Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

ISSN 1673-3436

ISSN 1673-355X(Online)

CN 11-5743/B

Postal Subscription Code 80-983

Front. Philos. China    2024, Vol. 19 Issue (2) : 108-120    https://doi.org/10.3868/s030-013-024-0007-2
An Inquiry of the Confucian “Inner Sage and Outer King”
CHAI Wenhua1, ZHANG Shou2
1. School of Philosophy, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150086, China
2. School of Philosophy, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150086, China
 Download: PDF(370 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The concept of “inner sage and outer king” (neisheng waiwang 内圣外王) first appeared in Zhuangzi, later evolving to become the Confucian Way (Dao 道 ). Daoist sages and Confucian sages are inconsistent in terms of inner sage due to the fundamental starting point of their thoughts and the way of thinking and reasoning, and thus the ways of their inner sage have their own characteristics and are inseparable. Regarding outer king, Confucian sages are more proactively concerned with real politics and social life, and the way of the king is richer and stronger. Confucian “inner sage” and “outer king” take “body” as the coordinate, and the directions of force are different, one being inward while the other being outward, but the two are actual one, unified in the ideal personality of the saint. From a modern perspective, Confucian “inner sage and outer king” features historical rationality and realistic vitality, and constitutes our valuable thought resources for the creative transformation and development of the fine traditional Chinese culture nowadays. That said, it has its historical limitations.

Keywords The concept of “inner sage and outer king” (neisheng waiwang 内圣外王) first appeared in Zhuangzi, later evolving to become the Confucian Way (Dao 道 ). Daoist sages and Confucian sages are inconsistent in terms of inner sage due to the fundamental starting point of their thoughts and the way of thinking and reasoning, and thus the ways of their inner sage have their own characteristics and are inseparable. Regarding outer king, Confucian sages are more proactively concerned with real politics and social life, and the way of the king is richer and stronger. Confucian “inner sage” and “outer king” take “body” as the coordinate, and the directions of force are different, one being inward while the other being outward, but the two are actual one, unified in the ideal personality of the saint. From a modern perspective, Confucian “inner sage and outer king” features historical rationality and realistic vitality, and constitutes our valuable thought resources for the creative transformation and development of the fine traditional Chinese culture nowadays. That said, it has its historical limitations.     
Issue Date: 06 September 2024
 Cite this article:   
CHAI Wenhua,ZHANG Shou. An Inquiry of the Confucian “Inner Sage and Outer King”[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2024, 19(2): 108-120.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.3868/s030-013-024-0007-2
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2024/V19/I2/108
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed