Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

ISSN 2095-0233

ISSN 2095-0241(Online)

CN 11-5984/TH

Postal Subscription Code 80-975

2018 Impact Factor: 0.989

Front. Mech. Eng.    2016, Vol. 11 Issue (3) : 289-298    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-016-0393-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Characterization of the tensile properties of friction stir welded aluminum alloy joints based on axial force, traverse speed, and rotational speed
Biranchi PANDA1,A. GARG2,*(),Zhang JIAN2,Akbar HEIDARZADEH3,Liang GAO4
1. IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa 1040-001, Portugal
2. Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China
3. Department of Materials Engineering, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran
4. The State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
 Download: PDF(1393 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Friction stir welding (FSW) process has gained attention in recent years because of its advantages over the conventional fusion welding process. These advantages include the absence of heat formation in the affected zone and the absence of large distortion, porosity, oxidation, and cracking. Experimental investigations are necessary to understand the physical behavior that causes the high tensile strength of welded joints of different metals and alloys. Existing literature indicates that tensile properties exhibit strong dependence on the rotational speed, traverse speed, and axial force of the tool that was used. Therefore, this study introduces the experimental procedure for measuring tensile properties, namely, ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and tensile elongation of the welded AA 7020 Al alloy. Experimental findings suggest that a welded part with high UTS can be achieved at a lower heat input compared with the high heat input condition. A numerical approach based on genetic programming is employed to produce the functional relationships between tensile properties and the three inputs (rotational speed, traverse speed, and axial force) of the FSW process. The formulated models were validated based on the experimental data, using the statistical metrics. The effect of the three inputs on the tensile properties was investigated using 2D and 3D analyses. A high UTS was achieved, including a rotational speed of 1050 r/min and traverse speed of 95 mm/min. The results also indicate that 8 kN axial force should be set prior to the FSW process.

Keywords tensile properties      ultimate tensile strength      tensile elongation      friction stir welding      tool rotational speed      genetic programming      welding speed     
Corresponding Author(s): A. GARG   
Online First Date: 20 June 2016    Issue Date: 31 August 2016
 Cite this article:   
Biranchi PANDA,A. GARG,Zhang JIAN, et al. Characterization of the tensile properties of friction stir welded aluminum alloy joints based on axial force, traverse speed, and rotational speed[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2016, 11(3): 289-298.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/10.1007/s11465-016-0393-y
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/Y2016/V11/I3/289
Fig.1  Mechanism of the FSW process at the top and bottom sheets
Fig.2  Procedure of the experimental and numerical investigation of the tensile properties of FSW-welded joints
x1/(r·min-1) x2/(mm·min-1) x3/kN
Minimum 47.00 58.00 5.32
Mean 944.69 94.15 6.76
Maximum 1200.00 125.00 8.00
Tab.1  Inputs used for the experimental set-up of FSW
No. x1/(r·min-1) x2/(mm·min-1) x3/kN UTS/MPa EL/%
1 1200 75 8.00 273.0508 7.689788
2 800 125 8.00 260.7020 4.634279
3 1200 125 8.00 265.2557 7.689788
4 664 100 7.00 243.8742 6.836077
15 664 100 7.00 243.8742 6.836077
16 1000 58 7.00 249.4299 6.018916
17 1000 58 7.00 249.4299 6.018916
39 900 100 8.00 299.2947 5.171500
40 1200 75 6.00 269.9894 7.689788
41 800 125 6.00 230.6714 4.634279
42 1200 125 6.00 262.1943 7.689788
43 1000 100 7.00 305.1451 6.018916
44 900 58 5.32 207.3690 5.171500
45 664 100 7.00 243.8742 6.836077
46 664 100 7.00 243.8742 6.836077
Tab.2  Uniform experiment design for the measurement of tensile properties
Fig.3  Line graph showing the nature of (a) ultimate tensile strength, and (b) tensile elongation
Fig.4  GP approach for modeling tensile properties
Models R2 RMSE/% MAPE/%
Training phase Testing phase Training phase Testing phase Training phase Testing phase
GP (UTS) 0.98 0.96 1.31 1.91 0.39 0.60
GP (EL) 0.97 0.96 0.42 0.45 0.73 0.81
Tab.3  Statistical metrics of the models for two tensile properties
No. Actual UTS /MPa Predicted UTS /MPa Actual EL/% Predicted EL/%
1 276.5059 274.8061 6.943182 6.943139
2 273.0508 273.2518 7.689788 7.689746
3 260.7020 261.8811 4.634279 4.634237
4 265.2557 267.1045 7.689788 7.689746
5 243.8742 243.0871 6.836077 6.836035
6 243.8742 243.0871 6.836077 6.836035
7 305.1451 305.2267 6.018916 6.018874
8 207.3690 211.4123 5.171500 5.171457
9 275.9505 275.0003 5.171500 5.171457
10 299.2947 297.4679 5.171500 5.171457
11 269.9894 268.1412 7.689788 7.689746
12 230.6714 232.8499 4.634279 4.634237
13 262.1943 261.9938 7.689788 7.689746
14 305.1451 305.2267 6.018916 6.018874
15 207.3690 211.4123 5.171500 5.171457
Tab.4  Actual and model values for two tensile properties obtained from the models
Fig.5  Curve fitting of the tensile properties models on the data set. (a) Ultimate tensile strength; (b) tensile elongation
Fig.6  2D plots showing the relationships of (a) ultimate tensile strength and rotational speed, (b) ultimate tensile strength and traverse speed, (c) ultimate tensile strength and axial force, and (d) tensile elongation and rotational speed
Fig.7  3D plots showing the relationships of ultimate tensile strength and (a) rotational speed and traverse speed, (b) traverse speed and axial force, and (c) rotational speed and axial force
Fig.8  3D plots showing the relationships of tensile elongation based on (a) rotational speed and axial force, (b) rotational speed and traverse speed
Fig.9  Percentage contribution of the three inputs to (a) ultimate tensile strength, and (b) tensile elongation
1 Yazdipour A, Heidarzadeh A. Effect of friction stir welding on microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar Al 5083-H321 and 316L stainless steel alloy joints. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2016, 680: 595–603
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.307
2 Yazdipour A, Heidarzadeh A. Dissimilar butt friction stir welding of Al 5083-H321 and 316L stainless steel alloys. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 1–8
3 Heidarzadeh A, Khodaverdizadeh H, Mahmoudi A, Tensile behavior of friction stir welded AA 6061-T4 aluminum alloy joints. Materials & Design, 2012, 37: 166–173
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.12.022
4 Heidarzadeh A, Kazemi-Choobi K, Hanifian H, 3-Microstructural evolution. In: Besharati-Givi M K, Asadi P, eds. Advances in Friction-Stir Welding and Processing. Woodhead Publishing, 2014, 65–140
https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857094551.65
5 Khodaverdizadeh H, Mahmoudi A, Heidarzadeh A, Effect of friction stir welding (FSW) parameters on strain hardening behavior of pure copper joints. Materials & Design, 2012, 35: 330–334
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.058
6 Heidarzadeh A, Saeid T. A comparative study of microstructure and mechanical properties between friction stir welded single and double phase brass alloys. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2016, 649: 349–358
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.10.012
7 Heidarzadeh A, Saeid T. On the effect of β phase on the microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir welded commercial brass alloys. Data in Brief, 2015, 5: 1022–1025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2015.11.013
8 Heidarzadeh A, Saeid T. Correlation between process parameters, grain size and hardness of friction-stir-welded Cu-Zn alloys. Rare Metals, 2016, 1–11
9 Heidarzadeh A, Jabbari M, Esmaily M. Prediction of grain size and mechanical properties in friction stir welded pure copper joints using a thermal model. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2015, 77(9–12): 1819–1829
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6543-7
10 Golezani A S, Barenji R V, Heidarzadeh A, Elucidating of tool rotational speed in friction stir welding of 7020-T6 aluminum alloy. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2015, 81(5–8): 1155–1164
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7252-6
11 Rahimzadeh Ilkhichi A, Soufi R, Hussain G, Establishing mathematical models to predict grain size and hardness of the friction stir-welded AA 7020 aluminum alloy joints. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 2015, 46 (1): 357–365
12 Barenji R V. Influence of heat input conditions on microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of friction stir welded pure copper joints. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, 2016, 69(5): 1077–1085
13 Garg A, Panda B, Shankhwar K. Investigation of the joint length of weldment of environmental-friendly magnetic pulse welding process. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 1–12
14 Barenji R V. Effect of tool traverse speed on microstructure and mechanical performance of friction stir welded 7020 aluminum alloy. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials Design and Applications, 2015, 230(2): 1–11
15 Azizi A, Barenji R V, Barenji A V, Microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir welded thick pure copper plates. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 1–11
16 Sharma V, Prakash U, Kumar B M. Surface composites by friction stir processing: A review. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2015, 224: 117–134
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.04.019
17 Rajakumar S, Muralidharan C, Balasubramanian V. Establishing empirical relationships to predict grain size and tensile strength of friction stir welded AA 6061-T6 aluminium alloy joints. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2010, 20(10): 1863–1872
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(09)60387-3
18 Babu S, Elangovan K, Balasubramanian V, Optimizing friction stir welding parameters to maximize tensile strength of AA2219 aluminum alloy joints. Metals and Materials International, 2009, 15(2): 321–330
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-009-0321-3
19 Heidarzadeh A, Saeid T, Khodaverdizadeh H, Establishing a mathematical model to predict the tensile strength of friction stir welded pure copper joints. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, Process Metallurgy and Materials Processing Science, 2013, 44(1): 175–183
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-012-9755-y
20 Lakshminarayanan A K, Balasubramanian V. Comparison of RSM with ANN in predicting tensile strength of friction stir welded AA7039 aluminium alloy joints. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2009, 19(1): 9–18
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(08)60221-6
21 Mohammadzadeh A, Azadbeh M, Namini S A. Densification and volumetric change during supersolidus liquid phase sintering of prealloyed brass Cu28Zn powder: modeling and optimization. Science of Sintering, 2014, 46(1): 23–35
https://doi.org/10.2298/SOS1401023M
22 Zhao D, Tian Q, Li Z, A new stepwise and piecewise optimization approach for CO 2 pipeline. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2016, 49: 192–200
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.03.005
23 Zhao D, Zhu Q, Dubbeldam J. Terminal sliding mode control for continuous stirred tank reactor. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2015, 94: 266–274
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2014.08.005
24 Zhao D, Ni W, Zhu Q. A framework of neural networks based consensus control for multiple robotic manipulators. Neurocomputing, 2014, 140: 8–18
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2014.03.041
25 Zhao D, Zhu Q, Li N, Synchronized control with neuro-agents for leader—Follower based multiple robotic manipulators. Neurocomputing, 2014, 124: 149–161
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2013.07.016
26 Vijayaraghavan V, Garg A, Wong C H, An integrated computational approach for determining the elastic properties of boron nitride nanotubes. International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design, 2015, 11(1): 1–14
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-014-9262-1
27 Vijayaraghavan V, Castagne S. Computational model for predicting the effect of process parameters on surface characteristics of mass finished components. Engineering Computations, 2016, 33(3): 789–805
https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-04-2015-0094
28 Garg A, Vijayaraghavan V, Wong C H, Combined CI-MD approach in formulation of engineering moduli of single layer graphene sheet. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2014, 48: 93–111
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2014.07.008
29 Vijayaraghavan V, Castagne S. Sustainable manufacturing models for mass finishing process. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2015, 1–9
30 Vijayaraghavan V, Wong C H. Torsional characteristics of single walled carbon nanotube with water interactions by using molecular dynamics simulation. Nano-Micro Letters, 2014, 6(3): 268–279
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03353791
31 Wong C H, Vijayaraghavan V. Nanomechanics of imperfectly straight single walled carbon nanotubes under axial compression by using molecular dynamics simulation. Computational Materials Science, 2012, 53(1): 268–277
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.08.011
32 Panda B N, Bahubalendruni M R, Biswal B B. A general regression neural network approach for the evaluation of compressive strength of FDM prototypes. Neural Computing & Applications, 2015, 26(5): 1129–1136
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-014-1788-5
33 Panda B N, Bahubalendruni M R, Biswal B B. Comparative evaluation of optimization algorithms at training of genetic programming for tensile strength prediction of FDM processed part. Procedia Materials Science, 2014, 5: 2250–2257
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.441
34 Panda B N, Babhubalendruni M R, Biswal B B, Application of artificial intelligence methods to spot welding of commercial aluminum sheets (B.S. 1050). In: Das K N, Deep K, Pant M, et al. eds. Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Soft Computing for Problem Solving. Springer, 2015, 21–32
35 Vijayaraghavan V, Garg A, Lam J S L, Process characterisation of 3D-printed FDM components using improved evolutionary computational approach. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2015, 78(5–8): 781–793
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6679-5
36 Garg A, Vijayaraghavan V, Wong C H, An embedded simulation approach for modeling the thermal conductivity of 2D nanoscale material. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2014, 44: 1–13
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2014.02.003
37 Garg A, Tai K. Comparison of regression analysis, artificial neural network and genetic programming in handling the multicollinearity problem. In: Proceedings of 2012 International Conference on Modelling, Identification & Control (ICMIC). Wuhan: IEEE, 2012, 353–358
38 Asghari A, Gandomi A H. Ductility reduction factor and collapse mechanism evaluation of a new steel knee braced frame. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering: Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle Design and Performance, 2016, 12(2): 239–255
https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2015.1009123
39 Gandomi A H, Faramarzifar A, Rezaee P G, New design equations for elastic modulus of concrete using multi expression programming. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 2015, 21(6): 761–774
https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.893910
40 Heidarzadeh A, Barenji R V, Esmaily M, Tensile properties of friction stir welds of AA 7020 aluminum alloy. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, 2015, 68(5): 757–767
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-014-0508-2
41 Koza J R. Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection. Cambridge: MIT press, 1992
42 Vapnik V N. Statistical Learning Theory. New York: Wiley, 1998
43 Garg A, Lam J S L, Gao L. Energy conservation in manufacturing operations: Modelling the milling process by a new complexity-based evolutionary approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 108: 34–45
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.043
44 Searson D P, Leahy D E, Willis M J. GPTIPS: An open source genetic programming toolbox for multigene symbolic regression. In: Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists. Hong Kong: Newswood Ltd., 2010, 1: 77–80
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed