Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-968

2018 Impact Factor: 1.272

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng.    2020, Vol. 14 Issue (4) : 867-887    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0649-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Typical diseases of a long-span concrete-filled steel tubular arch bridge and their effects on vehicle-induced dynamic response
Jianling HOU1, Weibing XU1(), Yanjiang CHEN1, Kaida ZHANG1, Hang SUN2, Yan LI2
1. College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
2. School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China
 Download: PDF(4423 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

A long-span concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) arch bridge suffers severe vehicle-induced dynamic responses during its service life. However, few quantitative studies have been reported on the typical diseases suffered by such bridges and their effects on vehicle-induced dynamic response. Thus, a series of field tests and theoretical analyses were conducted to study the effects of typical diseases on the vehicle-induced dynamic response of a typical CFST arch bridge. The results show that a support void results in a height difference between both sides of the expansion joint, thus increasing the effect of vehicle impact on the main girder and suspenders. The impact factor of the displacement response of the main girder exceeds the design value. The variation of the suspender force is significant, and the diseases are found to have a greater effect on a shorter suspender. The theoretical analysis results also show that the support void causes an obvious longitudinal displacement of the main girder that is almost as large as the vertical displacement. The support void can also cause significant changes in the vehicle-induced acceleration response, particularly when the supports and steel box girder continue to collide with each other under the vehicle load.

Keywords long-span arch bridge      expansion joint disease      vehicle-bridge coupling vibration      dynamic response     
Corresponding Author(s): Weibing XU   
Just Accepted Date: 28 June 2020   Online First Date: 31 July 2020    Issue Date: 27 August 2020
 Cite this article:   
Jianling HOU,Weibing XU,Yanjiang CHEN, et al. Typical diseases of a long-span concrete-filled steel tubular arch bridge and their effects on vehicle-induced dynamic response[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 867-887.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-020-0649-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2020/V14/I4/867
Fig.1  Photograph of the bridge.
Fig.2  Bridge layout (unit: m). (a) Elevation view; (b) side view.
Fig.3  Layout of the expansion joint (unit: cm). (a) D80; (b) D160.
Fig.4  Layout of the supports (cm).
Fig.5  Typical disease of the expansion joint. (a) Modular expansion joint (East-South); (b) elastomeric flexible strip (West-South).
Fig.6  Diseases of the steel box girder support. (a) Corrosion of the steel plate (the West middle support); (b) weld cracking and partial detachment (the West-North side support); (c) weld cracking and partial detachment (the West-South side support); (d) larger residual deformation and position deviation (the East-North side support).
Fig.7  Disease of the suspender.
suspender force (kN) suspender force (kN)
2010 2014 2018 2010 2014 2018
s1 679.59 1058.40? 1108.22? n1 680.64 740.13 759.09
s2 874.61 805.96 823.34 n2 874.68 805.96 797.34
s3 886.20 820.00 765.21 n3 887.08 841.37 805.38
s4 855.56 948.24 940.50 n4 855.36 909.83 909.83
s5 839.00 1080.98 1092.93? n5 841.08 820.93 843.00
s6 791.42 888.79 952.10 n6 793.08 845.87 905.90
s7 807.77 867.80 928.77 n7 805.44 823.78 897.30
s8 789.73 947.43 963.82 n8 790.08 830.17 850.93
s9 790.11 895.36 898.71 n9 791.08 880.20 947.43
s10 806.53 867.80 870.59 n10 807.44 867.80 870.59
s11 791.48 890.07 871.50 n11 791.08 804.02 845.87
s12 839.33 910.42 924.61 n12 840.08 992.61 1027.51
s13 856.85 1109.80? 1155.60? n13 856.36 872.21 990.61
s14 887.28 1084.06? 1106.28? n14 888.08 941.63 1040.28?
s15 871.31 1036.47? 1106.18? n15 870.68 805.96 874.34
s16 683.64 1150.00? 1234.17? n16 682.64 850.20 905.38
Tab.1  Measured suspender force without the effect of traffic loads
Fig.8  Layout of the measurements.
Fig.9  Frequency spectrum of the acceleration response of the girders. (a) Steel box girder; (b) concrete box girder.
testing year vertical first order
frequency (Hz) damping ratio (%)
2010 1.859 3.30
2014 0.950 3.87
2016 0.815 3.00
2018 0.687 1.47
Tab.2  Dynamic characteristics of the bridge
Fig.10  Time-history of the relative displacement response between two sides of the expansion joint (Deck3-D).
Fig.11  Time-history curves of the displacement response of the mid-span and the pivot. (a) Deck1-D; (b) Deck3-D.
Fig.12  Time–frequency curve of suspenders. (a) S1; (b) S4; (c) S8.
Fig.13  Analysis model of gap element.
Fig.14  Finite element analysis model of the bridge.
Fig.15  Model of vehicle.
Fig.16  Measurement points (unit: m).
Fig.17  The displacement time-history curves. (a) Single vehicle; (b) parallel vehicles.
Fig.18  Vertical displacement response of the steel box girder in mid-span. (a) 20 km/h; (b) 40 km/h; (c) 60 km/h; (d) 80 km/h.
Fig.19  Peak vertical dynamic response of the steel box girder in mid-span. (a) Vertical displacement; (b) vertical acceleration.
Fig.20  Longitudinal displacement response of the steel box girder in mid-span. (a) 20 km/h; (b) 40 km/h; (c) 60 km/h; (d) 80 km/h.
Fig.21  Peak longitudinal acceleration of the steel box girder in mid-span. (a) Longitudinal displacement; (b) longitudinal acceleration.
Fig.22  Vertical dynamic response of the main beam near the support area. (a) 20 km/h; (b) 40 km/h; (c) 60 km/h; (d) 80 km/h.
Fig.23  Peak acceleration of the steel box girder near the support area. (a) Vertical acceleration; (b) longitudinal acceleration.
Fig.24  Time-history curves for stress amplitude of suspenders. (a) S1; (b) S8.
Fig.25  Peak stress amplitude of suspenders. (a) S1; (b) S8.
Fig.26  Typical dynamic response results of the bridge under three-vehicle following condition at a speed of 60 km/h. (a) Vertical displacement in the midspan; (b) longitudinal displacement in the mid-span; (c) vertical displacement of area near the support; (d) peak acceleration response of the main girder.
Fig.27  Average contact forces between the support and the girder.
1 B C Chen, T L Wang, M Asce. Overview of concrete filled steel tube arch bridges in China. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 2009, 14(2): 70–80
2 J Zheng, J Wang. Concrete-filled steel tube arch bridges in China. Engineering (Beijing), 2018, 4(1): 143–155
3 Y Okamoto, S Nakamura, H Tanaka, Y Moriya. Study on steel box girder bridges partly stiffened by CFT arch ribs. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2012, 2012(70): 28–35
4 S Zhou, W Li. Causes of common diseases of CFST arch bridge. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science), 2013, Sup1(32): 738–741
5 X Huo, Q Pu. Impact factors of butterfly-shaped arch bridges. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(1): 176–182
6 H J Kang, Y Y Zhao, H P Zhu, Y X Jin. Static behavior of a new type of cable-arch bridge. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2013, 81(2): 1–10
7 P Klein, M Yamout. Cable-stayed arch bridges, Putrajaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Structural Engineering International, 2003, 3(13): 196–199
8 L Deng, Y Yu, Q Zou, C S Cai. State-of-the-art review of dynamic impact factors of highway bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2015, 20(5): 04014080
9 L Deng, C S Cai. Development of dynamic impact factor for performance evaluation of existing multi-girder concrete bridges. Engineering Structures, 2010, 32(1): 21–31
10 J Liu, Y Li. Development and challenge of the vehicle and highway bridges dynamic interaction. Key Engineering Materials, 2014, 2014(574): 135–150
11 M Yoshimura, Q Wu. Vibration analysis of the second saikai bridge—A concrete filled tubular (CFT) arch bridge. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2006, 290(1–2): 388–409
12 C W Roeder, G MacRae, P Crocker. Dynamic response and fatigue of steel tied arch bridge. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2000, 5(1): 14–21
13 D. Huang Dynamic and impact behavior of half-through arch bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2005, 10(133–141
14 W Wang, W Yan, L Deng. Dynamic analysis of a cable-stayed concrete-filled steel tube arch bridge under vehicle loading. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2015, 20(5): 04014082
15 Y Li, C S Cai, Y Liu, Y Chen. Dynamic analysis of a large span specially shaped hybrid girder bridge with concrete-filled steel tube arches. Engineering Structures, 2016, 2016(106): 243–260
16 Y Li, W Zhang, Y Liu. A method based on meta-model for updating the finite element model of bridges using the measured static and dynamic data. In: The 12th COTA International Conference of Transportation Professionals. Beijing: CICTP, 2012
17 R Haghani, M Al-Emrani, M Heshmati. Fatigue-prone details in steel bridges. Buildings, 2012, 2(4): 456–476
18 Q X Wu, W K Huang, B C Chen. Vehicle-induced vibration research and dynamic analysis for concrete-filled steel tubular arch bridges. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(1): 147–155
19 Q Wang, T Okumatsu. Fatigue failure analysis of cracks near the sole plate of a half-through steel-arch bridge. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2019, 5(24): 05019004
20 Y Shao, Z Sun, Y Chen. Study on equal stiffness design of arch bridge suspenders and its dynamic response analysis. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2018, 4(37): 219–225
21 Y Shao, Z G Sun, Y F. Chen Analysis of the impact effect of the suspender system in a half-through concrete filled steel tubular arch bridge. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, 477–478: 705–709
22 J Zhu, Q Yi. Non-uniformity of stress impact factor of suspenders on half-through or through arch bridges. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2012, 31(13): 5–10
23 C Anitescu, E Atroshchenko, N Alajlan. Artificial neural network methods for the solution of second order boundary value problems. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2019, 59(1): 345–359
24 H Guo, X Zhuang, T Rabczuk. A deep collocation method for the bending analysis of Kirchhoff Plate. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2019, 58(2): 433–456
25 C S Cai, X M Shi, M Araujo. Effect of approach span condition on vehicle-induced dynamic response of slab-on-girder road bridges. Engineering Structures, 2007, 29(12): 3210–3226
26 W Zhang, C S Cai, F Pan. Nonlinear fatigue damage assessment of existing bridges considering progressively deteriorated road conditions. Engineering Structures, 2013, 2013(56): 1922–1932
27 B H Kim, T Park. Estimation of cable tension force using the frequency-based system identification method. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2007, 304(3–5): 660–676
28 W X Ren, H L Liu, G Chen. Determination of cable tensions based on frequency differences. Engineering Computations, 2008, 1(1): 172–189
29 Q Gan, R Wang, R Rao. Practical formula for estimation on the tensional force of cable by its measured natural frequencies. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2010, 5(42): 983–987
30 W He. Study of suspender tension measurement based on frequency method with complex boundary conditions. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2012, 45(3): 93–98
31 W Zhang, C S Cai. Fatigue reliability assessment for existing bridges considering vehicle speed and road surface conditions. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2012, 17(3): 443–453
32 W Zhang, H Yuan. Corrosion fatigue effects on life estimation of deteriorated bridges under vehicle impacts. Engineering Structures, 2014, 2014(71): 128–136
33 P Hu, C Zhang. Dynamic responses of bridge-embankment transitions in high speed railway: Field tests and data analyses. Engineering Structures, 2018, 175: 565–576
34 H Yang, H He, X Zhang, W Yan. Displacement dependent damping model for RC structure damage evolution and parameter identification method. Engineering Mechanics, 2017, 34(11): 126–134
35 Y Chen, Y Qian, H Li, H He. Damage detection and tests for a RC simply supported girder bridge based on its damping characteristics. Journal of Vibration & Shock, 2017, 36(13): 208–213
36 AASHTO. Manual for bridge evaluation. Washington D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2011
37 TRB. Manual for bridge rating through load testing. Washington D.C.: Transportation Research Board, 1998
38 MOT. Code for Design of Highway Reinforced Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Bridges and Culverts. Beijing: Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China, 2004
39 N E Huang, S Zheng, S R Long. The empirical mode decomposition and the hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proceedings Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 1971, 1998(454): 903–995
40 Y B Yang, K C Chang. Filtering techniques for extracting bridge frequencies from a test vehicle moving over the bridge. Engineering Structures, 2013, 2013(48): 353–362
41 J Chen, Y. Xu Application of HHT for modal parameter identification to civil structures. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2003, 16(3): 383–388
42 J X Yang, W Z Chen, G U Rui. Analysis of dynamic characteristics of short hangers of arch bridge. Bridge Construction, 2014, 44(3): 13–18
[1] Zhijie HUANG, Xiaodan REN, Zuyu CHEN, Daosheng LING. Centrifuge experiment and numerical analysis of an air-backed plate subjected to underwater shock loading[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(6): 1350-1362.
[2] Tian ZHANG, He XIA, Weiwei GUO. Analysis on running safety of train on the bridge considering sudden change of wind load caused by wind barriers[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 558-567.
[3] Pengfei LIU, Dawei WANG, Frédéric OTTO, Markus OESER. Application of semi-analytical finite element method to analyze the bearing capacity of asphalt pavements under moving loads[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2018, 12(2): 215-221.
[4] Mehmet Bar?? Can üLKER. Modeling of dynamic response of poroelastic soil layers under wave loading[J]. Front Struc Civil Eng, 2014, 8(1): 1-18.
[5] Linjia BAI, Yunfeng ZHANG. Collapse fragility assessment of steel roof framings with force limiting devices under transient wind loading[J]. Front Struc Civil Eng, 2012, 6(3): 199-209.
[6] Xuexing CAO, Yunlong HE, Kun XIONG, . Confining pressure effect on dynamic response of high rockfill dam[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2010, 4(1): 116-126.
[7] Hanlong LIU, Xuanming DING. Propagation characteristics of transient waves in low-strain integrity testing on cast-in-situ concrete thin-wall pipe piles[J]. Front Arch Civil Eng Chin, 2009, 3(2): 180-186.
[8] He XIA, Yushu DENG, Yongwei ZOU, Guido DE ROECK, Geert DEGRANDE. Dynamic analysis of rail transit elevated bridge with ladder track[J]. Front Arch Civil Eng Chin, 2009, 3(1): 2-8.
[9] LI Liang, DU Xiuli, LI Liyun, ZHAO Chenggang. Explicit finite element method for calculation and analysis to the elasto-plastic dynamic response of fluid-saturated porous media[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2007, 1(4): 436-442.
[10] GUO Weiwei, XIA He, XU You-lin. Dynamic response of a long span suspension bridge and running safety of a train under wind action[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2007, 1(1): 71-79.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed