Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

ISSN 2095-0233

ISSN 2095-0241(Online)

CN 11-5984/TH

Postal Subscription Code 80-975

2018 Impact Factor: 0.989

Front Mech Eng    2011, Vol. 6 Issue (1) : 82-88    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-011-0208-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Instrumented toys for assessing spatial cognition in infants
Domenico CAMPOLO1(), Fabrizio TAFFONI2, Domenico FORMICA2, Flavio KELLER2, Eugenio GUGLIELMELLI2
1. School of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore; 2. Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Roma, Italy
 Download: PDF(422 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

This paper describes an interdisciplinary approach to the assessment on infants’ behavior, with a focus on the technology. The goal is an objective, quantitative analysis of concurrent maturation of sensory, motor and cognitive abilities in young children, in relation to the achievement of developmental milestones. An instrumented block-box toy specifically developed to assess the ability to insert objects into holes is presented. The functional specifications are derived from experimental protocols devised by neuroscientists to assess spatial cognition skills. Technological choices are emphasized with respect to ecological requirements. An ad hoc calibration procedure is also presented which is suitable to unstructured environments. Finally, preliminary tests carried out at a local day-care with 12–24 months old infants are presented which prove the in-field usability of the proposed technology.

Keywords inertial-magnetic sensing      in-field calibration      neuro-developmental engineering      ecological assessment     
Corresponding Author(s): CAMPOLO Domenico,Email:d.campolo@ntu.edu.sg   
Issue Date: 05 March 2011
 Cite this article:   
Domenico CAMPOLO,Fabrizio TAFFONI,Domenico FORMICA, et al. Instrumented toys for assessing spatial cognition in infants[J]. Front Mech Eng, 2011, 6(1): 82-88.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/10.1007/s11465-011-0208-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/Y2011/V6/I1/82
Fig.1  Selection chart of different motion tracking technologies
Fig.2  Block-box experimental scenario (top). Different cross-sections (bottom) for the cylindrical blocks and the relative number of insertion possibilities (‘inf’ means infinite), readapted from []
Fig.3  Kinematics sensing unit (top left). Bluetooth transmitting unit (top right). Examples of assemblies of electronics and batteries for shells with different cross-section (bottom)
Fig.4  Block-box platform architecture
Fig.5  Calibration sequences for magnetometers (a) and accelerometers (b), plots of the measurements (i.e., voltages , and from the triaxial sensors) derived from the calibration sequences for the magnetometers (c) and the accelerometers (d)
Fig.6  In-field experiments with the block-box
1 von Hofsten C, R?nnqvist L. The structuring of neonatal arm movements. Child Development , 1993, 64(4): 1046–1057
doi: 10.2307/1131326 pmid:8404256
2 Bhat A N, Heathcock J H, Galloway J C. Toy-oriented changes in hand and joint kinematics during the emergence of purposeful reaching. Infant Behavior and Development , 2005, 28(4): 445–465
doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2005.03.001
3 Bhat A N, Galloway J C. Toy-oriented changes during early arm movements: hand kinematics. Infant Behavior and Development , 2006, 29(3): 358–372
doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2006.01.005 pmid:17138291
4 Welch G, Foxlin E. Motion tracking: No silver bullet, but a respectable arsenal. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications , 2002, 22(6): 24–38
doi: 10.1109/MCG.2002.1046626
5 Kemp B, Janssen A J M W, van der Kamp B. Body position can be monitored in 3D using miniature accelerometers and earth-magnetic field sensors. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology , 1998, 109(6): 484–488
doi: 10.1016/S0924-980X(98)00053-8 pmid:10030679
6 Ornkloo H, von Hofsten C. Fitting objects into holes: on the development of spatial cognition skills. Developmental Psychology , 2007, 43(2): 404–416
doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.404 pmid:17352547
7 Campolo D, Maini E S. Patane F, Laschi C, Dario P, Keller F, Guglielmelli E. Design of a sensorized ball for ecological behavioral analysis of infants. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , Pasadena, California , 2007, 1318–1323
8 Campolo D, Schenato L, Pi L J, Deng X, Guglielmelli E. Multimodal sensor fusion for attitude estimation of micromechanical flying Insects: A geometric approach. In Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Nice, France , 2008, 3859–3864
9 Campolo D, Fabris M, Cavallo G, Accoto D, Keller F, Guglielmelli E. A novel procedure for in-field calibration of sourceless inertial/magnetic orientation tracking wearable devices, in Proceedings of the first IEEE / RAS-EMBS Intl Conf. on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BIOROB), Pisa, Italy , 2006, 471–476
10 Lotters J C, Schipper J, Veltink P H, Olthuis W, Bergveld P. Procedure for in-use calibration of triaxial accelerometers in medical applications. Sensors and Actuators. A, Physical , 1998, 68(1-3): 221–228
doi: 10.1016/S0924-4247(98)00049-1
11 Mari M, Castiello U, Marks D, Marraffa C, Prior M. The reach-to-grasp movement in children with autism spectrum disorder. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences , 2003, 358(1430): 393–403
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1205 pmid:12639336
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed