Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-968

2018 Impact Factor: 1.272

Front Arch Civil Eng Chin    2011, Vol. 5 Issue (4) : 496-502    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-011-0131-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Higher-order mode effects on the seismic performance of tall piers
Zhongguo GUAN, Jianzhong LI(), Yan XU, Hao LU
Department of Bridge Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
 Download: PDF(185 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

A comprehensive analysis was conducted to investigate the seismic performance of a typical tall bridge pier through incremental dynamical analysis (IDA). The effect of higher-order modes was studied specifically. The results showed that higher-order modes significantly contributed to the structural seismic response and should not be neglected. Including these modes resulted in an additional hinge midway up the pier. No plastic hinge would occur at this location for conventional bridge piers. Higher-order modes also led to an out-of-phase response between the hinge rotation at the pier bottom and the displacement at the top. This means that the displacement-based seismic design method cannot correctly predict the mechanical state of the critical hinge and therefore is not suitable for use in the seismic design of tall piers. Mistakenly using the displacement-based seismic design method for tall piers may result in a seriously unsafe condition.

Keywords tall bridges      higher-order mode effects      incremental dynamic analysis     
Corresponding Author(s): LI Jianzhong,Email:lijianzh@tongji.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 05 December 2011
 Cite this article:   
Zhongguo GUAN,Jianzhong LI,Yan XU, et al. Higher-order mode effects on the seismic performance of tall piers[J]. Front Arch Civil Eng Chin, 2011, 5(4): 496-502.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-011-0131-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2011/V5/I4/496
Fig.1  Section dimension of the 30 m and 60 m high piers (unit: mm)
No.recordsstationmagnitudePGA/gpredominant period/s
E11940 El CentroImperial Valley7.00.3130.46
E21995 KobeKJMA6.90.8210.34
E31971 San FernandoCarbon Canyon Dam6.60.0710.26
E41989 Loma PrietaAlameda Naval Air Stn Hanger6.90.2090.64
E51979 Imperial Valley Westmorland Fire Station5.50.1710.1
E61999 TurkeyAmbarli7.10.0250.92
Tab.1  Earthquake records for the IDA
Fig.2  Elastic seismic moment of 30 m pier. (a) First mode; (b) multi mode
Fig.3  Elastic seismic moment of 60 m pier. (a) First mode; (b) multi mode
Fig.4  Moment distribution of 30 m pier (E1)
Fig.5  Moment distribution of 60 m pier (E1)
Fig.6  Moment distribution of 30 m pier (1.0 g)
Fig.7  Moment distribution of 60 m pier (1.0 g)
Fig.8  Rotation development of the plastic hinge of the 60 m pier. (a) E1 earthquake; (b) E2 earthquake; (c) E3 earthquake; (d) E4 earthquake; (e) E5 earthquake; (f) E6 earthquake
Fig.9  Relationship of plastic hinge rotation and top displacement for 30 m pier
Fig.10  Relationship of plastic hinge rotation and top displacement for 60 m pier
Fig.11  Time history response of hinge rotation and top displacement of tall pier
Fig.12  Deformation comparison of tall pier
1 Kowalsky M J. Deformation limit states for circular reinforced concrete bridge column. Journal of Structural Engineering , 2000, 126(8): 869-878
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:8(869)
2 Priestley M J N, Seible F, Calvi M. Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1996
3 JTG/T B02-01-2008. Guidelines for Seismic Design of Highway Bridges. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2008 (in Chinese)
4 AASHTO. AASHTO Guide Specification for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design, 2007
5 Ceravolo R, Demarie G V, Giordano L, Mancini G, Sabia D. Problems in applying code-specified capacity design procedures to seismic design of tall piers. Engineering Structures , 2009, 31(8): 1811-1821
doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.042
6 Li J Z, Song X D, Fan L C. Investigation for displacement ductility capacity of tall piers. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration , 2005, 25(1): 43-48 (in Chinese)
7 Taucer F F, Enrico S F. Beam-column Model for Seismic Response Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures. EERC 91-17, 1991
8 Vamvatsikos D, Cornell C A. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics , 2002, 31(3): 491-514
doi: 10.1002/eqe.141
[1] Fadzli M. NAZRI, Pang Yew KEN. Seismic performance of moment resisting steel frame subjected to earthquake excitations[J]. Front Struc Civil Eng, 2014, 8(1): 19-25.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed