Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Architectural Research

ISSN 2095-2635

ISSN 2095-2643(Online)

CN 10-1024/TU

Postal Subscription Code 80-966

Front. Archit. Res.    2012, Vol. 1 Issue (3) : 305-315    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2012.07.001
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Landscape characteristic aesthetic structure: Construction of urban landscape characteristic time-spatial pattern based on aesthetic subjects
Min Wang(), Bochun Yu
School of Urban and Environmental Science, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
 Download: PDF(1981 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The paper presents means and models of city-landscape characteristic structure construction on the aspect of landscape aesthetics subjects, which is called the landscape characteristic aesthetic structure and in short as LCAS. In this paper, the steps of LCAS research are as follows: Describes the concepts of the landscape characteristic aesthetic structure (LCAS), and expounds the LCAS properties: systematic quality, temporal and spatial quality, and virtual existence.

Learns from typology research methods, discusses the elements and types needed in a landscape characteristic aesthetic system, and constructs research method for LCAS pattern. As for the temporal dimension, the dynamic evolution and interaction expressed in LCAS between the ‘‘tradition’’ and ‘‘modernity’’ landscapes conflict. As for the spatial dimension, this paper explores the LCAS patterns in macroscopic scope of city group, the middle scope of single cities and the microcosmic scope of urban spaces with questionnaires and examples research.

Uses pattern language to express different LCAS types in the temporal and spatial system.

We develop the patterns of various LCAS types with graphical patterned representation, as well as construct the LCAS research method and theory which is based on the general people’s aesthetic standards and sensibilities to build city characteristics and urban landscapes as a guidance.

Keywords Landscape characteristic aesthetic structure      LCAS      Urban      Space      Pattern     
Corresponding Author(s): Wang Min,Email:campero@163.com   
Issue Date: 05 September 2012
 Cite this article:   
Min Wang,Bochun Yu. Landscape characteristic aesthetic structure: Construction of urban landscape characteristic time-spatial pattern based on aesthetic subjects[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2012, 1(3): 305-315.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/10.1016/j.foar.2012.07.001
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/Y2012/V1/I3/305
[1] Xiao Wang, Yacheng Song, Peng Tang. Generative urban design using shape grammar and block morphological analysis[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 914-924.
[2] Ahlam Ammar Sharif. User activities and the heterogeneity of urban space: The case of Dahiyat Al Hussein park[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 837-857.
[3] Sabeeh Farhan, Venus Akef, Zuhair Nasar. The transformation of the inherited historical urban and architectural characteristics of Al-Najaf’s Old City and possible preservation insights[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 820-836.
[4] Yifei Pei, Kai Gong, Jiawei Leng. Study on the inter-village space of a traditional village group in Huizhou Region: Hongguan Village group as an example[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(3): 588-605.
[5] Mohamad Kashef, Mervat El-Shafie. Multifaceted perspective on North American urban development[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(2): 467-483.
[6] Cong Sun, Charlie Q.L. Xue. Shennan Road and the modernization of Shenzhen architecture[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(2): 437-449.
[7] Xiang Zhou, Yanbo Li, Yuning Cheng. Neighborhood, community and consumption: Study on the socio-spatial structure during two boosting epochs in Shanghai[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(2): 419-436.
[8] Friederike Well, Ferdinand Ludwig. Blueegreen architecture: A case study analysis considering the synergetic effects of water and vegetation[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(1): 191-202.
[9] Lydia Kiroff. Nexus between creative industries and the built environment: Creative placemaking in inner Auckland[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(1): 119-137.
[10] Jie Ding, Shanshan Ma. Comparative analysis of habitation behavioral patterns in spatial configuration of traditional houses in Anhui, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang provinces of China[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(1): 54-66.
[11] Wiem Zerouati, Tahar Bellal. Evaluating the impact of mass housings’ in-between spaces’ spatial configuration on users’ social interaction[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(1): 34-53.
[12] Maurice Mitchell, Amara Roca Iglesias. Urban agriculture in Kathmandu as a catalyst for the civic inclusion of migrants and the making of a greener city[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(1): 169-190.
[13] Rong Du, Chiu-Shui Chan. Quantitative analysis of social force in the processes of settlement aggregation[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(4): 634-645.
[14] Raed Salem Al-Tal, Hala Hesham Ahmad Ghanem. Impact of the Syrian crisis on the socio-spatial transformation of Eastern Amman, Jordan[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(4): 591-603.
[15] Long Zhao, Wun Bin Wong, Zulkifli Bin Hanafi. The evolution of George Town’s urban morphology in the Straits of Malacca, late 18th century-early 21st century[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(4): 513-534.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed