Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Architectural Research

ISSN 2095-2635

ISSN 2095-2643(Online)

CN 10-1024/TU

Postal Subscription Code 80-966

Front. Archit. Res.    2023, Vol. 12 Issue (4) : 732-753    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2023.03.001
CASE STUDY
Designing with nature: Advancing three-dimensional green spaces in architecture through frameworks for biophilic design and sustainability
Weijie Zhong(), Torsten Schroeder, Juliette Bekkering
Architectural Design and Engineering, Department of the Built Environment, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven 5600 MB, the Netherlands
 Download: PDF(4689 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

In the transition to a more sustainable built environment over the last two decades, the “greening” of architecture as a popular approach has received widespread attention. However, there are still many open questions and contradictions regarding how to design with “nature” and contribute to sustainability. In addition, explorations of built examples are rare, and three-dimensional (3D) green spaces in buildings are often overlooked. Therefore, we introduce “green pockets” (3D green spaces) as a typology distinct from two-dimensional green roofs and walls/facades. We draw on a mixed-method approach to study two cases (Erasmus MC and Hotel Jakarta), comprising 12 semi-structured interviews with different stakeholders, design document analysis, and site observation. We develop a critical reflection (a framework) on the impacts of “green architecture” on sustainability from unpacked benefits and adopt a biophilic design framework to analyse designing with “nature” in architectural practice. These findings demonstrate that green pockets contribute to integrating multiple experiences of “nature” into buildings and developing sustainable architecture. Designing green pockets with visibility, accessibility, and spatial characteristics (e.g., prospect and refuge, organised complexity, peril, and mystery) of “nature” improves building quality. Furthermore, we provide design recommendations to advance green pocket designs and make suggestions for future research.

Keywords Biophilic design      Biophilic architecture      Design with nature      Green space      Sustainability      Sustainable architecture     
Corresponding Author(s): Weijie Zhong   
Issue Date: 25 July 2023
 Cite this article:   
Weijie Zhong,Torsten Schroeder,Juliette Bekkering. Designing with nature: Advancing three-dimensional green spaces in architecture through frameworks for biophilic design and sustainability[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2023, 12(4): 732-753.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/10.1016/j.foar.2023.03.001
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/Y2023/V12/I4/732
[1] Soniya Falahatdoost, Xingping Wang. The long-run estimation role of industrial parks on the level of sustainability in Iran and Turkey[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2023, 12(4): 700-713.
[2] Antonio Jesús de-los-Aires-Solís, Francisco Gonzalez-Quintial. A wood-wood joining system suitable for digital fabrication and its application in the design of a “wood-only” spatial modulea[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2023, 12(3): 523-540.
[3] Bekir Huseyin Tekin, Rhiannon Corcoran, Rosa Urbano Gutiérrez. The impact of biophilic design in Maggie’s Centres: A meta-synthesis analysis[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2023, 12(1): 188-207.
[4] Wenzhang Zhou, Siyuan Song, Kan Feng. The sustainability cycle of historic houses and cultural memory: Controversy between historic preservation and heritage conservation[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2022, 11(6): 1030-1046.
[5] Weijie Zhong, Torsten Schröder, Juliette Bekkering. Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2022, 11(1): 114-141.
[6] Michaël Willem Maria Smits. Framework for capacity based sustainable design & development: towards resilient communities[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(4): 498-512.
[7] Olumuyiwa Bayode Adegun, Yomi Michael Daisiowa Adedeji. Review of economic and environmental benefits of earthen materials for housing in Africa[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2017, 6(4): 519-528.
[8] Egwunatum I. Samuel,Esther Joseph-Akwara,Akaigwe Richard. Assessment of energy utilization and leakages in buildings with building information model energy[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2017, 6(1): 29-41.
[9] O.K. Akanden,D. Odeleye,A. Coday,C. JimenezBescos. Performance evaluation of operational energy use in refurbishment, reuse, and conservation of heritage buildings for optimum sustainability[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2016, 5(3): 371-382.
[10] Ying Deng,Edwin H.W. Chan,S.W. Poon. Challenge-driven design for public housing: The case of Hong Kong[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2016, 5(2): 213-224.
[11] Teresa Marie Cracknell,Bassam Abu-Hijleh. Measuring LEED–NC applicability in design for hospitality[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2015, 4(4): 308-317.
[12] Moshood Olawale Fadeyi,Khawla Alkhaja,Maryam Bin Sulayem,Bassam Abu-Hijleh. Evaluation of indoor environmental quality conditions in elementary schools' classrooms in the United Arab Emirates[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2014, 3(2): 166-177.
[13] Jiangping Zhou. Sustainable transportation in the US: A review of proposals, policies, and programs since 2000[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2012, 1(2): 150-165.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed