Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-968

2018 Impact Factor: 1.272

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng.    2021, Vol. 15 Issue (4) : 1038-1046    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0748-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Experimental investigation on freeze−thaw durability of polymer concrete
Khashayar JAFARI1(), Fatemeh HEIDARNEZHAD2, Omid MOAMMER2, Majid JARRAH3
1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
2. Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA
 Download: PDF(1588 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Assessing the durability of concrete is of prime importance to provide an adequate service life and reduce the repairing cost of structures. Freeze–thaw is one such test that indicates the ability of concrete to last a long time without a significant loss in its performance. In this study, the freeze–thaw resistance of polymer concrete containing different polymer contents was explored and compared to various conventional cement concretes. Concretes’ fresh and hardened properties were assessed for their workability, air content, and compressive strength. The mass loss, length change, dynamic modulus of elasticity, and residual compressive strength were determined for all types of concretes subjected to freeze–thaw cycles according to ASTM C666-procedure A. Results showed that polymer concrete (PC) specimens prepared with higher dosages of polymer contents possessed better freeze–thaw durability compared to other specimens. This high durability performance of PCs is mainly due to their impermeable microstructures, absence of water in their structure, and the high bond strength between aggregates and a polymer binder. It is also indicated that the performance of high-strength concrete containing air-entraining admixture is comparable with PC having optimum polymer content in terms of residual compressive strength, dynamic modulus of elasticity, mass loss, and length change.

Keywords durability test      freeze-thaw resistance      polymer concrete      residual compressive strength      ASTM C666-15     
Corresponding Author(s): Khashayar JAFARI   
Just Accepted Date: 26 July 2021   Online First Date: 07 September 2021    Issue Date: 29 September 2021
 Cite this article:   
Khashayar JAFARI,Fatemeh HEIDARNEZHAD,Omid MOAMMER, et al. Experimental investigation on freeze−thaw durability of polymer concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 1038-1046.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-021-0748-2
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2021/V15/I4/1038
property coarse aggregate fine aggregate
SSD specific gravity 2.64 2.59
water absorption capacity 1.12% 0.97%
fineness modulus 2.82
Tab.1  Properties of the aggregates
Fig.1  Particle size distribution of the aggregates.
cement concrete coarse aggregate (kg/m 3) fine aggregate (kg/m 3) cement (kg/m 3) SF (kg/m 3) water (kg/m 3) SP (kg/m 3) AEA (kg/m 3) water/binder
NC 1070 670 350 0 164 0 0 0.47
NC-AE 1070 670 350 0 164 0 0.5 0.47
HSC 1070 670 315 35 120 1.8 0 0.34
HSC-AE 1070 670 315 35 120 1.8 0.5 0.34
Tab.2  Mixture design of conventional cement concretes
PC coarse aggregate (%) fine aggregate (%) polymer content (%)
PC10 49.1 40.9 10
PC12 48.0 40.0 12
PC14 46.9 39.1 14
Tab.3  Mixture design of PCs (wt.%)
concrete type slump (mm) air content at fresh state (vol. %) fresh density (kg/m 3)
NC 80 2.5 2380
NC-AE 90 6.1 2362
HSC 80 2.2 2408
HSC-AE 85 5.7 2398
PC10 2184
PC12 2236
PC14 2240
Tab.4  Fresh properties of concretes
concrete type air content at hardened state (vol.%) spacing factor (mm) 7 d compressive strength (MPa) 14 d compressive strength (MPa) strength development from 7 to 14 d (%)
NC 2.7 0.512 18.2 24.8 36.3
NC-AE 6.1 0.185 17.1 21.5 25.7
HSC 2.8 0.487 26.7 36.8 37.8
HSC-AE 6.3 0.192 24.5 32.9 34.3
PC10 8.4 0.194 48.9 50.8 3.9
PC12 7.5 0.224 61.8 62.7 1.5
PC14 6.9 0.231 66.7 67.3 0.9
Tab.5  Hardened properties of concretes
Fig.2  Compressive strength of the specimens.
Fig.3  Typical degradation of (a) HSC, (b) HSC-AE, and (c) PC14 specimens after 300 F/T cycles (I: damages on the edge, II: aggregate’s pop-out and surrounding paste deterioration, III: paste deterioration).
Fig.4  Residual mass versus F/T cycle.
Fig.5  Length change of samples exposed to consecutive F/T cycles.
Fig.6  DF of samples exposed to consecutive F/T cycles.
concrete type 14 d compressive strength (MPa) compressive strength after exposing to F/T cycles (MPa) residual strength (%)
NC 24.8 13.8 55.6
NC-AE 21.5 18.4 85.6
HSC 36.8 25.8 70.1
HSC-AE 32.9 29.2 88.8
PC10 50.8 41.5 81.7
PC12 62.7 57.2 91.2
PC14 67.3 64.6 96.0
Tab.6  Residual strength of samples after F/T cycles
1 A Toghroli, P Mehrabi, M Shariati, N T Trung, S Jahandari, H Rasekh. Evaluating the use of recycled concrete aggregate and pozzolanic additives in fiber-reinforced pervious concrete with industrial and recycled fibers. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 252 : 118997–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118997
2 E Shahrokhinasab, N Hosseinzadeh, A Monirabbasi, S Torkaman. Performance of image-based crack detection systems in concrete structures. Journal of Soft Computing in Civil Engineering, 2020, 4( 1): 127– 139
3 F Heidarnezhad, V Toufigh, M Ghaemian. Analyzing and predicting permeability coefficient of roller-compacted concrete (RCC). Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 2021, 49( 3): 1454– 1473
https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20180718
4 F Heidarnezhad, K Jafari, T Ozbakkaloglu. Effect of polymer content and temperature on mechanical properties of lightweight polymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 260 : 119853–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119853
5 H Abdel-Fattah, M M El-Hawary. Flexural behavior of polymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 1999, 13( 5): 253– 262
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(99)00030-6
6 S Y Jung, N Nejatishahidein, M Kim, E E Borujeni, L C Fernandez, D J Roush, A Borhan, A L Zydney. Quantitative interpretation of protein breakthrough curves in small-scale depth filter modules for bioprocessing. Journal of Membrane Science, 2021, 627 : 119217–
7 M Jarrah, E P Najafabadi, M H Khaneghahi, A V Oskouei. The effect of elevated temperatures on the tensile performance of GFRP and CFRP sheets. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 190 : 38– 52
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.086
8 M Jarrah, H Khezrzadeh, M Mofid, K Jafari. Experimental and numerical evaluation of piston metallic damper (PMD). Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2019, 154 : 99– 109
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.11.024
9 J P Gorninski, D C Dal Molin, C S Kazmierczak. Strength degradation of polymer concrete in acidic environments. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2007, 29( 8): 637– 645
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.04.001
10 R Bedi, R Chandra, S P Singh. Reviewing some properties of polymer concrete. Indian Concrete Journal, 2014, 88( 8): 47– 68
11 K C Jung, I T Roh, S H Chang. Evaluation of mechanical properties of polymer concretes for the rapid repair of runways. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2014, 58 : 352– 360
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.076
12 M Ghiasian, M Rossini, J Amendolara, B Haus, S Nolan, A Nanni, N Bel Had Ali, L Rhode-Barbarigos. Test-driven design of an efficient and sustainable seawall structure. Coastal Structures, 2019, 2019 : 1222– 1227
13 V Farhangi, M Karakouzian. Effect of fiber reinforced polymer tubes filled with recycled materials and concrete on structural capacity of pile foundations. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10( 5): 1554–
https://doi.org/10.3390/app10051554
14 A Bahrololoumi, V Morovati, E A Poshtan, R Dargazany. A multi-physics constitutive model to predict hydrolytic aging in quasi-static behaviour of thin cross-linked polymers. International Journal of Plasticity, 2020, 130 : 102676–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102676
15 D H Chen, H H Lin, R Sun. Field performance evaluations of partial-depth repairs. Construction and Building Materials, 2011, 25( 3): 1369– 1378
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.007
16 Ghaderi A, Morovati V, Bahrololoumi A, Dargazany R. A Physics-Informed Neural Network Constitutive Model for Cross-Linked Polymers. In: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Virtual: ASME, 2020
17 D W Fowler. Future trends in polymer concrete. Special Publication, 1989, 116 : 129– 144
18 S P Mehrabi, M Shariati, K Kabirifar, M Jarrah, H Rasekh, N T Trung, A Shariati, S Jahandari. Effect of pumice powder and nano-clay on the strength and permeability of fiber-reinforced pervious concrete incorporating recycled concrete aggregate. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 287 : 122652–
19 R Bedi, R Chandra, S P Singh. Mechanical properties of polymer concrete. Journal of Composites, 2013, 2013 : 948745–
20 K Jafari, M Tabatabaeian, A Joshaghani, T Ozbakkaloglu. Optimizing the mixture design of polymer concrete: An experimental investigation. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 167 : 185– 196
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.191
21 A K Gupta, P Mani, S Krishnamoorthy. Interfacial adhesion in polyester resin concrete. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 1983, 3( 3): 149– 154
https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-7496(83)90120-3
22 J M L Reis, A J M Ferreira. The effects of atmospheric exposure on the fracture properties of polymer concrete. Building and Environment, 2006, 41( 3): 262– 267
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.12.017
23 M M El-Hawary, A Abdul-Jaleel. Durability assessment of epoxy modified concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 2010, 24( 8): 1523– 1528
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.02.004
24 M C S Ribeiro, C M L Tavares, A J M Ferreira. Chemical resistance of epoxy and polyester polymer concrete to acids and salts. Journal of Polymer Engineering, 2002, 22( 1): 27– 44
https://doi.org/10.1515/POLYENG.2002.22.1.27
25 Heidarnezhad F, Jafari K, Toufigh V, Ghaemian M. Mechanical Properties of Different Types of Concrete under Triaxial Compression Loading. In: Urbanization Challenges in Emerging Economies: Resilience and Sustainability of Infrastructure. New Delhi: ASCE, 2018
26 M Kim, N Nejatishahidein, E E Borujeni, D J Roush, A L Zydney, A Borhan. Flow and residence time distribution in small-scale dual-layer depth filter capsules. Journal of Membrane Science, 2021, 617 : 118625–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118625
27 V Farhangi, M Karakouzian, M Geertsema. Effect of micropiles on clean sand liquefaction risk based on CPT and SPT. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10( 9): 3111–
https://doi.org/10.3390/app10093111
28 K S Rebeiz. Precast use of polymer concrete using unsaturated polyester resin based on recycled PET waste. Construction and Building Materials, 1996, 10( 3): 215– 220
https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-0618(95)00088-7
29 H A Bulut, R Şahin. A study on mechanical properties of polymer concrete containing electronic plastic waste. Composite Structures, 2017, 178 : 50– 62
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.058
30 J A Rossignolo, M V C Agnesini. Durability of polymer-modified lightweight aggregate concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2004, 26( 4): 375– 380
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(03)00022-2
31 Gemert D Van, L Czarnecki, M Maultzsch, H Schorn, A Beeldens, P Łukowski, E Knapen. Cement concrete and concrete–polymer composites: Two merging worlds: A report from 11th ICPIC Congress in Berlin, 2004. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2005, 27( 9–10): 926– 933
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.05.004
32 A Beeldens, D Van Gemert, H Schorn, Y Ohama, L Czarnecki. From microstructure to macrostructure: An integrated model of structure formation in polymer-modified concrete. Materials and Structures, 2005, 38( 6): 601– 607
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481591
33 L Agavriloaie, S Oprea, M Barbuta, F Luca. Characterisation of polymer concrete with epoxy polyurethane acryl matrix. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 37 : 190– 196
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.037
34 Vipulanandan C, Mantrala S K. Behavior of fiber reinforced polymer concrete. In: Materials for the New Millennium. Washington, D.C.: ASCE, 1996, 1160–1169
35 M M Shokrieh, M Heidari-Rarani, M Shakouri, E Kashizadeh. Effects of thermal cycles on mechanical properties of an optimized polymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 2011, 25( 8): 3540– 3549
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.047
36 W Ferdous, A Manalo, H S Wong, R Abousnina, O S AlAjarmeh, Y Zhuge, P Schubel. Optimal design for epoxy polymer concrete based on mechanical properties and durability aspects. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 232 : 117229–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117229
37 S Jahandari, M Saberian, Z Tao, S F Mojtahedi, J Li, M Ghasemi, S S Rezvani, W Li. Effects of saturation degrees, freezing−thawing, and curing on geotechnical properties of lime and lime-cement concretes. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2019, 160 : 242– 251
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.02.011
38 J Wu, X Jing, Z Wang. Uni-axial compressive stress-strain relation of recycled coarse aggregate concrete after freezing and thawing cycles. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 134 : 210– 219
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.142
39 S W Tang, Y Yao, C Andrade, Z J Li. Recent durability studies on concrete structure. Cement and Concrete Research, 2015, 78 : 143– 154
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.05.021
40 H Wu, Z Liu, B Sun, J Yin. Experimental investigation on freeze–thaw durability of Portland cement pervious concrete (PCPC). Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 117 : 63– 71
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.130
41 L Feo, F Ascione, R Penna, D Lau, M Lamberti. An experimental investigation on freezing and thawing durability of high performance fiber reinforced concrete (HPFRC). Composite Structures, 2020, 234 : 111673–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111673
42 A E Richardson, K A Coventry, G Ward. Freeze/thaw protection of concrete with optimum rubber crumb content. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2012, 23( 1): 96– 103
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.013
43 A Richardson, K Coventry, V Edmondson, E Dias. Crumb rubber used in concrete to provide freeze–thaw protection (optimal particle size). Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112 : 599– 606
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.028
44 M I Khan, R Siddique. Utilization of silica fume in concrete: Review of durability properties. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2011, 57 : 30– 35
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.09.016
45 Mehta P K, Monteiro P J M. Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2014
46 I Martínez-Lage, F Martínez-Abella, C Vázquez-Herrero, J L Pérez-Ordóñez. Properties of plain concrete made with mixed recycled coarse aggregate. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 37 : 171– 176
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.045
47 J A Bogas, J De Brito, D Ramos. Freeze–thaw resistance of concrete produced with fine recycled concrete aggregates. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 115 : 294– 306
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.065
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed