Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

ISSN 2095-0233

ISSN 2095-0241(Online)

CN 11-5984/TH

Postal Subscription Code 80-975

2018 Impact Factor: 0.989

Front. Mech. Eng.    2014, Vol. 9 Issue (1) : 58-70    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-014-0289-7
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Analyzing the nonlinear vibrational wave differential equation for the simplified model of Tower Cranes by Algebraic Method
M.R. AKBARI1,D.D. GANJI2,*(),A.R. AHMADI3,Sayyid H. Hashemi KACHAPI2
1. Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Pardisan Mazandaran and Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Tehran, P.O. Box 66456-43516, Iran
2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Babol University of Technology, P.O. Box 484, Babol, Iran
3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, P.O. Box 48161-19318, Iran
 Download: PDF(543 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

In the current paper, a simplified model of Tower Cranes has been presented in order to investigate and analyze the nonlinear differential equation governing on the presented system in three different cases by Algebraic Method (AGM). Comparisons have been made between AGM and Numerical Solution, and these results have been indicated that this approach is very efficient and easy so it can be applied for other nonlinear equations. It is citable that there are some valuable advantages in this way of solving differential equations and also the answer of various sets of complicated differential equations can be achieved in this manner which in the other methods, so far, they have not had acceptable solutions. The simplification of the solution procedure in Algebraic Method and its application for solving a wide variety of differential equations not only in Vibrations but also in different fields of study such as fluid mechanics, chemical engineering, etc. make AGM be a powerful and useful role model for researchers in order to solve complicated nonlinear differential equations.

Keywords Algebraic Method (AGM)      tower crane      oscillating system      angular frequency     
Corresponding Author(s): D.D. GANJI   
Issue Date: 16 May 2014
 Cite this article:   
M.R. AKBARI,D.D. GANJI,A.R. AHMADI, et al. Analyzing the nonlinear vibrational wave differential equation for the simplified model of Tower Cranes by Algebraic Method[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2014, 9(1): 58-70.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/10.1007/s11465-014-0289-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/Y2014/V9/I1/58
F(t)External force exerting on the system
MMass of the block
a,bLength and height of the block
EIElastic modulus
mMass of the rigid beam(the horizontal beam)
hHeight of the non-rigid beam(the vertical one)
k=E.AhAxial rigidity
cDamping coefficient
LLength of the rigid beam
I1Moment of inertia for the rigid beam (the horizontal one)
I2Moment of inertia for the block
ωAngular frequency
Tab.1  Nomenclature
Fig.1  The schematic diagram of the physical model
Fig.2  The displacement diagram of the mentioned system
Fig.3  The achieved solution, θ(t), by AGM
Fig.4  The resulted phase plane by AGM
t0481216202428323640
θ(t)0.2-0.1810.129-0.0537-0.03160.111-0.1700.198-0.1890.146-0.0752
dθdt00.0753-0.1360.172-0.1760.148-0.09320.0200.0564-0.1222-0.1651
Tab.2  The obtained results for θ(t) and its derivative according to the Numerical solution of Eq. (27)
Fig.5  Comparing the obtained solution by AGM and Numerical Method
Fig.6  A comparison between the resulted phase planes by AGM and Numerical Method
Fig.7  A comparison among the obtained phase planes by AGM on the basis of the different amplitudes of vibration
Fig.8  The obtained solution by AGM
Fig.9  The resulted phase planes by AGM
t02468101214161820
θ(t)0.10.013-0.0518-0.00460.02670.00131-0.0138-0.0001240.0071-0.000219-0.00363
dθdt0-0.05970.00230.0305-0.0024-0.01560.001850.00793-0.00126-0.004020.000811
Tab.3  The obtained results for θ(t) and its derivative according to the Numerical Solution of Eq. (42)
Fig.10  Comparing the obtained solution by AGM and Numerical Method
Fig.11  A comparison between the resulted phase planes by AGM and Numerical Method
Fig.12  A comparison among the obtained phase planes by AGM based on the four different damping coefficients
Fig.13  The chart of the obtained solution by AGM
Fig.14  The resulted phase plane by AGM
t036912151821242730
θ(t)0.1-0.0320.06430.10240.01050.2097-0.05730.2683-0.1290.268-0.1984
dθdt0-0.3870.0531-0.3370.120-0.21170.178-0.04470.2030.11980.1764
Tab.4  The obtained results for θ(t) and its derivative according to the Numerical Solution of Eq. (56)
Fig.15  A comparison between the obtained solution by AGM and Numerical Method
Fig.16  Comparing the resulted phase planes by AGM and Numerical Method
1 HeJ H. A note on delta-perturbation expansion method. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2002, 23(6): 634-638
doi: 10.1007/BF02437646
2 HeJ H. Bookkeeping parameter in perturbation methods. International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation, 2001, 2(3): 257
doi: 10.1515/IJNSNS.2001.2.3.257
3 AdomianG. Solving Frontier Problems of Physics: the Composition Method. Kluwer, Boston, 1994
4 RamosJ I. Piecewise-adaptive decomposition methods. Chaos, Solitons, and Fractals, 2008, 198(1): 92
5 GhoshS, RoyA, RoyD. An adaptation of adomian decomposition for numeric-analytic integration of strongly nonlinear and chaotic oscillators. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 196(4-6): 1133-1153
doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2006.08.010
6 RamosJ I. An artificial parameter LinstedtePoincaré method for oscillators with smooth odd nonlinearities. Chaos, Solitons, and Fractals, 2009, 41(1): 380-393
doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2008.01.009
7 HeJ H. Some asymptotic methods for strongly nonlinear equations. International Journal of Modern Physics B, 2006, 20(10): 1141-1199
doi: 10.1142/S0217979206033796
8 WangS Q, HeJ H. Nonlinear oscillator with discontinuity by parameter expansion method. Chaos, Solitons, and Fractals, 2008, 35(4): 688-691
doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2007.07.055
9 ShouD H, HeJ H. Application of parameter-expanding method to strongly nonlinear oscillators. International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation, 2007, 8(1): 121
doi: 10.1515/IJNSNS.2007.8.1.121
10 XuL, HeJ H. He’s parameter-expanding method for strongly nonlinear oscillators. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2007, 207(1): 148-154
doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2006.07.020
11 HeJ H. The homotopy perturbation method for nonlinear oscillators with discontinuities. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2004, 151(1): 287-292
doi: 10.1016/S0096-3003(03)00341-2
12 HeJ H. Approximate analytical solution of Blasiu’s equation. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 1998, 3(4): 260-263
doi: 10.1016/S1007-5704(98)90046-6
13 HeJ H. Variational iteration method- a kind of non-linear analytical technique: some examples. International Journal of Non-linear Mechanics, 1999, 34(4): 699-708
doi: 10.1016/S0020-7462(98)00048-1
14 HeJ H, WanY Q, GuoQ. An iteration formulation for normalized diode characteristics. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, 2004, 32(6): 629-632
doi: 10.1002/cta.300
15 HeJ H. Some asymptotic methods for strongly nonlinear equations, int. Journal of Modern Physics B, 2006, 20(10): 1141-1199
doi: 10.1142/S0217979206033796
16 RafeiM, GanjiD D, DanialiH, PashaeiH. The variational iteration method for nonlinear oscillators with discontinuities. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2007, 305(4-5): 614-620
doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2007.04.020
17 CloughR W, PenzienJ. Dynamics of structures. Third Edition. Computers & Structures. Inc. University Ave. Berkeley, CA 94704, 1995
18 ChopraA K. Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics Series. Prentice Hall/Pearson Education, 2011
19 ThompsonW. Theory of Vibration with Applications. Technology & Engineering. Fourth Edition. Taylor & Francis, 1996
[1] M. R. AKBARI,D. D. GANJI,A. MAJIDIAN,A. R. AHMADI. Solving nonlinear differential equations of Vanderpol, Rayleigh and Duffing by AGM[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2014, 9(2): 177-190.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed