|
|
Comparison of the removal of monovalent and divalent cations in the microbial desalination cell |
Shanshan CHEN,Haiping LUO,Yanping HOU,Guangli LIU(),Renduo ZHANG,Bangyu QIN |
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China |
|
|
Abstract Microbial desalination cell (MDC) is a promising technology to desalinate water and generate electrical power simultaneously. The objectives of this study were to investigate the desalination performance of monovalent and divalent cations in the MDC, and discuss the effect of ion characteristics, ion concentrations, and electrical characteristics. Mixed salt solutions of NaCl, MgCl2, KCl, and CaCl2 with the same concentration were used in the desalination chamber to study removal of cations. Results showed that in the mixed salt solutions, the electrodialysis desalination rates of cations were: Ca2+ >Mg2+>Na+>K+. Higher ionic charges and smaller hydrated ionic radii resulted in higher desalination rates of the cations, in which the ionic charge was more important than the hydrated ionic radius. Mixed solutions of NaCl and MgCl2 with different concentrations were used in the desalination chamber to study the effect of ion concentrations. Results showed that when ion concentrations of Na+ were one-fifth to five times of Mg2+, ion concentration influenced the dialysis more profoundly than electrodialysis. With the current densities below a certain value, charge transfer efficiencies became very low and the dialysis was the main process responsible for the desalination. And the phosphate transfer from the anode chamber and potassium transfer from the cathode chamber could balance 1%–3% of the charge transfer in the MDC.
|
Keywords
divalent ion
electrodialysis
ion characteristic
microbial desalination cell
monovalent ion
|
Corresponding Author(s):
Guangli LIU
|
Online First Date: 29 November 2013
Issue Date: 13 February 2015
|
|
1 |
Cao X, Huang X, Liang P, Xiao K, Zhou Y, Zhang X, Logan B E. A new method for water desalination using microbial desalination cells. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(18): 7148–7152
https://doi.org/10.1021/es901950j
pmid: 19806756
|
2 |
Logan B E, Regan J M. Microbial fuel cells–challenges and applications. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(17): 5172–5180
https://doi.org/10.1021/es0627592
pmid: 16999086
|
3 |
Hou Y, Li K, Luo H, Liu G, Zhang R, Qin B, Chen S. Using crosslinked polyvinyl alcohol polymer membrane as a separator in the microbial fuel cell. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 2014, 8(1): 137–143
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-013-0534-z
|
4 |
Chen X, Xia X, Liang P, Cao X, Sun H, Huang X. Stacked microbial desalination cells to enhance water desalination efficiency. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(6): 2465–2470
https://doi.org/10.1021/es103406m
pmid: 21322552
|
5 |
Jacobson K S, Drew D M, He Z. Efficient salt removal in a continuously operated upflow microbial desalination cell with an air cathode. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(1): 376–380
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.030
pmid: 20584603
|
6 |
Kim Y, Logan B E. Series assembly of microbial desalination cells containing stacked electrodialysis cells for partial or complete seawater desalination. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(13): 5840–5845
https://doi.org/10.1021/es200584q
pmid: 21671676
|
7 |
Luo H, Jenkins P E, Ren Z. Concurrent desalination and hydrogen generation using microbial electrolysis and desalination cells. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(1): 340–344
https://doi.org/10.1021/es1022202
pmid: 21121677
|
8 |
Mehanna M, Kiely P D, Call D F, Logan B E. Microbial electrodialysis cell for simultaneous water desalination and hydrogen gas production. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(24): 9578–9583
https://doi.org/10.1021/es1025646
pmid: 21077623
|
9 |
Chen S, Liu G, Zhang R, Qin B, Luo Y. Development of the microbial electrolysis desalination and chemical-production cell for desalination as well as acid and alkali productions. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(4): 2467–2472
pmid: 22242642
|
10 |
Chen S, Liu G, Zhang R, Qin B, Luo Y, Hou Y. Improved performance of the microbial electrolysis desalination and chemical-production cell using the stack structure.Bioresource Technology, 2012, 116: 507–511
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.073
pmid: 22608915
|
11 |
Jacobson K S, Drew D M, He Z. Use of a liter-scale microbial desalination cell as a platform to study bioelectrochemical desalination with salt solution or artificial seawater. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(10): 4652–4657
https://doi.org/10.1021/es200127p
pmid: 21526816
|
12 |
Mehanna M, Saito T, Yan J L, Hickner M, Cao X, Huang X, Logan B E. Using microbial desalination cells to reduce water salinity prior to reverse osmosis. Energy & Environmental Science, 2010, 3(8): 1114–1120
|
13 |
Cheng S, Xing D, Call D F, Logan B E. Direct biological conversion of electrical current into methane by electromethanogenesis. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(10): 3953–3958
https://doi.org/10.1021/es803531g
pmid: 19544913
|
14 |
Liu H, Cheng S, Logan B E. Production of electricity from acetate or butyrate using a single-chamber microbial fuel cell. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005, 39(2): 658–662
https://doi.org/10.1021/es048927c
pmid: 15707069
|
15 |
Logan B E, Hamelers B, Rozendal R, Schr?der U, Keller J, Freguia S, Aelterman P, Verstraete W, Rabaey K. Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(17): 5181–5192
https://doi.org/10.1021/es0605016
pmid: 16999087
|
16 |
Firdaous L, Quéméneur F, Schlumpf J P, Malériat J P. Modification of the ionic composition of salt solutions by electrodialysis. Desalination, 2004, 167: 397–402
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2004.06.153
|
17 |
Walha K, Amar R B, Firdaous L, Quéméneur F, Jaouen P. Brackish groundwater treatment by nanofiltration, reverse osmosis and electrodialysis in Tunisia: performance and cost comparison. Desalination, 2007, 207(1–3): 95–106
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.583
|
18 |
Luo H, Xu P, Jenkins P E, Ren Z. Ionic composition and transport mechanisms in microbial desalination cells. Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, 409–410: 16–23
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.02.059
|
19 |
Kim J R, Cheng S, Oh S E, Logan B E. Power generation using different cation, anion, and ultrafiltration membranes in microbial fuel cells. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(3): 1004–1009
https://doi.org/10.1021/es062202m
pmid: 17328216
|
20 |
Choi J H, Lee H J, Moon S H. Effects of electrolytes on the transport phenomena in a cation-exchange membrane. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2001, 238(1): 188–195
https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2001.7510
pmid: 11350153
|
21 |
Rozendal R A, Sleutels T H J A, Hamelers H V M, Buisman C J N. Effect of the type of ion exchange membrane on performance, ion transport, and pH in biocatalyzed electrolysis of wastewater. Water Science and Technology, 2008, 57(11): 1757–1762
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.043
pmid: 18547927
|
22 |
Elattar A, Elmindaoui A, Pismenskaia N, Gavach C, Pourcelly G. Comparison of transport properties of monovalent anions through anion-exchange membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 1998, 143(1–2): 249–261
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00013-1
|
23 |
Sleutelsa T H J A, Hamelersa H V M, Rozendal R A, Buisman C J N. Ion transport resistance in microbial electrolysis cells with anion and cation exchange membranes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(9): 3612–3620
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.03.004
|
24 |
Rozendal R A, Hamelers H V M, Molenkamp R J, Buisman C J N. Performance of single chamber biocatalyzed electrolysis with different types of ion exchange membranes. Water Research, 2007, 41(9): 1984–1994
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.01.019
pmid: 17343894
|
25 |
Fan Y, Hu H, Liu H, Sustainable power generation in microbial fuel cells using bicarbonate buffer and proton transfer mechanisms. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(23): 8154–8158
https://doi.org/10.1021/es071739c
pmid: 18186352
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|