Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Architectural Research

ISSN 2095-2635

ISSN 2095-2643(Online)

CN 10-1024/TU

Postal Subscription Code 80-966

Front. Archit. Res.    2019, Vol. 8 Issue (2) : 238-260    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.03.001
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Teaching sustainable design in architecture education: Critical review of Easy Approach for Sustainable and Environmental Design (EASED)
Camille de Gaulmyn(), Karine Dupre
Griffith Architecture, Griffith University, Southport, Qld 4215,Australia
 Download: PDF(5215 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

In the current context of climate change and ecological awareness, designing sustainable environments is definitely understood as a shared responsibility. With the construction sector consuming half of the world's energy, the role of some key stakeholders such as architects becomes even more critical when providing responsible and relevant design for the built environment. Thus, improving the way our environments are being designed challenges some cultural systems that show evident limits, such as the training of future architects and engineers.

In this research, the focus is on architecture students and aims to demonstrate how the use of a new sustainable performance simulation tool, called Easy Approach for Sustainable and Environmental Design (EASED) could contribute to educate them about innovatively sustainable design. This was assessed through the evaluation of student engagement, their use of the tool and its appropriation. Results show that individual work was not convincing, whereas success was met during group work. Limits and improvement possibilities were found in the interface of EASED as well as in the educational set up of the tool.

Keywords Architecture education      Energy      Sustainable      Design      Teaching      Ecological     
Corresponding Author(s): Camille de Gaulmyn   
Issue Date: 12 August 2019
 Cite this article:   
Camille de Gaulmyn,Karine Dupre. Teaching sustainable design in architecture education: Critical review of Easy Approach for Sustainable and Environmental Design (EASED)[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(2): 238-260.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/10.1016/j.foar.2019.03.001
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/Y2019/V8/I2/238
[1] Xiao Wang, Yacheng Song, Peng Tang. Generative urban design using shape grammar and block morphological analysis[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 914-924.
[2] Yuyang Wang, Asterios Agkathidis, Andrew Crompton. Parametrising historical Chinese courtyarddwellings: An algorithmic design framework for the digital representation of Siheyuan iterations based on traditional design principles[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 751-773.
[3] Ran Xu, Haishan Xia, Mei Tian. Wayfinding design in transportation architecture e are saliency models or designer visual attention a good predictor of passenger visual attention?[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 726-738.
[4] Ester Pujadas-Gispert, Mohammed Alsailani, K.C.A. van Dijk (Koen), A.D.K. Rozema (Annine), J.P. ten Hoope (Puck), C.C. Korevaar (Carmen), S.P.G. Moonen (Faas). Design, construction, and thermal performance evaluation of an innovative bio-based ventilated façade[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(3): 681-696.
[5] Ahdha Moosa, Khoa Do, Emil Jonescu. Design response to rising sea levels in the Maldives: A study into aquatic architecture[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(3): 623-640.
[6] Salomé A. Bentinck, Clarine J. van Oel, Machiel J. van Dorst. Perception of privacy in a university building: The transparency paradox[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(3): 579-587.
[7] Randa M.A. Mahmoud, Amr M.A. Youssef. Design framework for robotic surgery wards at hospitals: Computational implementation[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(3): 514-540.
[8] Navid Jamali, Ramsey K. Leung, Stephen Verderber. A review of computerized hospital layout modelling techniques and their ethical implications[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(3): 498-513.
[9] Cong Sun, Charlie Q.L. Xue. Shennan Road and the modernization of Shenzhen architecture[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(2): 437-449.
[10] Sahba Samadi, Esmatullah Noorzai, Liliana O. Beltrán, Saman Abbasi. A computational approach for achieving optimum daylight inside buildings through automated kinetic shading systems[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(2): 335-349.
[11] Abel Tablada, Vesna Kosorić, Huajing Huang, Stephen S.Y. Lau, Veronika Shabunko. Architectural quality of the productive façades integrating photovoltaic and vertical farming systems: Survey among experts in Singapore[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(2): 301-318.
[12] Inês Caetano, Luís Santos, António Leitão. Computational design in architecture: Defining parametric, generative, and algorithmic design[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(2): 287-300.
[13] Vinicius Mizobuti, Luiz C.M. Vieira Junior. Bioinspired architectural design based on structural topology optimization[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(2): 264-276.
[14] Saman Jamshidi, Jan S. Parker, Seyedehnastaran Hashemi. The effects of environmental factors on the patient outcomes in hospital environments: A review of literature[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(2): 249-263.
[15] Ahlam Ammar Sharif. Users as co-designers: Visualespatial experiences at Whitworth Art Gallery[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(1): 106-118.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed