Please wait a minute...
Frontiers in Energy

ISSN 2095-1701

ISSN 2095-1698(Online)

CN 11-6017/TK

Postal Subscription Code 80-972

2018 Impact Factor: 1.701

Front. Energy    2021, Vol. 15 Issue (1) : 14-25    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0805-x
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Effect of temperature on Lu’an bituminous char structure evolution in pyrolysis and combustion
Yandi ZHANG, Yinhe LIU(), Xiaoli DUAN, Yao ZHOU, Xiaoqian LIU, Shijin XU
State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
 Download: PDF(3442 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

In the process of pyrolysis and combustion of coal particles, coal structure evolution will be affected by the ash behavior, which will further affect the char reactivity, especially in the ash melting temperature zone. Lu’an bituminous char and ash samples were prepared at the N2 and air atmospheres respectively across ash melting temperature. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to observe the morphology of char and ash. The specific surface area (SSA) analyzer and thermogravimetric analyzer were respectively adopted to obtain the pore structure characteristics of the coal chars and combustion parameters. Besides, an X-ray diffractometer (XRD) was applied to investigate the graphitization degree of coal chars prepared at different pyrolysis temperatures. The SEM results indicated that the number density and physical dimension of ash spheres exuded from the char particles both gradually increased with the increasing temperature, thus the coalescence of ash spheres could be observed obviously above 1100°C. Some flocculent materials appeared on the surface of the char particles at 1300°C, and it could be speculated that β-Si3N4 was generated in the pyrolysis process under N2. The SSA of the chars decreased with the increasing pyrolysis temperature. Inside the char particles, the micropore area and its proportion in the SSA also declined as the pyrolysis temperature increased. Furthermore, the constantly increasing pyrolysis temperature also caused the reactivity of char decrease, which is consistent with the results obtained by XRD. The higher combustion temperature resulted in the lower porosity and more fragments of the ash.

Keywords bituminous char      pyrolysis      ash      structure evolution      reactivity     
Corresponding Author(s): Yinhe LIU   
Online First Date: 31 March 2020    Issue Date: 19 March 2021
 Cite this article:   
Yandi ZHANG,Yinhe LIU,Xiaoli DUAN, et al. Effect of temperature on Lu’an bituminous char structure evolution in pyrolysis and combustion[J]. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(1): 14-25.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/10.1007/s11708-020-0805-x
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/Y2021/V15/I1/14
Proximate analysis/wt% Ultimate analysis/wt% Ash fusion temperature t/°C
Mad Aad Vad FCad Cad Had Nad Sad Oad* DT ST HT FT
6.83 10.92 31.78 50.47 61.35 2.97 0.57 0.14 17.22 1140 1180 1190 1200
Tab.1  Analyses of Lu’an bituminous coal and ash (air-dried basis)
Ash composition SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 CaO MgO Na2O K2O TiO2 SO3
Content/wt% 36.75 16.32 6.46 27.54 2.74 2.90 0.24 0.94 3.70
Tab.2  Ash composition analysis of Lu’an bituminous coal
Fig.1  Experimental setup of fixed bed for bituminous char/ash preparing.
Fig.2  Char yield of Lu’an bituminous coal at different pyrolysis temperatures.
Fig.3  Micro-morphology of parent coal and char.
Fig.4  Effect of pyrolysis temperature on char behavior.
Elements Mass percentage of element/%
Non-highlighted area (001) Highlighted area (002)
C 64.96±2.53 28.85±0.81
O 10.31±1.85 32.37±0.69
Mg 0 1.04±0.08
Al 1.79±0.36 1.56±0.09
Si 12.53±1 11.56±0.24
Ca 8.99±1.14 23.34±0.42
Fe 0 1.01±0.23
Tab.3  EDS analysis of non-highlighted area (001) and highlighted area (002)
Fig.5  SEM analysis of flocculent substance.
Elements Mass percentage of element/%
Needle-like materials abundant zone (003) Needle-like materials non-abundant zone (004) Needle-like materials non-abundant zone (005)
C 23.74±0.28 75.52±0.23 83.65±0.25
N 17.13±0.82 0 0
O 1.66±0.38 3.29±0.98 4.35±1.69
Al 0.99±0.12 0.74±0.29 0.49±0.49
Si 54.77±0.14 18.19±0.32 10.18±0.54
Ca 1.24±0.36 1.54±0.77 0.98±1.26
Tab.4  EDS analyses on needle-like materials abundant zone (003) and needle-like materials non-abundant zones (004 and 005)
Fig.6  Reaction of C and SiO2 in N2 atmosphere at different temperatures.
Fig.7  SEM images of coal char prepared in Ar atmosphere.
Fig.8  Effect of pyrolysis temperature on SSA of coal char.
Fig.9  Effect of pyrolysis temperature on MIA and MEA&MAA of coal char.
Fig.10  Effect of pyrolysis temperature on PMIA and PMEA&PMAA of coal char.
Fig.11  TG/DTG curves of char prepared at different temperatures.
Fig.12  ITs and BTs of coal char at different pyrolysis temperatures.
Pyrolysis temperature/°C 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
d002/nm 0.34205 0.3411 0.34048 0.33968 0.33899
G/% 22.67 33.72 40.93 50.23 58.26
Tab.5  Comparison of combustion reactivity of coal chars prepared at different pyrolysis temperatures
Fig.13  Morphology of coal ash at various combustion temperatures.
1 BP. BP Statistical Review of World Energy, 2019, 45
2 P Teixeira, H Lopes, I Gulyurtlu, N Lapa, P Abelha. Evaluation of slagging and fouling tendency during biomass co-firing with coal in a fluidized bed. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2012, 39: 192–203
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.01.010
3 A Williams. Understanding slagging and fouling during PF combustion: Gordon Couch IEA Coal Research. Fuel, 1995, 74(10): 1541
https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(95)90012-8
4 S A Benson, J N Harb. Fuel minerals, fouling and slagging. Energy & Fuels, 1993, 7(6): 743–745
https://doi.org/10.1021/ef00042a007
5 M Seggiani. Empirical correlations of the ash fusion temperatures and temperature of critical viscosity for coal and biomass ashes. Fuel, 1999, 78(9): 1121–1125
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(99)00031-9
6 R Noda, I Naruse, K Ohtake. Fundamentals on combustion and gasification behavior of coal particle trapped on molten slag layer. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 1996, 29(2): 235–241
https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.29.235
7 X Wang, D Zhao, L He, Y Chen, H Aoki, T Miura. Study on the mechanism and simulation method for wall burning process. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2006, 38(4): 462–470
8 L Kong, J Bai, W Li, X Wen, X Liu, X Li, Z Bai, Z Guo, H Li. The internal and external factor on coal ash slag viscosity at high temperatures, part 2: effect of residual carbon on slag viscosity. Fuel, 2015, 158: 976–982
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.06.055
9 Z Ma, F Iman, P Lu, R Sears, L Kong, A S Rokanuzzaman, D P McCollor, S A Benson. A comprehensive slagging and fouling prediction tool for coal-fired boilers and its validation/application. Fuel Processing Technology, 2007, 88(11–12): 1035–1043
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.06.025
10 M Lackner, F Winter, A K Agarwal. Handbook of Combustion, Vol. 4: Solid Fuels. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2010, 493–531
11 L Fryda, C Sobrino, M Cieplik, W L van de Kamp. Study on ash deposition under oxyfuel combustion of coal/biomass blends. Fuel, 2010, 89(8): 1889–1902
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.11.022
12 K Akiyama, H Pak, T Tada, Y Ueki, R Yoshiie, I Naruse. Ash deposition behavior of upgraded brown coal and bituminous coal. Energy & Fuels, 2010, 24(8): 4138–4143
https://doi.org/10.1021/ef9014313
13 X Wu, H Ji, B Dai, L Zhang. Xinjiang lignite ash slagging and flowability under the weak reducing environment at 1300°C—a new method to quantify slag flow velocity and its correlation with slag properties. Fuel Processing Technology, 2018, 171: 173–182
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.11.017
14 B Dai, A Hoadley, L Zhang. Characteristics of high temperature C–CO2 gasification reactivity of Victorian brown coal char and its blends with high ash fusion temperature bituminous coal. Fuel, 2017, 202: 352–365
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.04.044
15 Z Ma, J Bai, W Li, Z Bai, L Kong. Mineral transformation in char and its effect on coal char gasification reactivity at high temperatures, part 1: mineral transformation in char. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27(8): 4545–4554
https://doi.org/10.1021/ef4010626
16 Z Ma, J Bai, Z Bai, L Kong, Z Guo, J Yan, W Li. Mineral transformation in char and its effect on coal char gasification reactivity at high temperatures, part 2: char gasification. Energy & Fuels, 2014, 28(3): 1846–1853
https://doi.org/10.1021/ef402382m
17 J Bai, W Li, C Li, Z Bai, B Li. Influences of minerals transformation on the reactivity of high temperature char gasification. Fuel Processing Technology, 2010, 91(4): 404–409
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.05.017
18 Z Ma, J Bai, X Wen, X Li, Y Shi, Z Bai, L Kong, Z Guo, J Yan, W Li. Mineral transformation in char and its effect on coal char gasification reactivity at high temperatures part 3: carbon thermal reaction. Energy & Fuels, 2014, 28(5): 3066–3073
https://doi.org/10.1021/ef5004792
19 S Y Lin, M Hirato, M Horio. The characteristics of coal char gasification at around ash melting temperature. Energy & Fuels, 1994, 8(3): 598–606
https://doi.org/10.1021/ef00045a014
20 L Ding, Z Zhou, Q Guo, Y Wang, G Yu. In situ analysis and mechanism study of char-ash/slag transition in pulverized coal gasification. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(6): 3532–3544
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00322
21 X Wu, Z Zhang, G Piao, X He, Y Chen, N Kobayashi, S Mori, Y Itaya. Behavior of mineral matters in Chinese coal ash melting during char-CO2 /H2O gasification reaction. Energy & Fuels, 2009, 23(5): 2420–2428
https://doi.org/10.1021/ef801002n
22 H Liu, C Luo, M Toyota, S Uemiya, T Kojima. Kinetics of CO2/char gasification at elevated temperatures. Part II: clarification of mechanism through modelling and char characterization. Fuel Processing Technology, 2006, 87(9): 769–774
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2006.02.007
23 C Shen, W Lin, S Wu, X Tong, W Song. Experimental study of combustion characteristics of bituminous char derived under mild pyrolysis conditions. Energy & Fuels, 2009, 23(11): 5322–5330
https://doi.org/10.1021/ef900306w
24 L Tang, S Hu, Y Ni, X Zhu, Z Zhu. Effect of char marking temperature on coal char characteristics. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology, 2007, 33(2): 149–152
25 X Wang, W Xu, L Zhang, Z Hu, H Tan, Y Xiong, T Xu. Char characteristics from the pyrolysis of straw, wood and coal at high temperatures. Journal of Biobased Materials and Bioenergy, 2013, 7(6): 675–683
https://doi.org/10.1166/jbmb.2013.1380
26 K Xie. Coal Structure and its Reactivity. Beijing: Science Press, 2002
27 J G Speight. Handbook of Coal Analysis. 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2015
28 H Zhang, X Li. Application of scanning electron microscope in coal and rock science. Journal of Chinese Electron Microscopy Society, 2004, 23(4): 467–467
29 J Cao, L Cong. Discussion on the research and application of silicon nitride. Ceramics, 2008, 4(8): 34–36
30 H Lorenz, E Carrea, M Tamura, J Haas. The role of char surface structure development in pulverized fuel combustion. Fuel, 2000, 79(10): 1161–1172
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(99)00259-8
31 J Q Shi, S Durucan. Gas storage and flow in coalbed reservoirs: implementation of a bidisperse pore model for gas diffusion in coal matrix. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2005, 8(02): 169–175
https://doi.org/10.2118/84342-PA
32 C R Clarkson, J Wood, S Burgis, S Aquino, M Freeman. Nanopore-structure analysis and permeability predictions for a tight gas siltstone reservoir by use of low-pressure adsorption and mercury-intrusion techniques. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2012, 15(06): 648–661
https://doi.org/10.2118/155537-PA
33 J Wu. Study on the characteristics of coal micro-pore and its relationship with hydrocarbon migration and reservoir. Science in China, 1993, 23(1): 77–84
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02906887
34 H Zhang, S Yang. Research into the nitrogen adsorption test of coal under low temperature. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology, 1993, 12(3): 245–249
35 S J Gregg, K S W Sing, H W Salzberg. Adsorption surface area and porosity. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1967, 114(11): 279C
https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2426447
36 K S W Sing. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1985, 57(4): 603–619
https://doi.org/10.1351/pac198557040603
37 X Li, B Ma, L Xu, Z Hu, X Wang. Thermogravimetric analysis of the co-combustion of the blends with high ash coal and waste tyres. Thermochimica Acta, 2006, 441(1): 79–83
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2005.11.044
38 B G Ma, X G Li, L Xu, K Wang, X G Wang. Investigation on catalyzed combustion of high ash coal by thermogravimetric analysis. Thermochimica Acta, 2006, 445(1): 19–22
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2006.03.021
39 B Feng, S K Bhatia, J C Barry. Variation of the crystalline structure of coal char during gasification. Energy & Fuels, 2003, 17(3): 744–754
https://doi.org/10.1021/ef0202541
40 Y Wu, S Wu, J Gu, J Gao. Differences in physical properties and CO2 gasification reactivity between coal char and petroleum coke. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2009, 87(5): 323–330
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2009.05.001
41 L Lu, C Kong, V Sahajwalla, D Harris. Char structural ordering during pyrolysis and combustion and its influence on char reactivity. Fuel, 2002, 81(9): 1215–1225
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00035-2
42 Z Tang, G Zhou, J Xiong, Z Zhou. Measurement of graphitization degree of carbon-carbon composites by average X-ray diffraction angle method. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2003, 13(6): 1435–1440
43 L Ding, Y Gong, Y Wang, F Wang, G Yu. Characterisation of the morphological changes and interactions in char, slag and ash during CO2 gasification of rice straw and lignite. Applied Energy, 2017, 195: 713–724
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.098
[1] Na DENG, Dongyan LI, Qiang ZHANG, Awen ZHANG, Rongchang CAI, Biting ZHANG. Simulation analysis of municipal solid waste pyrolysis and gasification based on Aspen plus[J]. Front. Energy, 2019, 13(1): 64-70.
[2] Dmitry KUKLIN. Choosing configurations of transmission line tower grounding by back flashover probability value[J]. Front. Energy, 2016, 10(2): 213-226.
[3] Arunachalam VELMURUGAN,Marimuthu LOGANATHAN,E. James GUNASEKARAN. Prediction of performance, combustion and emission characteristics of diesel-thermal cracked cashew nut shell liquid blends using artificial neural network[J]. Front. Energy, 2016, 10(1): 114-124.
[4] Weiwei ZHANG, Huisheng ZHANG, Ming SU. Fault simulation of boiler heating surface ash deposition in a power plant system[J]. Front Energ, 2011, 5(4): 435-443.
[5] Jun YAO, Wenbing LI, Fangfang XIA, Jing WANG, Chengran FANG, Dongsheng SHEN. Investigation of Cu leaching from municipal solid waste incinerator bottom ash with a comprehensive approach[J]. Front Energ, 2011, 5(3): 340-348.
[6] Zhengjiao TANG, Cunwen WANG, Weiguo WANG, Jia GUO, Yuanxin WU, Jinfang CHEN, Yigang DING. Simulation analysis of methanol flash distillation circulation process in biodiesel production with supercritical method[J]. Front Energ, 2011, 5(1): 93-97.
[7] Xifeng ZHU, Qiang LU, Wenzhi LI, Dong ZHANG, . Fast and catalytic pyrolysis of xylan: Effects of temperature and M/HZSM-5 (M= Fe, Zn) catalysts on pyrolytic products[J]. Front. Energy, 2010, 4(3): 424-429.
[8] Xiangsong HOU, Shi YANG, Junfu LU, Hai ZHANG, Guangxi YUE. Effect of circulating ash from CFB boilers on NO and N2O emission[J]. Front Energ Power Eng Chin, 2009, 3(2): 241-246.
[9] HE Hongzhou, LUO Zhongyang, CEN Kefa. Parameter for judging reactivity of coal and coke[J]. Front. Energy, 2008, 2(3): 354-358.
[10] WANG Shurong, LIU Qian, LUO Zhongyang, WEN Lihua, CEN Kefa. Mechanism study on cellulose pyrolysis using thermogravimetric analysis coupled with infrared spectroscopy[J]. Front. Energy, 2007, 1(4): 413-419.
[11] YAN Jianhua, CHEN Tong, LU Shengyong, LI Xiaodong, GU Yueling, CEN Kefa. Experimental study on low temperature thermal treatment of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) in fly ash[J]. Front. Energy, 2007, 1(3): 280-284.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed