Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-968

2018 Impact Factor: 1.272

Front Arch Civil Eng Chin    2011, Vol. 5 Issue (4) : 432-450    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-011-0126-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Concept and requirements of sustainable development in bridge engineering
Yaojun GE(), Haifan XIANG
State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
 Download: PDF(780 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The concept of sustainability is described in this paper using a single sustainable principle, two goals of sustainable development, three dimensions of sustainable engineering, four sustainable requirements and five phases of sustainable construction. Four sustainable requirements and their practice in China are discussed in particular. The safe reliability of bridges is first compared with the events of bridge failure in China and in the rest of the world and followed by structural durability, including the cracking of concrete cable-stayed bridges, deflection of concrete girder bridges and fatigue cracks of orthotropic steel decks. With respect to functional adaptability, lateral wind action on vehicles and its improvement are introduced regarding a sea-crossing bridge located in a typhoon-prone area. The Chinese practice of using two double main span suspension bridges and a twin parallel deck cable-stayed bridge is presented in discussing the final sustainable requirement: capacity extensibility.

Keywords sustainable engineering      safe reliability      structural durability      functional adaptability      capacity extensibility     
Corresponding Author(s): GE Yaojun,Email:yaojunge@tongji.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 05 December 2011
 Cite this article:   
Yaojun GE,Haifan XIANG. Concept and requirements of sustainable development in bridge engineering[J]. Front Arch Civil Eng Chin, 2011, 5(4): 432-450.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-011-0126-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2011/V5/I4/432
Fig.1  Conceptual framework of sustainability
bridge typematerialnumber of failurespercentage of failures
ChinaworldChinaworld
archmasonry3011.60
archconcrete6023.10
archsteel113.83.0
beam/girderconcrete11242.36.1
beam/girdersteel05015.2
cable-stayedconcrete103.80
suspensionconcrete113.83.0
miscellaneous32411.672.7
total2633100100
Tab.1  Type and number of failed bridges
types of failuresconstructionserviceunknown
ChinaworldChinaworldChinaworld
partial collapses4891301
total collapses3110701
unknown010001
total710192003
Tab.2  Types of failures and phase of failure occurrences
principal causesspecific causesnumber of collapsespercentage of collapses
ChinaworldChinaworld
enablingdesign123.86.1
detailing103.80
construction5819.324.3
maintenance5419.312.1
material103.80
triggeringoverload4315.49.1
collision3211.56.1
flood217.73.0
strong wind0206.1
explosion0103.0
fire0103.0
landslide0103.0
terrorist0103.0
unknown4715.421.2
total2633100100
Tab.3  Type and number of failure causes
bridge namelocationspans/mbuilt incracks
topbottomwebdiaphragm
Lijiatuo Yangtze RiverChongqing169+ 444+ 1691997manymanymanymany
YongheTianjin120+ 260+ 120198722
Shimen Yangtze RiverChongqing200+ 2301988338478
Jinan Yellow RiverShandong40+ 94+ 220+ 94+ 401982138611521794
MaogangShanghai85+ 200+ 851982many
the 3rd QiantanjiangZhejiang72+ 80+ 168 × 2+ 80+ 721996many148
FanyuGuangdong70+ 91+ 380+ 91+ 701998many
Ningbo YongjiangZhejiang105+ 971992147164
Tab.4  Cracking of some typical concrete cable-stayed bridges
bridge spanstop platediaphragmweb platebottom
upmiddownupmiddownupdownupdown
side one: 40 m46047660390000
side two: 94 m53384378304521403
center:55 m8560531312712110413
55 m11210061113361427802
55 m93107871131221233000
55 m24545391621191010
side two: 94 m5966658072883010
side one: 40 m30050370590000
total502425459709349736262638
Tab.5  Crack distribution in the box girder of Jinan Yellow River Bridge
Fig.2  Deck cross section of Ningbo Yongjiang Bridge. (a) Original concrete twin-rib cross section; (b) final composite cross section
bridge namecountryspan/mtime builtdeflection/mmtime measuredduration/year
StolmaNorway30119989220013
HumenChina270199722320047
HuangshiChina245199530520027
Koror-BabeldaobUSA24119781200199012
StovsetNorway220199320020018
ParrottsUSA1951978635199012
Grand-MereCanada181.4197730019869
KingstonUK143.31970300199828
SanmenxiaChina1401992220200210
Tab.6  Deflection of some typical PC girder bridges
Fig.3  Cross section of orthotropic steel box of Humen Bridge
Fig.4  U-rib details of orthotropic steel deck of Humen Bridge
Fig.5  Classification of typical fatigue cracks observed
Fig.6  Three initial types of Pattern A cracks. (a) Welding intersection of the diaphragm and U-rib; (b) middle of two adjacent diaphragms; (c) filed connection of deck plate
Fig.7  Pattern B cracks
Fig.8  Pattern C cracks
Fig.9  Pattern D cracks
Fig.10  Pattern E cracks
Fig.11  Daily vehicle volume
Fig.12  Distribution of vehicle weight
key levelsdeck level (h)/mvehicle level (H)/mwind speed (UH)/(m·s-1)allowable speed [Ua]/(m·s-1)allowable coefficient [βa]
lowest level13.014.528.725.00.87
10 m higher23.024.531.225.00.80
20 m higher33.034.532.925.00.76
30 m higher43.044.534.325.00.73
highest level A50.752.235.225.00.71
highest level B58.059.535.925.00.70
Tab.7  Wind speeds at the key levels when = 27 m/s
Fig.13  Corresponding cross sections of Jintang Bridge
cross sectionrailingszr/mLane ALane BLane CLane DLane ELane F
steel boxwithout4.51.071.041.031.021.021.02
steel boxwithout2.01.020.980.960.940.940.94
steel boxwith4.50.940.900.860.810.800.80
steel boxwith2.00.720.640.570.410.390.39
3.55 m boxwithout4.51.121.081.020.981.001.01
3.55 m boxwithout2.00.910.660.670.820.870.91
3.55 m boxwith4.50.870.770.700.680.730.73
3.55 m boxwith2.00.150.100.210.280.290.26
7.65 m boxwithout4.51.000.880.790.750.740.80
7.65 m boxwithout2.00.510.160.250.280.260.44
7.65 m boxwith4.50.790.470.260.520.620.48
7.65 m boxwith2.00.060.150.180.660.770.42
11.95 m boxwithout4.50.900.570.250.280.330.31
11.95 m boxwithout2.00.140.170.150.320.380.30
11.95 m boxwith4.50.700.290.140.350.370.22
11.95 m boxwith2.00.060.160.120.270.400.28
Tab.8  Reduced lateral wind speed coefficients for four cross sections
cross sectionbarrier shapeNr.Lane ALane BLane CLane DLane ELane F
steel boxrectangle60.700.620.590.520.500.48
steel boxellipse60.760.680.630.560.540.52
steel boxcircular60.790.720.680.620.590.58
3.55 m boxrectangle30.740.610.650.520.540.57
3.55 m boxellipse30.820.720.700.650.670.70
3.55 m boxcircular30.830.740.750.690.710.74
3.55 m boxrectangle40.690.570.600.460.490.52
3.55 m boxellipse40.770.660.660.570.600.62
3.55 m boxcircular40.800.690.71`0.620.650.68
Tab.9  Reduced lateral wind speed coefficients of nine wind barriers
Fig.14  Layout of wind barriers (a) for steel box girders, and (b) for concrete box girders
Fig.15  Turbulent wind speeds around bridge decks (a) for steel box girder, and (b) for concrete box girder
Fig.16  Mean wind profiles above bridge decks (a) for steel box girder, and (b) for concrete box girder
Fig.17  Anhui Maanshan Bridge and its comparison scheme (unit: m). (a) (1080+ 1080) m double main-span scheme; (b) 2160-m single main-span scheme
schemelateral bending/Hzvertical bending/Hztorsional vibration/Hz
firstsecondfirstsecondfirstsecond
A-10.03670.07680.10160.14660.17890.2045
A-20.03630.07650.09600.12830.17880.1998
B-10.09230.09730.11950.15900.37800.3836
B-20.09220.09710.11940.15530.33470.3610
B-30.09220.09690.08280.11960.26340.3355
Tab.10  The first and second natural frequencies of Mssnshan Bridge
Fig.18  Longitudinal shapes of the central pylon. (a) A-shaped pylon; (b) I-shaped pylon; (c) inverse Y-shaped pylon
Fig.19  General layout of the Jiangsu Taizhou Bridge
connectionlateral bending/Hzvertical bending/Hztorsional vibration/Hz
firstsecondfirstsecondfirstsecond
Maanshan (hinged)0.06960.09340.06390.08680.26200.3457
Maanshan (fixed)0.09110.09340.07880.11360.26240.3457
Taizhou Bridge0.07230.09710.07990.10260.2732
Tab.11  Comparison of the first and second natural frequencies of Taishou Bridge
Fig.20  Span arrangement of the Ningbo Yongjiang Bridge
Fig.21  Alternative shapes of bridge pylons (unit: m). (a) Twin-diamond-shaped (b) twin-H-shaped
Fig.22  Alternative cross sections of bridge deck (unit: m). (a) Closed box; (b) twin separated boxes
deck sectionlateral bending/Hzvertical bending/Hztorsional vibration/Hz
diamondH-shapeddiamondH-shapeddiamondH-shaped
closed box0.2480.2790.3100.3020.9370.896
twin boxes0.2720.3080.3080.3010.8100.794
twin side ribs0.3060.3450.3100.2990.5990.555
Tab.12  Comparison of the fundamental natural frequencies of the six combinations
1 Meadows D. Grenzen des Wachstums (Limits of Growth)—Bericht an den Club of Rome zur Lage der Menschheit. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1972
2 Weltkommission für Umwelt und Entwicklung: Unsere gemeinsame Zukunft, Brundtland-Bericht (World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, Brundtland-Report). Greven: Eggenkamp Verlag, 1987
3 Schmidheiny S. Kurswechsel—Globale Unternehmerische Perspektiven für Entwicklung und Umwelt. München: Artemis Verlags GmbH, 1992
4 Nakamura S I. Sustainable engineering—putting it into practice: an introduction. Structural Engineering International , 2004, 14(3): 176-180
doi: 10.2749/101686604777963775
5 Maydl P. Sustainable engineering: state-of-the-art and prospects. Structural Engineering International , 2004, 14(3): 176-180
doi: 10.2749/101686604777963928
6 Harik I E, Shaaban A M, Gesund H, Valli G Y S, Wang S T. United States bridge failures, 1951-1988. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities , 1990, 4(4): 272-277
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1990)4:4(272)
7 Wardhana K, Hadipriono F C. Analysis of recent bridge failures in the United States. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities , 2003, 17(3): 144-150
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2003)17:3(144)
8 Li X F. Crack Distribution of Main Girder in PC Cable-Stayed Bridges and Case Study. Master Thesis . Shanghai: Tongji University, 2009 (in Chinese)
9 Chen W Z, Health Check and Technical Evaluation of Jinan Yellow River Bridge. Technical Report of Department of Bridge Engineering . Shanghai: Tongji University, 2008 (in Chinese)
10 Ge Y J, Xiang H F. Bridging capacity innovations on Cable-Supported Bridges. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management. Seoul, Korea , 2008, 53-62
11 Ge Y J, Cao F C. Study on Safety and Mitigation of Lateral Wind Action on Vehicles on Jintang Bridge. Technical Report of State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering (WT200834) . 2008 (in Chinese)
12 Anhui Provincial Highway Design Institute and China Major Bridge Reconnaissance and Design Institute. Documents of Preliminary Design of Anhui Maanshan Bridge, Shanghai, 2008 (in Chinese).
13 Ge Y J, Study on Aerodynamic Performance of Anhui Maanshan Bridge (for preliminary design stage). Technical Report of State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering (WT200802). Shanghai , 2008 (in Chinese)
14 Ge Y J, Xiang H F. Great demand and great challenge—Chinese major bridges under construction for improving traffic infrastructure nationwide. In: Proceedings of the IABSE Symposium on Improving Infrastructure Worldwide. Weimar, Germany , 2007, 6-9
15 Jiangsu Provincial Highway Planning and Design Institute. China Major Bridge Reconnaissance and Design Institute and Architecture Design and Research Institute of Tongji University. Research Report of Structural Analysis of Jiangsu Taizhou Bridge . 2007 (in Chinese)
16 Zhejiang Provincial Highway Planning and Design Institute. Documents of Preliminary Design of Ningbo Yongjiang Bridge. 2007 (in Chinese)
17 Ge Y J, Study on Aerodynamic Performance of Ningbo Yongjiang Bridge (for preliminary design stage). Technical Report of State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering (WT200601). Shanghai , 2007 (in Chinese)
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed