Please wait a minute...
Soil Ecology Letters

ISSN 2662-2289

ISSN 2662-2297(Online)

Soil Ecology Letters    2024, Vol. 6 Issue (1) : 230189    https://doi.org/10.1007/s42832-023-0189-z
RAPID REPORT
Comparing the temperature sensitivity of organic matter decomposition in oxic and oxygen-deprived soils
Zhenhui Jiang1,3, Xin Wang1,2,4, Ting Liu1, Xiaojuan Feng1,2()
1. State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3. State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A & F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
4. Henan Key Laboratory of Ecological Environment Protection and Restoration of Yellow River Basin, Yellow River Institute of Hydraulic Research, Zhengzhou 450003, China
 Download: PDF(1745 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

● No consistent variation was found in soil respiration Q10 under various O2 conditions.

● Substrate C quality had a strong effect on Q10 in oxic soils.

● N limitation had a large impact on Q10 in soils under O2 limitation.

Current studies on the temperature sensitivity (Q10) of soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition mainly focus on aerobic conditions. However, variations and determinants of Q10 in oxygen (O2)-deprived soils remain unclear. Here we incubated three grassland soils under oxic, suboxic, and anoxic conditions subjected to varying temperatures to compare variations in Q10 in relation to changing substrates. No consistent variation was found in Q10 under various O2 conditions. Further analysis of edaphic properties demonstrated that substrate carbon quality showed a strong influence on Q10 in oxic soils, whereas nitrogen limitation played a more important role in suboxic and anoxic soils. These results suggest that substrate carbon quality and nitrogen limitation may play roles of varying importance in determining the temperature sensitivity of SOM decomposition under various O2 conditions.

Keywords oxygen-limited conditions      temperature sensitivity      soil respiration      carbon substrate      nitrogen limitation     
Corresponding Author(s): Xiaojuan Feng   
Issue Date: 10 December 2023
 Cite this article:   
Zhenhui Jiang,Xin Wang,Ting Liu, et al. Comparing the temperature sensitivity of organic matter decomposition in oxic and oxygen-deprived soils[J]. Soil Ecology Letters, 2024, 6(1): 230189.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/sel/EN/10.1007/s42832-023-0189-z
https://academic.hep.com.cn/sel/EN/Y2024/V6/I1/230189
Fig.1  (A) Soil cumulative C-CO2 emission and (B) Q10 in Experiment 1 (mean and standard errors are shown; n = 3). Uppercase and lowercase letters indicate different levels among three temperature cycles and three O2 levels, respectively (Tukey’s test, p < 0.05).
Fig.2  Relationship between (A) Q10 and specific ultraviolet absorbance at 254 nm (SUVA254), and (B) Q10 and L-leucine aminopeptidase (LAP) activity under three O2 levels (n = 9).
1 E., Bosatta, G.I., Ågren, 1999. Soil organic matter quality interpreted thermodynamically. Soil Biology & Biochemistry31, 1889–1891.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00105-4
2 K., Butterbach-Bahl, E.M., Baggs, M., Dannenmann, R., Kiese, S., Zechmeister-Boltenstern, 2013. Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we understand the processes and their controls? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences368, 20130122.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0122
3 X., Chen, J., Tang, L., Jiang, B., Li, J., Chen, C., Fang 2010. Evaluating the impacts of incubation procedures on estimated Q10 values of soil respiration. Soil Biology & Biochemistry42, 2282–2288.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.08.030
4 J., Ding, L., Chen, B., Zhang, L., Liu, G., Yang, K., Fang, Y., Chen, F., Li, D., Kou, C., Ji, Y., Luo, Y. Yang, 2016. Linking temperature sensitivity of soil CO2 release to substrate, environmental, and microbial properties across alpine ecosystems. Global Biogeochemical Cycles30, 1310–1323.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005333
5 C., Fang, P., Smith, J.B., Moncrieff, J.U., Smith 2005. Similar response of labile and resistant soil organic matter pools to changes in temperature. Nature433, 57–59.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03138
6 A., Gershenson, N.E., Bader, W., Cheng, 2009. Effects of substrate availability on the temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter decomposition. Global Change Biology15, 176–183.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01827.x
7 Y., Liu, N., He, X., Wen, G., Yu, Y., Gao, Y., Jia, 2016. Patterns and regulating mechanisms of soil nitrogen mineralization and temperature sensitivity in Chinese terrestrial ecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment215, 40–46.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.09.012
8 D.L., Moorhead, G., Lashermes, R.L., Sinsabaugh, 2012. A theoretical model of C- and N-acquiring exoenzyme activities, which balances microbial demands during decomposition. Soil Biology & Biochemistry53, 133–141.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.05.011
9 L., Olander, P., Vitousek, 2000. Regulation of soil phosphatase and chitinase activity by N and P availability. Biogeochemistry49, 175–190.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006316117817
10 G., Sakurai, M., Jomura, S., Yonemura, T., Iizumi, Y., Shirato, M., Yokozawa, 2012. Inversely estimating temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition by assimilating a turnover model and long-term field data. Soil Biology & Biochemistry46, 191–199.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.11.005
11 N., van Gestel, Z., Shi, K.J., van Groenigen, C.W., Osenberg, L.C., Andresen, J.S., Dukes, M.J., Hovenden, Y., Luo, A., Michelsen, E., Pendall, P.B., Reich, E.A.G., Schuur, B.A., Hungate, 2018. Predicting soil carbon loss with warming. Nature554, E4–E5.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25745
12 T.W.N., Walker, C., Kaiser, F., Strasser, C.W., Herbold, N.I.W., Leblans, D., Woebken, I.A., Janssens, B.D., Sigurdsson, A., Richter, 2018. Microbial temperature sensitivity and biomass change explain soil carbon loss with warming. Nature Climate Change8, 885–889.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0259-x
13 Y., Wang, H., Wang, J.S., He, X., Feng, 2017. Iron-mediated soil carbon response to water-table decline an alpine wetland. Nature Communications8, 15972.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15972
14 W., Yang, K., Weber, W., Silver, 2012. Nitrogen loss from soil through anaerobic ammonium oxidation coupled to iron reduction. Nature Geoscience5, 538–541.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1530
[1] SEL-00189-OF-XJF_suppl_1 Download
[1] Shuaiwen Zhang, Wei Gong, Xin Wan, Junya Li, Zhiguo Li, Peng Chen, Shunlin Xing, Ziyan Li, Yi Liu. Influence of organic matter input and temperature change on soil aggregate-associated respiration and microbial carbon use efficiency in alpine agricultural soils[J]. Soil Ecology Letters, 2024, 6(3): 230220-.
[2] Baile Xu, Gaowen Yang, Anika Lehmann, Sebastian Riedel, Matthias C. Rillig. Effects of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) on soil structure and function[J]. Soil Ecology Letters, 2023, 5(1): 108-117.
[3] Eva F. Leifheit, Hanna L. Kissener, Erik Faltin, Masahiro Ryo, Matthias C. Rillig. Tire abrasion particles negatively affect plant growth even at low concentrations and alter soil biogeochemical cycling[J]. Soil Ecology Letters, 2022, 4(4): 409-415.
[4] Simin Wang, Xiaoyun Chen, Debao Li, Jianping Wu. Effects of soil organism interactions and temperature on carbon use efficiency in three different forest soils[J]. Soil Ecology Letters, 2021, 3(2): 156-166.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed