Please wait a minute...
Frontiers in Energy

ISSN 2095-1701

ISSN 2095-1698(Online)

CN 11-6017/TK

Postal Subscription Code 80-972

2018 Impact Factor: 1.701

Front. Energy    2022, Vol. 16 Issue (6) : 900-915    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-021-0812-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Experimental study of stratified lean burn characteristics on a dual injection gasoline engine
Chun XIA, Tingyu ZHAO, Junhua FANG(), Lei ZHU(), Zhen HUANG
Key laboratory of Power Machinery and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
 Download: PDF(4474 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Due to increasingly stringent fuel consumption and emission regulation, improving thermal efficiency and reducing particulate matter emissions are two main issues for next generation gasoline engine. Lean burn mode could greatly reduce pumping loss and decrease the fuel consumption of gasoline engines, although the burning rate is decreased by higher diluted intake air. In this study, dual injection stratified combustion mode is used to accelerate the burning rate of lean burn by increasing the fuel concentration near the spark plug. The effects of engine control parameters such as the excess air coefficient (Lambda), direct injection (DI) ratio, spark interval with DI, and DI timing on combustion, fuel consumption, gaseous emissions, and particulate emissions of a dual injection gasoline engine are studied. It is shown that the lean burn limit can be extended to Lambda= 1.8 with a low compression ratio of 10, while the fuel consumption can be obviously improved at Lambda= 1.4. There exists a spark window for dual injection stratified lean burn mode, in which the spark timing has a weak effect on combustion. With optimization of the control parameters, the brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) decreases 9.05% more than that of original stoichiometric combustion with DI as 2 bar brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) at a 2000 r/min engine speed. The NOx emissions before three-way catalyst (TWC) are 71.31% lower than that of the original engine while the particle number (PN) is 81.45% lower than the original engine. The dual injection stratified lean burn has a wide range of applications which can effectively reduce fuel consumption and particulate emissions. The BSFC reduction rate is higher than 5% and the PN reduction rate is more than 50% with the speed lower than 2400 r/min and the load lower than 5 bar.

Keywords dual injection      stratified lean burn      gasoline engine      particulate matter emission      combustion analysis     
Corresponding Author(s): Junhua FANG,Lei ZHU   
Online First Date: 10 January 2022    Issue Date: 17 January 2023
 Cite this article:   
Chun XIA,Tingyu ZHAO,Junhua FANG, et al. Experimental study of stratified lean burn characteristics on a dual injection gasoline engine[J]. Front. Energy, 2022, 16(6): 900-915.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/10.1007/s11708-021-0812-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/Y2022/V16/I6/900
Items Specifications
Displaced volume/mL 1995
Stroke/mm 82
Bore/mm 88
Connecting rod/mm 150.5
Compression ratio 10:01
Number of cylinder 4
Number of valves 4
Intake valve open/(°CA bTDC) 340
Intake valve close/(°CA bTDC) 100
Exhaust valve open/(°CA bTDC) 244
Exhaust valve close/(°CA bTDC) 4
Tab.1  Test engine specification
Fig.1  Dual injection engine system and test bench.
Parameters Value
Temperature recovered to 80%/°C 144.6
Temperature recovered to 90%/°C 165.3
Temperature recovered to 95%/°C 178.3
Final boiling point (FBP)/°C 191.7
Residue/vol.% 1.1
Loss/vol.% 1.3
Evaporated at 70°C/vol.% 34.3
Evaporated at 100°C/vol.% 55. 8
Evaporated at 150°C/vol.% 83.8
Evaporated at 180°C/vol.% 96.7
Tab.2  Physical parameters of fuel
Speed/(r·min–1) BMEP/bar PFI timing/(°CA bTDC) DI ratio/% Lambda DI timing/(°CA bTDC) Spark timing/(°CA aINJ) Spark timing/(°CA bTDC)
2000 2 350 50
75
1.2 50 8 42
1.4
1.6
1.8
50 1.4 50 4 46
6 44
8 42
10 40
12 38
25
50
75
1.4 30 8 22
40 32
50 42
60 52
Tab.3  Test conditions
Fig.2  Schematic diagram of dual injection stratified lean burn.
Fig.3  Effect of Lambda on combustion pressure and combustion heat release rate at different DI ratios.
Fig.4  Effect of Lambda on combustion phase and combustion duration at different DI ratios.
Fig.5  Effect of Lambda on BSFC and ΔBSFC at different DI ratios.
Fig.6  Effect of Lambda on gaseous emissions at different DI ratios.
Fig.7  Effect of Lambda on particle size distribution at different DI ratios.
Fig.8  Effect of Lambda on GMD and PM at different DI ratios.
Fig.9  Effect of Lambda on mode ratio and PN at different DI ratios.
Fig.10  Effect of spark timing on combustion pressure and combustion heat release rate in stratified lean burn.
Fig.11  Effect of DI timing on combustion pressure and combustion heat release rate at different DI ratios.
Fig.12  Effect of DI timing on combustion phase and combustion duration at different DI ratios.
Fig.13  Effect of DI timing on BSFC and ΔBSFC at different DI ratios.
Fig.14  Effect of DI timing on gaseous emissions at different DI ratios.
Fig.15  Effect of DI timing on particle size distribution at different DI ratios.
Fig.16  Effect of DI timing on mode ratio and PN at different DI ratios.
Fig.17  Effect of DI timing on GMD and PM at different DI ratios.
Fig.18  Roadmap of optimal control strategy for dual injection stratified lean burn.
Fig.19  Optimization of PN and BSFC at different speeds and loads.
SI Spark ignition
PFI Port fuel injection
GDI Gasoline direct injection
BMEP Brake mean effective pressure
TDC Top dead center
bTDC Before TDC
aINJ After injection timing
CA10 Crank angle at 10% of total heat release
CA50 Crank angle at 50% of total heat release
CA90 Crank angle at 90% of total heat release
BSFC Brake specific fuel consumption
TWC Three way catalyst
GMD Geometric mean diameter
PM Particle mass
  
1 H Wei, J Yu, L Zhou. Improvement of engine performance with high compression ratio based on knock suppression using Miller cycle with boost pressure and split injection. Frontiers in Energy, 2019, 13(4): 691–706
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-019-0621-3
2 X Liang, J Zhang, Z Li, et al. Effects of fuel combination and IVO timing on combustion and emissions of a dual-fuel HCCI combustion engine. Frontiers in Energy, 2020, 14(4): 778–789
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0698-8
3 Z Huang, Z Li, J Zhang, et al. Active fuel design—a way to manage the right fuel for HCCI engines. Frontiers in Energy, 2016, 10(1): 14–28
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-016-0399-5
4 Z Gao, E Hu, Z Xu, et al. Effect of 2, 5-dimethylfuran addition on ignition delay times of n-heptane at high temperatures. Frontiers in Energy, 2019, 13(3): 464–473
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-019-0609-z
5 X Li, W Zhang, Z Huang, et al. Pre-chamber turbulent jet ignition of methane/air mixtures with multiple orifices in a large bore constant volume chamber: effect of air-fuel equivalence ratio and pre-mixed pressure. Frontiers in Energy, 2019, 13(3): 483–493
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-019-0631-1
6 W Liu, J Zhang, Z Huang, et al. Applicability of high dimensional model representation correlations for ignition delay times of n-heptane/air mixtures. Frontiers in Energy, 2019, 13(2): 367–376
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-018-0584-9
7 T Nagasawa, Y Okura, R Yamada, et al. Thermal efficiency improvement of super-lean burn spark ignition engine by stratified water insulation on piston top surface. International Journal of Engine Research, 2021, 22(5): 1421–1439
https://doi.org/10.1177/1468087420908164
8 C Gong, L Yi, Z Zhang, et al. Assessment of ultra-lean burn characteristics for a stratified-charge direct-injection spark-ignition methanol engine under different high compression ratios. Applied Energy, 2020, 261: 114478
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114478
9 S Tsuboi, S Miyokawa, M Matsuda, et al. Influence of spark discharge characteristics on ignition and combustion process and the lean operation limit in a spark ignition engine. Applied Energy, 2019, 250: 617–632
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.036
10 X Yu, Z Guo, L He, et al. Experimental study on lean-burn characteristics of an SI engine with hydrogen/gasoline combined injection and EGR. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(26): 13988–13998
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.236
11 F He, S Li, X Yu, et al. Comparison study and synthetic evaluation of combined injection in a spark ignition engine with hydrogen-blended at lean burn condition. Energy, 2018, 157: 1053–1062
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.112
12 C Gong, Z Li, L Yi, et al. Comparative study on combustion and emissions between methanol port-injection engine and methanol direct-injection engine with H2-enriched port-injection under lean-burn conditions. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 200: 112096
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112096
13 X Yu, Z Guo, P Sun, et al. Investigation of combustion and emissions of an SI engine with ethanol port injection and gasoline direct injection under lean burn conditions. Energy, 2019, 189: 116231
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116231
14 X Li, B He, H Zhao. Effect of direct injection dimethyl ether on the micro-flame ignited (MFI) hybrid combustion characteristics of an optical gasoline engine at ultra-lean conditions. Fuel Processing Technology, 2020, 203: 106383
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106383
15 L Wang, Z Chen, T Zhang, et al. Effect of excess air/fuel ratio and methanol addition on the performance, emissions, and combustion characteristics of a natural gas/methanol dual-fuel engine. Fuel, 2019, 255: 115799
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.115799
16 Z Chen, L Wang, Q Zhang, et al. Effects of spark timing and methanol addition on combustion characteristics and emissions of dual-fuel engine fueled with natural gas and methanol under lean-burn condition. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 181: 519–527
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.040
17 W Chen, C Xia, K Mao, et al. The effects of injection strategies on particulate emissions from a dual-injection gasoline engine. SAE Technical Paper Series 2019-01-0055, 2019
https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0055
18 W Chen, C Xia, L Zhu, et al. An experimental study on combustion and particulate emissions characteristics on a dual-injection gasoline engine. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 156: 722–729
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.04.069
19 J Tao, C Xia, K Mao, et al. Effects of spark timing with other engine operating parameters on the particulate emissions of a dual injection gasoline engine during warm-up conditions. SAE Technical Paper Series 2019-01-2214, 2019
https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-2214
20 C Xia, W Chen, J Fang, et al. An experimental study of the effects of coolant temperature on particle emissions from a dual injection gasoline engine. SAE Technical Paper Series 2019-01-0051, 2019
https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0051
21 Z Zheng, L Yue, H Liu, et al. Effect of two-stage injection on combustion and emissions under high EGR rate on a diesel engine by fueling blends of diesel/gasoline, diesel/n-butanol, diesel/gasoline/n-butanol and pure diesel. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 90: 1–11
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.11.011
22 H Liu, Z Zheng, M Yao, et al. Influence of temperature and mixture stratification on HCCI combustion using chemiluminescence images and CFD analysis. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2012, 33–34: 135–143
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.09.026
23 H Yu, W Han, J Santner, et al. Radiation-induced uncertainty in laminar flame speed measured from propagating spherical flames. Combustion and Flame, 2014, 161(11): 2815–2824
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.05.012
24 A A Konnov, A Mohammad, V R Kishore, et al. A comprehensive review of measurements and data analysis of laminar burning velocities for various fuel+air mixtures. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2018, 68: 197–267
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2018.05.003
25 H Liu, X Wang, D Zhang, et al. Investigation on blending effects of gasoline fuel with n-butanol, DMF, and ethanol on the fuel consumption and harmful emissions in a GDI vehicle. Energies, 2019, 12(10): 1845
https://doi.org/10.3390/en12101845
26 H Liu, S Ma, Z Zhang, et al. Study of the control strategies on soot reduction under early-injection conditions on a diesel engine. Fuel, 2015, 139: 472–481
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.09.011
27 D Nativel, M Pelucchi, A Frassoldati, et al. Laminar flame speeds of pentanol isomers: an experimental and modeling study. Combustion and Flame, 2016, 166: 1–18
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.11.012
28 A Harbi, A Farooq. Monte-Carlo based laminar flame speed correlation for gasoline. Combustion and Flame, 2020, 222: 61–69
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.08.023
29 C Gong, Z Li, L Yi, et al. Experimental investigation of equivalence ratio effects on combustion and emissions characteristics of an H2/methanol dual-injection engine under different spark timings. Fuel, 2020, 262: 116463
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116463
30 B Deng, Y Chen, A Liu, et al. The excess air coefficient effect on the performances for a motorcycle twin-spark gasoline engine: a wide condition range study. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 150: 1028–1036
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.01.084
31 Y Luo, L Zhu, J Fang, et al. Size distribution, chemical composition and oxidation reactivity of particulate matter from gasoline direct injection (GDI) engine fueled with ethanol-gasoline fuel. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2015, 89: 647–655
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.06.060
32 T Gupta, A Kothari, D K Srivastava, et al. Measurement of number and size distribution of particles emitted from a mid-sized transportation multipoint port fuel injection gasoline engine. Fuel, 2010, 89(9): 2230–2233
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.12.014
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed