Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Mathematics in China

ISSN 1673-3452

ISSN 1673-3576(Online)

CN 11-5739/O1

Postal Subscription Code 80-964

2018 Impact Factor: 0.565

Front Math Chin    2013, Vol. 8 Issue (3) : 583-608    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11464-013-0278-x
RESEARCH ARTICLE
VaR Criteria for optimal limited changeloss and truncated change-loss reinsurance
Xiaojing MA1(), Lan WU1,2
1. Department of Financial Mathematics, School of Mathematical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; 2. Center for Statistical Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
 Download: PDF(260 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Reinsurance can provide an effective way for insurer to manage its risk exposure. In this paper, we further analyze the optimal reinsurance models recently proposed by J. Cai and K. S. Tan [Astin Bulletin, 2007, 37(1): 93-112]. With the criteria of minimizing the value-at-risk (VaR) risk measure of insurer’s total loss exposure, we derive the optimal values of sharing proportion a, retention d, and layer l of two reinsurance treaties: the limited changeloss f(x) = a{(x - d)+ - (x - l)+} and the truncated change-loss f(x) = a(x-d)+I(xl). Both of the reinsurance plans have been considered to be more realistic and practical in the real business. Our solutions have several appealing features: (i) there is only one condition to verify for the existence of optimal limited change-loss reinsurance while there always exists an optimal truncated change-loss reinsurance, (ii) the resulting optimal parameters have simple analytic forms which depend only on assumed loss distribution, reinsurer’s safety loading, and insurer’s risk tolerance, (iii) the optimal retention d for limited change-loss reinsurance is the same as that by Cai and Tan while the optimal value is smaller for truncated change-loss, (iv) the optimal sharing proportion and layer are always the same for both reinsurance plans, (v) minimized VaR are strictly lower than the values derived by Cai and Tan, (vi) the optimization results reveal possible drawbacks of VaR-based risk management that a heavy tail risk exposure may be expressed by lower VaR.

Keywords Limited change-loss      truncated change-loss      value-at-risk (VaR)      optimal reinsurance     
Corresponding Author(s): MA Xiaojing,Email:xiaojingma@pku.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 01 June 2013
 Cite this article:   
Xiaojing MA,Lan WU. VaR Criteria for optimal limited changeloss and truncated change-loss reinsurance[J]. Front Math Chin, 2013, 8(3): 583-608.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fmc/EN/10.1007/s11464-013-0278-x
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fmc/EN/Y2013/V8/I3/583
1 Arrow K J. Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Amer Economic Rev , 1963, 53(5): 941-973
2 Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J-M, Heath D. Coherent Measures of Risk. Math Finance , 1999, 9: 203-228
doi: 10.1111/1467-9965.00068
3 Bernard C, Tian W. Optimal reinsurance arrangements under tail risk measures. J Risk Insurance , 2009, 76(3): 709-725
doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6975.2009.01315.x
4 Bowers N J, Gerber H U, Hickman J C, Jones D A, Nesbitt C J. Actuarial Mathematics. 2nd ed. Schaumburg: The Society of Actuaries , 1997
5 Cai J, Tan K S. Optimal retention for a stop-loss reinsurance under the VaR and CTE risk measure. Astin Bulletin , 2007, 37(1): 93-112
doi: 10.2143/AST.37.1.2020800
6 Cai J, Tan K S, Weng C, Zhang Y. Optimal reinsurance under VaR and CTE risk measures. Insurance Math Econom , 2008, 43: 185-196
doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2008.05.011
7 Gajek L, Zagrodny D. Optimal reinsurance under general risk measures. Insurance Math Econom , 2004, 34: 227-240
doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2003.12.002
8 Gerber H U. An Introduction to Mathematical Risk Theory. S. S. Huebner Foundation for Insurance Education . Philadelphia: Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 1979
9 Huang H H. Optimal insurance contract under a Value-at-Risk constraint. Geneva Risk Insur Rev , 2006, 31: 91-110
doi: 10.1007/s10713-006-0557-5
10 Kaas R, Goovaerts M, Dhaene J, Denuit M. Modern Actuarial Risk Theory. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001
11 Kaluszka M, Okolewski A. An extension of Arrow’s result on optimal reinsurance contract. J Risk Insurance , 2008, 75(2): 275-288
doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6975.2008.00260.x
12 Wirch J L, Hardy M R. A synthesis of risk measures for capital adequacy. Insurance Math Econom , 1999, 25: 337-347
doi: 10.1016/S0167-6687(99)00036-0
13 Zhou C, Wu C. Optimal insurance under the insurer’s risk constraint. Insurance Math Econom , 2008, 42: 992-999
doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.11.005
14 Zhou C, Wu W, Wu C. Optimal insurance in the presence of insurer’s loss limit. Insurance Math Econom , 2010, 46: 300-307
doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2009.11.002
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed