Fabrication of cellulose aerogel from wheat straw with strong absorptive capacity

doi:10.15302/J-FASE-2014004

Front. Agr. Sci. Eng.

2014, Vol. 1

Issue (1) : 46-52 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2014004

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Fabrication of cellulose aerogel from wheat straw with strong absorptive capacity

Jian LI(

),Caichao WAN,Yun LU,Qingfeng SUN

Material Science and Engineering College, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China

Download: PDF(1242 KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract

An effectively mild solvent solution containing NaOH/PEG was employed to dissolve the cellulose extracted from the wheat straw. With further combined regeneration process and freeze-drying, the cellulose aerogel was successfully obtained. Scanning electron microscope, X-ray diffraction technique, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller were used to characterize this cellulose aerogel of low density (about 40 mg·cm^-3) and three-dimensional network with large specific surface area (about 101 m²·g^-1). Additionally, with a hydrophobic modification by trimethylchlorosilane, the cellulose aerogel showed a strong absorptive capacity for oil and dye solutions.

Keywords cellulose aerogel absorptive capacity waste wheat straw freeze-drying

Corresponding Author(s): Jian LI

Issue Date: 22 May 2014

Cite this article:

Jian LI,Caichao WAN,Yun LU, et al. Fabrication of cellulose aerogel from wheat straw with strong absorptive capacity[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2014, 1(1): 46-52.

URL:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/10.15302/J-FASE-2014004
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/Y2014/V1/I1/46

Tab.1 Generation of piPSCs

Tab.2 Generation of bovine iPS cells

Tab.3 Generation of ovine and caprine iPS cells

Fig.1 Attempts to derive authentic piPSCs in the na?ve state. Chemicals, cytokines, fatty acids and other additives can be supplemented into the basic medium during the course of iPSC generation from somatic cells and ESC derivation from embryos. Various standards can be used to evaluate pluripotency of na?ve porcine PSCs. Then, these na?ve cells can be used in different applications such as animal breeding as well as basic research and clinical medicine

1	Evans M J, Kaufman M H. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature, 1981, 292(5819): 154-156 https://doi.org/10.1038/292154a0
2	Martin G R. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1981, 78(12): 7634-7638 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.78.12.7634
3	Wang Z Q, Kiefer F, Urbánek P, Wagner E F. Generation of completely embryonic stem cell-derived mutant mice using tetraploid blastocyst injection. Mechanisms of Development, 1997, 62(2): 137-145 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4773(97)00655-2
4	Eakin G S, Behringer R R. Tetraploid development in the mouse. Developmental Dynamics, 2003, 228(4): 751-766 https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.10363
5	Nagy A, Gócza E, Diaz E M, Prideaux V R, Iványi E, Markkula M, Rossant J. Embryonic stem cells alone are able to support fetal development in the mouse. Development, 1990, 110(3): 815-821
6	Thomson J A. Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Blastocysts. Science, 1998, 282(5391): 1145-1147 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5391.1145
7	Evans M J, Notarianni E, Laurie S, Moor R M. Derivation and preliminary characterization of pluripotent cell lines from porcine and bovine blastocysts. Theriogenology, 1990, 33(1): 125-128 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(90)90603-Q
8	Notarianni E, Laurie S, Moor R M, Evans M J. Maintenance and differentiation in culture of pluripotential embryonic cell lines from pig blastocysts. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. Supplement, 1990, 41: 51-56
9	Strojek R M, Reed M A, Hoover J L, Wagner T E. A method for cultivating morphologically undifferentiated embryonic stem cells from porcine blastocysts. Theriogenology, 1990, 33(4): 901-913 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(90)90825-E
10	Saito S, Strelchenko N, Niemann H. Bovine embryonic stem cell-like cell lines cultured over several passages. Roux's Archives of Developmental Biology, 1992, 201(3): 134-141 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188711
11	Talbot N C, Powell A M, Rexroad C E Jr. In vitro pluripotency of epiblasts derived from bovine blastocysts. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 1995, 42(1): 35-52 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080420106
12	Van Stekelenburg-Hamers A E, Van Achterberg T A, Rebel H G, Fléchon J E, Campbell K H, Weima S M, Mummery C L. Isolation and characterization of permanent cell lines from inner cell mass cells of bovine blastocysts. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 1995, 40(4): 444-454 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080400408
13	Cibelli J B, Stice S L, Golueke P J, Kane J J, Jerry J, Blackwell C, de León F A P, Robl J M. Transgenic bovine chimeric offspring produced from somatic cell-derived stem-like cells. Nature Biotechnology, 1998, 16(7): 642-646 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0798-642
14	Notarianni E, Galli C, Laurie S, Moor R M, Evans M J. Derivation of pluripotent, embryonic cell lines from the pig and sheep. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. Supplement, 1991, 43: 255-260
15	Meinecke-Tillmann S, Meinecke B. Isolation of ES-like cell lines from ovine and caprine pre-implantation embryos. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 1996, 113(1-6):413-426
16	Wang S, Tang X, Niu Y, Chen H, Li B, Li T, Zhang X, Hu Z, Zhou Q, Ji W. Generation and characterization of rabbit embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells, 2007, 25(2): 481-489 https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2006-0226
17	Saito S, Sawai K, Minamihashi A, Ugai H, Murata T, Yokoyama K K. Derivation, maintenance, and induction of the differentiation in vitro of equine embryonic stem cells. Methods in Molecular Biology, 2006, 329: 59-79
18	Hatoya S, Torii R, Kondo Y, Okuno T, Kobayashi K, Wijewardana V, Kawate N, Tamada H, Sawada T, Kumagai D, Sugiura K, Inaba T. Isolation and characterization of embryonic stem-like cells from canine blastocysts. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 2006, 73(3): 298-305 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20392
19	Yu X, Jin G, Yin X, Cho S, Jeon J, Lee S, Kong I. Isolation and characterization of embryonic stem-like cells derived from in vivo-produced cat blastocysts. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 2008, 75(9): 1426-1432 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20867
20	Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell, 2006, 126(4): 663-676 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024
21	Park J K, Kim H S, Uh K J, Choi K H, Kim H M, Lee T, Yang B C, Kim H J, Ka H H, Kim H, Lee C K. Primed pluripotent cell lines derived from various embryonic origins and somatic cells in pig. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8(1): e52481 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052481
22	Tan G, Ren L, Huang Y, Tang X, Zhou Y, Zhou Y, Li D, Song H, Ouyang H, Pang D. Isolation and culture of embryonic stem-like cells from pig nuclear transfer blastocysts of different days. Zygote, 2012, 20(4): 347-352 https://doi.org/10.1017/S096719941100030X
23	Vackova I, Ungrova A, Lopes F. Putative embryonic stem cell lines from pig embryos. Journal of Reproduction and Development, 2007, 53(6): 1137-1149 https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.19108
24	Kim H S, Son H Y, Kim S, Lee G S, Park C H, Kang S K, Lee B C, Hwang W S, Lee C K. Isolation and initial culture of porcine inner cell masses derived from in vitro-produced blastocysts. Zygote, 2007, 15(01): 55 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199406003972
25	Li M, Ma W, Hou Y, Sun X F, Sun Q Y, Wang W H. Improved isolation and culture of embryonic stem cells from Chinese miniature pig. Journal of Reproduction and Development, 2004, 50(2): 237-244 https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.50.237
26	Li M, Li Y H, Hou Y, Sun X F, Sun Q, Wang W H. Isolation and culture of pluripotent cells from in vitro produced porcine embryos. Zygote, 2004, 12(1): 43-48 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199404002679
27	Brevini T A L, Cillo F, Gandolfi F. 168 Establishment and molecular characterization of pig parthenogenetic embryonic stem cells. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development, 2004, 17(2): 235 https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv17n2Ab168
28	Li M, Zhang D, Hou Y, Jiao L, Zheng X, Wang W H. Isolation and culture of embryonic stem cells from porcine blastocysts. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 2003, 65(4): 429-434 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.10301
29	Miyoshi K, Taguchi Y, Sendai Y, Hoshi H, Sato E. Establishment of a porcine cell line from in vitro-produced blastocysts and transfer of the cells into enucleated oocytes. Biology of Reproduction, 2000, 62(6): 1640-1646 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod62.6.1640
30	Anderson G B, Choi S J, Bondurant R H. Survival of porcine inner cell masses in culture and after injection into blastocysts. Theriogenology, 1994, 42(1): 204-212 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(94)90676-A
31	Hochereau-de Reviers M T, Perreau C. P.C., In vitro culture of embryonic disc cells from porcine blastocysts. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development, 1993, 33(5): 475-483 https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:19930508
32	Piedrahita J A, Anderson G B, Bondurant R H. On the isolation of embryonic stem cells: Comparative behavior of murine, porcine and ovine embryos. Theriogenology, 1990, 34(5): 879-901 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(90)90559-C
33	Chen L R, Shiue Y L, Bertolini L, Medrano J F, BonDurant R H, Anderson G B. Establishment of pluripotent cell lines from porcine preimplantation embryos. Theriogenology, 1999, 52(2): 195-212 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00122-3
34	Iwasaki S, Campbell K H, Galli C, Akiyama K. Production of live calves derived from embryonic stem-like cells aggregated with tetraploid embryos. Biology of Reproduction, 2000, 62(2): 470-475 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod62.2.470
35	Alberio R, Croxall N, Allegrucci C. Pig epiblast stem cells depend on activin/nodal signaling for pluripotency and self-renewal. Stem Cells and Development, 2010, 19(10): 1627-1636 https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2010.0012
36	Kim S, Kim J H, Lee E, Jeong Y W, Hossein M S, Park S M, Park S W, Lee J Y, Jeong Y I, Kim H S, Kim Y W, Hyun S H, Hwang W S. Establishment and characterization of embryonic stem-like cells from porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer blastocysts. Zygote, 2010, 18(2): 93-101 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199409990372
37	Vassiliev I, Vassilieva S, Beebe L F S, Harrison S J, McIlfatrick S M, Nottle M B. In vitro and in vivo characterization of putative porcine embryonic stem cells. Cell Reprogram, 2010, 12(2): 223-230 https://doi.org/10.1089/cell.2009.0053
38	Vassiliev I, Vassilieva S, Truong K P, Beebe L F S, McIlfatrick S M, Harrison S J, Nottle M B. Isolation and in vitro characterization of putative porcine embryonic stem cells from cloned embryos treated with trichostatin A. Cell Reprogram, 2011, 13(3): 205-213 https://doi.org/10.1089/cell.2010.0102
39	Telugu B P, Ezashi T, Roberts R M. The promise of stem cell research in pigs and other ungulate species. Stem Cell Reviews, 2010, 6(1): 31-41 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-009-9101-1
40	Moore K, Piedrahita J A. The effects of human leukemia inhibitory factor (hLIF) and culture medium on in vitro differentiation of cultured porcine inner cell mass (pICM). In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Animal, 1997, 33(1): 62-71 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-997-0023-4
41	Ma T, Xie M, Laurent T, Ding S. Progress in the reprogramming of somatic cells. Circulation Research, 2013, 112(3): 562-574 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.249235
42	Hou P, Li Y, Zhang X, Liu C, Guan J, Li H, Zhao T, Ye J, Yang W, Liu K, Ge J, Xu J, Zhang Q, Zhao Y, Deng H. Pluripotent stem cells induced from mouse somatic cells by small-molecule compounds. Science, 2013, 341(6146): 651-654 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239278
43	Lin S L, Chang D C, Chang-Lin S, Lin C H, Wu D T S, Chen D T, Ying S Y. Mir-302 reprograms human skin cancer cells into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. RNA, 2008, 14(10): 2115-2124 https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.1162708
44	Judson R L, Babiarz J E, Venere M, Blelloch R. Embryonic stem cell-specific microRNAs promote induced pluripotency. Nature Biotechnology, 2009, 27(5): 459-461 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1535
45	Melton C, Judson R L, Blelloch R. Opposing microRNA families regulate self-renewal in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature, 2010, 463(7281): 621-626 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08725
46	Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell, 2007, 131(5): 861-872 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019
47	Blelloch R, Venere M, Yen J, Ramalho-Santos M. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells in the absence of drug selection. Cell Stem Cell, 2007, 1(3): 245-247 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2007.08.008
48	Yu J, Vodyanik M A, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane J L, Tian S, Nie J, Jonsdottir G A, Ruotti V, Stewart R, Slukvin I I, Thomson J A. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science, 2007, 318(5858): 1917-1920 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151526
49	Stadtfeld M, Maherali N, Breault D T, Hochedlinger K. Defining molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse. Cell Stem Cell, 2008, 2(3): 230-240 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2008.02.001
50	Esteban M A, Xu J, Yang J, Peng M, Qin D, Li W, Jiang Z, Chen J, Deng K, Zhong M, Cai J, Lai L, Pei D. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cell lines from Tibetan miniature pig. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2009, 284(26): 17634-17640 https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.008938
51	Ezashi T, Telugu B P V L, Alexenko A P, Sachdev S, Sinha S, Roberts R M. Derivation of induced pluripotent stem cells from pig somatic cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009, 106(27): 10993-10998 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905284106
52	Nayernia K, Lee J H, Lako M, Armstrong L, Herbert M, Li M, Engel W, Elliott D, Stojkovic M, Parrington J, Murdoch A, Strachan T, Zhang X. In Vitro Derivation of Human Sperm from Embryonic Stem Cells. Stem Cells and Development, 2009,(Epub ahead of print) https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2009.0063
53	Telugu B P, Ezashi T, Sinha S, Alexenko A P, Spate L, Prather R S, Roberts R M. Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF)-dependent, pluripotent stem cells established from inner cell mass of porcine embryos. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2011, 286(33): 28948-28953 https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.229468
54	Brevini T, Pennarossa G, Maffei S, Gandolfi F. Pluripotency network in porcine embryos and derived cell lines. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 2012, 47(Suppl 4): 86-91 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2012.02060.x
55	Liu K, Ji G, Mao J, Liu M, Wang L, Chen C, Liu L. Generation of porcine-induced pluripotent stem cells by using OCT4 and KLF4 porcine factors. Cell Reprogram, 2012, 14(6): 505-513
56	Montserrat N, de O?ate L, Garreta E, González F, Adamo A, Eguizábal C, H?fner S, Vassena R, Belmonte J C I. Generation of feeder-free pig induced pluripotent stem cells without Pou5f1. Cell Transplantation, 2012, 21(5): 815-825 https://doi.org/10.3727/096368911X601019
57	Gao Y, Guo Y, Duan A, Cheng D, Zhang S, Wang H. Optimization of culture conditions for maintaining porcine induced pluripotent stem cells. DNA and Cell Biology, 2014, 33(1): 1-11 https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.2013.2095
58	West F D, Terlouw S L, Kwon D J, Mumaw J L, Dhara S K, Hasneen K, Dobrinsky J R, Stice S L. Porcine induced pluripotent stem cells produce chimeric offspring. Stem Cells and Development, 2010, 19(8): 1211-1220 https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2009.0458
59	Wu Z, Chen J, Ren J, Bao L, Liao J, Cui C, Rao L, Li H, Gu Y, Dai H, Zhu H, Teng X, Cheng L, Xiao L. Generation of pig induced pluripotent stem cells with a drug-inducible system. Journal of Molecular Cell Biology, 2009, 1(1): 46-54 https://doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mjp003
60	West F D, Uhl E W, Liu Y, Stowe H, Lu Y, Yu P, Gallegos-Cardenas A, Pratt S L, Stice S L. Brief Report: Chimeric Pigs Produced from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Demonstrate Germline Transmission and No Evidence of Tumor Formation in Young Pigs. Stem Cells, 2011, 29(10): 1640-1643 https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.713
61	Montserrat N, Bahima E G, Batlle L, H?fner S, Rodrigues A M C, González F, Belmonte J C I. Generation of pig iPS cells: a model for cell therapy. Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, 2011, 4(2): 121-130 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-010-9233-3
62	Hall V J, Kristensen M, Rasmussen M A, Ujhelly O, Dinnyés A, Hyttel P. Temporal repression of endogenous pluripotency genes during reprogramming of porcine induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Reprogram, 2012, 14(3): 204-216
63	Fujishiro S H, Nakano K, Mizukami Y, Azami T, Arai Y, Matsunari H, Ishino R, Nishimura T, Watanabe M, Abe T, Furukawa Y, Umeyama K, Yamanaka S, Ema M, Nagashima H, Hanazono Y. Generation of naive-like porcine-induced pluripotent stem cells capable of contributing to embryonic and fetal development. Stem Cells and Development, 2013, 22(3): 473-482 https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2012.0173
64	Ji G, Ruan W, Liu K, Wang F, Sakellariou D, Chen J, Yang Y, Okuka M, Han J, Liu Z, Lai L, Gagos S, Xiao L, Deng H, Li N, Liu L. Telomere reprogramming and maintenance in porcine iPS cells. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8(9): e74202 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074202
65	Kwon D J, Jeon H, Oh K B, Ock S A, Im G S, Lee S S, Im S K, Lee J W, Oh S J, Park J K, Hwang S. Generation of leukemia inhibitory factor-dependent induced pluripotent stem cells from the Massachusetts General Hospital miniature pig. BioMed Research International, 2013, 2013: 1-11 https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/140639
66	Ma K, Song G, An X, Fan A, Tan W, Tang B, Zhang X, Li Z. miRNAs promote generation of porcine-induced pluripotent stem cells. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, 2014, 389(1-2): 209-218 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-013-1942-x
67	Zhang Y, Wei C, Zhang P, Li X, Liu T, Pu Y, Li Y, Cao Z, Cao H, Liu Y, Zhang X, Zhang Y. Efficient reprogramming of naive-like induced pluripotent stem cells from porcine adipose-derived stem cells with a feeder-independent and serum-free system. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(1): e85089 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085089
68	Huang B, Li T, Alonso-Gonzalez L, Gorre R, Keatley S, Green A, Turner P, Kallingappa P K, Verma V, Oback B. A virus-free poly-promoter vector induces pluripotency in quiescent bovine cells under chemically defined conditions of dual kinase inhibition. PLoS ONE, 2011, 6(9): e24501 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024501
69	Han X, Han J, Ding F, Cao S, Lim S S, Dai Y, Zhang R, Zhang Y, Lim B, Li N. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from bovine embryonic fibroblast cells. Cell Research, 2011, 21(10): 1509-1512 https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2011.125
70	Sumer H, Liu J, Malaver-Ortega L F, Lim M L, Khodadadi K, Verma P J. NANOG is a key factor for induction of pluripotency in bovine adult fibroblasts. Journal of Animal Science, 2011, 89(9): 2708-2716 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3666
71	Cao H, Yang P, Pu Y, Sun X, Yin H, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Li Y, Liu Y, Fang F, Zhang Z, Tao Y, Zhang X. Characterization of bovine induced pluripotent stem cells by lentiviral transduction of reprogramming factor fusion proteins. International Journal of Biological Sciences, 2012, 8(4): 498-511 https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.3723
72	Bao L, He L, Chen J, Wu Z, Liao J, Rao L, Ren J, Li H, Zhu H, Qian L, Gu Y, Dai H, Xu X, Zhou J, Wang W, Cui C, Xiao L. Reprogramming of ovine adult fibroblasts to pluripotency via drug-inducible expression of defined factors. Cell Research, 2011, 21(4): 600-608 https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2011.6
73	Yang Li M C. Andrew Stephen Lee, Kehua Zhang, Dongjun Liu, Reprogramming of Sheep Fibroblasts into Pluripotency under a Drug-Inducible Expression of Mouse-Derived Defined Factors. PLoS ONE, 2011, 6(1): e15947
74	Liu, J., Balehosur D, Murray B, Kelly JM, Sumer H, Verma PJ. Generation and characterization of reprogrammed sheep induced pluripotent stem cells. Theriogenology, 2012. 77(2): p. 338-346.
75	Sartori C, DiDomenico A I, Thomson A J, Milne E, Lillico S G, Burdon T G, Whitelaw C B. Ovine-induced pluripotent stem cells can contribute to chimeric lambs. Cell Reprogram, 2012, 14(1): 8-19
76	Ren J, Pak Y, He L, Qian L, Gu Y, Li H, Rao L, Liao J, Cui C, Xu X, Zhou J, Ri H, Xiao L. Generation of hircine-induced pluripotent stem cells by somatic cell reprogramming. Cell Research, 2011, 21(5): 849-853 https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2011.37
77	Song H, Li H, Huang M, Xu D, Gu C, Wang Z, Dong F, Wang F. Induced pluripotent stem cells from goat fibroblasts. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 2013, 80(12): 1009-1017 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22266
78	Nichols J, Smith A. Naive and primed pluripotent states. Cell Stem Cell, 2009, 4(6): 487-492 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.015
79	Ying Q L, Wray J, Nichols J, Batlle-Morera L, Doble B, Woodgett J, Cohen P, Smith A. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature, 2008, 453(7194): 519-523 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06968
80	Horiuchi H, Tategaki A, Yamashita Y, Hisamatsu H, Ogawa M, Noguchi T, Aosasa M, Kawashima T, Akita S, Nishimichi N, Mitsui N, Furusawa S, Matsuda H. Chicken leukemia inhibitory factor maintains chicken embryonic stem cells in the undifferentiated state. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2004, 279(23): 24514-24520 https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M313231200
81	Brevini T A L, Cillo F, Gandolfi F. Establishment and molecular characterizition of pig parthenogenetic embryonic stem cells. Reproduction,Fertility and Development, 2005, 17(2): 235
82	Hochereau-de Reviers M T, Perreau C. In vitro culture of embryonic disc cells from porcine blastocysts. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development, 1993, 33(5): 475-483 https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:19930508
83	Prigione A, Rohwer N, Hoffmann S, Mlody B, Drews K, Bukowiecki R, Blümlein K, Wanker E E, Ralser M, Cramer T, Adjaye J. HIF1alpha modulates cell fate reprogramming through early glycolytic shift and upregulation of PDK1-3 and PKM2. Stem Cells, 2014, 32(2): 364-376 https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1552
84	Sanna D, Sanna A, Mara L, Pilichi S, Mastinu A, Chessa F, Pani L, Dattena M. Oct4 expression in in-vitro-produced sheep blastocysts and embryonic-stem-like cells. Cell Biology International, 2010, 34(1): 53-60
85	Yadav P S, Kues W A, Herrmann D, Carnwath J W, Niemann H. Bovine ICM derived cells express the Oct4 ortholog. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 2005, 72(2): 182-190 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20343
86	Saito S, Sawai K, Ugai H, Moriyasu S, Minamihashi A, Yamamoto Y, Hirayama H, Kageyama S, Pan J, Murata T, Kobayashi Y, Obata Y, Yokoyama K K. Generation of cloned calves and transgenic chimeric embryos from bovine embryonic stem-like cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2003, 309(1): 104-113 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(03)01536-5
87	Brevini T A, Antonini S, Pennarossa G, Gandolfi F. Recent progress in embryonic stem cell research and its application in domestic species. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 2008, 43(Suppl 2): 193-199 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01161.x
88	Hanna J, Cheng A W, Saha K, Kim J, Lengner C J, Soldner F, Cassady J P, Muffat J, Carey B W, Jaenisch R. Human embryonic stem cells with biological and epigenetic characteristics similar to those of mouse ESCs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107(20): 9222-9227 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004584107
89	Blomberg L A, Telugu B P. Twenty years of embryonic stem cell research in farm animals. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 2012, 47(Suppl 4): 80-85 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2012.02059.x
90	Huangfu D, Maehr R, Guo W, Eijkelenboom A, Snitow M, Chen A E, Melton D A. Induction of pluripotent stem cells by defined factors is greatly improved by small-molecule compounds. Nature Biotechnology, 2008, 26(7): 795-797 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1418
91	Shi Y, Desponts C, Do J T, Hahm H S, Sch?ler H R, Ding S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic fibroblasts by Oct4 and Klf4 with small-molecule compounds. Cell Stem Cell, 2008, 3(5): 568-574 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2008.10.004
92	Shi Y, Tae Do J, Desponts C, Hahm H S, Sch?ler H R, Ding S. A combined chemical and genetic approach for the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell, 2008, 2(6): 525-528 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2008.05.011
93	Ezashi T, Telugu B P, Roberts R M. Induced pluripotent stem cells from pigs and other ungulate species: an alternative to embryonic stem cells? Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 2012, 47(Suppl 4): 92-97 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2012.02061.x
94	Liu Y, Ma Y, Yang JY, Cheng D, Liu X, Ma X, West F D, Wang H. Comparative Gene Expression Signature of Pig, Human and Mouse Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines Reveals Insight into Pig Pluripotency Gene Networks. Stem Cell Reviews, 2014, 10(2): 162-176
95	Hall V J, Christensen J, Gao Y, Schmidt M H, Hyttel P. Porcine pluripotency cell signaling develops from the inner cell mass to the epiblast during early development. Developmental Dynamics, 2009, 238(8): 2014-2024 https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.22027
96	Hall V J. Early development of the porcine embryo: the importance of cell signalling in development of pluripotent cell lines. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development, 2012, 25(1): 94-102 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD12264
97	Cao S, Han J, Wu J, Li Q, Liu S, Zhang W, Pei Y, Ruan X, Liu Z, Wang X, Lim B, Li N. Specific gene-regulation networks during the pre-implantation development of the pig embryo as revealed by deep sequencing. BMC Genomics, 2014, 15(1): 4 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-4
98	Vander Heiden M G, Cantley L C, Thompson C B. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science, 2009, 324(5930): 1029-1033 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160809
99	Zhang J, Nuebel E, Daley G Q, Koehler C M, Teitell M A. Metabolic regulation in pluripotent stem cells during reprogramming and self-renewal. Cell Stem Cell, 2012, 11(5): 589-595 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2012.10.005
100	Chen X, Xu H, Yuan P, Fang F, Huss M, Vega V B, Wong E, Orlov Y L, Zhang W, Jiang J, Loh Y H, Yeo H C, Yeo Z X, Narang V, Govindarajan K R, Leong B, Shahab A, Ruan Y, Bourque G, Sung W K, Clarke N D, Wei C L, Ng H H. Integration of external signaling pathways with the core transcriptional network in embryonic stem cells. Cell, 2008, 133(6): 1106-1117 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.04.043
101	Demaria M, Giorgi C, Lebiedzinska M, Esposito G, D'Angeli L, Bartoli A, Gough D J, Turkson J, Levy D, Watson C J, Wieckowski M R, Provero P, Pinton P, Poli V. A STAT3-mediated metabolic switch is involved in tumour transformation and STAT3 addiction. Aging, 2010, 2(11): 823-842
102	Wang J, Alexander P, Wu L, Hammer R, Cleaver O, McKnight S L. Dependence of mouse embryonic stem cells on threonine catabolism. Science, 2009, 325(5939): 435-439 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1173288
103	Yanes O, Clark J, Wong D M, Patti G J, Sánchez-Ruiz A, Benton H P, Trauger S A, Desponts C, Ding S, Siuzdak G. Metabolic oxidation regulates embryonic stem cell differentiation. Nature Chemical Biology, 2010, 6(6): 411-417 https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.364
104	Panopoulos A D, Yanes O, Ruiz S, Kida Y S, Diep D, Tautenhahn R, Herrerías A, Batchelder E M, Plongthongkum N, Lutz M, Berggren W T, Zhang K, Evans R M, Siuzdak G, Belmonte J C I. The metabolome of induced pluripotent stem cells reveals metabolic changes occurring in somatic cell reprogramming. Cell Research, 2012, 22(1): 168-177 https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2011.177
105	Ware C B, Wang L, Mecham B H, Shen L, Nelson A M, Bar M, Lamba D A, Dauphin D S, Buckingham B, Askari B, Lim R, Tewari M, Gartler S M, Issa J P, Pavlidis P, Duan Z, Blau C A. Histone deacetylase inhibition elicits an evolutionarily conserved self-renewal program in embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell, 2009, 4(4): 359-369 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2009.03.001
106	Liang G, Taranova O, Xia K, Zhang Y. Butyrate promotes induced pluripotent stem cell generation. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2010, 285(33): 25516-25521 https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.142059
107	Mali P, Chou B K, Yen J, Ye Z, Zou J, Dowey S, Brodsky R A, Ohm J E, Yu W, Baylin S B, Yusa K, Bradley A, Meyers D J, Mukherjee C, Cole P A, Cheng L. Butyrate greatly enhances derivation of human induced pluripotent stem cells by promoting epigenetic remodeling and the expression of pluripotency-associated genes. Stem Cells, 2010, 28(4): 713-720 https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.402
108	Ware C B, Nelsona A M, Mechamc B, Hesson J, Zhou W Y, Jonlin E C, Jimenez-Caliani A J, Deng X X, Cavanaugh C, Cook S, Tesarh P, Okada J, Margaretha L, Sperber H, Choi M, Blau C A, Treuting P M, Hawkins R D, Cirulli V, Ruohola-Bakera H. Derivation of na?ve human embryonic stem cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014(first published online) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319738111
109	Gandolfi F, Pennarossa G, Maffei S, Brevini T A L. Why is it so difficult to derive pluripotent stem cells in domestic ungulates? Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 2012, 47(Suppl 5): 11-17 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2012.02106.x
110	Loh Y H, Wu Q, Chew J L, Vega V B, Zhang W, Chen X, Bourque G, George J, Leong B, Liu J, Wong K Y, Sung K W, Lee C W H, Zhao X D, Chiu K P, Lipovich L, Kuznetsov V A, Robson P, Stanton L W, Wei C L, Ruan Y, Lim B, Ng H H. The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature Genetics, 2006, 38(4): 431-440 https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1760
111	Bonnet A, Dalbies-Tran R, Sirard M A. Opportunities and challenges in applying genomics to the study of oogenesis and folliculogenesis in farm animals. Reproduction, 2008, 135(2): 119-128 https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-07-0331
112	Teo A K, Wagers A J, Kulkarni R N. New opportunities: harnessing induced pluripotency for discovery in diabetes and metabolism. Cell Metabolism, 2013, 18(6): 775-791 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2013.08.010

[1]	Jian LI,Yue JIAO,Caichao WAN. Synthesis of MnFe₂O₄/cellulose aerogel nanocomposite with strong magnetic responsiveness[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2017, 4(1): 116-120.
[2]	Jian LI,Caichao WAN. Cellulose aerogels decorated with multi-walled carbon nanotubes: preparation, characterization, and application for electromagnetic interference shielding[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2015, 2(4): 341-346.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed