Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-7505

ISSN 2095-977X(Online)

CN 10-1204/S

Postal Subscription Code 80-906

Front. Agr. Sci. Eng.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
SOIL CARBON CHECK: A TOOL FOR MONITORING AND GUIDING SOIL CARBON SEQUESTRATION IN FARMER FIELDS
Jan Adriaan REIJNEVELD1(), Martijn Jasper van OOSTRUM1, Karst Michiel BROLSMA1, Oene OENEMA2
1. Eurofins International Agro Competence Center, Binnenhaven 5, 6709 PD Wageningen, the Netherlands
2. Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, the Netherlands
 Download: PDF(3132 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

● Establishment of a rapid tool for monitoring soil carbon sequestration in farmer fields.

● Novel linkage of multiconstituent soil analyses with a carbon mineralization model.

● Extensive calibration and validation of the results of the near-infrared spectroscopy NIRS analyses.

● Soil bulk density derived from NIRS analyses and pedotransfer functions.

In 2015, 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were approved, including SDG13, which addresses actions to increase carbon capture (CO2-C storage) for climate change mitigation. However, no analytical procedures have been defined for quantifying soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration. This paper presents a rapid tool for guiding farmers and for monitoring SOC sequestration in farmer fields. The tool consists of multiconstituent soil analyses through near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and an SOC mineralization model. The tool provides forecasts of SOC sequestration over time. Soil analyses by NIRS have been calibrated and validated for farmer fields in European countries, China, New Zealand, and Vietnam. Results indicate a high accuracy of determination for SOC (R2 ≥ 0.93), and for inorganic C, soil texture, and soil bulk density. Permanganate oxidizable soil C is used as proxy for active SOC, to detect early management-induced changes in SOC contents, and is also quantified by NIRS (R2 = 0.92). A pedotransfer function is used to convert the results of the soil analyses to SOC sequestration in kg·ha−1 C as well as CO2. In conclusion, the tool allows fast, quantitative, and action-driven monitoring of SOC sequestration in farmer fields, and thereby is an essential tool for monitoring progress of SDG13.

Keywords 4 per 1000 initiative      carbon sequestration      climate action      farmer fields      SDG13      soil organic carbon      soil testing     
Corresponding Author(s): Jan Adriaan REIJNEVELD   
Just Accepted Date: 19 April 2023   Online First Date: 11 May 2023   
 Cite this article:   
Jan Adriaan REIJNEVELD,Martijn Jasper van OOSTRUM,Karst Michiel BROLSMA, et al. SOIL CARBON CHECK: A TOOL FOR MONITORING AND GUIDING SOIL CARBON SEQUESTRATION IN FARMER FIELDS[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 11 May 2023. [Epub ahead of print] doi: 10.15302/J-FASE-2023499.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/10.15302/J-FASE-2023499
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/Y/V/I/0
Fig.1  Conceptual framework of Soil Carbon Check, which is a rapid tool for guiding and monitoring soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration in farmer fields. The processes on the left indicate farmer involvement (dashed lines), those in the center the sequential analytical steps, and those on the right interactive calibration and validation (solid lines).
TypeCountrynP5MeanSDP95R2RPDRMSEP
Calibration/21,9760.71.991.74.880.9912.90.49
ValidationChina1380.51.11.02.70.964.70.23
Vietnam770.41.30.62.30.964.80.13
New Zealand1532.05.95.413.00.9914.30.31
Belarus871.27.56.718.91.0013.70.49
Finland1090.93.32.99.91.0015.50.19
Germany1000.81.51.62.10.933.50.16
France480.61.40.62.50.96?0.13
Lithuania1000.72.32.85.20.996.40.44
Norway501.82.91.15.10.97?0.23
Sweden490.95.44.916.00.99?0.40
UK541.63.01.66.70.97?0.24
The Netherlands18400.82.51.96.20.986.40.30
Tab.1  Results of the calibration and validation of the determination of SOC contents by NIRS
Fig.2  Scatter plots showing the results of the validation of soil inorganic carbon (SIC) content (a) and clay (particles < 2 μm) content (b) determinations using NIRS for samples taken in the eastern provinces in China versus reference methods.
Soil characteristicnP5MeanSDP95R2RPDRMSEP
Active carbon89330680460119550.933.5175
Soil bulk density47,6251.11.380.151.530.9929.80.005
Active C of SOC (%)8931.12.61.04.3n.a.n.a.n.a.
Tab.2  Results of the validation of active SOC and soil bulk density determinations by NIRS
Fig.3  Scatter plots showing the results of the validation of active carbon (POXC) (a) and soil bulk density (b) determinations by NIRS versus reference methods.
Fig.4  Scatter plots showing the relationships between SOC content and active SOC carbon (a), clay content and active SOC (b).
Initial valuesP5MeanSDP95
SOC (%)0.833.193.179.12
SOM (%)1.705.965.9216.9
N-total (mg·kg?1 N)750255223777395
C:N9.012.53.719
pH4.86.10.957.4
Amount of C (kg·ha?1)24,90095,55695,106273,600
C breakdown (%)2.202.840.363.40
SOC after 25 years (%)0.131.071.253.56
Tab.3  Calculated mean SOC breakdown (% per year) with the MINIP model, using results of 30,451 soil tests of samples taken in the Netherlands
SOC (%)N-total(mg·kg?1 N)C:NS-total(mg·kg?1 S)SOM (%)CaCO3 (%)Clay (%)Sand (%)pH-CaCl2Effective CEC (mmol+·kg?1)
Field A (n = 33)
 Mean0.9891310.92832.050.71.091.36.959.2
 SD0.08891.2300.160.30.21.90.14.0
 SD%8.27.411.010.67.843202.11.46.8
Field B (n = 8)
 Mean1.0594611.13142.280.81.190.46.960.9
 SD0.05861.0460.120.30.43.60.13.9
 SD%4.89.19.014.65.238363.91.46.4
Tab.4  Soil characteristics (soil layer 0–25 cm) of arable land that received no fertilization, measured monthly from September 2016 to October 2018 (Field A) and from November 2018 to April 2019 (Field B)
Fig.5  Changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) content (as regression coefficients from the linear regression of SOC content determinations over time) versus effective carbon input (from MINIP model calculations) for 70 fields on eight farms in the Netherlands.
1 F E Allison . Soil Organic Matter and Its Role in Crop Production. New York: Elsevier, 1973
2 A, Bauer A L Black . Quantification of the effect of soil organic matter content on soil productivity. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1994, 58(1): 185–193
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800010027x
3 S M, Devine K L, Steenwerth A T O’Geen . Soil health practices have different outcomes depending on local soil conditions. California Agriculture, 2022, 76(1): 46–55
https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.2022a0005
4 R Lal . Managing soils for negative feedback to climate change and positive impact on food and nutritional security. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2020, 66(1): 1–9
https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2020.1718548
5 P, Mäder A, Fliessbach D, Dubois L, Gunst P, Fried U Niggli . Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science, 2002, 296(5573): 1694–1697
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1071148 pmid: 12040197
6 P, Loveland J Webb . Is there a critical level of organic matter in the agricultural soils of temperate regions: a review. Soil & Tillage Research, 2003, 70(1): 1–18
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(02)00139-3
7 P, Leinweber G, Reuter K Brozio . Cation-exchange capacities of organo-mineral particle size fractions in soils from long-term experiments. Journal of Soil Science, 1993, 44(1): 111–119
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1993.tb00438.x
8 L, Tang G, Zeng F, Nourbakhsh G Shen . Artificial neural network approach for predicting cation exchange capacity in soil based physico-chemical properties. Environmental Engineering Science, 2009, 26(1): 137–146
https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2007.0238
9 P, Lavelle A Spain . Soil Ecology. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002
10 G, Bonanomi V, Antignani M, Capodilupo F Scala . Identifying the characteristics of organic soil amendments that suppress soil-borne plant diseases. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2010, 42(2): 136–144
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.10.012
11 E, Tipping C J, Somerville J Luster . The C:N:P:S stoichiometry of soil organic matter. Biogeochemistry, 2016, 130(1): 117–131
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-016-0247-z pmid: 32355381
12 H H Janzen . Carbon cycling in earth systems—a soil science perspective. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2004, 104(3): 399–417
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.040
13 H H Janzen . The soil carbon dilemma: shall we hoard it or use it. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2006, 38(3): 419–424
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.10.008
14 R, Lal J M, Kimble R F, Follett B A Stewart . Soil Processes and the Carbon Cycle. Boston: CRC Press, 1998
15 R Lal . World cropland soils as a source or sink for atmospheric carbon. Advances in Agronomy, 2001, 71: 145–191
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(01)71014-0
16 N H Batjes . Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. European Journal of Soil Science, 1996, 47(2): 151–163
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01386.x
17 international “4 per 1000” initiative The . Soils for Food Security and Climate. Available at the international “4 per 1000” initiative website on April 8, 2023
18 A, Freibauer M D A, Rounsevell P, Smith J Verhagen . Carbon sequestration in the agricultural soils of Europe. Geoderma, 2004, 122(1): 1–23
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.021
19 P, Smith D S, Powlson J U, Smith P, Falloon K Coleman . Meetings Europe’s climate change commitments: quantitative estimates of the potential for carbon mitigation by agriculture. Global Change Biology, 2000, 6(5): 525–539
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00331.x
20 P, Smith O, Andrén T, Karlsson P, Perälä K, Regina M, Rounsevell Wesemael B Van . Carbon sequestration potential in European croplands has been overestimated. Global Change Biology, 2005, 11(12): 2153–2163
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01052.x pmid: 34991280
21 P H, Bellamy P J, Loveland R I, Bradley R M, Lark G J D Kirk . Carbon losses from all soils across England and Wales 1978–2003. Nature, 2005, 437(7056): 245–248
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04038 pmid: 16148931
22 S, Sleutel Neve S, De G, Hofman P, Boeckx D, Beheydt Cleemput O, Van I, Mestdagh P, Lootens L, Carlier Camp N, Van H, Verbeeck Walle I, Vande R, Samson N, Lust R Lemeur . Carbon stock changes and carbon sequestration potential of Flemish cropland soils. Global Change Biology, 2003, 9(8): 1193–1203
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00651.x
23 I, Mestdagh P, Lootens Cleemput O, Van L Carlier . Soil organic carbon stocks in Flemish grassland soils: how accurate are they?. Grass and Forage Science, 2004, 59(4): 310–317
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2004.00432.x
24 I, Mestdagh P, Lootens Cleemput O, Van L Carlier . Variation in organic-carbon concentration and bulk density in Flemish grassland soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2006, 169(5): 616–622
https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200521861
25 N P A, Saby D, Arrouays V, Antoni B, Lemercier S, Follain C, Walter C Schvartz . Changes in soil organic carbon in a mountainous French region, 1990–2004. Soil Use and Management, 2008, 24(3): 254–262
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2008.00159.x
26 E A, Davidson I A Janssens . Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature, 2006, 440(7081): 165–173
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04514 pmid: 16525463
27 A, Juřicová T, Chuman D Žížala . Soil organic carbon content and stock change after half a century of intensive cultivation in a chernozem area. Catena, 2022, 211: 105950
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105950
28 D E, Romig M J, Garlynd R F, Harris K Mcsweeny . How farmers assess soil health and quality?. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1995, 50(3): 229–236
29 J A Reijneveld . Unravelling changes in soil fertility of agricultural land in the Netherlands. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Wageningen: Wageningen University, 2013
30 J A, Reijneveld Oostrum M J, Van K M, Brolsma D, Fletcher O Oenema . Empower innovations in routine soil testing. Agronomy, 2022, 12(1): 191
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010191
31 H S, Yang B H Janssen . A mono-component model of carbon mineralization with a dynamic rate constant. European Journal of Soil Science, 2000, 51(3): 517–529
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2000.00319.x
32 X, Han S R, Williams B L Zuckerman . A snapshot of translational research funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH): a case study using behavioral and social science research awards and Clinical and Translational Science Awards funded publications. PLoS One, 2018, 13(5): e0196545
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196545 pmid: 29742129
33 R, Rietra M, Heinen O Oenema . A review of crop husbandry and soil management practices using meta-analysis studies: towards soil-improving cropping systems. Land, 2022, 11(2): 255
https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020255
34 H S Yang . Modelling organic matter and exploring options for organic matter in arable farming in northern China. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Wageningen: Wageningen University, 1996
35 H S, Yang B H Janssen . Analysis of impact of farming practices on dynamics of soil organic matter in northern China. European Journal of Agronomy, 1997, 7(1−3): 211−219
36 Willigen P, de B H, Janssen H I M, Heesmans J G, Conijn G J, Velthof W J Chardon . Decomposition and Accumulation of Organic Matter in Soil. Comparison of Some Models. Alterra-rapport 1726. Wageningen: Alterra, 2008, 73
37 R, Postma Dijk T A, Van der Weijden A G G Van . Organische stofopbouw en N-mineralisatie: praktijktoepassing van een verbeterd model. Telen met toekomst OV0413. Wageningen: Plant Research International, 2004, 39 (in Dutch)
38 Organization for Standardization (ISO) International . ISO 10694:1995. Soil Quality—Determination of Organic and Total Carbon after Dry Combustion (Elementary Analysis). Geneva: ISO, 1995, 3
39 Europeen de Normalisation Comite . EN 15936:2012. Sludge, Treated Biowaste, Soil and Waste—Determination of Total Organic Carbon by Dry Combustion. Comite Europeen de Normalisation, 2012
40 R R, Weil K R, Islam M A, Stine J B, Gruver S E Samson-Liebig . Estimating active carbon for soil quality assessment: a simplified method for laboratory and field use. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 2003, 18(1): 3–17
https://doi.org/10.1079/AJAA2003003
41 G, Bongiorno E K, Bünemann C U, Oguejiofor J, Meier G, Gort R, Comans P, Mäder L, Brussaard Goede R De . Sensitivity of labile carbon fractions to tillage and organic matter management and their potential as comprehensive soil quality indicators across pedoclimatic conditions in Europe. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 99: 38–50
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.008
42 Organization for Standardization (ISO) International . ISO 13878:1998. Soil Quality—Determination of Total Nitrogen Content by Dry Combustion (Elemental Analysis). Geneva: ISO, 1998
43 Norm (NEN) Nederlands . NEN 6966. Environment—Analyses of Selected Elements in Water, Eluates and Destruates— Atomic Emission Spectrometry with Inductively Coupled Plasma. NEN, 2005, 21 (in Dutch)
44 Norm (NEN) Nederlands . NEN-EN-ISO 15587–2. Water Quality—Digestion for the Determination of Selected Elements in Water—Part 2: Nitric Acid Digestion. NEN, 2002, 28
45 Norm (NEN) Nederlands . NEN 5753. Soil—Determination of Clay Content and Particle Size Distribution in Soil and Sediment by Sieve and Pipet. NEN, 2014, 39 (in Dutch)
46 J M, Hollis J, Hannam P H Bellamy . Empirically-derived pedotransfer functions for predicting bulk density in European soil. European Journal of Soil Science, 2012, 63(1): 96–109
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2011.01412.x
47 A, Savitzky M J E Golay . Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified Least-Squares Procedures. Analytical Chemistry, 1964, 36(8): 1627–1639
https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60214a047
48 G S, Liu H S, Guo T, Pan J H, Wang G Cao . Vis-NIR spectroscopic pattern recognition combined with SG smoothing applied to breed screening of transgenic sugarcane. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2014, 34(10): 2701−2706 (in Chinese)
49 K, Kawamura Y, Tsujimoto T, Nishigaki A, Andriamananjara M, Rabenarivo H, Asai T, Rakotoson T Razafimbelo . Laboratory visible and near-infrared spectroscopy with genetic algorithm-based partial least squares regression for assessing the soil phosphorus content of upland and lowland rice fields in Madagascar. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(5): 506
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11050506
50 L, Ramirez-Lopez T, Behrens K, Schmidt A, Stevens J A M, Demattê T Scholten . The spectrum-based learner: a new local approach for modeling soil vis-NIR spectra of complex datasets. Geoderma, 2013, 195−196: 268−279
51 M, Liu C, Huang L, Wang Y, Zhang X Luo . Short-term soil moisture forecasting via Gaussian process regression with sample selection. Water, 2020, 12(11): 3085
https://doi.org/10.3390/w12113085
52 C W, Chang D A, Laird M J, Mausbach C R Hurburgh . Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy—Principal components regression analyses of soil properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2001, 65(2): 480–490
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2001.652480x
53 H S, Yang B H Janssen . Relationship between substrate initial reactivity and residues ageing speed in carbon mineralization. Plant and Soil, 2002, 239(2): 215–224
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015026223686
54 C Maljaars . Trend Analysis of Organic Matter Changes of Arable Land in the Dutch Province Zealand. Dronten: University of Applied Sciences, 2017 (in Dutch)
55 R, Lal R F, Follett B A, Stewart J M Kimble . Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change and advance food security. Soil Science, 2007, 172(12): 943–956
https://doi.org/10.1097/ss.0b013e31815cc498
56 K, Lorenz R, Lal K Ehlers . Soil organic carbon stock as an indicator for monitoring land and soil degradation in relation to United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. Land Degradation & Development, 2019, 30(7): 824–838
https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3270
57 D A, Bossio S C, Cook-Patton P W, Ellis J, Fargione J, Sanderman P, Smith S, Wood R J, Zomer Unger M, Von I M, Emmer B W Griscom . The role of soil carbon in natural climate solutions. Nature Sustainability, 2020, 3(5): 391–398
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0491-z
58 A, Hamidov K, Helming G, Bellocchi W, Bojar T, Dalgaard B B, Ghaley C, Hoffmann I, Holman A, Holzkämper D, Krzeminska S H, Kværnø H, Lehtonen G, Niedrist L, Øygarden P, Reidsma P P, Roggero T, Rusu C, Santos G, Seddaiu E, Skarbøvik D, Ventrella J, Żarski M Schönhart . Impacts of climate change adaptation options on soil functions: a review of European case-studies. Land Degradation & Development, 2018, 29(8): 2378–2389
https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3006 pmid: 30393451
59 of Latin America and the Caribbean for Climate Action on Agriculture (PLACA) Platform . PLACA Homepage. Available at PLACA website on April 8, 2023
60 of African Agriculture (AAA) Initiative Adaptation . Initiative for the Adaptation of African Agriculture to Climate Change. Available at AAA Initiative website on April 8, 2023
61 Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA) Inter-American . Living Soils of the Americas. IICA, 2020. Available at IICA website on April 8, 2023
62 Commission European . A European Green Deal. Available at official European Union website on April 8, 2023
63 H, Riley M Bakkegard . Declines of soil organic matter content under arable cropping in southeast Norway. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica. Section B: Soil and Plant Science, 2006, 56(3): 217–223
https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710510029141
64 J, Heikkinen E, Ketoja V, Nuutinen K Regina . Declining trend of carbon in Finnish cropland soils in 1974–2009. Global Change Biology, 2013, 19(5): 1456–1469
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12137 pmid: 23505137
65 P Capriel . Trends in organic carbon and nitrogen contents in agricultural soils in Bavaria (south Germany) between 1986 and 2007. European Journal of Soil Science, 2013, 64(4): 445–454
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12054
66 V, Genot G, Colinet L, Bock D, Vanvyve Y, Reusen P Dardenne . Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy for estimating soil characteristics valuable in diagnosis of soil fertility. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy, 2011, 19(2): 117–138
https://doi.org/10.1255/jnirs.923
67 T T, Hurisso S W, Culman W R, Horwath J, Wade D, Cass J W, Beniston T M, Bowles A S, Grandy A J, Franzluebbers M E, Schipanski S T, Lucas C M Ugarte . Comparison of permanganate-oxidizable carbon and mineralizable carbon for assessment of organic matter stabilization and mineralization. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2016, 80(5): 1352–1364
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2016.04.0106
68 P R Hesse . A Textbook of Soil Chemical Analysis. London: Murray, 1971
69 D F, Malley P Williams . Analysis of sediments and suspended material in lake ecosystems using near-infrared spectroscopy: a review. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 2014, 17(4): 447–453
https://doi.org/10.1080/14634988.2014.979311
70 C, Nduwamungu N, Ziadi L É, Parent G F, Tremblay L Thuriès . Opportunities for, and limitations of, near infrared reflectance applications in soil analysis: a review. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 2009, 89(5): 531–541
https://doi.org/10.4141/CJSS08076
71 R, Zornoza C, Guerrero J, Mataix-Solera K M, Scow V, Arcenegui J Mataix-Beneyto . Near infrared spectroscopy for determination of various physical, chemical and biochemical properties in Mediterranean soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2008, 40(7): 1923–1930
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.04.003 pmid: 23226882
72 K R, Islam R R Weil . Soil quality indicator properties in mid-Atlantic soils as influenced by conservation management. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000, 55(1): 69–78
73 A J, Franzluebbers R, Haney C W, Honeycutt H H, Schomberg F M Hons . Flush of carbon dioxide following rewetting of dried soil relates to active organic pools. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2000, 64(2): 613–623
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.642613x
74 A, Girona-García D, Badía-Villas N T, Jiménez-Morillo J A González-Pérez . Changes in soil organic matter composition after Scots pine afforestation in a native European beech forest revealed by analytical pyrolysis (Py-GC/MS). Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 691: 1155–1161
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.229 pmid: 31466197
75 T T, Hurisso D J, Moebius-Clune S W, Culman B N, Moebius-Clune J E, Thies Es H M Van . Soil protein as a rapid soil health indicator of potentially available organic nitrogen. Agricultural & Environmental Letters, 2018, 3(1): 180006
https://doi.org/10.2134/ael2018.02.0006
76 A, Ghani M, Dexter K W Perrott . Hot-water extractable carbon in soils: a sensitive measurement for determining impacts of fertilisation, grazing and cultivation. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2003, 35(9): 1231–1243
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00186-X
77 B, Sarkar M, Singh S, Mandal G J, Churchman N S Bolan . Chapter 3—Clay minerals—Organic matter interactions in relation to carbon stabilization in soils. In: Garcia C, Nannipieri P, Hernandez T, eds. The Future of Soil Carbon. Academic Press, 2018, 71–86
78 Organization for Standardization (ISO) International . NEN-EN-ISO 11272:2017 en. Soil Quality—Determination of Dry Bulk Density. Geneva: ISO, 2017, 14
79 Looy K, Van J, Bouma M, Herbst J, Koestel B, Minasny U, Mishra C, Montzka A, Nemes Y A, Pachepsky J, Padarian M G, Schaap B, Tóth A, Verhoef J, Vanderborght der Ploeg M J, van L, Weihermüller S, Zacharias Y, Zhang H Vereecken . Pedotransfer functions in earth system science: challenges and perspectives. Reviews of Geophysics, 2017, 55(4): 1199–1256
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RG000581
80 C, Périé R Ouimet . Organic carbon, organic matter and bulk density relationships in boreal forest soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 2008, 88(3): 315–325
https://doi.org/10.4141/CJSS06008
81 G Z, Han G L, Zhang Z T, Gong G F Wang . Pedotransfer functions for estimating soil bulk density in China. Soil Science, 2012, 177(3): 158–164
https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e31823fd493
82 J Bouma . Using soil survey data for quantitative land evaluation. In: Stewart B A, ed. Advances in Soil Science. New York: Springer, 1989, 177–213
83 R Lal . Soil health and carbon management. Food and Energy Security, 2016, 5(4): 212–222
https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.96
84 C, Oyonarte M D, Mingorance P, Durante G, Piñero E Barahona . Indicators of change in the organic matter in arid soils. Science of the Total Environment, 2007, 378(1–2): 133–137
85 M, Knotters K, Teuling A, Reijneveld J P, Lesschen P Kuikman . Changes in organic matter contents and carbon stocks in Dutch soils, 1998–2018. Geoderma, 2022, 414: 115751
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115751
86 S, Manzoni A Porporato . Soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization: theory and models across scales. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2009, 41(7): 1355–1379
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.02.031
87 J, Aertsens Nocker L, De A Gobin . Valuing the carbon sequestration potential for European agriculture. Land Use Policy, 2013, 31: 584–594
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.09.003
88 A, Chambers R, Lal K Paustian . Soil carbon sequestration potential of US croplands and grasslands: implementing the 4 per Thousand Initiative. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 71(3): 68A–74A
https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.71.3.68A
89 J, Bouma L, Montanarella G Evanylo . The challenge of the soil science community to contribute to the implementation of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Soil Use and Management, 2019, 35(4): 538–546
https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12518
90 O Oenema . Soil organic carbon sequestration matters but is no panacea for carbon-neutral. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2022 [Published Online] doi:
91 Organization for Standardization (ISO) International . ISO 18400–100:2017. Soil Quality—Sampling—Part 100: Guidance on the Selection of Sampling Standards. Geneva: ISO, 2017, 4
92 Organization for Standardization (ISO) International . ISO 18400–104:2018. Soil Quality—Sampling—Part 104: Strategies. Geneva: ISO, 2018, 131
93 VassarStats. Website for Statistical Computation. Available at VassarStats website on April 8, 2023
94 A P, Field J, Miles Z C Field . Discovering Statistics Using R: and Sex and Drugs and Rock 'n' Roll. London: Sage Publications Ltd., 2012
95 K, Mei Z, Wang H, Huang C, Zhang Z, Shang R A, Dahlgren M, Zhang F Xia . Stimulation of N2O emission by conservation tillage management in agricultural lands: a meta-analysis. Soil & Tillage Research, 2018, 182: 86–93
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.05.006
96 Kumara T M, Kiran A, Kandpal S Pal . A meta-analysis of economic and environmental benefits of conservation agriculture in South Asia. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 269: 110773
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110773 pmid: 32560994
97 Groenigen J W, van Kessel C, van B A, Hungate O, Oenema D S, Powlson Groenigen K J van . Sequestering soil organic carbon: a nitrogen dilemma. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51(9): 4738–4739
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01427 pmid: 28426199
98 M, Almaraz M Y, Wong E K, Geoghegan B Z Houlton . A review of carbon farming impacts on nitrogen cycling, retention, and loss. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2021, 1505(1): 102–117
https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14690 pmid: 34580879
[1] FASE-23499-OF-RJA_suppl_1 Download
[1] Enzai DU, Nan XIA, Yuying GUO, Yuehan TIAN, Binghe LI, Xuejun LIU, Wim de VRIES. ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF NITROGEN DEPOSITION ON URBAN FORESTS: AN OVERVIEW[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2022, 9(3): 445-456.
[2] Jonathan STORKEY, Andrew J. MACDONALD. THE ROLE OF LONG-TERM EXPERIMENTS IN VALIDATING TRAIT-BASED APPROACHES TO ACHIEVING MULTIFUNCTIONALITY IN GRASSLANDS[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2022, 9(2): 187-196.
[3] C. Wayne HONEYCUTT, Cristine L.S. MORGAN, Pipa ELIAS, Michael DOANE, John MESKO, Rob MYERS, LaKisha ODOM, Bianca MOEBIUS-CLUNE, Ron NICHOLS. Soil health: model programs in the USA[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2020, 7(3): 356-361.
[4] Rattan LAL. Managing soil quality for humanity and the planet[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2020, 7(3): 251-253.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed