|
|
Pilot plants of membrane technology in industry: Challenges and key learnings |
Colin A. Scholes() |
Peter Cook Centre for Carbon Capture and Storage Research, Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia |
|
|
Abstract Membrane technology holds great potential in gas separation applications, especially carbon dioxide capture from industrial processes. To achieve this potential, the outputs from global research endeavours into membrane technologies must be trialled in industrial processes, which requires membrane-based pilot plants. These pilot plants are critical to the commercialization of membrane technology, be it as gas separation membranes or membrane gas-solvent contactors, as failure at the pilot plant level may delay the development of the technology for decades. Here, the author reports on his experience of operating membrane-based pilot plants for gas separation and contactor configurations as part of three industrial carbon capture initiatives: the Mulgrave project, H3 project and Vales Point project. Specifically, the challenges of developing and operating membrane pilot plants are presented, as well as the key learnings on how to successfully manage membrane pilot plants to achieve desired performance outcomes. The purpose is to assist membrane technologists in the carbon capture field to achieve successful outcomes for their technology innovations.
|
Keywords
membrane gas separation
membrane contactors
carbon capture
pilot plants
key learnings
|
Corresponding Author(s):
Colin A. Scholes
|
Just Accepted Date: 18 September 2019
Online First Date: 08 November 2019
Issue Date: 28 April 2020
|
|
1 |
R W Baker. Advanced Membrane Technology and Applications. Li N N, Fane A G, Ho W S W, Boylewoo T M, eds. New Jersy: John Wiley & Sons, 2008, 559–580
|
2 |
B Van der Bruggen, C Vandecasteele, T Van Gestel, W Doyen, R Leysen. A review of pressure-driven membrane processes in wastewater treatment and drinking water production. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 2004, 22(1): 46–56
|
3 |
T Matsuura. Progress in membrane science and technology for seawater desalination—a review. Desalination, 2001, 134(1-3): 47–54
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(01)00114-X
|
4 |
N Hilal, H Al-Zoubi, N A Darwish, A W Mohammad, M Abu Arabi. A comprehensive review of nanofiltration membranes: Treatment, pretreatment, modelling, and atomic force microscopy. Desalination, 2004, 170(3): 281–308
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2004.01.007
|
5 |
A W Mohammad, Y H Teow, W L Ang, Y T Chung, D L Oatley-Radcliffe, N Hilal. Nanofiltration membranes review: Recent advances and future prospects. Desalination, 2015, 356: 226–254
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.10.043
|
6 |
N Porcelli, S Judd. Chemical cleaning of potable water membranes: A review. Separation and Purification Technology, 2010, 71(2): 137–143
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2009.12.007
|
7 |
M Padaki, R Surya Murali, M S Abdullah, N Misdan, A Moslehyani, M A Kassim, N Hilal, A F Ismail. Membrane technology enhancement in oil-water separation. A review. Desalination, 2015, 357: 197–207
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.11.023
|
8 |
S Sridhar, B Smitha, T M Aminabhavi. Separation of carbon dioxide from natural gas mixtures through polymeric membranes—a review. Separation and Purification Reviews, 2007, 36(2): 113–174
https://doi.org/10.1080/15422110601165967
|
9 |
R W Baker, K Lokhandwala. Natural gas processing with membranes: An overview. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2008, 47(7): 2109–2121
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie071083w
|
10 |
C A Scholes, G W Stevens, S E Kentish. Membrane gas separation applications in natural gas processing. Fuel, 2012, 96(1): 15–28
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.12.074
|
11 |
P Bernardo, E Drioli, G Golemme. Membrane gas separation: A review/state of the art. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2009, 48(10): 4638–4663
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie8019032
|
12 |
R Klaassen, A E Jansen. The membrane contactor: Environmental applications and possibilities. Environmental Progress, 2001, 20(1): 37–43
https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.670200114
|
13 |
C A Scholes, K H Smith, S E Kentish, G W Stevens. CO2 capture from pre-combustion processes—strategies for membrane gas separation. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2010, 4(5): 739–755
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.04.001
|
14 |
C A Scholes, M T Ho, D E Wiley, G W Stevens, S E Kentish. Cost competitive membrane—cryogenic post-combustion carbon capture. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 17: 341–348
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.05.017
|
15 |
T C Merkel, X Lin, X Wei, R W Baker. Power plant post-combustion carbon dioxide capture: An opportunity for membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2010, 359(1-2): 126–139
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.10.041
|
16 |
R Klaassen, P H M Feron, A E Jansen. Membrane contactors in industrial applications. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2005, 83(3): 234–246
https://doi.org/10.1205/cherd.04196
|
17 |
O Falk-Pedersen, M S Gronvold, P Nokleby, Y Bjerve, H F Svendsen. CO2 capture with membrane contactors. International Journal of Green Energy, 2005, 2(2): 157–165
https://doi.org/10.1081/GE-200058965
|
18 |
C E Powell, G G Qiao. Polymeric CO2/N2 gas separation membranes for the capture of carbon dioxide from power plant flue gases. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 279(1-2): 1–49
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.062
|
19 |
M Rezakazemi, A E Amooghin, M M Montazer-Rahmati, A F Ismail, T Matsuura. State-of-the-art membrane based CO2 separation using mixed matrix membranes (MMMs): An overview on current status and future directions. Progress in Polymer Science, 2014, 39(5): 817–861
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.01.003
|
20 |
M B Hägg, A Lindbrathen, X He, S G Nodeland, T Cantero. Pilot demonstration reporting on CO2 capture from a cement plant using hollow fiber process. Energy Procedia, 2017, 114: 6150–6165
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1752
|
21 |
M Sandru, T J Kim, W Capala, M Huijbers, M B Hagg. Pilot scale testing of polymeric membranes for CO2 capture from coal fired power plants. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 6473–6480
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.577
|
22 |
J Pohlmann, M Bram, K Wilkner, T Brinkmann. Pilot scale separation of CO2 from power plant flue gases by membrane technology. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2016, 53: 56–64
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.07.033
|
23 |
A Qader. Carbon capture and storage demonstration by CO2CRC. In: Carbon Management. Houston, TX: AIChE Academy, 2017, 3.15–3.45
|
24 |
L S White, X Wei, S Pande, T Wu, T C Merkel. Extended flue gas trials with a membrane-based pilot plant at a one-ton-per-day carbon capture rate. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 496(1): 48–57
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.08.003
|
25 |
O Falk-Pedersen, Y Bjerve, G Glittum, S Ronning. Separation of carbon dioxide from offshore gas turbine exhaust. Energy Conversion and Management, 1995, 36(6-9): 393–396
https://doi.org/10.1016/0196-8904(95)00028-C
|
26 |
O Falk-Pedersen, H Dannstrom. Separation of carbon dioxide from offshore gas turbine exhaust. Energy Conversion and Management, 1997, 38: S81–S86
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(96)00250-6
|
27 |
A Comite, C Costa, M Demartini, R Di Felice, M Oliva. Exploring CO2 capture from pressurized industrial gaseous effluents in membrane contactor-based pilot plant. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2017, 67: 60–70
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.10.014
|
28 |
S Li, D J Rocha, S J Zhou, H S Meyer, B Bikson, Y Ding. Post-combustion CO2 capture using super-hydrophobic, polyether ether ketone, hollow fiber membrane contactors. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 430: 79–86
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.12.001
|
29 |
C A Scholes, J Bacus, G Q Chen, W X Tao, G Li, A Qader, G W Stevens, S E Kentish. Pilot plant performance of rubbery polymeric membranes for carbon dioxide separation from syngas. Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, 389: 470–477
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.11.011
|
30 |
C A Scholes, M Simioni, A Qader, G W Stevens, S E Kentish. Membrane gas-solvent contactor trials of CO2 absorption from syngas. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2012, 195-196: 188–197
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.04.034
|
31 |
C A Scholes, A Qader, G W Stevens, S E Kentish. Membrane gas-solvent contactor trials of CO2 absorption from flue gas. Separation Science and Technology, 2014, 49(16): 2449–2458
https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2014.937499
|
32 |
C A Scholes, A Qader, G W Stevens, S E Kentish. Membrane pilot plant trials of CO2 separation from flue gas. Greenhouse Gases. Science and Technology, 2015, 5(3): 1–10
|
33 |
A Qader, B Hooper, G Stevens. Demonstrating carbon capture. Chemical Engineering (Albany, N.Y.), 2009, 11: 30–31 (TCE)
|
34 |
C A Scholes, S E Kentish, G W Stevens. Effects of minor components in carbon dioxide capture using polymeric gas separation membranes. Separation and Purification Reviews, 2009, 38(1): 1–44
https://doi.org/10.1080/15422110802411442
|
35 |
C A Scholes, J Motuzas, S Smart, S E Kentish. Membrane adhesives. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2014, 53(23): 9523–9533
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie501036p
|
36 |
D deMontigny, P Tontiwachwuthikul, A Chakma. Comparing the absorption performance of packed columns and membrane contactors. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2005, 44(15): 5726–5732
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie040264k
|
37 |
K Alharthi, Y Christianto, A Aguiar, A D Stickland, G W Stevens, S E Kentish. Impact of fly ash on the membrane performance in postcombustion carbon capture applications. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2016, 55(16): 4711–4719
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b00312
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|