Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-7505

ISSN 2095-977X(Online)

CN 10-1204/S

Postal Subscription Code 80-906

Front. Agr. Sci. Eng.    2022, Vol. 9 Issue (1) : 82-97    https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2021404
REVIEW
BIOINSECTICIDES AS FUTURE MAINSTREAM PEST CONTROL AGENTS: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES
Mingbo QU1,2, Hans MERZENDORFER3(), Bernard MOUSSIAN4(), Qing YANG1,2,5()
1. School of Bioengineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
2. State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
3. Institute of Biology, University of Siegen, 57076 Siegen, Germany.
4. Interfaculty Institute of Cell Biology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
5. Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
 Download: PDF(1020 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

•Wide use of botanical insecticides is limited by the availability of certain plants.

•Studies are needed to improve RNAi efficiency and to assess their safety risk.

•Microbial insecticides are promising, but they only control a narrow range of pests.

•Multitarget approach should be a promising strategy in future pest control.

•Nanoformulation could enhance stability and control the release of bioinsecticides.

Bioinsecticides are naturally-occurring substances from different sources that control insect pests. Ideal bioinsecticides should have low toxicity to non-target organisms. They should also be easily degraded in sewage treatment works and natural environments, highly effective in small quantities and affect target pests only. Public concerns about possible side-effects of synthetic pesticides have accelerated bioinsecticide research and development. However, to develop bioinsecticides into mainstream products, their high production costs, short shelf-life and often uncertain modes of action need to be considered. This review summarizes current progress on bioinsecticides which are categorized as biochemical insecticides and their derivatives, plant-incorporated protectants, and microbial bioinsecticides. The current constraints that prevent bioinsecticides from being widely used are discussed and future research directions are proposed.

Keywords biochemical insecticide      bioinsecticide      microbial bioinsecticides      plant-incorporated protectant      RNA insecticide     
Corresponding Author(s): Hans MERZENDORFER,Bernard MOUSSIAN,Qing YANG   
Just Accepted Date: 04 June 2021   Online First Date: 13 July 2021    Issue Date: 17 January 2022
 Cite this article:   
Mingbo QU,Hans MERZENDORFER,Bernard MOUSSIAN, et al. BIOINSECTICIDES AS FUTURE MAINSTREAM PEST CONTROL AGENTS: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2022, 9(1): 82-97.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/10.15302/J-FASE-2021404
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/Y2022/V9/I1/82
Bioinsecticide Type Target Application References
Biochemical pesticides
Animal Animal hormones Juvenile hormone Juvenile hormone receptor These hormones are chemically unstable, thus their agonists and antagonist are widely used as insecticides [4,5]
Ecdysone Ecdysone receptor
Semiochemicals Aldehydes, terpenes, alkanes, triglycerides and so on They are applied to suppress insect pests using strategies such as attract-and-kill, mass trapping, mating disruption, monitoring and push–pull [610]
Animal toxins Spider venoms Postsynaptic receptors They are mostly used as PIPs generating transgenic plants or for viral vector construction [11]
β-Toxins Insect voltage-gated sodium channels [12]
Microbial Chemicals Avermectins Glutamate-gated Cl channels They are widely applied as insecticides. The high resistance by the pests has been developed, and toxicity to humans and animals has been reported [13,14]
Spinosyns Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor
Okaramines L-glutamate-gated chloride channels It could be developed as new insecticide [15]
Microbial toxins Bt endotoxins Receptor in the insect midgut cells They have been sprayed to control mosquito larvae in breeding areas. More frequently, they have been introduced into transgenic crops or sold with live spores to control insect pests [1618]
Botanical insecticides Essential oils Neem oil, orange oil, rosemary oil, peppermint oil Multiple targets such as P450 cytochromes, octopamine receptors They have been widely used as bioinsecticides. However, many essential oils are restricted to local, indigenous use because of their lack of widespread cultivation [1922]
Pyrethrins Voltage-gated sodium channels It has been widely used in agricultural pest control, structural pest control and for public health [23]
Azadirachtin Insect growth regulator It has been widely used for decades against insect pest [2426]
Rotenone Site I respiration in mitochondria It has been used as an insecticide for more than 150 years, but fallen out of favor in most industrialized countries because of mammalian toxicity [14]
Plant alkaloids Nicotine Cholinergic acetylcholine nicotinic receptor It has been used for many years as a fumigant for the control of many insects. But it is very toxic to humans by inhalation or skin contact [27]
Ryania Calcium channels in the sarcoplasmic reticulum It has limited use as insecticides because they are moderately toxic to mammals, but very toxic to fish [28]
Sabadilla Voltage-sensitive sodium channels It is used for the control of thrips on citrus, avocados, and mangos [28]
Plant-Incorporated Protectants
Insecticidal proteins-based PIPs Bt toxins Receptor in the insect midgut cells Bt genes have been approved for commercialized cultivation in most of the major grain and economic crops. Other insecticidal proteins have also been evaluated as potential PIPs [2931]
RNAi-based PIPs   Multiple targets RNAi-based PIPs are highly specific and provide an environmentally friendly method to control insect pests. Public resentment toward genetically modified plants generally limits their acceptance [32,33]
Microbial bioinsecticides
Bacterial bioinsecticides Bacillus thuringiensis Paenibacillus popilliae
Paenibacillus lentimorbus
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Pseudomonas taiwanensis
Release toxins targeting receptor in the insect midgut cells B. thuringiensis is the most widely used species to control a variety of insect pests in agriculture, forestry and public health. To date, over one hundred B. thuringiensis-based bioinsecticides have been developed [34,35]
Fungal bioinsecticides Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopilae, Metarhizium rileyi, Paecilomyces farinosus, Verticillium lecanii Attack integument or gut epithelium, utilizing nutrients in the hemocoel, some release toxins They have been widely evaluated as control agents for a diverse variety of noxious arthropods of agricultural importance [35]
Viral bioinsecticides  – Nucleopolyhedroviruses, granuloviruses Cell lysis The use of entomopathogenic viruses in global crop protection has grown in the last decade, mainly to control lepidopteran pests [36]
Tab.1  Type, target and application of different bioinsecticides
Fig.1  Delivery of dsRNA to insects by different approaches. Double-stranded RNA can be delivered directly, or by nanoparticles viruses, bacteria and transgenic plants. Following ingestion dsRNA is absorbed by midgut cells as shown here for the tobacco hornworm. The absorption of dsRNA may be mediated by endocytosis or may involve specific channels. In many insects the RNAi effect is systemic, requiring the spread of the silencing signal.
Fig.2  Multitarget strategy targeting the chitin degradation system. Structural data are derived from the PDB database (OfHex1, 3NSN; OfChtI, 3WQV; OfChtII, 6JAW; and OfChi-h, 1HKK).
1 K Haddi, L M Turchen, L O Viteri Jumbo, R N Guedes, E J Pereira, R W Aguiar, E E Oliveira. Rethinking biorational insecticides for pest management: unintended effects and consequences. Pest Management Science, 2020, 76(7): 2286–2293
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5837 pmid: 32237033
2 Bioinsecticides Market by Organism Type(Bacteria Thuringiensis, Beauveria Bassiana, and Metarhizium Anisopliae), Type (Microbials and Macrobials), Mode of Application, Formulation, Crop Type and Region-Global Trends & Forecast to 2025. MarketsandMarkets, 2020: 1–194
3 J N Seiber, J Coats, S O Duke, A D Gross. Biopesticides: state of the art and future opportunities. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2014, 62(48): 11613–11619
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf504252n pmid: 25406111
4 T S Dhadialla, G R Carlson, D P Le. New insecticides with ecdysteroidal and juvenile hormone activity. Annual Review of Entomology, 1998, 43(1): 545–569
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.545 pmid: 9444757
5 M Jindra, L Bittova. The juvenile hormone receptor as a target of juvenoid “insect growth regulators”. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, 2020, 103(3): e21615
https://doi.org/10.1002/arch.21615 pmid: 31502704
6 P C Gregg, A P Del Socorro, P J Landolt. Advances in attract-and-kill for agricultural pests: beyond pheromones. Annual Review of Entomology, 2018, 63(1): 453–470
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035040 pmid: 29058978
7 Y Y Liang, M Luo, X G Fu, L X Zheng, H Y Wei. Mating disruption of chilo suppressalis from sex pheromone of another pyralid rice pest Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Insect Science, 2020, 20(3): 19
https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieaa050 pmid: 32559298
8 L Xu, Y Xie, R Na, Q X Li. Mini-review: recent advances in the identification and application of sex pheromones of gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Pest Management Science, 2020, 76(12): 3905–3910
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5949 pmid: 32506552
9 M J Hassemer, M Borges, D M Withall, J A Pickett, R A Laumann, M A Birkett, M C Blassioli-Moraes. Development of pull and push-pull systems for management of lesser mealworm, Alphitobius diaperinus, in poultry houses using alarm and aggregation pheromones. Pest Management Science, 2019, 75(4): 1107–1114
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5225 pmid: 30270497
10 R Gries, R Britton, M Holmes, H Zhai, J Draper, G Gries. Bed bug aggregation pheromone finally identified. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2015, 54(4): 1135–1138
https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201409890 pmid: 25529634
11 G F King, M C Hardy. Spider-venom peptides: structure, pharmacology, and potential for control of insect pests. Annual Review of Entomology, 2013, 58(1): 475–496
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153650 pmid: 23020618
12 M Gurevitz, I Karbat, L Cohen, N Ilan, R Kahn, M Turkov, M Stankiewicz, W Stühmer, K Dong, D Gordon. The insecticidal potential of scorpion beta-toxins. Toxicon, 2007, 49(4): 473–489
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2006.11.015 pmid: 17197009
13 J E Casida, K A Durkin. Neuroactive insecticides: targets, selectivity, resistance, and secondary effects. Annual Review of Entomology, 2013, 58(1): 99–117
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153645 pmid: 23317040
14 L G Copping, J Menn. J. Biopesticides: a review of their action, applications and efficacy. Pest Management Science, 2000, 56(8): 651–676
https://doi.org/10.1002/1526-4998(200008)56:8<651::AID-PS201>3.0.CO;2-U
15 K Matsuda. Okaramines and other plant fungal products as new insecticide leads. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 2018, 30: 67–72
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2018.09.010 pmid: 30553487
16 G S Jouzani, E Valijanian, R Sharafi. Bacillus thuringiensis: a successful insecticide with new environmental features and tidings. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2017, 101(7): 2691–2711
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8175-y pmid: 28235989
17 L Pardo-López, M Soberón, A Bravo. Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal three-domain Cry toxins: mode of action, insect resistance and consequences for crop protection. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 2013, 37(1): 3–22
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00341.x pmid: 22540421
18 C Then, A Bauer-Panskus. Possible health impacts of Bt toxins and residues from spraying with complementary herbicides in genetically engineered soybeans and risk assessment as performed by the European Food Safety Authority EFSA. Environmental Sciences Europe, 2017, 29(1): 1
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-016-0099-0 pmid: 28133586
19 F Bakkali, S Averbeck, D Averbeck, M Idaomar. Biological effects of essential oils–a review. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2008, 46(2): 446–475
20 B C da Silva, D R Melo, C T Franco, R Maturano, R L Fabri, E Daemon. Evaluation of eugenol and (E)-cinnamaldehyde insecticidal activity against larvae and pupae of Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). Journal of Medical Entomology, 2020, 57(1): 181–186
pmid: 31332448
21 C Regnault-Roger, C Vincent, J T Arnason. Essential oils in insect control: low-risk products in a high-stakes world. Annual Review of Entomology, 2012, 57(1): 405–424
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120710-100554 pmid: 21942843
22 M B Isman. Botanical insecticides, deterrents, and repellents in modern agriculture and an increasingly regulated world. Annual Review of Entomology, 2006, 51(1): 45–66
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151146 pmid: 16332203
23 M B Isman. Botanical insecticides in the twenty-first century-fulfilling their promise? Annual Review of Entomology, 2020, 65(1): 233–249
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025010 pmid: 31594414
24 G Benelli, A Canale, C Toniolo, A Higuchi, K Murugan, R Pavela, M Nicoletti. Neem (Azadirachta indica): towards the ideal insecticide? Natural Product Research, 2017, 31(4): 369–386
https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2016.1214834 pmid: 27687478
25 S R Fernandes, L Barreiros, R F Oliveira, A Cruz, C Prudêncio, A I Oliveira, C Pinho, N Santos, J Morgado. Chemistry, bioactivities, extraction and analysis of azadirachtin: state-of-the-art. Fitoterapia, 2019, 134: 141–150
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2019.02.006 pmid: 30738093
26 E D Morgan. Azadirachtin, a scientific gold mine. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, 2009, 17(12): 4096–4105
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2008.11.081 pmid: 19112026
27 I Ujvary. Nicotine and Other Insecticidal Alkaloids. In: Yamamoto I, Casida J E, eds. Nicotinoid Insecticides and the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor.Tokyo: Springer, 1999
28 L G Copping, S O Duke. Natural products that have been used commercially as crop protection agents. Pest Management Science, 2007, 63(6): 524–554
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1378 pmid: 17487882
29 C James. Executive Summary. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops. ISAAA Brief, 2015, 51
30 E Schnepf, N Crickmore, J Van Rie, D Lereclus, J Baum, J Feitelson, D R Zeigler, D H Dean. Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 1998, 62(3): 775–806
https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.62.3.775-806.1998 pmid: 9729609
31 T Syed, M Askari, Z Meng, Y Li, M A Abid, Y Wei, S Guo, C Liang, R Zhang. Current insights on vegetative insecticidal proteins (Vip) as next generation pest killers. Toxins, 2020, 12(8): 522
https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12080522 pmid: 32823872
32 O S Adeyinka, S Riaz, N Toufiq, I Yousaf, M U Bhatti, A Batcho, A A Olajide, I A Nasir, B Tabassum. Advances in exogenous RNA delivery techniques for RNAi-mediated pest control. Molecular Biology Reports, 2020, 47(8): 6309–6319
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-05666-2 pmid: 32696345
33 S Liu, M Jaouannet, D A Dempsey, J Imani, C Coustau, K H Kogel. RNA-based technologies for insect control in plant production. Biotechnology Advances, 2020, 39: 107463
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.107463 pmid: 31678220
34 A Kesho. Microbial bio-pesticides and their use in integrated pest management. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 2020, 5(1): 26–34
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20200501.15
35 L A Lacey, D Grzywacz, D I Shapiro-Ilan, R Frutos, M Brownbridge, M S Goettel. Insect pathogens as biological control agents: back to the future. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 2015, 132: 1–41
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2015.07.009 pmid: 26225455
36 F Moscardi. Assessment of the application of baculoviruses for control of Lepidoptera. Annual Review of Entomology, 1999, 44(1): 257–289
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.44.1.257 pmid: 15012374
37 A Sharma, R K Sandhi, G V P Reddy. A review of interactions between insect biological control agents and semiochemicals. Insects, 2019, 10(12): 439
https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10120439 pmid: 31817457
38 B P S Khambay, P J Jewess. Pyrethroids. In: Gilbert L I, Gill S, eds. Insect Control, 1st Edition.London: Academic Press, 2010, 1–29
39 M Miyazawa, J Fujioka, Y Ishikawa. Insecticidal compounds from Phellodendron amurense active against Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2002, 82(8): 830–833
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1112
40 G D Ainge, S D Lorimer, P J Gerard, L D Ruf. Insecticidal activity of huperzine A from the New Zealand clubmoss, Lycopodium varium. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2002, 50(3): 491–494
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0106087 pmid: 11804518
41 N Crickmore, C Berry, S Panneerselvam, R Mishra, T R Connor, B C Bonning. A structure-based nomenclature for Bacillus thuringiensis and other bacteria-derived pesticidal proteins. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 2020: 107438
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2020.107438 pmid: 32652083
42 P M Campbell, D Reiner, A E Moore, R Y Lee, M M Epstein, T J V Higgins. Comparison of the α-amylase inhibitor-1 from common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) varieties and transgenic expression in other legumes—post-translational modifications and immunogenicity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2011, 59(11): 6047–6054
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf200456j pmid: 21542649
43 G Vandenborre, G Smagghe, E J M Van Damme. Plant lectins as defense proteins against phytophagous insects. Phytochemistry, 2011, 72(13): 1538–1550
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.02.024 pmid: 21429537
44 J A Gatehouse. Prospects for using proteinase inhibitors to protect transgenic plants against attack by herbivorous insects. Current Protein & Peptide Science, 2011, 12(5): 409–416
https://doi.org/10.2174/138920311796391142 pmid: 21418023
45 Y Arakane, S Muthukrishnan. Insect chitinase and chitinase-like proteins. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 2010, 67(2): 201–216
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-009-0161-9 pmid: 19816755
46 S G Cooper, D S Douches, E J Grafius. Combining engineered resistance, avidin, and natural resistance derived from Solanum chacoense bitter to control Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 2009, 102(3): 1270–1280
https://doi.org/10.1603/029.102.0354 pmid: 19610448
47 J A Baum, T Bogaert, W Clinton, G R Heck, P Feldmann, O Ilagan, S Johnson, G Plaetinck, T Munyikwa, M Pleau, T Vaughn, J Roberts. Control of coleopteran insect pests through RNA interference. Nature Biotechnology, 2007, 25(11): 1322–1326
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1359 pmid: 17982443
48 H Li, C Khajuria, M Rangasamy, P Gandra, M Fitter, C Geng, A Woosely, J Hasler, G Schulenberg, S Worden, R McEwan, C Evans, B Siegfried, K E Narva. Long dsRNA but not siRNA initiates RNAi in western corn rootworm larvae and adults. Journal of Applied Entomology, 2015, 139(6): 432–445
https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12224
49 N Thakur, S K Upadhyay, P C Verma, K Chandrashekar, R Tuli, P K Singh. Enhanced whitefly resistance in transgenic tobacco plants expressing double stranded RNA of v-ATPase A gene. PLoS One, 2014, 9(3): e87235
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087235 pmid: 24595215
50 J Cruz, D Mané-Padrós, X Bellés, D Martín. Functions of the ecdysone receptor isoform-A in the hemimetabolous insect Blattella germanica revealed by systemic RNAi in vivo. Developmental Biology, 2006, 297(1): 158–171
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.06.048 pmid: 16890931
51 J Q Zhu, S Liu, Y Ma, J Q Zhang, H S Qi, Z J Wei, Q Yao, W Q Zhang, S Li. Improvement of pest resistance in transgenic tobacco plants expressing dsRNA of an insect-associated gene EcR. PLoS One, 2012, 7(6): e38572
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038572 pmid: 22685585
52 T Hussain, E Aksoy, M E Çalışkan, A Bakhsh. Transgenic potato lines expressing hairpin RNAi construct of molting-associated EcR gene exhibit enhanced resistance against Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata, Say). Transgenic Research, 2019, 28(1): 151–164
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-018-0109-7 pmid: 30607744
53 R Bolognesi, P Ramaseshadri, J Anderson, P Bachman, W Clinton, R Flannagan, O Ilagan, C Lawrence, S Levine, W Moar, G Mueller, J Tan, J Uffman, E Wiggins, G Heck, G Segers. Characterizing the mechanism of action of double-stranded RNA activity against western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte). PLoS One, 2012, 7(10): e47534
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047534 pmid: 23071820
54 J Tan, S L Levine, P M Bachman, P D Jensen, G M Mueller, J P Uffman, C Meng, Z Song, K B Richards, M H Beevers. No impact of DvSnf7 RNA on honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) adults and larvae in dietary feeding tests. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2016, 35(2): 287–294
https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3075 pmid: 26011006
55 Mamta, K R Reddy, M V Rajam. Targeting chitinase gene of Helicoverpa armigera by host-induced RNA interference confers insect resistance in tobacco and tomato. Plant Molecular Biology, 2016, 90(3): 281–292
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-015-0414-y pmid: 26659592
56 Y B Mao, W J Cai, J W Wang, G J Hong, X Y Tao, L J Wang, Y P Huang, X Y Chen. Silencing a cotton bollworm P450 monooxygenase gene by plant-mediated RNAi impairs larval tolerance of gossypol. Nature Biotechnology, 2007, 25(11): 1307–1313
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1352 pmid: 17982444
57 H Guo, X Song, G Wang, K Yang, Y Wang, L Niu, X Chen, R Fang. Plant-generated artificial small RNAs mediated aphid resistance. PLoS One, 2014, 9(5): e97410
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097410 pmid: 24819752
58 M Zotti, E A Dos Santos, D Cagliari, O Christiaens, C N T Taning, G Smagghe. RNA interference technology in crop protection against arthropod pests, pathogens and nematodes. Pest Management Science, 2018, 74(6): 1239–1250
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4813 pmid: 29194942
59 K San Miguel, J G Scott. The next generation of insecticides: dsRNA is stable as a foliar-applied insecticide. Pest Management Science, 2016, 72(4): 801–809
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4056 pmid: 26097110
60 S G Mehlhorn, S Geibel, G Bucher, R Nauen. Profiling of RNAi sensitivity after foliar dsRNA exposure in different European populations of Colorado potato beetle reveals a robust response with minor variability. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2020, 166: 104569
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2020.104569 pmid: 32448424
61 J Lü, Z Q Liu, W Guo, M J Guo, S M Chen, C X Yang, Y J Zhang, H P Pan. Oral delivery of dsHvlwr is a feasible method for managing the pest Henosepilachna vigintioctopunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Insect Science, 2021, 28(2): 509–520
https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.12784 pmid: 32240577
62 D H Kwon, J H Park, S H Lee. Screening of lethal genes for feeding RNAi by leaf disc-mediated systematic delivery of dsRNA in Tetranychus urticae. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2013, 105(1): 69–75
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2012.12.001 pmid: 24238293
63 D H Kwon, J H Park, P A Ashok, U Lee, S H Lee. Screening of target genes for RNAi in Tetranychus urticae and RNAi toxicity enhancement by chimeric genes. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2016, 130: 1–7
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2015.11.005 pmid: 27155477
64 M W Ali, M M Khan, F Song, L Wu, L He, Z Wang, Z Y Zhang, H Zhang, Y Jiang. RNA interference-based silencing of the Chitin Synthase 1 gene for reproductive and developmental disruptions in Panonychus citri. Insects, 2020, 11(11): 786
https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11110786 pmid: 33187256
65 R A Camargo, G O Barbosa, I P Possignolo, L E Peres, E Lam, J E Lima, A Figueira, H Marques-Souza. RNA interference as a gene silencing tool to control Tuta absoluta in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). PeerJ, 2016, 4: e2673
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2673 pmid: 27994959
66 E C Andrade, W B Hunter. RNAi feeding bioassay: development of a non-transgenic approach to control Asian citrus psyllid and other hemipterans. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2017, 162(3): 389–396
https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.12544
67 H Tian, H Peng, Q Yao, H Chen, Q Xie, B Tang, W Zhang. Developmental control of a lepidopteran pest Spodoptera exigua by ingestion of bacteria expressing dsRNA of a non-midgut gene. PLoS One, 2009, 4(7): e6225
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006225 pmid: 19593438
68 Y Xiong, H Zeng, Y Zhang, D Xu, D Qiu. Silencing the HaHR3 gene by transgenic plant-mediated RNAi to disrupt Helicoverpa armigera development. International Journal of Biological Sciences, 2013, 9(4): 370–381
https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.5929 pmid: 23630449
69 O Ganbaatar, B Cao, Y Zhang, D Bao, W Bao, H Wuriyanghan. Knockdown of Mythimna separata chitinase genes via bacterial expression and oral delivery of RNAi effectors. BMC Biotechnology, 2017, 17(1): 9
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-017-0328-7 pmid: 28183289
70 M Vatanparast, Y Kim. Optimization of recombinant bacteria expressing dsRNA to enhance insecticidal activity against a lepidopteran insect, Spodoptera exigua. PLoS One, 2017, 12(8): e0183054
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183054 pmid: 28800614
71 Z Z Ma, H Zhou, Y L Wei, S Yan, J Shen. A novel plasmid-Escherichia coli system produces large batch dsRNAs for insect gene silencing. Pest Management Science, 2020, 76(7): 2505–2512
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5792 pmid: 32077251
72 X Zhang, J Zhang, K Y Zhu. Chitosan/double-stranded RNA nanoparticle-mediated RNA interference to silence chitin synthase genes through larval feeding in the African malaria mosquito (Anopheles gambiae). Insect Molecular Biology, 2010, 19(5): 683–693
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2583.2010.01029.x pmid: 20629775
73 M R Forim, E S Costa, M F da Silva, J B Fernandes, J M Mondego, A L Boiça Junior. Development of a new method to prepare nano-/microparticles loaded with extracts of Azadirachta indica, their characterization and use in controlling Plutella xylostella. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2013, 61(38): 9131–9139
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf403187y pmid: 23991702
74 L A Avila, R Chandrasekar, K E Wilkinson, J Balthazor, M Heerman, J Bechard, S Brown, Y Park, S Dhar, G R Reeck, J M Tomich. Delivery of lethal dsRNAs in insect diets by branched amphiphilic peptide capsules. Journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2018, 273: 139–146
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.01.010 pmid: 29407675
75 O Christiaens, M G Tardajos, Z L Martinez Reyna, M Dash, P Dubruel, G Smagghe. Increased RNAi efficacy in Spodoptera exigua via the formulation of dsRNA with guanylated polymers. Frontiers in Physiology, 2018, 9: 316
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00316 pmid: 29670535
76 Y H Lin, J H Huang, Y Liu, X Belles, H J Lee. Oral delivery of dsRNA lipoplexes to German cockroach protects dsRNA from degradation and induces RNAi response. Pest Management Science, 2017, 73(5): 960–966
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4407 pmid: 27470169
77 H J Malik, A Raza, I Amin, J A Scheffler, B E Scheffler, J K Brown, S Mansoor. RNAi-mediated mortality of the whitefly through transgenic expression of double-stranded RNA homologous to acetylcholinesterase and ecdysone receptor in tobacco plants. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1): 38469
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38469 pmid: 27929123
78 A L Cordova-Kreylos, L E Fernandez, M Koivunen, A Yang, L Flor-Weiler, P G Marrone. Isolation and characterization of Burkholderia rinojensis sp. nov., a non-Burkholderia cepacia complex soil bacterium with insecticidal and miticidal activities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2013, 79(24): 7669–7678
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02365-13 pmid: 24096416
79 T R Glare, M O’Callaghan. Microbial biopesticides for control of invertebrates: progress from New Zealand. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 2019, 165: 82–88
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2017.11.014 pmid: 29196233
80 S Rasmann, A Bennett, A Biere, A Karley, E Guerrieri. Root symbionts: powerful drivers of plant above- and belowground indirect defenses. Insect Science, 2017, 24(6): 947–960
https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.12464 pmid: 28374534
81 A Pineda, I Kaplan, S E Hannula, W Ghanem, T M Bezemer. Conditioning the soil microbiome through plant-soil feedbacks suppresses an aboveground insect pest. New Phytologist, 2020, 226(2): 595–608
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16385 pmid: 31863484
82 E Garzo, E Rizzo, A Fereres, S K Gomez. High levels of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus colonization on Medicago truncatula reduces plant suitability as a host for pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum). Insect Science, 2020, 27(1): 99–112
https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.12631 pmid: 30039604
83 M C Vekemans, P A Marchand. The fate of biocontrol agents under the European phytopharmaceutical regulation: how this regulation hinders the approval of botanicals as new active substances. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2020, 27(32): 39879–39887
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10114-6 pmid: 32748363
84 L Chen, T Liu, Y Duan, X Lu, Q Yang. Microbial secondary metabolite, phlegmacin B1, as a novel inhibitor of insect chitinolytic enzymes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2017, 65(19): 3851–3857
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b01710 pmid: 28457127
85 Y Duan, T Liu, Y Zhou, T Dou, Q Yang. Glycoside hydrolase family 18 and 20 enzymes are novel targets of the traditional medicine berberine. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2018, 293(40): 15429–15438
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA118.004351 pmid: 30135205
86 E E Enan. Molecular response of Drosophila melanogaster tyramine receptor cascade to plant essential oils. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2005, 35(4): 309–321
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2004.12.007 pmid: 15763467
87 X H Makhoba, C Viegas Jr, R A Mosa, F P D Viegas, O J Pooe. Potential Impact of the multi-target drug approach in the treatment of some complex diseases. Drug Design, Development and Therapy, 2020, 14: 3235–3249
https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S257494 pmid: 32884235
88 S Muthukrishnan, H Merzendorfer, Y Arakane, Q Yang. Chitin organizing and modifying enzymes and proteins involved in remodeling of the insect cuticle. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 2019, 1142: 83–114
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7318-3_5 pmid: 31102243
89 K Y Zhu, H Merzendorfer, W Zhang, J Zhang, S Muthukrishnan. Biosynthesis, turnover, and functions of chitin in insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 2016, 61(1): 177–196
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-010715-023933 pmid: 26982439
90 W Chen, M Qu, Y Zhou, Q Yang. Structural analysis of group II chitinase (ChtII) catalysis completes the puzzle of chitin hydrolysis in insects. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2018, 293(8): 2652–2660
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA117.000119 pmid: 29317504
91 M Qu, T Watanabe-Nakayama, S Sun, K Umeda, X Guo, Y Liu, T Ando, Q Yang. High-speed atomic force microscopy reveals factors affecting the processivity of chitinases during interfacial enzymatic hydrolysis of crystalline chitin. ACS Catalysis, 2020, 10(22): 13606–13615
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c02751
92 K Shahzad, F Manzoor. Nanoformulations and their mode of action in insects: a review of biological interactions. Drug and Chemical Toxicology, 2021, 44(1): 1–11
https://doi.org/10.1080/01480545.2018.1525393 pmid: 30760084
93 J Jampílek, K Kráľová. Chapter 17-Nanobiopesticides in agriculture: state of the art and future opportunities. In: Koul O, ed. Nano-Biopesticides Today and Future Perspectives. Academic Press, 2019: 397–447
94 J Jampílek, K Katarína. 3-Nanopesticides: preparation, targeting, and controlled release. In: Grumezescu A M, eds. New Pesticides and Soil Sensors. Academic Press, 2017, 81–27
95 J L de Oliveira, E V R Campos, M Bakshi, P C Abhilash, L F Fraceto. Application of nanotechnology for the encapsulation of botanical insecticides for sustainable agriculture: prospects and promises. Biotechnology Advances, 2014, 32(8): 1550–1561
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.10.010 pmid: 25447424
96 F L Yang, X G Li, F Zhu, C L Lei. Structural characterization of nanoparticles loaded with garlic essential oil and their insecticidal activity against Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2009, 57(21): 10156–10162
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9023118 pmid: 19835357
97 G Benelli. Plant-mediated biosynthesis of nanoparticles as an emerging tool against mosquitoes of medical and veterinary importance: a review. Parasitology Research, 2016, 115(1): 23–34
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-015-4800-9 pmid: 26541154
98 S Pradhan, D R Mailapalli. Nanopesticides for Pest Control. In: Lichtfouse E, eds. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 40. Cham: Springer, 2020, 43–74
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed