Please wait a minute...
Frontiers in Energy

ISSN 2095-1701

ISSN 2095-1698(Online)

CN 11-6017/TK

Postal Subscription Code 80-972

2018 Impact Factor: 1.701

Front. Energy    2021, Vol. 15 Issue (1) : 143-158    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0703-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Evaluation of the situational awareness effects for smart distribution networks under the novel design of indicator framework and hybrid weighting method
Leijiao GE1, Yuanliang LI1, Suxuan LI1(), Jiebei ZHU1, Jun YAN2
1. School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2. Concordia Institute for Information Systems Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal 300072, Canada
 Download: PDF(3098 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

As a key application of smart grid technologies, the smart distribution network (SDN) is expected to have a high diversity of equipment and complexity of operation patterns. Situational awareness (SA), which aims to provide a critical visibility of the SDN, will enable a significant assurance for stable SDN operations. However, the lack of systematic evaluation through the three stages of perception, comprehensive, and prediction may prevent the SA technique from effectively achieving the performance necessary to monitor and respond to events in SDN. To analyze the feasibility and effectiveness of the SA technique for the SDN, a comprehensive evaluation framework with specific performance indicators and systematic weighting methods is proposed in this paper. Besides, to implement the indicator framework while addressing the key issues of human expert scoring ambiguity and the lack of data in specific SDN areas, an improved interval-based analytic hierarchy process-based subjective weighting and a multi-objective programming method-based objective weighting are developed to evaluate the SDN SA performance. In addition, a case study in a real distribution network of Tianjin, China is conducted whose outcomes verify the practicality and effectiveness of the proposed SA technique for SDN operating security.

Keywords distribution networks      operation and maintenance      expert systems     
Corresponding Author(s): Suxuan LI   
Online First Date: 21 October 2020    Issue Date: 19 March 2021
 Cite this article:   
Leijiao GE,Yuanliang LI,Suxuan LI, et al. Evaluation of the situational awareness effects for smart distribution networks under the novel design of indicator framework and hybrid weighting method[J]. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(1): 143-158.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/10.1007/s11708-020-0703-2
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/Y2021/V15/I1/143
Fig.1  Situation awareness of smart distribution networks.
Fig.2  Evaluation indicators framework of SDN SA effects.
Fig.3  Indicator layer A of SA perception effect for SDN.
Fig.4  Indicator layer B of SA comprehension effect for SDN.
Fig.5  Indicator layer C of SA prediction effect for SDN.
n 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
RI 0 0 0.58 0.9 1.12 1.24 1.32 1.41
Tab.1  Freedom index
Fig.6  Flowchart of evaluation for SA effects.
Fig.7  SA framework of Tianjin distribution network.
Fig.8  Weight for AHP and IIAHP at different weighting factor values of q.
Fig.9  Weight for the proposed method at different weighting factor q and subjective preference coefficient a.
Indicator Hybrid method IIAHP method Multi-objective programming
A1 0.1898 0.3170 0.0627
A2 0.0877 0.1049 0.0705
A3 0.0654 0.0661 0.0646
A4 0.0529 0.0419 0.0638
A5 0.0416 0.0304 0.0529
B1 0.0500 0.0354 0.0646
B2 0.0316 0.0161 0.0470
B3 0.0701 0.0932 0.0470
B4 0.0567 0.0624 0.0509
B5 0.0545 0.0385 0.0705
B6 0.0312 0.0271 0.0353
B7 0.0363 0.0118 0.0607
B8 0.0170 0.0066 0.0274
C1 0.0384 0.0039 0.0729
C2 0.0363 0.0216 0.0509
C3 0.0331 0.0103 0.0558
C4 0.0473 0.0417 0.0529
C5 0.0603 0.0712 0.0494
Tab.2  Weights of the proposed hybrid method, IIAHP, and multi-objective programming method
Fig.10  Statistical chart of normalized indicator score.
Area Subjective score Objective score Comprehensive score
Urban 0.8655 0.9200 0.8928
Suburban 0.1888 0.1691 0.1790
Tab.3  Comprehensive evaluation results
1 X He, R C Qiu, Q Ai, L Chu, X Xu, Z Ling. Designing for situation awareness of future power grids: an indicator system based on linear eigenvalue statistics of large random matrices. IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 2016, 4: 3557–3568
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2581838
2 J Yin, M Hu, Y Ma, K Han, D Chen. Airport taxi situation awareness with a macroscopic distribution network analysis. Networks and Spatial Economics, 2019, 19(3): 669–695
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-018-9402-5
3 S N Danial, J Smith, F Khan, B Veitch. Situation awareness modeling for emergency management on offshore platforms. Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences, 2019, 9(1): 37
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-019-0199-0
4 X Liu, J Yu, W Lv, D Yu, Y Wang, Y Wu. Network security situation: from awareness to awareness-control. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2019, 139: 15–30
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2019.04.022
5 D L Donaldson, D Jayaweera. Effective solar prosumer identification using net smart meter data. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2020, 118: 105823
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.105823
6 X Li, G Tian, Q Shi, T Jiang, F Li, H Jia. Security region of natural gas network in electricity-gas integrated energy system. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2020, 117: 105601
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.105601
7 Y L Liu, X J Shi, Y Xu. A hybrid data-driven method for fast approximation of practical dynamic security region boundary of power systems. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2020, 117: 105658
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.105658
8 G L Garcia, L Stevahn. Situational awareness and interpersonal competence as evaluator competencies. American Journal of Evaluation, 2020, 41(1): 107–124
https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214018814941
9 S Wang, L Ge, S Cai, L Wu. Hybrid interval AHP-entropy method for electricity user evaluation in smart electricity utilization. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 2018, 6(4): 701–711
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40565-017-0355-3
10 I Kosen, C Huang, Z Chen, X Zhang, L Min, D Zhou, L Zhu, Y Liu. UPS: unified PMU-data storage system to enhance TD PMU data usability. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2020, 11(1): 739–748
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2019.2916570
11 Y Wang, C Chen, J Wang, R Baldick. Research on resilience of power systems under natural disasters—a review. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2016, 31(2): 1604–1613
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2429656
12 Y Tan, F Qiu, A K Das, D S Kirschen, P Arabshahi, J Wang. Scheduling post-disaster repairs in electricity distribution networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2019, 34(4): 2611–2621
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2898966
13 T Wang, S Zhang, X P Gu. A trend-based approach for situation awareness in power systems. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 2017, 27(12): 1–16
https://doi.org/10.1002/etep.2446
14 H Bahrampour, A K Beheshti Marnani, M B Askari, M R Bahrampour. Evaluation of renewable energies production Potential in the Middle East: confronting the world’s energy crisis. Frontiers in Energy, 2020, 14(1): 42–56
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.05.057
15 J H Menke, N Bornhorst, M Braun. Distribution system monitoring for smart power grids with distributed generation using artificial neural networks. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2019, 113: 472–480
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.05.057
16 F Shen, Q Wu, S Huang, X Chen, H Liu, Y Xu. Two-tier demand response with flexible demand swap and transactive control for real-time congestion management in distribution networks. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2020, 114: 105399
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.105399
17 D A Quijano, A Padilha-Feltrin. Optimal integration of distributed generation and conservation voltage reduction in active distribution networks. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2019, 113: 197–207
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.05.039
18 J Xiao, B Q Zhang, F Z Luo. Distribution network security situation awareness method based on security distance. IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 2019, 7: 37855–37864
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2906779
19 D Diez, R Romero, S Tena. Designing a human supervisory control system for smart grid. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 2016, 14(4): 1899–1905
https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2016.7483532
20 H Y Su, T Y Liu. A PMU-based method for smart transmission grid voltage security visualization and monitoring. Energies, 2017, 10(8): 1103
https://doi.org/10.3390/en10081103
21 Y Zhang, X Ai, J Wen, J Fang, H He. Data-adaptive robust optimization method for the economic dispatch of active distribution networks. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2019, 10(4): 3791–3800
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2018.2834952
22 S Gao, H J Jia, C Marnay. Techno-economic evaluation of mixed AC and DC power distribution network for integrating large-scale photovoltaic power generation. IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 2019, 7: 105019–105029
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2931985
23 Y Q Wang, L Ge, N Zhang. Hybrid evaluation method for dispatching control level of smart distribution network. Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, 2019, 14(6): 2263–2275
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-019-00267-x
[1] FEP-20079-OF-GLJ_suppl_1 Download
[1] Salman HABIB, Muhammad Mansoor KHAN, Farukh ABBAS, Muhammad NUMAN, Yaqoob ALI, Houjun TANG, Xuhui YAN. A framework for stochastic estimation of electric vehicle charging behavior for risk assessment of distribution networks[J]. Front. Energy, 2020, 14(2): 298-317.
[2] Kallol ROY,Kamal Krishna MANDAL. Hybrid optimization algorithm for modeling and management of micro grid connected system[J]. Front. Energy, 2014, 8(3): 305-314.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed