Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

Postal Subscription Code 80-969

2018 Impact Factor: 2.809

Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.    2018, Vol. 12 Issue (3) : 509-536    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-018-1740-9
REVIEW ARTICLE
Engineering operando methodology: Understanding catalysis in time and space
Raquel Portela, Susana Perez-Ferreras, Ana Serrano-Lotina, Miguel A. Bañares()
Instituto de Catálisis y Petroleoquímica, ICP-CSIC, Marie Curie 2, Madrid, Spain
 Download: PDF(1670 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The term operando was coined at the beginning of this century to gather the growing efforts devoted to establish structure-activity relationships by simultaneously characterizing a catalyst performance and the relevant surface chemistry during genuine catalytic operation. This approach is now widespread and consolidated; it has become an increasingly complex but efficient junction where spectroscopy, materials science, catalysis and engineering meet. While for some characterization techniques kinetically relevant reactor cells with good resolution are recently developing, the knowledge gained with magnetic resonance and X-ray and vibrational spectroscopy studies is already huge and the scope of operando methodology with these techniques is recently expanding from studies with small amounts of powdered solids to more industrially relevant catalytic systems. Engineering catalysis implies larger physical domains, and thus all sort of gradients. Space- and time- resolved multi-technique characterization of both the solid and fluid phases involved in heterogeneous catalytic reactions (including temperature data) is key to map processes from different perspectives, which allows taking into account existing heterogeneities at different scales and facing up- and down-scaling for applications ranging from microstructured reactors to industrial-like macroreactors (operating with shaped catalytic bodies and/or in integral regime). This work reviews how operando methodology is evolving toward engineered reaction systems.

Keywords operando      structured catalysts      space-resolved      time-resolved      spectroscopy     
Corresponding Author(s): Miguel A. Bañares   
Just Accepted Date: 24 April 2018   Online First Date: 31 August 2018    Issue Date: 18 September 2018
 Cite this article:   
Raquel Portela,Susana Perez-Ferreras,Ana Serrano-Lotina, et al. Engineering operando methodology: Understanding catalysis in time and space[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(3): 509-536.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/10.1007/s11705-018-1740-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/Y2018/V12/I3/509
Fig.1  Multiparametric evolution in catalyst development process. Reproduced with permission from [1]
Fig.2  Overview of the spatial (left) and temporal (right) resolution of vibrational micro-spectroscopic techniques applied in heterogeneous catalysis. Adapted from [50]
Fig.3  Operando Raman-GC study of a VOx/Al2O3 catalyst. Raman spectra at different reaction temperatures (left) and activity data vs. reaction temperature (right) during (top) propane ODH at 673 K, and (bottom) propane DH at different temperatures and in situ reoxidation at 773 K. Catalyst weight: 150 mg, total flow: 67 mL·min1, reaction feed: propane/oxygen/helium= 1/6/4 for ODH and 1/0/6 for DH. Reproduced with permission from [68]
Fig.4  Arrhenius plots obtained in an operando fixed-bed reactor using Raman spectroscopy with gas cromatography during ethane oxidative dehydrogenation on vanadium oxide molecularly dispersed on ceria. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [70], Coright (2008) American Chemical Society
Fig.5  Relative evolution of the FTIR bands of 12C-containing carbonate, 12C-containing formate and 13CO2 at (A) 155°C and (B) 220°C under 2% 13CO+ 7% H2O, following steady-state under 2% 12CO+ 7% H2O. Reprinted with permission from [75]
Fig.6  Sintering mechanism on Pt/ZSM-5 catalysts on the external surface and in the mesopores according to 2D IR pressure-jump spectroscopy of adsorbed CO. Reproduced with permission from [76]
Fig.7  Top: ‘Sandwich’ IR reactor cell (A) longitudinal, and (B) radial views. 1: Thermocouple location; 2: KBr windows; 3: O-ring; 4: Gas inlet; 5: Sample; 6: Sample holder; 7: Gas outlet. (C) Circular, and (D) square sample holders. Bottom: Flow model in the round sample holder (left panel) and evolution of the concentration with time (right panel). Reprinted with permission [59]
Fig.8  Pore size distribution (line) and cumulative volume (dotted line) for uncompacted and compacted titania-supported vanadia-tungsta catalyst at different pressures [81]
Fig.9  Effect of pelletizing pressure and wafer thickness on catalyst efficiency and intrinsic activity during NOx selective catalytic reduction on titania-supported vanadia-tungsta wafers in an operando transmission IR reactor. Reproduced with permission from [81]
Fig.10  Vibrational spectroscopy operando reaction cells for monoliths. Left: transmission FT-IR, reproduced with permission from [39]. Right: Raman, reproduced with permission from [15]
Fig.11  Transient state operando study on a V2O5-WO3/TiO2-sepiolite wafer catalyst. Top: FTIR spectra contour plot showing the growth of ammonia-derived species on the surface after changing from 20% O2/Ar to SCR conditions; Middle: FTIR area profiles of NH3,ads and NH4+; Bottom: evolution of gas phase species concentration measured by MS. Reproduced with permission [90]
Fig.12  Top: schematic illustration of a cell for space- and time-resolved DRIFTS-Raman experiments; Bottom: DRIFT (A–C) and Raman (D–F) spectra during NOx storage reduction at the front, middle, and back positions of a Pt-Ba/CeO2 catalyst bed. Reproduced with permission from [18]
Fig.13  Methanation over Ni/g-Al2O3 monolithic catalyst. The activity was followed by MS. The stability of crystalline and non-crystalline distributions was proven by m-XRD-CT (2D during heat ramping, then 3D) and m-absorption-CT. The high quality summed 1D XRD patterns confirmed that no reaction intermediates were formed. Figures reproduced with permission from [102]
Fig.14  Reconstructed 2D weight percent composition maps of Co/g-Al2O3 during H2 reduction and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis and composition profiles compiled from the integrated and scaled reflection intensities for the various cobalt-containing phases from the summed 2D diffraction data. Adapted from [103]. Figure cited with permission of ACS as source
Fig.15  X-ray radiography images showing the evolution of surplus electrolyte ring between the separator and the lithium anode hole at different states (A–H) of charge/discharge (%) during the first cycle. The plot shows the charge/discharge curve and the measured thickness d (red color in the scheme and the plot). Reproduced with permission from [107]
Fig.16  Calculated velocity profile in a monolith showing the negligible effect of a capillary MS probe situated in the corner of the central channel. Temp. = 200°C, u0 = 0.016 m?s1, channel size= 0.001 m, probe diameter= 250 µm. Reproduced with permission from [111]
Fig.17  Simultaneous measurement of thermal, kinetic and spectroscopic profiles through a fixed-bed tubular reactor. Left: Catalytic bed of 50 wt-% MoO3/g-alumina spheres; Middle: probe geometry; Right: Raman spectra, temperature and composition profiles. Reproduced with permission from [116]
Fig.18  2-D slice section through 3-D MR images of water distribution within an initially water-saturated packing of 500-µm glass spheres. Voxel resolution is 94 mm × 94 mm × 94 mm. Data are shown before drying commenced and at three time intervals during the drying process. Only the water within the inter-particle space of the bead packing was imaged (white pixels). No signal was obtained from the solid and gas phases present. Reproduced with permission from [123,124]
Fig.19  1H zero-time echo images and axial slices extracted from the corresponding 3D data set obtained from a membrane-electrode assembly operating with H2 and air at 80°C and 30 mA. (a) Fuel cell at 25°C before operation (0 V); (b) t = 0 min (0.44 V); (c) t = 420 min (0.42 V); (d) fuel cell at 25°C 14 h after the switch off at 420 min. Reproduced with permission from [125]
Fig.20  2-D MR image of an oscillating chemical reaction occurring within a bed packed with glass beads. Chemical waves are imaged as a result of the oscillatory production of Mn2+ and Mn3+ species, identified as dark and light bands, respectively. Reproduced with permission from [126]
Fig.21  Operando study of ethylene hydrogenation over cordierite monoliths coated with 1% wt. Pt/Al2O3. (a) Cross-section photographic image of the honeycomb catalyst; (b) NMR ethylene image of the cross section under a non-reactive mixture of ethylene and argon measured by 3D MRSI; (c, d) ethane concentration (%vol) maps at low and high flow rate, respectively; (e) experimental and model ethane/ethylene ratio profile of the low flow-rate experiment. Adapted from [127]
Fig.22  2D 1H MRI data from which bed porosity, liquid holdup and wetting efficiency of 0.3 wt-% Pd/Al2O3 catalyst pellets were calculated. (a) bed flooded with liquid 1-octene, and (b) bed during 1-octene hydrogenation reaction. Reproduced with permission from [129]
Fig.23  Thermographs showing an ignition sequence on a 5 wt-% Rh/Si02 catalyst wafer; the flow is parallel to the wafer surface, flowing from the bottom left corner to the top right one. Reproduced with permission [132,133]
Fig.24  Space-resolved operando study on the ignition of the catalytic partial oxidation of methane in a fixed-bed capillary microreactor. (a–d) Oxidized catalyst (yellow-orange), formation of the front of reduction (red-violet), advance of the front toward the inlet; (e) X-ray absorption image where the single reduced particles can be identified; (f) temperature profile evolution measured by IR-thermography. Reproduced with permission from [136]
Fig.25  Operando Raman-GC results of silver catalyst during oxidation/reaction cycles at 773 K. Raman spectra at the end of: (a, c, e) Oxidation, and (b, d, f) reaction steps. Oxidation in a flow of O2 (4.1%), He as balance; reaction in a flow of CH3OH (8.75%), O2 (3.5%) and H2O (6.63%), He as balance. Reproduced with permission from [137]
Fig.26  Space- and time-resolved data during CO oxidation at 110°C with a Pt catalyst in a capillary reactor in 1000 ppm CO, 10% O2 in He, total flow of 50 mL·min?1. (a) Catalyst bed scheme with the characterization points location and global gas-phase MS results, (b) LCF of XANES spectra, and (c) k2-weighted Fourier-transformed QEXAFS data (k-range: 3.0–9.0 Å?1). Reproduced with permission from [138]
Fig.27  Map of a Rh/Al2O3 catalyst during methane partial oxidation. (a) Oxidized Rh-species, (b) reduced Rh-species, (c) featureless background, and (d) relative concentration of the oxidized and reduced Rh-particles in the axis of the fixed-bed (conditions: Temp. = 362°C, space velocity= 1.9 × 105 h?1). Reproduced with permission from [139]
Fig.28  3D plots of Raman intensity in the T-junction region for specific bands: (a) 893 cm1 from acetic acid, and (b) 882 cm1 from ethanol. Reproduced with permission from [141]
1 Mitchell S, Michels N L, Pérez-Ramírez J. From powder to technical body: the undervalued science of catalyst scale up. Chemical Society Reviews, 2013, 42(14): 6094–6112
https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs60076a pmid: 23648466
2 Boger T, Heibel A K, Sorensen C M. Monolithic catalysts for the chemical industry. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2004, 43(16): 4602–4611
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie030730q
3 Scheffler F, Claus P, Schimpf S, Lucas M, Scheffler M. Heterogeneously catalyzed processes with porous cellular ceramic monoliths. Cellular ceramics. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2006, 454–483
4 Tronconi E, Groppi G, Visconti C G. Structured catalysts for non-adiabatic applications. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 2014, 5: 55–67
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2014.04.003
5 Kreutzer M T, Kapteijn F, Moulijn J A, Heiszwolf J J. Multiphase monolith reactors: Chemical reaction engineering of segmented flow in microchannels. Chemical Engineering Science, 2005, 60(22): 5895–5916
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2005.03.022
6 Twigg M V, Richardson J T. Fundamentals and applications of structured ceramic foam catalysts. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2007, 46(12): 4166–4177
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie061122o
7 Jähnisch K, Hessel V, Löwe H, Baerns M. Chemistry in microstructured reactors. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2004, 43(4): 406–446
https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200300577 pmid: 14735530
8 Yue J, Schouten J C, Nijhuis T A. Integration of microreactors with spectroscopic detection for online reaction monitoring and catalyst characterization. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51(45): 14583–14609
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie301258j
9 Kestenbaum H, Lange de Oliveira A, Schmidt W, Schüth F, Ehrfeld W, Gebauer K, Löwe H, Richter T, Lebiedz D, Untiedt I, Züchner H. Silver-catalyzed oxidation of ethylene to ethylene oxide in a microreaction system. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2002, 41(4): 710–719
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie010306u
10 Inoue T, Schmidt M A, Jensen K F. Microfabricated multiphase reactors for the direct synthesis of hydrogen peroxide from hydrogen and oxygen. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2007, 46(4): 1153–1160
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie061277w
11 Yoshida J, Nagaki A, Iwasaki T, Suga S. Enhancement of chemical selectivity by microreactors. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2005, 28(3): 259–266
https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.200407127
12 Al-Rifai N, Cao E, Dua V, Gavriilidis A. Microreaction technology aided catalytic process design. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 2013, 2(3): 338–345
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2013.05.004
13 Ufer A, Sudhoff D, Mescher A, Agar D W. Suspension catalysis in a liquid-liquid capillary microreactor. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 167(2): 468–474
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.09.088
14 Martin A J, Mitchell S, Kunze K, Weston K C, Pérez-Ramírez J. Visualising compositional heterogeneity during the scale up of multicomponent zeolite bodies. Materials Horizons, 2017, 4(5): 857–861
https://doi.org/10.1039/C7MH00088J
15 Rasmussen S B, López-Medina R, Portela R, Mikolajska E, Daturi M, Avila P, Bañares M A. Shaping up operando spectroscopy: Raman characterization of a working honeycomb monolith. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2015, 5(11): 4942–4945
https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CY01375E
16 Hunger M, Weitkamp J. In situ IR, NMR, EPR, and UV/Vis spectroscopy: Tools for new insight into the mechanisms of heterogeneous catalysis. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2001, 40(16): 2954–2971
https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3773(20010817)40:16<2954::AID-ANIE2954>3.0.CO;2-# pmid: 12203619
17 Urakawa A. Trends and advances in operando methodology. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 2016, 12: 31–36
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2016.02.002
18 Urakawa A, Maeda N, Baiker A. Space- and time-resolved combined DRIFT and Raman spectroscopy: Monitoring dynamic surface and bulk processes during NOx storage reduction. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2008, 47(48): 9256–9259
https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200804077 pmid: 18973217
19 Burch R. In situ methods in catalysis—Proceedings of the surface reactivity and catalysis group meeting of the royal society of chemistry. Catalysis Today, 1991, 9(1–2)
20 Clausen B S, Topsøe H, Frahm R. Application of combined X-ray diffraction and absorption techniques for in situ catalyst characterization. In: Eley D D, Haag W O, Gates B, Knözinger H, eds. Advances in Catalysis. Massachusetts: Academic Press, 1998, 315–344
21 Dumesic J A, Topsøe H. Mössbauer Spectroscopy Applications to Heterogeneous Catalysis. In: Eley D D, Pines H, Weisz P B, eds. Advances in Catalysis. Massachusetts: Academic Press, 1977, 121–246
22 Bañares M A. Operando spectroscopy: The knowledge bridge to assessing structure–performance relationships in catalyst nanoparticles. Advanced Materials, 2011, 23(44): 5293–5301
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201101803 pmid: 22299144
23 Topsøe H. Developments in operando studies and in situ characterization of heterogeneous catalysts. Journal of Catalysis, 2003, 216(1–2): 155–164
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9517(02)00133-1
24 Topsøe H. In situ characterization of catalysts. In: Corma A, Melo F V, Mendioroz S, Fierro J L G, eds. 12th International Congress on Catalysis, Proceedings of the 12th ICC. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2000, 1–21
25 Meunier F C. The design and testing of kinetically-appropriate operando spectroscopic cells for investigating heterogeneous catalytic reactions. Chemical Society Reviews, 2010, 39(12): 4602–4614
https://doi.org/10.1039/b919705m pmid: 20936228
26 Weckhuysen B M. Preface: Recent advances in the in-situ characterization of heterogeneous catalysts. Chemical Society Reviews, 2010, 39(12): 4557–4559
https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cs90031a
27 Weckhuysen B M. Snapshots of a working catalyst: Possibilities and limitations of in situ spectroscopy in the field of heterogeneous catalysis. Chemical Communications, 2002, 2(2): 97–110
https://doi.org/10.1039/b107686h pmid: 12120361
28 Bañares M A, Guerrero-Pérez M O, Fierro J L G, Garcia Cortez G. Raman spectroscopy during catalytic operations with on-line activity measurement (operando spectroscopy): A method for understanding the active centres of cations supported on porous materials. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2002, 12(11): 3337–3342
https://doi.org/10.1039/B204494C
29 Calvino-Casilda V, Banares M A. Recent advances in imaging and monitoring of heterogeneous catalysts with Raman spectroscopy. Catalysis, 2012, 24: 1–47
https://doi.org/10.1039/9781849734776-00001
30 Banares M A. In situ to operando spectroscopy: From proof of concept to industrial application. Topics in Catalysis, 2009, 52(10): 1301–1302
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-009-9313-2
31 Niemantsverdriet J W. Spectroscopy In Catalysis: An Introduction. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Wiley, 2007
32 Somorjai G A. In situ surface science studies of catalytic reactions. CATTech, 1999, 3(1): 84–97
33 Bennici S M, Vogelaar B M, Nijhuis T A, Weckhuysen B M. Real-time control of a catalytic solid in a fixed-bed reactor based on in situ spectroscopy. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2007, 46(28): 5412–5416
https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200700499 pmid: 17554745
34 Brückner A, Kondratenko E. Simultaneous operando EPR/UV-vis/laser-Raman spectroscopy—A powerful tool for monitoring transition metal oxide catalysts during reaction. Catalysis Today, 2006, 113(1–2): 16–24
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2005.11.006
35 Bañares M A, Mestl G. Structural characterization of catalysts by operando Raman spectroscopy. In-situ Characterization of Heterogeneous Catalysts, 2013, 267–292
36 Balboni M L. Process analytical technology: Concepts and principles. Pharmaceutical Technology, 2003, 27(10): 54
37 Vogt C, Weckhuysen B M, Ruiz-Martínez J. Effect of feedstock and catalyst impurities on the methanol-to-olefin reaction over H-SAPO-34. ChemCatChem, 2017, 9(1): 183–194
https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201600860 pmid: 28163792
38 Jentoft F C. Chapter 3. Ultraviolet-visible-near infrared spectroscopy in catalysis: Theory, experiment, analysis, and application under reaction conditions. Advances in Catalysis, 2009, 52: 129–211
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-0564(08)00003-5
39 Rasmussen S B, Bañares M A, Bazin P, Due-Hansen J, Ávila P, Daturi M. Monitoring catalysts at work in their final form: Spectroscopic investigations on a monolithic catalyst. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2012, 14(7): 2171–2177
https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CP22629K pmid: 22009277
40 Ferraro J R, Nakamoto K, Brown C W. Introductory Raman spectroscopy. In: Nakamoto K, Brown C W, eds. Introductory Raman spectroscopy. 2nd ed. Massachusetts: Academic Press, 2003, 1–434
41 Brückner A. Electron paramagnetic resonance: A powerful tool for monitoring working catalysts. Advances in Catalysis, 2007, 51: 265–308
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-0564(06)51005-3
42 Ivanova I I, Kolyagin Y G. Impact of in situ MAS NMR techniques to the understanding of the mechanisms of zeolite catalyzed reactions. Chemical Society Reviews, 2010, 39(12): 5018–5050
https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cs00011f pmid: 21038049
43 Blasco T. Insights into reaction mechanisms in heterogeneous catalysis revealed by in situ NMR spectroscopy. Chemical Society Reviews, 2010, 39(12): 4685–4702
https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cs00033g pmid: 20976339
44 Beale A M, Jacques S D M, Weckhuysen B M. Chemical imaging of catalytic solids with synchrotron radiation. Chemical Society Reviews, 2010, 39(12): 4656–4672
https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cs00089b pmid: 20978688
45 Newton M A, van Beek W. Combining synchrotron-based X-ray techniques with vibrational spectroscopies for the in situ study of heterogeneous catalysts: A view from a bridge. Chemical Society Reviews, 2010, 39(12): 4845–4863
https://doi.org/10.1039/b919689g pmid: 20967341
46 Senyshyn A, Mühlbauer M J, Nikolowski K, Pirling T, Ehrenberg H. “In-operando” neutron scattering studies on Li-ion batteries. Journal of Power Sources, 2012, 203: 126–129
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.12.007
47 Lennon D, Parker S F. Inelastic neutron scattering studies of methyl chloride synthesis over alumina. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2014, 47(4): 1220–1227
https://doi.org/10.1021/ar400271c pmid: 24579759
48 Frenken J, Groot I. Operando Research in Heterogeneous Catalysis. Berlin: Springer International Publishing, 2017
49 Han B, Stoerzinger K A, Tileli V, Gamalski A D, Stach E A, Shao-Horn Y. Nanoscale structural oscillations in perovskite oxides induced by oxygen evolution. Nature Materials, 2017, 16(1): 121–126
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4764 pmid: 27698352
50 Stavitski E, Weckhuysen B M. Infrared and Raman imaging of heterogeneous catalysts. Chemical Society Reviews, 2010, 39(12): 4615–4625
https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cs00064g pmid: 20938559
51 Weckhuysen B M. Chemical imaging of spatial heterogeneities in catalytic solids at different length and time scales. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2009, 48(27): 4910–4943
https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200900339 pmid: 19536746
52 Buurmans I L C, Weckhuysen B M. Heterogeneities of individual catalyst particles in space and time as monitored by spectroscopy. Nature Chemistry, 2012, 4(11): 873–886
https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1478 pmid: 23089861
53 Morgan K, Touitou J, Choi J S, Coney C, Hardacre C, Pihl J A, Stere C E, Kim M Y, Stewart C, Goguet A, Partridge W P. Evolution and enabling capabilities of spatially resolved techniques for the characterization of heterogeneously catalyzed reactions. ACS Catalysis, 2016, 6(2): 1356–1381
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5b02602
54 Sattler J J H B, Mens A M, Weckhuysen B M. Real-time quantitative operando raman spectroscopy of a CrOx/Al2O3 propane dehydrogenation catalyst in a pilot-scale reactor. ChemCatChem, 2014, 6(11): 3139–3145
https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201402649
55 Guerrero-Pérez M O, Bañares M A. Operando Raman study of alumina-supported Sb-V-O catalyst during propane ammoxidation to acrylonitrile with on-line activity measurement. Chemical Communications, 2002, 12(12): 1292–1293
https://doi.org/10.1039/b202556f pmid: 12109121
56 Bañares M A, Wachs I E. Molecular structures of supported metal oxide catalysts under different environments. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, 2002, 33(5): 359–380
https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.866
57 Wachs I E. International congress on operando spectroscopy: Fundamental and technical aspects of spectroscopy of catalysts under working conditions. Catalysis Communications, 2003, 4(11): 567–570
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2003.08.011
58 Chakrabarti A, Ford M E, Gregory D, Hu R, Keturakis C J, Lwin S, Tang Y, Yang Z, Zhu M, Bañares M A, Wachs I E. A decade+ of operando spectroscopy studies. Catalysis Today, 2017, 283: 27–53
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2016.12.012
59 Thomas S, Marie O, Bazin P, Lietti L, Visconti C G, Corbetta M, Manenti F, Daturi M. Modelling a reactor cell for operando IR studies: From qualitative to fully quantitative kinetic investigations. Catalysis Today, 2017, 283: 176–184
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2016.07.008
60 Thibault-Starzyk F, Seguin E, Thomas S, Daturi M, Arnolds H, King D A. Real-time infrared detection of cyanide flip on silver-alumina NOx removal catalyst. Science, 2009, 324(5930): 1048–1051
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1169041 pmid: 19461000
61 Krivanek O L, Lovejoy T C, Dellby N, Aoki T, Carpenter R W, Rez P, Soignard E, Zhu J, Batson P E, Lagos M J, Egerton R F, Crozier P A. Vibrational spectroscopy in the electron microscope. Nature, 2014, 514(7521): 209–212
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13870 pmid: 25297434
62 Choi J S, Partridge W P, Daw C S. Spatially resolved in situ measurements of transient species breakthrough during cyclic, low-temperature regeneration of a monolithic Pt/K/Al2O3 NOx storage-reduction catalyst. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2005, 293(1–2): 24–40
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2005.06.025
63 Nguyen H, Peng P Y, Luss D, Harold M P. Assessing intrusion by the capillary during spatially resolved mass spectrometry measurement. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 307: 845–859
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.101
64 Bentrup U. Combining in situ characterization methods in one set-up: Looking with more eyes into the intricate chemistry of the synthesis and working of heterogeneous catalysts. Chemical Society Reviews, 2010, 39(12): 4718–4730
https://doi.org/10.1039/b919711g pmid: 20959916
65 Wachs I E, Routray K. Catalysis science of bulk mixed oxides. ACS Catalysis, 2012, 2(6): 1235–1246
https://doi.org/10.1021/cs2005482
66 Wachs I E. Recent conceptual advances in the catalysis science of mixed metal oxide catalytic materials. Catalysis Today, 2005, 100(1): 79–94
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2004.12.019
67 Tran L, Bañares M A, Rallo R. Modelling the Toxicity of Nanoparticles. Berlin: Springer International Publishing, 2017
68 Guerrero-Pérez M O, Bañares M A. From conventional in situ to operando studies in Raman spectroscopy. Catalysis Today, 2006, 113(1–2): 48–57
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2005.11.009
69 Bañares M A, Khatib S J. Structure-activity relationships in alumina-supported molybdena-vanadia catalysts for propane oxidative dehydrogenation. Catalysis Today, 2004, 96(4): 251–257
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2004.06.152
70 Martínez-Huerta M V, Deo G, Fierro J L G, Bañares M A. Operando Raman-GC study on the structure-activity relationships in V5+/CeO2 catalyst for ethane oxidative dehydrogenation: The formation of CeVO4. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2008, 112(30): 11441–11447
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp802827t
71 Banares M A, Dauphin L, Calvoperez V, Fehlner T P, Wolf E E. Activity and characterization of self-supported model catalysts derived from cobalt-based clusters of clusters: Hydrogenation of 1,3-butadiene. Journal of Catalysis, 1995, 152(2): 396–409
https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.1995.1094
72 Bañares M A, Dauphin L, Lei X, Cen W, Shang M, Wolf E E, Fehlner T P. Effect of precursor core structure on the hydrogenation of 1,3-butadiene catalyzed by cluster-derived model catalysts. Chemistry of Materials, 1995, 7(3): 553–561
https://doi.org/10.1021/cm00051a017
73 Bañares M, Patil A N, Fehlner T P, Wolf E E. Novel cluster-derived catalysts for the selective hydrogenation of crotonaldehyde. Catalysis Letters, 1995, 34(3–4): 251–258
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00806874
74 Deutschmann O, Schwiedemoch R, Maier L I, Chatterjee D. Natural gas conversion in monolithic catalysts: Interaction of chemical reactions and transport phenomena. In: Iglesia E, Spivey J J, Fleisch T H, eds. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001, 251–258
75 Meunier F, Reid D, Goguet A, Shekhtman S, Hardacre C, Burch R, Deng W, Flytzanistephanopoulos M. Quantitative analysis of the reactivity of formate species seen by DRIFTS over a Au/Ce(La)O2 water-gas shift catalyst: First unambiguous evidence of the minority role of formates as reaction intermediates. Journal of Catalysis, 2007, 247(2): 277–287
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2007.02.013
76 Rivallan M, Seguin E, Thomas S, Lepage M, Takagi N, Hirata H, Thibault-Starzyk F. Platinum sintering on H-ZSM-5 followed by chemometrics of CO adsorption and 2D pressure-jump IR spectroscopy of adsorbed species. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2010, 49(4): 785–789
https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200905181 pmid: 20017171
77 Bare S R, Ressler T. Characterization of catalysts in reactive atmospheres by X-ray absorption spectroscopy. In: Gates B, Knoezinger H, Jentoft F, eds. Advances in Catalysis. Massachusetts: Academic Press, 2009, 339–465
78 Doronkin D E, Lichtenberg H, Grunwaldt J D. Cell designs for in situ and operando studies. In: Iwasawa Y, Asakura K, Tada M, eds. XAFS Techniques for Catalysts, Nanomaterials, and Surfaces Techniques for Catalysts, Nanomaterials, and Surfaces. Berlin: Springer International Publishing, 2017, 75–89
79 Carías-Henriquez A, Pietrzyk S, Dujardin C. Modelling and optimization of IR cell devoted to in situ and operando characterization of catalysts. Catalysis Today, 2013, 205(Supp. C): 134–140
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2012.08.003
80 Burcham L J, Badlani M, Wachs I E. The origin of the ligand effect in metal oxide catalysts: Novel fixed-bed in situ infrared and kinetic studies during methanol oxidation. Journal of Catalysis, 2001, 203(1): 104–121
https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.2001.3312
81 Rasmussen S B, Perez-Ferreras S, Bañares M A, Bazin P, Daturi M. Does pelletizing catalysts influence the efficiency number of activity measurements? Spectrochemical engineering considerations for an accurate operando study. ACS Catalysis, 2012, 3(1): 86–94
https://doi.org/10.1021/cs300687v
82 Lisi L, Pirone R, Russo G, Stanzione V. Cu-ZSM5 based monolith reactors for NO decomposition. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2009, 154(1): 341–347
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.04.025
83 Gibson E K, Zandbergen M W, Jacques S D M, Biao C, Cernik R J, O’Brien M G, Di Michiel M, Weckhuysen B M, Beale A M. Noninvasive spatiotemporal profiling of the processes of impregnation and drying within mMo/Al2O3 catalyst bodies by a combination of X-ray absorption tomography and diagonal offset Raman spectroscopy. ACS Catalysis, 2013, 3(3): 339–347
https://doi.org/10.1021/cs300746a
84 Ferri D, Elsener M, Kröcher O. Methane oxidation over a honeycomb Pd-only three-way catalyst under static and periodic operation. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2018, 220: 67–77
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.070
85 Malpartida I, Marie O, Bazin P, Daturi M, Jeandel X. An operando IR study of the unburnt HC effect on the activity of a commercial automotive catalyst for NH3-SCR. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2011, 102(1): 190–200
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.11.041
86 Ávila P, Montes M, Miró E E. Monolithic reactors for environmental applications: A review on preparation technologies. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2005, 109(1): 11–36
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2005.02.025
87 Chen J, Yang H, Wang N, Ring Z, Dabros T. Mathematical modeling of monolith catalysts and reactors for gas phase reactions. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2008, 345(1): 1–11
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2008.04.010
88 Grunwaldt J D, Wagner J B, Dunin-Borkowski R E. Imaging catalysts at work: A hierarchical approach from the macro- to the meso- and nano-scale. ChemCatChem, 2013, 5(1): 62–80
https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201200356
89 Goguet A, Stewart C, Touitou J, Morgan K. In situ spatially resolved techniques for the investigation of packed bed catalytic reactors: Current status and future outlook of Spaci-FB. Advances in Chemical Engineering, 2017, 50: 131–160
https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ache.2017.05.001
90 Rasmussen S B, Portela R, Bazin P, Ávila P, Bañares M A, Daturi M. Transient operando study on the NH3/NH4+ interplay in V-SCR monolithic catalysts. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2018, 224: 109–115
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.10.026
91 Grunwaldt J D, Kimmerle B, Baiker A, Boye P, Schroer C G, Glatzel P, Borca C N, Beckmann F. Catalysts at work: From integral to spatially resolved X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Catalysis Today, 2009, 145(3–4): 267–278
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2008.11.002
92 van de Water L G A, Bergwerff J A, Nijhuis T A, de Jong K P, Weckhuysen B M. UV-Vis microspectroscopy: probing the initial stages of supported metal oxide catalyst preparation. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2005, 127(14): 5024–5025
https://doi.org/10.1021/ja044460u pmid: 15810829
93 Fait M J G, Abdallah R, Linke D, Kondratenko E V, Rodemerck U. A novel multi-channel reactor system combined with operando UV/vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: Proof of principle. Catalysis Today, 2009, 142(3–4): 196–201
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2008.10.023
94 García-Casado M, Prieto J, Vico-Ruiz E, Lozano-Diz E, Goberna-Selma C, Bañares M A. High-throughput operando Raman-quadrupole mass spectrometer (QMS) system to screen catalytic systems. Applied Spectroscopy, 2014, 68(1): 69–78
https://doi.org/10.1366/13-07212 pmid: 24405956
95 Zandbergen M W, Jacques S D M, Weckhuysen B M, Beale A M. Chemical probing within catalyst bodies by diagonal offset Raman spectroscopy. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2012, 51(4): 957–960
https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201107175 pmid: 22162095
96 van Schrojenstein Lantman E M, Deckert-Gaudig T, Mank A J G, Deckert V, Weckhuysen B M. Catalytic processes monitored at the nanoscale with tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nature Nanotechnology, 2012, 7(9): 583–586
https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.131 pmid: 22902959
97 Li G, Hu D, Xia G, White J M, Zhang C. High throughput operando studies using Fourier transform infrared imaging and Raman spectroscopy. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2008, 79(7): 074101
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2949389 pmid: 18681719
98 Grunwaldt J D, Schroer C G. Hard and soft X-ray microscopy and tomography in catalysis: Bridging the different time and length scales. Chemical Society Reviews, 2010, 39(12): 4741–4753
https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cs00036a pmid: 20978666
99 Jacques S D, Di Michiel M, Kimber S A, Yang X, Cernik R J, Beale A M, Billinge S J. Pair distribution function computed tomography. Nature Communications, 2013, 4(1): 2536
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3536 pmid: 24077398
100 Beale A M, Jacques S D M, Gibson E K, Di Michiel M. Progress towards five dimensional diffraction imaging of functional materials under process conditions. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 2014, 277–278: 208–223
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2014.05.008
101 Vila F D, Rehr J J, Kelly S D, Bare S R. Operando effects on the structure and dynamics of PtnSnm/g-Al2O3 from ab initio molecular dynamics and X-ray absorption spectra. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2013, 117(24): 12446–12457
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp403931z
102 O’Brien M G, Jacques S D M, Di Michiel M, Barnes P, Weckhuysen B M, Beale A M. Active phase evolution in single Ni/Al2O3 methanation catalyst bodies studied in real time using combined μ-XRD-CT and μ-absorption-CT. Chemical Science, 2012, 3(2): 509–523
https://doi.org/10.1039/C1SC00637A
103 Senecal P, Jacques S D M, Di Michiel M, Kimber S A J, Vamvakeros A, Odarchenko Y, Lezcano-Gonzalez I, Paterson J, Ferguson E, Beale A M. Real-time scattering-contrast imaging of a supported cobalt-based catalyst body during activation and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis revealing spatial dependence of particle size and phase on catalytic properties. ACS Catalysis, 2017, 7(4): 2284–2293
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.6b03145
104 Ngo C, Dzara M J, Shulda S, Pylypenko S.Spectroscopy and Microscopy for Characterization of Fuel Cell Catalysts. Electrocatalysts for Low Temperature Fuel Cells. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2017, 443–466
105 Zhang C, Gustafson J, Merte L R, Evertsson J, Norén K, Carlson S, Svensson H, Carlsson P A. An in situ sample environment reaction cell for spatially resolved X-ray absorption spectroscopy studies of powders and small structured reactors. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2015, 86(3): 033112
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4915321 pmid: 25832216
106 Alrwashdeh S S, Manke I, Markötter H, Klages M, Göbel M, Haußmann J, Scholta J, Banhart J. In operando quantification of three-dimensional water distribution in nanoporous carbon-based layers in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. ACS Nano, 2017, 11(6): 5944–5949
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b01720 pmid: 28541662
107 Yang Y, Risse S, Mei S, Jafta C J, Lu Y, Stöcklein C, Kardjilov N, Manke I, Gong J, Kochovski Z, Ballauff M. Binder-free carbon monolith cathode material for operando investigation of high performance lithium-sulfur batteries with X-ray radiography. Energy Storage Materials, 2017, 9: 96–104
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2017.06.008
108 Sezen H, Rockett A A, Suzer S. XPS investigation of a CdS-based photoresistor under working conditions: Operando-XPS. Analytical Chemistry, 2012, 84(6): 2990–2994
https://doi.org/10.1021/ac300220u pmid: 22369585
109 Polcari D, Dauphin-Ducharme P, Mauzeroll J. Scanning electrochemical microscopy: A comprehensive review of experimental parameters from 1989 to 2015. Chemical Reviews, 2016, 116(22): 13234–13278
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00067 pmid: 27736057
110 Li F, Ciani I, Bertoncello P, Unwin P R, Zhao J, Bradbury C R, Fermin D J. Scanning electrochemical microscopy of redox-mediated hydrogen evolution catalyzed by two-dimensional assemblies of palladium nanoparticles. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2008, 112(26): 9686–9694
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp8001228
111 Sá J, Fernandes D L A, Aiouache F, Goguet A, Hardacre C, Lundie D, Naeem W, Partridge W P, Stere C, Spaci M S. SpaciMS: Spatial and temporal operando resolution of reactions within catalytic monoliths. Analyst, 2010, 135(9): 2260–2272
https://doi.org/10.1039/c0an00303d pmid: 20697617
112 Bosco M, Vogel F. Optically accessible channel reactor for the kinetic investigation of hydrocarbon reforming reactions. Catalysis Today, 2006, 116(3): 348–353
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2006.05.064
113 Horn R, Williams K A, Degenstein N J, Bitsch-Larsen A, Dalle Nogare D, Tupy S A, Schmidt L D. Methane catalytic partial oxidation on autothermal Rh and Pt foam catalysts: Oxidation and reforming zones, transport effects, and approach to thermodynamic equilibrium. Journal of Catalysis, 2007, 249(2): 380–393
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2007.05.011
114 Luo J Y, Hou X, Wijayakoon P, Schmieg S J, Li W, Epling W S. Spatially resolving SCR reactions over a Fe/zeolite catalyst. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2011, 102(1–2): 110–119
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.11.031
115 Kopyscinski J, Schildhauer T J, Vogel F, Biollaz S M A, Wokaun A. Applying spatially resolved concentration and temperature measurements in a catalytic plate reactor for the kinetic study of CO methanation. Journal of Catalysis, 2010, 271(2): 262–279
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2010.02.008
116 Geske M, Korup O, Horn R. Resolving kinetics and dynamics of a catalytic reaction inside a fixed bed reactor by combined kinetic and spectroscopic profiling. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2013, 3(1): 169–175
https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CY20489D
117 Korup O, Mavlyankariev S, Geske M, Goldsmith C F, Horn R. Measurement and analysis of spatial reactor profiles in high temperature catalysis research. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 2011, 50(10): 998–1009
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2011.05.024
118 Gladden L F, Mantle M D, Sederman A J. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Catalysts and Catalytic Processes. In: Gates B C, Knzinger H, eds. Advances in Catalysis. Massachusetts: Academic Press, 2006, 1–75
119 Lysova A A, Koptyug I V. Magnetic resonance imaging methods for in situ studies in heterogeneous catalysis. Chemical Society Reviews, 2010, 39(12): 4585–4601
https://doi.org/10.1039/b919540h pmid: 20936227
120 Barskiy D A, Coffey A M, Nikolaou P, Mikhaylov D M, Goodson B M, Branca R T, Lu G J, Shapiro M G, Telkki V V, Zhivonitko V V, Koptyug I V, Salnikov O G, Kovtunov K V, Bukhtiyarov V I, Rosen M S, Barlow M J, Safavi S, Hall I P, Schröder L, Chekmenev E Y. NMR hyperpolarization techniques of gases. Chemistry, 2017, 23(4): 725–751
https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201603884 pmid: 27711999
121 Kovtunov K V, Barskiy D A, Shchepin R V, Coffey A M, Waddell K W, Koptyug I V, Chekmenev E Y. Demonstration of heterogeneous parahydrogen induced polarization using hyperpolarized agent migration from dissolved Rh(I) complex to gas phase. Analytical Chemistry, 2014, 86(13): 6192–6196
https://doi.org/10.1021/ac5013859 pmid: 24918975
122 Telkki V V, Zhivonitko V V, Selent A, Scotti G, Leppäniemi J, Franssila S, Koptyug I V. Lab-on-a-chip reactor imaging with unprecedented chemical resolution by Hadamard-encoded remote detection NMR. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2014, 53(42): 11289–11293
https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201405681 pmid: 25169921
123 Gladden L F, Buckley C, Chow P S, Davidson J F, Mantle M D, Sederman A J. ‘Looking into’ chemical products and processes. Current Applied Physics, 2004, 4(2): 93–97
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2003.10.004
124 Gladden L F, Mantle M D, Sederman A J. Magnetic resonance imaging of catalysts and catalytic processes. Advances in Catalysis, 2006, 50: 1–75
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-0564(06)50001-X
125 Cattaneo A S, Villa D C, Angioni S, Ferrara C, Melzi R, Quartarone E, Mustarelli P. Operando electrochemical NMR microscopy of polymer fuel cells. Energy & Environmental Science, 2015, 8(8): 2383–2388
https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EE01668A
126 Britton M M, Sederman A J, Taylor A F, Scott S K, Gladden L F. Magnetic resonance imaging of flow-distributed oscillations. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2005, 109(37): 8306–8313
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp053063i pmid: 16834220
127 Ulpts J, Dreher W, Kiewidt L, Schubert M, Thöming J. In situ analysis of gas phase reaction processes within monolithic catalyst supports by applying NMR imaging methods. Catalysis Today, 2016, 273: 91–98
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2016.02.062
128 Ulpts J, Kiewidt L, Dreher W, Thöming J. 3D characterization of gas phase reactors with regularly and irregularly structured monolithic catalysts by NMR imaging and modeling. Catalysis Today, 2018, 310: 176–186
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2017.05.009
129 Zheng Q, Russo-Abegao F J, Sederman A J, Gladden L F. Operando determination of the liquid-solid mass transfer coefficient during 1-octene hydrogenation. Chemical Engineering Science, 2017, 171: 614–624
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2017.04.051
130 Li H, Rivallan M, Thibault-Starzyk F, Travert A, Meunier F C. Effective bulk and surface temperatures of the catalyst bed of FT-IR cells used for in situ and operando studies. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2013, 15(19): 7321–7327
https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp50442e pmid: 23576134
131 Kellow J C, Wolf E E. Infrared thermography and FTIR studies of catalyst preparation effects on surface reaction dynamics during CO and ethylene oxidation on Rh/SiO2 catalysts. Chemical Engineering Science, 1990, 45(8): 2597–2602
https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(90)80147-7
132 Kellow J, Wolf E E. In-situ IR thermography studies of reaction dynamics during CO oxidation on Rh-SiO2 catalysts. Catalysis Today, 1991, 9(1): 47–51
https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-5861(91)85006-T
133 Kellow J C, Wolf E E. Propagation of oscillations during ethylene oxidation on a Rh/SiO2 catalyst. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1991, 37(12): 1844–1848
https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690371209
134 Koptyug I V, Khomichev A V, Lysova A A, Sagdeev R Z. Spatially resolved NMR thermometry of an operating fixed-bed catalytic reactor. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2008, 130(32): 10452–10453
https://doi.org/10.1021/ja802075m pmid: 18642909
135 Lysova A A, Kulikov A V, Parmon V N, Sagdeev R Z, Koptyug I V. Quantitative temperature mapping within an operating catalyst by spatially resolved 27Al NMR. Chemical Communications, 2012, 48(46): 5763–5765
https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cc31260c pmid: 22552524
136 Kimmerle B, Grunwaldt J D, Baiker A, Glatzel P, Boye P, Stephan S, Schroer C G. Visualizing a catalyst at work during the ignition of the catalytic partial oxidation of methane. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2009, 113(8): 3037–3040
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp810319v
137 Cao E, Firth S, McMillan P F, Gavriilidis A. Application of microfabricated reactors for operando Raman studies of catalytic oxidation of methanol to formaldehyde on silver. Catalysis Today, 2007, 126(1–2): 119–126
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2006.11.002
138 Gänzler A M, Casapu M, Boubnov A, Müller O, Conrad S, Lichtenberg H, Frahm R, Grunwaldt J D. Operando spatially and time-resolved X-ray absorption spectroscopy and infrared thermography during oscillatory CO oxidation. Journal of Catalysis, 2015, 328: 216–224
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2015.01.002
139 Hannemann S, Grunwaldt J D, van Vegten N, Baiker A, Boye P, Schroer C G. Distinct spatial changes of the catalyst structure inside a fixed-bed microreactor during the partial oxidation of methane over Rh/Al2O3. Catalysis Today, 2007, 126(1–2): 54–63
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2006.08.065
140 Grunwaldt J D, Baiker A. Axial variation of the oxidation state of Pt-Rh/Al2O3 during partial methane oxidation in a fixed-bed reactor: An in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy study. Catalysis Letters, 2005, 99(1): 5–12
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-005-0770-3
141 Fletcher P D I, Haswell S J, Zhang X. Monitoring of chemical reactions within microreactors using an inverted Raman microscopic spectrometer. Electrophoresis, 2003, 24(18): 3239–3245
https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200305532 pmid: 14518051
[1] Yonghyun Kim, Huiwen Liu, Yi Liu, Boa Jin, Hao Zhang, Wenjing Tian, Chan Im. Long-lasting photoluminescence quantum yield of cesium lead halide perovskite-type quantum dots[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 187-197.
[2] Yifei Wang, Kai Wang, Zhao Zhou, Wenli Du. Modeling of oil near-infrared spectroscopy based on similarity and transfer learning algorithm[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(3): 599-607.
[3] Mahmoud Trad, Alexandre Nominé, Natalie Tarasenka, Jaafar Ghanbaja, Cédric Noël, Malek Tabbal, Thierry Belmonte. Synthesis of Ag and Cd nanoparticles by nanosecond-pulsed discharge in liquid nitrogen[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(2): 360-368.
[4] Xiuqi Fang, Carles Corbella, Denis B. Zolotukhin, Michael Keidar. Plasma-enabled healing of graphene nano-platelets layer[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(2): 350-359.
[5] Huiquan Wu, Erik Read, Maury White, Brittany Chavez, Kurt Brorson, Cyrus Agarabi, Mansoor Khan. Real time monitoring of bioreactor mAb IgG3 cell culture process dynamics via Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy: Implications for enabling cell culture process analytical technology? ?[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9(3): 386-406.
[6] Annett SCHROETER, Tanja ENGELBRECHT, Reinhard H. H. NEUBERT. Influence of short chain ceramides and lipophilic penetration enhancers on the nano-structure of stratum corneum model membranes studied using neutron diffraction[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2013, 7(1): 29-36.
[7] Dingding JING, Yongli WANG, Zhijian CHEN, Lina ZHOU, Jingkang WANG. Polymorphism and crystal transformation of penicillin sulfoxide[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2011, 5(4): 442-447.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed