Please wait a minute...
Protein & Cell

ISSN 1674-800X

ISSN 1674-8018(Online)

CN 11-5886/Q

Postal Subscription Code 80-984

2018 Impact Factor: 7.575

Protein Cell    2017, Vol. 8 Issue (8) : 558-559    https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-017-0432-4
HIGHLIGHT
Editing base in mouse model
Haoyi Wang()
State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
 Download: PDF(313 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Corresponding Author(s): Haoyi Wang   
Issue Date: 23 August 2017
 Cite this article:   
Haoyi Wang. Editing base in mouse model[J]. Protein Cell, 2017, 8(8): 558-559.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/pac/EN/10.1007/s13238-017-0432-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/pac/EN/Y2017/V8/I8/558
1 BogdanoveAJ, VoytasDF (2011) TAL effectors: customizable proteins for DNA targeting.Science333:1843–1846.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204094
2 DelkerRK, Fugmann SD, PapavasiliouFN (2009) A coming-of-age story: activation-induced cytidine deaminase turns 10.Nat Immunol10:1147–1153.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.1799
3 DoudnaJA, Charpentier E (2014) Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9.Science346:1258096.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258096
4 KimKet al. (2017) Highly efficient RNA-guided base editing in mouse embryos.Nat Biotechnol35:435–437.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3816
5 KleinstiverBPet al. (2016) High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects.Nature529:490–495.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16526
6 KomorAC, KimYB, PackerMS, Zuris JA, LiuDR (2016) Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage.Nature533:420–424.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17946
7 MaYet al. (2016) Targeted AID-mediated mutagenesis (TAM) enables efficient genomic diversification in mammalian cells.Nat Methods13:1029–1035.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4027
8 NishidaKet al. (2016) Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems.Science.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf8729
9 QinWet al. (2015) Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in mice by zygote electroporation of nuclease.Genetics200:423–430.
https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.176594
10 SilvaGet al. (2011) Meganucleases and other tools for targeted genome engineering: perspectives and challenges for gene therapy.Curr Gene Ther11:11–27
https://doi.org/10.2174/156652311794520111
11 UrnovFD, RebarEJ, HolmesMC, Zhang HS, GregoryPD (2010) Genome editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases.Nat Rev Genet11:636–646.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2842
12 WangWet al. (2016) Delivery of Cas9 protein into mouse zygotes through a series of electroporation dramatically increases the efficiency of model creation.J Genet Genom43:319–327.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2016.02.004
13 WilesMV, QinW, ChengAW, Wang H (2015) CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing and guide RNA design.Mamm Genome26:501–510.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-015-9565-z
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed