095-1701

ISSN 2095-1698(Online)

CN 11-6017/TK

Postal Subscription Code 80-972

2018 Impact Factor: 1.701

Front Energ    2012, Vol. 6 Issue (3) : 227-236    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-012-0198-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Load shedding scheme for an interconnected hydro-thermal hybrid system with SMES
D. TYAGI, Ashwani KUMAR(), Saurabh CHANANA
Department of Electrical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra 136119, India
 Download: PDF(425 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The frequency of the power system varies based on the load pattern of the consumers. With continuous increase in the load, the frequency of the system keeps decreasing and may reach its minimum allowable limits. Further increase in the load will result in more frequency drop leading to the need of load shedding, if excess generation is not available to cater the need. This paper proposed a methodology in a hybrid thermal-hydro system for finding the required amount of load to be shed for setting the frequency of the system within its minimum allowable limits. The load shedding steps were obtained based on the rate of change of frequency with the increase in the load in both areas. The impact of superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES) was obtained on load shedding scheme. The comparison of the results was presented on the two-area system.

Keywords critical load      frequency response      load shedding      multi-area system      rate of change of frequency      superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES) device     
Corresponding Author(s): KUMAR Ashwani,Email:ashwa_ks@yahoo.co.in   
Issue Date: 05 September 2012
 Cite this article:   
D. TYAGI,Ashwani KUMAR,Saurabh CHANANA. Load shedding scheme for an interconnected hydro-thermal hybrid system with SMES[J]. Front Energ, 2012, 6(3): 227-236.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/10.1007/s11708-012-0198-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/Y2012/V6/I3/227
Fig.1  Model of two-area system without SMES
Fig.2  SMES-circuit diagram []
Fig.3  SMES block diagram with negative inductor current deviation feedback
Fig.4  SIMULINK diagram of hydrothermal power plant with SMES in thermal area
Fig.5  Frequency response of Area 1 corresponding to equally varying loads in both areas
Case No.?PL1/pu?PL2/puΔf1max/Hzf1min/HzΔf2max/Hzf2min/Hz
1-0.20-0.20-1.0258.98-1.358.7
2-0.3692-0.3692-1.9258.08-2.457.6
3-0.40-0.40-2.1057.9-2.657.4
4-0.46-0.46-2.457.6-2.9957.01
5-0.60-0.60-3.156.9-3.956.1
6-0.80-0.80-4.0855.92-5.254.8
7-1.0-1.0-5.154.9-6.553.5
Tab.1  Frequency variation w.r.t change in loads without SMES
Fig.6  Frequency response of Area 2 corresponding to equally varying loads in both areas
Fig.7  Frequency response of Area 1 after load shedding
Fig.8  Frequency response of Area 2 after load shedding
Fig.9  Frequency response of Area 1 corresponding to equally varying loads in both areas with SMES
Case No.?PL1/pu?PL2/puΔf1max/Hzf1min/HzΔf2max/Hzf2min/Hz
1-0.20-0.20-0.6259.38-0.82659.174
2-0.40-0.40-1.2458.76-1.65258.348
3-0.581-0.581-1.82458.176-2.457.6
4-0.60-0.60-1.8858.12-2.47857.522
5-0.764-0.764-2.457.6-3.15556.844
6-0.80-0.80-2.51257.488-3.30456.696
7-1.0-1.0-3.1456.86-4.1355.87
Tab.2  Frequency variation w.r.t loads with SMES
Fig.10  Frequency response of Area 2 corresponding to equally varying loads in both areas with SMES
Fig.11  Frequency response of Area 1 after load shedding
Fig.12  Frequency response of Area 2 after load shedding
Fig.13  Frequency for different loads with and without SMES for Area 1
Fig.14  Frequency for different loads with and without SMES for Area 2
1 Thompson J G, Fox B. Adaptive load shedding for isolated power systems. IEEE Proceedings of Generation, Transmission and Distribution , 1994, 141(5): 491–496
doi: 10.1049/ip-gtd:19941370
2 Concordia C, Fink L H, Poullikkas G. Load shedding on an isolated system. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , 1995, 10(3): 1467–1472
doi: 10.1109/59.466502
3 Anderson P M, Mirheydar M. A low-order system frequency response model. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , 1990, 5(3): 720–729
doi: 10.1109/59.65898
4 Anderson P M, Mirheydar M. An adaptive method for setting under frequency load shedding relays. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , 1992, 7(2): 647–655
doi: 10.1109/59.141770
5 Maliszewski R M, Dunlop R D, Wilson G L. Frequency actuated load shedding and restoration Part I—Philosophy. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems , 1971, PAS-90(4): 1452–1459
doi: 10.1109/TPAS.1971.293129
6 Horowitz S, Polities A, Gabrielle A. Frequency actuated load shedding and restoration art II—Implementation. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems , 1971, 90(4): 1460–1468
doi: 10.1109/TPAS.1971.293130
7 Rudez U, Mihalic R. Monitoring the first frequency derivative to improve adaptive underfrequency load-shedding schemes. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , 2011, 26(2): 839–846
doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2059715
8 Lokay H E, Burtnyk V. Application of under-frequency relays for automatic load shedding. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems , 1968, PAS-87(5): 1362–1366
9 Chuvychin V N, Gurov N S, Venkata S S, Brown R E. An adaptive approach to load shedding and spinning reserve control during under-frequency conditions. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , 1996, 11(4): 1805–1810
doi: 10.1109/59.544646
10 Shilling S R. Electrical transient stability and under-frequency load shedding analysis for a large pump station. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications , 1997, 33(1): 194–201
doi: 10.1109/28.567111
11 Kottick D, Or O. Neural-networks for predicting the operation of an under-frequency load shedding system. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , 1996, 11(3): 1350–1358
doi: 10.1109/59.535676
12 Elgerd O I, Fosha C E. Optimum megawatt frequency—Control of multi-area electric energy systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , 1970, PAS-89(4): 556–563
doi: 10.1109/TPAS.1970.292602
13 Giroletti M, Farina M, Scattolini R. A hybrid frequency/power based method for industrial load shedding. Electric Power and Energy Systems , 2012, 35(1): 194–200
doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2011.10.013
14 Abraham R J, Das D, Patra A. Automatic generation control of an interconnected hydrothermal power system considering superconducting magnetic energy storage. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems , 2007, 29(8): 571–579
doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2007.01.004
[1] Alagarsamy KRISHNAVEL, Dusmata Kumar MOHANTA, M. Jaya Bharata REDDY. Well-being analysis of GSU transformer insulation incorporating the impact on power generation using fuzzy logic[J]. Front Energ, 2013, 7(3): 288-299.
[2] D. TYAGI, Ashwani KUMAR, Saurabh CHANANA. Load shedding scheme for the two-area system with linear quadratic regulator[J]. Front Energ, 2013, 7(1): 90-102.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed