Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-968

2018 Impact Factor: 1.272

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng.    2019, Vol. 13 Issue (3) : 653-666    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-018-0503-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Extrapolation reconstruction of wind pressure fields on the claddings of high-rise buildings
Yehua SUN1, Guquan SONG1(), Hui LV1,2
1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330033, China
2. Jiangxi Institute of Economic Administrators, Nanchang 330038, China
 Download: PDF(3075 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Recent research about reconstruction methods mainly used the interpolation reconstruction of the fluctuating wind pressure field on the surface. However, to investigate wind pressure at the edge of the building, the work presented in this paper focuses on the extrapolation reconstruction of wind pressure fields. Here, we propose an improved proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and Kriging method with a von Kármán correlation function to resolve this issue. The studies show that it works well for not only interpolation reconstruction but also extrapolation reconstruction. The proposed method does require determination of the Hurst exponent and other parameters analysed from the original data. Hence, the fluctuating wind fields have been characterized by the von Kármán correlation function, as an a priori function. Compared with the cubic spline method and different variogram, preliminary results suggest less time consumption and high efficiency in extrapolation reconstruction at the edge.

Keywords extrapolation reconstruction      proper orthogonal decomposition      Kriging method      von Kármán function      Hurst exponent      rescaled range analysis     
Corresponding Author(s): Guquan SONG   
Online First Date: 03 September 2018    Issue Date: 05 June 2019
 Cite this article:   
Yehua SUN,Guquan SONG,Hui LV. Extrapolation reconstruction of wind pressure fields on the claddings of high-rise buildings[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(3): 653-666.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-018-0503-5
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2019/V13/I3/653
Fig.1  The claddings of several buildings damaged by strong wind in Wan chai of Hongkong
Fig.2  POD-Kriging procedure workflow
Fig.3  Experimental variogram form (c0 is the nugget variance, c is the pure nugget, a is the range of spatial dependence, and c0+c is the sill variance)
Fig.4  The channel positions on the windward surface (red circles denote the taps to be measured, blue rectangles denote the points to be extrapolated, and pink triangles denote the points to be interpolated)
Fig.5  Eigenvalue of each mode and modal accumulated energy
Fig.6  The original at the tap 161 of spectrum of mode (a) mode 1-3; (b) mode 1-9; (c) mode 1-18 and the reconstructed results at the tap 161 of spectrum of (d) mode 1-3; (e) mode 1-9; (f) mode 1-18
Fig.7  Mean wind pressure coefficients (a) and Hurst exponents on the windward surface (b)
Fig.8  The original data and interpolation results using the spline of spectrum at (a) tap 162; (b) tap 171; (c) tap 206 and POD/Kriging methods of spectrum at (d) tap 162; (e) tap 171; (f) tap 206
Fig.9  The original data and the extrapolation results via the spline of spectrum at (a) tap 1; (b) tap 7; (c) tap 13 and POD-Kriging methods of spectrum at (d) tap 1; (e) tap 7; (f) tap 13
Fig.10  The original data and extrapolation results via the POD-Kriging algorithm with the linear variogram of spectrum at (a) tap 401; (b) tap 407; (c) tap 413 and with the von Kármán function of spectrum at (d) tap 401; (e) tap 407; (f) tap 413
tap 1 POD/KV-1 POD /CS-1 tap 7 POD/KV-7 POD /CS-7 tap 13 POD/KV-13 POD /CS-13
sample size 32768 32768 32768 32768 32768 32768 32768 32768 32768
mean 0.478 0.5173 ?0.1159 0.689 0.893 0.291 0.641 0.649 0.0073
rms 0.237 0.234 0.301 0.242 0.257 0.255 0.241 0.242 0.265
skewness 0.305 0.445 0.365 0.255 0.393 0.299 0.194 0.453 0.222
kurtosis ?0.072 0.306 1.059 ?0.023 0.216 1.064 ?0.015 0.805 1.041
minimum ?0.751 ?0.2635 ?1.419 ?0.1506 ?0.0219 ?.8028 ?0.3041 ?.2868 ?1.1527
maximum 1.526 1.670 1.799 1.824 2.176 1.8396 1.5994 1.9584 1.5622
Tab.1  Statistical parameters of the extrapolation results compared with the original data
1 Y Quan, Y Liang, F Wang, M Gu. Wind tunnel test study on the wind pressure coefficient of claddings of high-rise buildings. Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 2011, 5(4): 518–524
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-011-0128-4
2 D J Han, J Li. Application of proper orthogonal decomposition method in wind field simulation for roof structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 135(8): 786–795
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:8(786)
3 Y G Wang, Z N Li, Q S Li, B Gong. Application of POD method on the wind-induced vibration response of heliostat. Journal Vibration and Shock, 2008, 27(12): 107–111 (in Chinese)
4 X Y Zhou, G Li. Application of POD combined with thin-plate splines in research on wind pressure. Building Structure, 2011, (06): 98–102 (in Chinese)
5 S Cammelli, L Vacca, Y F Li. The investigation of multi-variate random pressure fields acting on a tall building through proper orthogonal decomposition. International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering Symposium Report, 2016: 897–904
6 Z W Zhao, Z H Chen, X D Wang, X Hao, H B Liu. Wind-induced response of large-span structures based on POD-pseudo-excitation method. Advanced Steel Construction, 2016, 12(1): 1–16
7 J Y Fu, Q S Li, Z N Xie. Prediction of wind loads on a large flat roof using fuzzy neural networks. Engineering Structures, 2006, 28(1): 153–161
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.08.006
8 J Y Fu, S G Liang, Q S Li. Prediction of wind-induced pressures on a large gymnasium roof using artificial neural networks. Computers & Structures, 2007, 85(3–4): 179–192
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.08.070
9 N Vu-Bac, M Silani, T Lahmer, X Zhuang, T Rabczuk. A unified framework for stochastic predictions of mechanical properties of polymeric nanocomposites. Computational Materials Science, 2015, 96: 520–535
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.04.066
10 J Armitt. Eigenvector analysis of pressure fluctuations on the West Burton instrumented cooling tower. Internal Report RD/L/N 114/68, Central Electricity Research Laboratories UK, 1968
11 G Berkooz, P Holmes, J L Lumley. The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1993, 25(1): 539–575
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.25.010193.002543
12 J Borée. Extended proper orthogonal decomposition: a tool to analyse correlated events in turbulent flows. Experiments in Fluids, 2003, 35(2): 188–192
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-003-0656-3
13 S Y Motlagh, S Taghizadeh. POD analysis of low Reynolds turbulent porous channel flow. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2016, 61: 665–676
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2016.07.010
14 A Kareem, J E Cermak. Pressure fluctuations on a square building model in boundary-layer flows. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1984, 16(1): 17–41
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(84)90047-3
15 J D Holmes. Analysis and synthesis of pressure fluctuations on bluff bodies using eigenvectors. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1990, 33(1–2): 219–230 (J)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(90)90037-D
16 B Bienkiewicz, Y Tamura, H J Ham, H Ueda, K Hibi. Proper orthogonal decomposition and reconstruction of multi-channel roof pressure. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1995, 54: 369–381
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(94)00066-M
17 Y Tamura, S Suganuma, H Kikuchi, K Hibi. Proper orthogonal decomposition of random wind pressure field. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 1999, 13(7–8): 1069–1095 (J)
https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.1999.0242
18 Y Uematsu, O Kuribara, M Yamada, A Sasaki, T Hongo. Wind-induced dynamic behavior and its load estimation of a single-layer latticed dome with a long span. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2001, 89(14-15): 1671–1687 (J)
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00125-8
19 Y G Wang, Z N Li, B Gong, Q S Li. Reconstruction & prediction of wind pressure on heliostat. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2009, 27(5): 586–591 (in Chinese)
20 Z R Jiang, Z H Ni, Z N Xie. Reconstruction and prediction of wind pressure field on roof. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2007, 24(4): 592–598 (in Chinese)
21 F H Li, Z H Ni, S Z Shen, M Gu. Theory of POD and its application in wind engineering of structure. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2009, 28(4): 29–32 (in Chinese)
22 F H Li, M Gu, Z H Ni, S Z Shen. Wind pressures on structures by proper orthogonal decomposition. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2012, 6(2): 238–243
23 F B Chen, Q S Li. Application investigation of predicting wind loads on large-span roof by Kriging-POD method. Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 31(1): 91–96 (in Chinese)
24 K M Hamdia, M Silani, X Zhuang, P He, T Rabczuk. Stochastic analysis of the fracture toughness of polymeric nanoparticle composites using polynomial chaos expansions. International Journal of Fracture, 2017, (3): 1–13
25 X Zhuang, R Huang, C Liang, T Rabczuk. A coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical model of jointed hard rock for compressed air energy storage. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 2014, 179169
26 Y G Wang, Z N Li, H H Wu, L H Zhang. Predication of fluctuating wind pressure on low building roof. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2013, 32(5): 157–162 (in Chinese)
27 M Loeve. Probability theory, vol. ii. Vol. 46, Graduate texts in mathematics, 1978, 1–387
28 Y C Liang, H P Lee, S P Lim, W Z Lin, K H Lee, C G Wu. Proper orthogonal decomposition and its applications—Part I: Theory. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2002, 252(3): 527–544 (J)
https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2001.4041
29 G Matheron. Principles of geostatistics. Economic Geology and the Bulletin of the Society of Economic Geologists, 1963, 58(8): 1246–1266
https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246
30 M A Oliver, R Webster. Basic steps in geostatistics: the variogram and kriging. Springer International, 2015
31 D D Sarma. Geostatistics with Applications in Earth Sciences. Springer Science & Business Media, 2009, 265–269
32 T Von Kármán. Progress in the statistical theory of turbulence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1948, 34(11): 530–539
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.34.11.530
33 R Sidler. Kriging and Conditional Geostatistical Simulation Based on Scale-Invariant Covariance Models. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, 2003
34 T M Müller, J Toms-Stewart, F Wenzlau. Velocity-saturation relation for partially saturated rocks with fractal pore fluid distribution. Geophysical Research Letters, 2008, 35(9): L09306
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL033074
35 M Guatteri, P M Mai, G C Beroza. A pseudo-dynamic approximation to dynamic rupture models for strong ground motion prediction. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2004, 94(6): 2051–2063
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120040037
36 W J Cody. An overview of software development for special functions. In: Alistair Watson G, ed. Numerical Analysis: Proceedings of the Dundee Conference on Numerical Analysis.Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1976, 38–48
37 M Abramowitz, I A Stegun. Handbook of Mathematical Functions. National Bureau of Standards: Applied Math. Series #55: Dover Publications, 1965
38 L Klimeš. Correlation functions of random media. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2002, 159(7): 1811–1831
39 S Katsev, I L’Heureux. Are Hurst exponents estimated from short or irregular time series meaningful? Computers & Geosciences, 2003, 29(9): 1085–1089
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(03)00105-5
40 H E Hurst. Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 1951, 116(1): 770–799
41 A Aue, L Horváth, J Steinebach. Rescaled range analysis in the presence of stochastic trend. Statistics & Probability Letters, 2007, 77(12): 1165–1175
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2007.03.003
42 Mason D M. The Hurst phenomenon and the rescaled range statistic. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications, 2016, 126(12): 3790–3807
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spa.2016.04.008
43 B B Mandelbrot, J R Wallis. Robustness of the rescaled range R/S in the measurement of noncyclic long run statistical dependence. Water Resources Research, 1969, 5(5): 967–988
https://doi.org/10.1029/WR005i005p00967
44 E Pardo-Igúzquiza. MLREML: a computer program for the inference of spatial covariance parameters by maximum likelihood and restricted maximum likelihood. Computers & Geosciences, 1997, 23(2): 153–162
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(97)85438-6
45 N Vu-Bac, T Lahmer, X Zhuang, T Nguyen-Thoi, T Rabczuk. A software framework for probabilistic sensitivity analysis for computationally expensive models. Advances in Engineering Software, 2016, 100: 19–31
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.06.005
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed