Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

ISSN 2095-0233

ISSN 2095-0241(Online)

CN 11-5984/TH

Postal Subscription Code 80-975

2018 Impact Factor: 0.989

Front. Mech. Eng.    2024, Vol. 19 Issue (1) : 2    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-023-0775-x
Three-dimensional parametric contact analysis of planetary roller screw mechanism and its application in grouping for selective assembly
Huilin HE1, Peitang WEI1(), Huaiju LIU1, Xuesong DU1, Rui HU1, Genshen LIU1, Yajun WU2
1. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission for Advanced Equipment, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
2. Taiyuan Heavy Machinery Group Co., Ltd., Taiyuan 030024, China
 Download: PDF(8900 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The planetary roller screw mechanism (PRSM) is a novel precision transmission mechanism that realizes the conversion between linear and rotary motions. The contact characteristics of helical surfaces directly determine PRSM’s performance in load-carrying capacity and transmission accuracy. Therefore, studying the contact characteristics of PRSM forms the fundamental basis for enhancing its transmission performance. In this study, a three-dimensional parametric analysis method of contact characteristics is proposed based on the PRSM meshing principle and PyVista (a high-level API to the Visualization Toolkit). The proposed method considers the influence of machining errors among various thread teeth. The effects of key machining errors on contact positions and axial clearance, as well as their sensitivities, are analyzed. With excellent solution accuracy, this method exhibits higher calculation efficiency and stronger robustness than the analytical and numerical meshing models. The influence of nominal diameter and pitch errors of the screw, roller, and nut on the axial clearance follows a linear relationship, whereas flank angle errors have negligible effects on the axial clearance. The corresponding influence coefficients for these three machining errors on the axial clearance are 0.623, 0.341, and 0.036. The variations in contact positions caused by individual errors are axisymmetric. Flank angle errors and roller diameter errors result in linear displacements of the contact points, whereas pitch errors cause the contact points to move along the arc of the roller diameter. Based on the proposed three-dimensional parametric contact characteristics analysis method, the Fuzzy C-Means clustering algorithm considering error sensitivity is utilized to establish a component grouping technique in the selective assembly of critical PRSM components, ensuring the rational and consistent clearances based on the given component’s machining errors. This study provides effective guidance for analyzing contact characteristics and grouping in selective assembly for PRSM components. It also presents the proposed method’s potential applicability to similar calculation problems for contact positions and clearances in other transmission systems.

Keywords planetary roller screw mechanism (PRSM)      contact position      axial clearance      machining error      grouping for selective assembly     
Corresponding Author(s): Peitang WEI   
Just Accepted Date: 01 November 2023   Issue Date: 27 February 2024
 Cite this article:   
Huilin HE,Peitang WEI,Huaiju LIU, et al. Three-dimensional parametric contact analysis of planetary roller screw mechanism and its application in grouping for selective assembly[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2024, 19(1): 2.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/10.1007/s11465-023-0775-x
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/Y2024/V19/I1/2
Fig.1  Schematic illustration of the planetary roller screw mechanism structure.
Fig.2  Thread profile of the components: (a) screw, (b) roller, and (c) nut.
Fig.3  Initial three-dimensional meshing model of the planetary roller screw mechanism.
Fig.4  Schematic illustration of the machining errors in threads: (a) pitch error, denoted as Δpi, (b) nominal diameter error, denoted as Δdi, and (c) flank angle error, denoted as Δβi.
Fig.5  Calculation flow for contact characteristics in this study. PRSM: planetary roller screw mechanism.
Fig.6  Mesh division method for the meshing model.
MachinePitch, p/mmFlank angle, β/(° )Nominal diameter, d/mmThread addendum, a/mmThread dedendum, b/mmHalf of thread tooth thickness, c/mmNumber of starts, nHelix angle, λ/(° )Root arc radius, rroot/mmRoller arc radius, rRar/mm
Screw0.84525.50.3480.30.453.5710.078?
Roller0.8458.50.3480.30.412.1450.0986.010
Nut0.84542.50.3480.30.452.1450.078?
Tab.1  Geometric parameters of 25 × 4 model PRSM
MachiningError limitΔdi/mmΔpi/mmΔβi/(° )
ScrewUpper?0.0010.0020.5
Lower?0.014?0.002?0.5
RollerUpper?0.0010.0020.5
Lower?0.010?0.002?0.5
NutUpper0.0160.0020.5
Lower0.000?0.002?0.5
Tab.2  Tolerance range of machining errors
CompositionContent/wt.%
C0.900–0.100
Si≤ 0.800
Mn≤ 0.800
S≤ 0.030
P≤ 0.035
Cr17.00–19.00
Ni≤ 0.600
Mo≤ 0.750
Tab.3  Chemical composition of 95Cr18 stainless steel
Fig.7  Specimens of the 25 × 4 model planetary roller screw mechanism.
Fig.8  MarSurf UD 130 profilometer.
Fig.9  Thread machining error data of the roller: (a) nominal diameter error, (b) pitch error, and (c) flank angle error.
Fig.10  Actual distribution curve of machining errors in rollers: (a) nominal diameter error, (b) pitch error, and (c) flank angle error.
ParameterΔdS/mmΔdR/mmΔdN/mmΔpS/mmΔpR/mmΔpN/mmΔβS/(° )ΔβR/(° )ΔβN/(° )
μ?0.00750?0.005500.008000.000250.000250.000250.180000.180000.18000
σ0.004300.003000.005300.000100.000060.000200.100000.060000.15000
p-values?0.08136??0.45177??0.20527?
Tab.4  Distribution parameters of errors
ParameterSymbol
Screw contact radius/mmrSm
Screw contact angle/(° )φSm
Roller contact radius on the screw?roller side/mmrRmS
Roller contact angle on the screw?roller side/(° )φRmS
Axial clearances on the screw?roller side/mmδmSR
Nut contact radius/mmrNm
Nut contact angle/(° )φNm
Roller contact radius on the nut?roller side/mmrRmN
Roller contact angle on the nut?roller side/(° )φRmN
Axial clearances on the nut?roller side/mmδmNR
Tab.5  Key calculated parameters of contact characteristics
Fig.11  Projection of the screw, nut, and roller contact points on the O?XY plane.
Contact characteristicsParameterCalculation results of 20 × 10 PRSM in Liu et al.’s model [43]Calculation results of 20 × 10 PRSM in our modelCalculation results of 30 × 20 PRSM in Fedosovsky et al.’s model [24]Calculation results of 30 × 20 PRSM in our model
Contact positionsrSm/mm9.81739.812515.050015.1000
φSm/(° )3.66053.66844.58004.5000
rRmS/mm3.26353.26855.14005.0400
φRmS/(° )11.073011.074513.510013.6000
rNm/mm16.25016.24625.00025.000
φNm/(° )0000
rRmN/mm3.2503.2465.0005.000
φRmN/(° )0000
Axial clearancesδmSR/mm0.015300.015400?0.00704
δmNR/mm0.020.020.000.00
Tab.6  Contact positions and axial clearances of error-free PRSM
Fig.12  Deviation of calculation results between this study and two models.
Fig.13  Meshing position variations induced by the nominal diameter errors in the (a) screw–roller meshing region and (b) nut–roller meshing region, pitch errors in the (c) screw–roller meshing region and (d) nut–roller meshing region, and flank angle errors in the (e) screw–roller meshing region and (f) nut–roller meshing region.
Fig.14  Axial clearance variation caused by the given nominal diameter error ranges in the (a) screw–roller meshing region and (b) nut–roller meshing region; [μ ? 3σ, μ + 3σ] range nominal diameter errors in Tab.4 in the (c) screw–roller meshing region and (d) nut–roller meshing region; given pitch error ranges in the (e) screw–roller meshing region and (f) nut–roller meshing region; [μ ? 3σ, μ + 3σ] range pitch errors in Tab.4 in the (g) screw–roller meshing region and (h) nut–roller meshing region; given flank angle error ranges in the (i) screw–roller meshing region and (j) nut–roller meshing region; and [μ ? 3σ, μ + 3σ] range flank angle errors in Tab.4 in the (k) screw–roller meshing region and (l) nut–roller meshing region.
Error parameterSingle errorSensitivity rankingSingle class errorSensitivity ranking
ΔdS/mm0.13040.6231
ΔdR/mm0.2342
ΔdN/mm0.2591
ΔpS/mm0.11850.3412
ΔpR/mm0.1323
ΔpN/mm0.0916
ΔβS/(° )0.03470.0363
ΔβR/(° )0.0018
ΔβN/(° )0.0019
Tab.7  Sensitivity coefficients of error parameters
Fig.15  Main workflow of Fuzzy C-Means.
Fig.16  Distortion measure for different numbers of clusters.
Fig.17  Selective assembly intervals for different errors in the grouping results.
Fig.18  Axial clearance before and after grouping.
Abbreviations
CNCComputer numerical control
FCMFuzzy C-Means
OBBOriented bounding box
PRSMPlanetary roller screw mechanism
VTKVisualization toolkit
Variables
AiBi (i = S, R, N)Thread root arc segment in the axial thread profile of screw, roller, or nut
axesThree coordinate axis vectors of the meshing model’s OBB
BiEi (i = S, R, N)Contact profile segment in the axial thread profile of screw, roller, or nut
ci (i = S, R, N)Half thread tooth thickness of screw, roller, or nut
cciCluster center of the ith group of samples
Ci (i = 1,2,...,K)ith group group of samples
cVertex coordinates matrix of the meshing model’s OBB
celli (i = 1,2,...,n)Cell of the meshing model’s OBB
di (i = S, R, N)Nominal diameter of screw, roller, or nut
dijwWeighted Euclidean distance between cluster center cci and the jth sample xj
Δdi (i = S, R, N)Nominal diameter error of screw, roller, or nut
ennth sample
EsamSample set
EEij (i = 1,2,...,9; j = 1,2,...,Nsam)Axial clearance variation resulting from consecutive runs in which only the ith error xij of the jth sample is changed to (xij + Δ)
KNumber of clusters
LintOverlapping region between the meshing model and v
LmProjection ranges of the meshing model along the axes
LvProjection ranges of v along the axes
ni (i = S, R, N)Number of starts of screw, roller, or nut
Nj (j = 1,2,...,K)Total number of samples in the jth group
NsamNumber of samples in Esam
ni (i = 1,2,3)Normal vectors of meshing model cell
pi (i = S, R, N)Pitch of screw, roller, or nut
Δpi (i = S, R, N)Pitch error of screw, roller, or nut
PClustering center
Pi (i = S, R, N)Point sets for the screw, roller, or nut thread profiles
pi1, pi2, pi3 (i = 1,2,...,n)Three vertices of meshing model cell
pintIntersection point between celli and v
pintNIntersection points between v and the nut
pintR?NIntersection points between v and the roller on nut side
pintR?SIntersection points between v and the roller on screw side
pintSIntersection points between v and the screw
rNmNut contact radius
rroot_i (i = S, R, N)Root arc radius of screw, roller, or nut
rRarRoller arc radius
rRmNRoller contact radius on the nut?roller side
rRmSRoller contact radius on the screw?roller side
rSa, rRa, rNfMajor diameters of the screw, roller, and nut, respectively
rSmScrew contact radius
R1, R2Random numbers within the range [0, 1]
SerrorWeighting coefficients of errors
SclearanceWeighting coefficients of axial clearance
si (i = 1,2,...,9)Sensitivity coefficient of 9 errors
sk (k = 1,2,...,10)Weight coefficient of the kth sample attribute
SSESum of square errors
tIntersection coefficient between celli and v
TIteration times
uij (i = 1,2,...,K)Membership of the jth sample to the ith group Ci
UMembership matrix
v = b1 ? b2Ray vector and its starting point vector and ending point vector
xn1, xn2, …, xn9Sampling values of 9 errors in en
ZNiU, ZNiB, ZR?NiU, ZR?NiB (i = 1,2,...,n)z-coordinate of the intersection point between v and the upper and lower contact surfaces of the ith pair of meshing threads on the nut?roller side, corresponding to the minimum axial distance
ZSiU, ZSiB, ZR?SiU, ZR?SiB (i = 1,2,...,n)z-coordinate of the intersection point between v and the upper and lower contact surfaces of the ith pair of meshing threads on the screw?roller side, corresponding to the minimum axial distance
αSignificance level of hypothesis testing
βi (i = S, R, N)Flank angle of screw, roller, or nut
Δβi (i = S, R, N)Flank angle error of screw, roller, or nut
ΓUi, ΓBi (i = S, R, N)Upper and lower profile curves of the screw, roller, or nut, respectively
ΓSRU, ΓSRB, ΓNRU, ΓNRBContact pairs on the upper and lower sides of the roller threads
δgOverall global axial clearance of PRSM
δij, δj (i = 1,2,...,Nj;  j = 1,2,...,K)Clearance values of sample within the group and their mean value
δnAxial clearance value with 9 errors in en
δNRiU, δNRiB (i = 1,2,...,n)Axial clearances between the upper and lower contact surfaces of the ith pair of meshing threads on the nut?roller side, respectively
δRmNAxial clearances on the nut?roller side
δRmSAxial clearances on the screw?roller side
δSRiU, δSRiB  (i = 1,2,...,n)Axial clearances between the upper and lower contact surfaces of the ith pair of meshing threads on the screw?roller side, respectively
εIterative threshold
λi (i = S, R, N)Helix angle of screw, roller, or nut
μLocation parameter of errors distribution
μi (i = 1, 2,..., 10)Sensitivity factor of each error
σScale parameter of errors distribution
φNmNut contact angle
φRmNRoller contact angle on the nut?roller side
φRmSRoller contact angle on the screw?roller side
φSmScrew contact angle
  
1 M FalknerT NitschkoL SupperG TraxlerJ V ZemannE W Roberts. Roller screw lifetime under oscillatory motion: from dry to liquid lubrication. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Space Mechanisms and Tribology Symposium. San Sebastián: ESA, 2003, 297–301
2 J WanderV ByrdJ Parker. Initial disturbance accommodating control system analysis for prototype electromechanical space shuttle steering actuator. In: Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference. Seattle: IEEE, 1995, 3961–3964
3 A Garcia , J Cusido , J A Rosero , J A Ortega , L Romeral . Reliable electro-mechanical actuators in aircraft. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 2008, 23(8): 19–25
https://doi.org/10.1109/MAES.2008.4607895
4 H WangM H TongP Zheng. Research on contact strength between roller screw pair on hoisting mechanism applied in deep sea crane. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, 423–426: 2001–2005
5 L RichterO Kroemer. Application of a remote controlled hammering drill from space to deep sea. In: Proceedings of OCEANS 2009-EUROPE. Bremen: IEEE, 2009, 1–4
6 P E Dupont. Friction modeling in dynamic robot simulation. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Cincinnati: IEEE, 1990, 1370–1376
7 S LohmeierT BuschmannH Ulbrich. Humanoid robot LOLA. In: Proceedings of 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Kobe: IEEE, 2009, 775–780
8 A Andrade , D Nicolosi , J Lucchi , J Biscegli , A C F Arruda , Y Ohashi , J Mueller , E Tayama , J Glueck , Y Nosé . Auxiliary total artificial heart: a compact electromechanical artificial heart working simultaneously with the natural heart. Artificial Organs, 1999, 23(9): 876–880
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1594.1999.06273.x
9 S Takatani , Y Takami , T Nakazawa , G Jacobs , Y Nose . Double chamber ventricular assist device with a roller screw linear actuator driven by left and right latissimus dorsi muscles. ASAIO Journal, 1995, 41(3): M475–M480
https://doi.org/10.1097/00002480-199507000-00056
10 G RosenbergW S PierceA J SnyderW J WeissT Lamson. The pennsylvania state university roller screw electric total artificial heart: 205 days survival in the calf. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Orlando: IEEE, 1991, 2087–2089
11 L Zago , S Droz . Small parallel manipulator for the active alignment and focusing of the secondary mirror of the VLTI ATS. In: Proceedings of Optical Design, Materials, Fabrication, and Maintenance. Munich: SPIE, 2000, 4003: 450–455
12 M S WorthingtonT A BeetsJ H BenoJ R MockB T MurphyB J SouthJ M Good. Design and development of a high-precision, high-payload telescope dual-drive system. In: Proceedings of Ground-Based and Airborne Telescopes III. San Diego: SPIE, 2010, 77335G
13 S C ZhengY L FuD Y WangW S ZhangJ L Pan. Investigations on system integration method and dynamic performance of electromechanical actuator. Science Progress, 2020, 103(3): 1–35
14 X Du , B K Chen , Z D Zheng . Investigation on mechanical behavior of planetary roller screw mechanism with the effects of external loads and machining errors. Tribology International, 2021, 154: 106689
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106689
15 R Hu , P T Wei , H J Liu , X S Du , P L Zhou , C C Zhu . Investigation on load distribution among rollers of planetary roller screw mechanism considering machining errors: analytical calculation and machine learning approach. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2023, 185: 105322
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2023.105322
16 M H Jones , S A Velinsky . Kinematics of roller migration in the planetary roller screw mechanism. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2012, 134(6): 061006
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4006529
17 S J Ma , W Cai , L P Wu , G Liu , C Peng . Modelling of transmission accuracy of a planetary roller screw mechanism considering errors and elastic deformations. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2019, 134: 151–168
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2018.12.025
18 H L Wu , P T Wei , R Hu , H J Liu , X S Du , P L Zhou , C C Zhu . Study on the relationship between machining errors and transmission accuracy of planetary roller screw mechanism using analytical calculations and machine-learning model. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 2023, 10(1): 398–413
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcde/qwad003
19 Z J Xie , Y Wang , J Ni , J H Yin , D Yu , J Q Liu . Friction torque analysis of planetary roller screw based on the creepage theory. Tribology International, 2023, 178: 108059
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2022.108059
20 Y Q LiuY ShangJ S Wang. Mathematical analysis of the meshing performance of planetary roller screws applying different roller thread shapes. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 9(5): 1687814017703009
21 R Hu , P T Wei , X S Du , J Zhou , H J Liu , G S Liu , C C Zhu . Investigation of loaded contact characteristics of planetary roller screw mechanism based on influence coefficient method and machine learning. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2023, 58: 102146
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2023.102146
22 D S BlinovO A RyakhovskyP A Sokolov. Numerical method of determining the point of initial thread contact of two screws with parallel axes and different thread inclinations. Mashinostr, 1996, 3: 93–97 (in Russian)
23 O A RyakhovskiyF D SorokinA S Marokhin. Calculation of radial displacements of nut and rollers axes and the position of a contact between the nut and the roller thread in an inverted planetary roller screw mechanism. BMSTU Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 11(644): 12–19 (in Russian)
24 M E Fedosovsky , S A Aleksanin , R V Puctozerov . Use of numerical method for determination of contact points position in roller screw threads. Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia, 2015, 12(1): 721–730
https://doi.org/10.13005/bbra/1717
25 M H Jones , S A Velinsky . Contact kinematics in the roller screw mechanism. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2013, 135(5): 051003
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023964
26 Y Q Liu , J S Wang , H X Cheng , Y P Sun . Kinematics analysis of the roller screw based on the accuracy of meshing point calculation. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015, 2015: 303972
https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/303972
27 X J FuG LiuS J MaR T Tong. Meshing properties of planetary roller screw mechanism within misalignments. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 53(3): 25–33 (in Chinese)
28 X J Fu , G Liu , S J Ma , R T Tong , T C Lim . A comprehensive contact analysis of planetary roller screw mechanism. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2017, 139(1): 012302
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034580
29 S M WangQ XuZ W LuoY P HuangL P Pi. Effect of profile error on meshing state of planetary roller screw. In: Proceedings of 2017 Chinese Automation Congress. Jinan: IEEE, 2017, 7472–7477
30 F L LitvinA Fuentes. Gear Geometry and Applied Theory. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004
31 L P Wu , S J Ma , X J Fu , J X Zhang , G Liu . A review of planetary roller screw mechanism for development and new trends. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2022, 236(21): 10822–10840
https://doi.org/10.1177/09544062221106287
32 C Q Zhang , J Y Shao , K Chen , C Z Ren . A robotic manipulator control and simulation system with Qt and VTK. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 462: 712–719
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.462.712
33 L Hong , B S Wang , X L Yang , Y G Wang , Z Lin . Offline programming method and implementation of industrial robot grinding based on VTK. Industrial Robot, 2020, 47(4): 547–557
https://doi.org/10.1108/IR-04-2019-0093
34 Q Liu , Z Qiao , Y Lv . PyVT: a Python-based open-source software for visualization and graphic analysis of fluid dynamics datasets. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 117: 106961
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106961
35 G Wheeler , S J Deng , N Toussaint , K Pushparajah , J A Schnabel , J M Simpson , A Gomez . Virtual interaction and visualisation of 3D medical imaging data with VTK and Unity. Healthcare Technology Letters, 2018, 5(5): 148–153
https://doi.org/10.1049/htl.2018.5064
36 A Chaudhary , S J Jhaveri , A Sanchez , L S Avila , K M Martin , A Vacanti , M D Hanwell , W Schroeder . Cross-platform ubiquitous volume rendering using programmable shaders in VTK for scientific and medical visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 2019, 39(1): 26–43
https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2018.2880818
37 S A Velinsky , B Chu , T A Lasky . Kinematics and efficiency analysis of the planetary roller screw mechanism. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2009, 131(1): 011016
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3042158
38 P C Lemor. The roller screw, an efficient and reliable mechanical component of electro-mechanical actuators. In: Proceedings of the 31st Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference. Washington DC: IEEE, 1996, 215–220
39 L J Sun , J J Ren , X G Xu . A data-driven machining errors recovery method for complex surfaces with limited measurement points. Measurement, 2021, 181: 109661
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109661
40 H W XuP T WeiP L ZhouX S Du. Non-contact detection and deviation evaluation method of small pitch roller profile. Journal of Chongqing University, 2023, 46(3): 45–57 (in Chinese)
41 K Ishizaki , E Shamoto . A new real-time trajectory generation method modifying trajectory based on trajectory error and angular speed for high accuracy and short machining time. Precision Engineering, 2022, 76: 173–189
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2022.02.012
42 Y F Wu . Correlated sampling techniques used in Monte Carlo simulation for risk assessment. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2008, 85(9): 662–669
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.11.004
43 G LiuS J MaX J Fu. Planetary Roller Screw Transmission–Meshing Principle. Beijing: Science Press, 2019 (in Chinese)
44 Q Cheng , Q N Feng , Z F Liu , P H Gu , G J Zhang . Sensitivity analysis of machining accuracy of multi-axis machine tool based on POE screw theory and Morris method. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 84(9–12): 2301–2318
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7791-x
45 M S Kumar , S M Kannan . Optimum manufacturing tolerance to selective assembly technique for different assembly specifications by using genetic algorithm. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2007, 32(5–6): 591–598
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0337-x
46 M V RajS S SankarS G Ponnambalam. Minimizing assembly variation in selective assembly by using particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Engineering and Technology. Kuala Lumpur: ASME, 2011, 91–96
47 Y Zhang , X D Wang , Z T Chen , Z Q Zhu , H Ye . A synchronous polishing method for aero-engine blade based on multi-spindle machine tool. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2022, 123(5): 1669–1678
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10025-5
48 X R Shi , W Cui , P Zhu , Y H Yang . Research on automobile assembly line optimization based on industrial engineering technology and machine learning algorithm. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2021, 2021: 2658090
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2658090
49 B C Li , Y Liu . The study of fuzzy clustering analysis in the determination of assembly process for hull block module. Hydraulic Equipment and Support Systems for Mining, 2012, 619: 329–335
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.619.329
50 T M Kodinariya , P R Makwana . Review on determining number of cluster in k-means clustering. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, 2013, 1(6): 90–95
51 J C Bezdek , R Ehrlich , W Full . FCM: the Fuzzy C-Means clustering algorithm. Computers & Geosciences, 1984, 10(2–3): 191–203
https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-3004(84)90020-7
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed