Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

ISSN 1673-3436

ISSN 1673-355X(Online)

CN 11-5743/B

Postal Subscription Code 80-983

Front. Philos. China    2024, Vol. 19 Issue (2) : 95-107    https://doi.org/10.3868/s030-013-024-0006-5
“Home” and Philosophy: The Imagery and Metaphysical Significance of “Home” in Chinese Philosophy
LI Jinglin
School of Philosophy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; Philosophy Department, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610044, China
 Download: PDF(372 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Chinese philosophy is a philosophy based on “home” rather than merely a philosophy about the home. “Home” is the origin from which the individual emerges. Heaven and Earth are the origins from which humanity emerges. Human knowledge and thought allow individuals to transcend the undifferentiated unity of “home,” becoming individual existences while also endowing themselves with a universal ethical mode of existence. Returning to oneself through the act of departure becomes the inevitable way to realize human existence. Civilization, as a rational forward movement, is inevitably accompanied by the obscuration of ignorance, causing individuals to deviate from their true essence. The realization of human existence inherently contains a dimension of returning to one’s original essence within its forward movement. In the depths of the human soul, there is an original and persistent nostalgia for “home.” Chinese philosophy emphasizes “knowing where to stop,” with Daoism advocating “having become remote, it returns” and Confucianism advocating “returning from a short distance,” which aims to maintain a balanced tension between advancement and stopping, preserving the holistic significance of human existence. Humans, as holistic beings, grasp themselves and their surrounding world in an original modal way. Human existence originates from “home,” with the closest emotional expression being “kinship.” “Home” and “kinship” serve as intermediaries or bridges for individuals to realize universal love for themselves and others, extending to “loving the people and all things.” This universality, founded on the premise of difference, bestows the image and meaning of “home.” Thus, human self-identity and the development of civilization can achieve their authentic significance and rational foundation. The modal existence approach followed by Chinese philosophy presents a unique spiritual direction for the future development of philosophy.

Keywords home      philosophy      nature      humanity      nostalgia      “knowing where to stop”      identification     
Issue Date: 06 September 2024
 Cite this article:   
LI Jinglin. “Home” and Philosophy: The Imagery and Metaphysical Significance of “Home” in Chinese Philosophy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2024, 19(2): 95-107.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.3868/s030-013-024-0006-5
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2024/V19/I2/95
[1] GONG Xiaokang. Theory of the Unity of Body and Mind from the Perspective of Wang Yangming’s Philosophy of Mind[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2024, 19(2): 177-192.
[2] WU Fei. Body-Mind Monism and the Establishment of the Zoeontological Subject[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2024, 19(2): 158-176.
[3] WU Genyou, DING Ming. A New Interpretation of Mozi’s Idea of “Identification with the Superior” from the Perspective of “Common Good”[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2024, 19(2): 121-136.
[4] ZHU Cheng. The Search for Universality and the Consciousness of Human Community in Chinese Philosophy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2024, 19(1): 69-94.
[5] BAI Tongdong. Han Feizi on Human Nature[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2024, 19(1): 53-68.
[6] HUANG Yushun. Philosophical Essence of “Heart Nature” in Traditional Confucianism and Its Contemporary Transformation: A Review of Meng Peiyuan’s “Chinese Theory of Heart Nature”[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2024, 19(1): 22-36.
[7] GUO Yi. The Meta-Question, Components, and Basic Structure of Chinese Philosophy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2024, 19(1): 1-21.
[8] SUN Xiaoxi, LYU Yang. Constructing the Contemporary Concepts of Ecological Ethics in the Context of Laozi’s Philosophy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2023, 18(4): 474-485.
[9] YE Dongna. Exploring China’s National Governance Modernization from the Perspective of Ecological Ethics[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2023, 18(4): 486-506.
[10] HUAN Qingzhi. Politics of Eco-Civilization Construction: From the Perspective of Political Philosophy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2023, 18(4): 397-417.
[11] QIAO Qingju. On “Ecological Confucianism” and Its Theoretical and Practical Significance[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2023, 18(4): 435-448.
[12] LIU Dachun. The Rise of the Philosophy of Science and Technology in China and the Dialectics of Nature[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2023, 18(3): 253-272.
[13] PENG Jinsong, YU Junjie. Several Issues on the Philosophy of AI[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2023, 18(3): 273-289.
[14] MEI Jianhua, ZHANG Duan. Understanding of the Three Levels of Interactions Between Philosophy of AI and Philosophy for Children[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2023, 18(3): 290-305.
[15] DING Sixin. The Search for Subjectivity: Chinese Philosophical Studies in the Last Hundred Years and Its Contemporary Orientation[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2023, 18(2): 148-174.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed