Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-7505

ISSN 2095-977X(Online)

CN 10-1204/S

Postal Subscription Code 80-906

Front. Agr. Sci. Eng.    2020, Vol. 7 Issue (3) : 289-295    https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2020337
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Using a systems modeling approach to improve soil management and soil quality
Enli WANG(), Di HE, Zhigan ZHAO, Chris J. SMITH, Ben C. T. MACDONALD
CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
 Download: PDF(1145 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Soils provide the structural support, water and nutrients for plants in nature and are considered to be the foundation of agriculture production. Improving soil quality and soil health has been advocated as the goal of soil management toward sustainable agricultural intensification. There have been renewed efforts to define and quantify soil quality and soil health but establishing a consensus on the key indicators remains difficult. It is argued that such difficulties are due to the former ways of thinking in soil management which largely focus on soil properties alone. A systems approach that treats soils as a key component of agricultural production systems is promoted. It is argued that soil quality must be quantified in terms of crop productivity and impacts on ecosystems services that are also strongly driven by climate and management interventions. A systems modeling approach captures the interactions among climate, soil, crops and management, and their impacts on system performance, thus helping to quantify the value and quality of soils. Here, three examples are presented to demonstrate this. In this systems context, soil management must be an integral part of systems management practices that also include managing the crops and cropping systems under specific climatic conditions, with cognizance of future climate change.

Keywords APSIM      available water capacity      nitrogen management      soil functional properties      soil health      soil-plant modeling     
Corresponding Author(s): Enli WANG   
Just Accepted Date: 14 May 2020   Online First Date: 02 June 2020    Issue Date: 28 July 2020
 Cite this article:   
Enli WANG,Di HE,Zhigan ZHAO, et al. Using a systems modeling approach to improve soil management and soil quality[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2020, 7(3): 289-295.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/10.15302/J-FASE-2020337
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/Y2020/V7/I3/289
Soil functional properties Key functions
Available water capacity Water available to crops, water and nutrient holding in soil
Infiltration rate Runoff and water infiltration to soil
Water conductivity Water and nutrient (N) movement, drainage and leaching
Soil organic matter Nutrient delivery in soil from mineralization
Salinity (electrical conductivity) Water and nutrient availability for root uptake
Soil pH Root growth, toxicity, water and nutrient uptake
Available water content Water uptake
Available macronutrients (N, P and K) Nutrient uptake, crop growth and environmental footprint
Available micronutrients Nutrient uptake, crop growth
Tab.1  Key soil functional properties in crop production systems and their key functions
Fig.1  Agricultural system simulation model APSIM as a tool to integrate knowledge and data for evaluating the performance of crop-soil-climate-management systems to assist in management decision-making.
Fig.2  Impact of plant available water holding capacity (PAWC) of soil on the average APSIM simulated 120-year wheat yield potential under rainfed conditions across contrasting climatic regions of Australia. (a) Sites along the north-south (N-S) rainfall transect roughly following the 650 mm annual rainfall isohyet where rainfall pattern changes from summer dominant to winter dominant rainfall; (b) sites along the west-east (W-E) rainfall transect with similar rainfall pattern where annual rainfall increases from west to east. The first number in the legend shows the 120-year average in-crop season (May–October) rainfall (mm) and the second number is the average annual rainfall (mm) at each site. Adapted from He and Wang et al.[7], with permission from Elsevier.
Fig.3  Simulated ranges of (a) aboveground biomass, (b) grain yield, (c) N loss from leaching, and (d) N loss from denitrification in response to fertilizer N input rates to continuous maize at Wuqiao (1970–2012). The box boundaries indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles and the solid lines indicate the median, and the whiskers extend to the 5th and 95th percentiles, with the average shown by a black circle. The red crosses are the outliers. Adapted from Zhao et al.[9], with permission from Elsevier.
Fig.4  The effect of maintaining a N bank of mineral N (kg·ha1 N) in the surface 0.4 cm of the soil profile at mid-July (near crop tillering) on (a) yield, (b) N leached, (c) return ratio to the N applied to satisfy the N bank criteria, and (d) the changes in the humus pool of a Red Chromosol at Young, NSW, Australia. Horizontal bars and upper and lower edges of boxes indicate 10th, 25th, 75th and 90th percentiles, median (solid lines) and mean (dotted line) in the box. The solid circles represent the 5th and 95th percentiles. Adapted from Smith et al.[25], with permission from Elsevier.
1 L Montanarella, R Vargas. Global governance of soil resources as a necessary condition for sustainable development. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2012, 4(5): 559–564
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.06.007
2 J W Doran, M R Zeiss. Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality. Applied Soil Ecology, 2000, 15(1): 3–11
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(00)00067-6
3 C J Bi, Z L Chen, J Wang, D Zhou. Quantitative assessment of soil health under different planting patterns and soil types. Pedosphere, 2013, 23(2): 194–204
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(13)60007-7
4 E Armenise, M A Redmile-Gordon, A M Stellacci, A Ciccarese, P Rubino. Developing a soil quality index to compare soil fitness for agricultural use under different managements in the Mediterranean environment. Soil & Tillage Research, 2013, 130: 91–98
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.02.013
5 A C R Lima, L Brussaard, M R Totola, W B Hoogmoed, R G M de Goede. A functional evaluation of three indicator sets for assessing soil quality. Applied Soil Ecology, 2013, 64: 194–200
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.12.009
6 E L Wang, H Cresswell, J Xu, Q Jiang. Capacity of soils to buffer impact of climate variability and value of seasonal forecasts. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2009, 149(1): 38–50
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.07.001
7 D He, E L Wang. On the relation between soil water holding capacity and dryland crop productivity. Geoderma, 2019, 353: 11–24
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.06.022
8 Z G Zhao, X Qin, Z M Wang, E L Wang. Performance of different cropping systems across precipitation gradient in North China Plain. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2018, 259: 162–172
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.04.019
9 Z G Zhao, X Qin, E L Wang, P Carberry, Y H Zhang, S L Zhou, X Y Zhang, C S Hu, Z M Wang. Modelling to increase the eco-efficiency of a wheat–maize double cropping system. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2015, 210: 36–46
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.05.005
10 J Z Li, E L Wang, Y C Wang, H T Xing, D L Wang, L G Wang, C Y Gao. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from a wheat–maize rotation system while still maintaining productivity. Agricultural Systems, 2016, 145: 90–98
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.03.007
11 G C Wang, Z K Luo, E L Wang, W Zhang. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions while maintaining yield in the croplands of Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2018, 260–261: 80–94
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.06.003
12 P Sambo, C Nicoletto, A Giro, Y Pii, F Valentinuzzi, T Mimmo, P Lugli, G Orzes, F Mazzetto, S Astolfi, R Terzano, S Cesco. Hydroponic solutions for soilless production systems: issues and opportunities in a smart agriculture perspective. Frontiers of Plant Science, 2019, 10: 923
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00923 pmid: 31396245
13 I A Lakhiar, J M Gao, T N Syed, F A Chandio, N A Buttar. Modern plant cultivation technologies in agriculture under controlled environment: a review on aeroponics. Journal of Plant Interactions, 2018, 13(1): 338–352
https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2018.1472308
14 C Maucieri, C Nicoletto, E van Os, D Anseeuw, R van Havermaet, R Junge. In: Goddek S, Joyce A, Kotzen B, Burnell G M, eds. Aquaponics food production systems: combined aquaculture and hydroponic production technologies for the future. Springer International Publishing, 2019, 77–110
15 Z K Luo, E L Wang, O J Sun, C J Smith, M E Probert. Modeling long-term soil carbon dynamics and sequestration potential in semi-arid agro-ecosystems. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2011, 151(12): 1529–1544
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.06.011
16 Z K Luo, E L Wang, H T Xing, C Smith, G C Wang, H Cresswell. Opportunities for enhancing yield and soil carbon sequestration while reducing N2O emissions in rainfed cropping systems. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2017, 232: 400–410
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.09.008
17 D P Holzworth, N I Huth, P G De Voil, E J Zurcher, N I Herrmann, G McLean, K Chenu, E J van Oosterom, V Snow, C Murphy, A D Moore, H Brown, J P M Whish, S Verrall, J Fainges, L W Bell, A S Peake, P L Poulton, Z Hochman, P J Thorburn, D S Gaydon, N P Dalgliesh, D Rodriguez, H Cox, S Chapman, A Doherty, E Teixeira, J Sharp, R Cichota, I Vogeler, F Y Li, E L Wang, G L Hammer, M J Robertson, J P Dimes, A M Whitbread, J Hunt, H van Rees, T McClelland, P S Carberry, J N G Hargreaves, N MacLeod, C McDonald, J Harsdorf, S Wedgwood, B A Keating. APSIM—evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2014, 62: 327–350
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.07.009
18 D S Gaydon, Balwinder-Singh, E Wang, P L Poulton, B Ahmad, F Ahmed, S Akhter, I Ali, R Amarasingha, A K Chaki, C Chen, B U Choudhury, R Darai, A Das, Z Hochman, H Horan, E Y Hosang, P V Kumar, A S M M R Khan, A M Laing, L Liu, M A P W K Malaviachichi, K P Mohapatra, M A Muttaleb, B Power, A M Radanielson, G S Rai, M H Rashid, W M U K Rathanayake, M M R Sarker, D R Sena, M Shamim, N Subash, A Suriadi, L D B Suriyagoda, G Wang, J Wang, R K Yadav, C H Roth. Evaluation of the APSIM model in cropping systems of Asia. Field Crops Research, 2017, 204: 52–75
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.015
19 C Chen, R Lawes, A Fletcher, Y Oliver, M Robertson, M Bell, E L Wang. How well can APSIM simulate nitrogen uptake and nitrogen fixation of legume crops? Field Crops Research, 2016, 187: 35–48
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.12.007
20 C Chen, E L Wang, Q Yu. Modeling wheat and maize productivity as affected by climate variation and irrigation supply in North China Plain. Agronomy Journal, 2010, 102(3): 1037–1049
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2009.0505
21 B A Keating, P S Carberry, G L Hammer, M E Probert, M J Robertson, D Holzworth, N I Huth, J N G Hargreaves, H Meinke, Z Hochman, G McLean, K Verburg, V Snow, J P Dimes, M Silburn, E L Wang, S Brown, K L Bristow, S Asseng, S Chapman, R L McCown, D M Freebairn, C J Smith. An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. European Journal of Agronomy, 2003, 18(3–4): 267–288
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00108-9
22 H Y Sun, X Y Zhang, E L Wang, S Y Chen, L W Shao. Quantifying the impact of irrigation on groundwater reserve and crop production—a case study in the North China Plain. European Journal of Agronomy, 2015, 70: 48–56
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2015.07.001
23 E L Wang, C J Smith, W J Bond, K Verburg. Estimations of vapour pressure deficit and crop water demand in APSIM and their implications for prediction of crop yield, water use, and deep drainage. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2004, 55(12): 1227–1240
https://doi.org/10.1071/AR03216
24 C J Smith, B C T Macdonald, H T Xing, O T Denmead, E L Wang, G McLachlan, S Tuomi, D Turner, D Chen. Measurements and APSIM modelling of soil C and N dynamics. Soil Research, 2020, 58(1): 41–61
https://doi.org/10.1071/SR19021
25 C J Smith, J R Hunt, E L Wang, B C T Macdonald, H T Xing, O T Denmead, S Zeglin, Z G Zhao. Using fertiliser to maintain soil inorganic nitrogen can increase dryland wheat yield with little environmental cost. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2019, 286: 106644
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.106644
[1] Rebecca SCHNEIDER, Stephen MORREALE, Zhigang LI, Erin MENZIES PLUER, Kirsten KURTZ, Xilu NI, Cuiping WANG, Changxiao LI, Harold VAN ES. Restoring soil health to reduce irrigation demand and buffer the impacts of drought[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2020, 7(3): 339-346.
[2] Yakov KUZYAKOV, Anna GUNINA, Kazem ZAMANIAN, Jing TIAN, Yu LUO, Xingliang XU, Anna YUDINA, Humberto APONTE, Hattan ALHARBI, Lilit OVSEPYAN, Irina KURGANOVA, Tida GE, Thomas GUILLAUME. New approaches for evaluation of soil health, sensitivity and resistance to degradation[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2020, 7(3): 282-288.
[3] Qiaofang LU, Tongtong LIU, Nanqi WANG, Zhechao DOU, Kunguang WANG, Yuanmei ZUO. A review of soil nematodes as biological indicators for the assessment of soil health[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2020, 7(3): 275-281.
[4] Zhenling CUI, Zhengxia DOU, Hao YING, Fusuo ZHANG. Producing more with less: reducing environmental impacts through an integrated soil-crop system management approach[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2020, 7(1): 14-20.
[5] Yuxin MIAO, David J. MULLA, Pierre C. ROBERT. An integrated approach to site-specific management zone delineation[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2018, 5(4): 432-441.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed