|
|
Lattice-based certificateless encryption scheme |
Mingming JIANG1,*( ),Yupu HU1,Hao LEI2,Baocang WANG1,Qiqi LAI1 |
1. State Key Laboratory of Integrated Service Networks, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China 2. Security and Privacy Lab, CRDU, Huawei Technologies Co., LTD., Beijing 100095, China |
|
|
Abstract Certificateless public key cryptography (CLPKC) can solve the problems of certificate management in a public key infrastructure (PKI) and of key escrows in identity-based public key cryptography (ID-PKC). In CL-PKC, the key generation center (KGC) does not know the private keys of all users, and their public keys need not be certificated by certification authority (CA). At present, however, most certificateless encryption schemes are based on large integer factorization and discrete logarithms that are not secure in a quantum environment and the computation complexity is high. To solve these problems, we propose a new certificateless encryption scheme based on lattices, more precisely, using the hardness of the learning with errors (LWE) problem. Compared with schemes based on large integer factorization and discrete logarithms, the most operations are matrix-vector multiplication and inner products in our scheme, our approach has lower computation complexity. Our scheme can be proven to be indistinguishability chosen ciphertext attacks (IND-CPA) secure in the random oracle model.
|
Keywords
lattice-based cryptography
LWE
identitybased encryption (IBE)
post-quantum cryptography
certificateless encryption
|
Corresponding Author(s):
Mingming JIANG
|
Issue Date: 11 October 2014
|
|
1 |
Al-Riyami S, Paterson K G. Certificateless public key cryptography. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2003, 2894: 452-473
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-40061-5_29
|
2 |
Al-Riyami S, Paterson K G. CBE from CL-PKE: a generic construction and efficient schemes. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005, 3386: 398-415
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30580-4_27
|
3 |
Baek J, Safavi-Naini R, Susilo W. Certificateless public key encryption without pairing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005, 3650: 134-148
https://doi.org/10.1007/11556992_10
|
4 |
Lai J Z, Deng R H, Liu S L, Kou W D. RSA-based certificateless public key encryption. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2009, 5451: 24-34
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00843-6_3
|
5 |
Yum D H, Lee P J. Generic construction of certificateless encryption. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2004, 3043: 802-811
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24707-4_93
|
6 |
Libert B, Quisquater J J. On constructing certificateless cryptosystems from identity based encryption. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2006, 3958: 474-490
https://doi.org/10.1007/11745853_31
|
7 |
Cheng Z H, Chen L Q, Ling L, Comley R. General and efficient certificateless public key encryption constructions. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2007, 4575: 83-107
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73489-5_6
|
8 |
Dent A W, Libert B, Paerson K G. Certificateless encryption schemes strongly secure in the standard model. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2008, 4939: 344-359
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78440-1_20
|
9 |
Huang Q, Wong D S. Generic certificateless encryption in the standard model. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2007, 4752: 278-291
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75651-4_19
|
10 |
Gentry C, Peikert C, Vaikuntanathan V. Trapdoors for hard lattices and new cryptographic constructions. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. 2008, 197-206
|
11 |
Regev O. On lattices, learning with errors, random linear codes, and cryptography. Journal of ACM, 2009, 56(6): Article No. 34
https://doi.org/10.1145/1568318.1568324
|
12 |
Lyubashevsky V, Peikert C, Regev O. On ideal lattices and learning with errors over rings. Journal of ACM, 2013, 60(6): Article No. 43
https://doi.org/10.1145/2535925
|
13 |
Lindner R, Peikert C. Better key sizes (and attacks) for LWE-based encryption. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2011, 6558: 319-339
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19074-2_21
|
14 |
Stehlé D, Steinfeld R. Making NTRU as secure as worst-case problems over ideal lattices. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2011, 6632: 27-47
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20465-4_4
|
15 |
Cash D, Hofheinz D, Kiltz E, Peikert C. Bonsai trees, or how to delegate a lattice basis. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2010, 6110: 523-552
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13190-5_27
|
16 |
Agrawal S, Boneh D, Boyen X. Efficient lattice (H) IBE in the standard model. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2010, 6110: 553-572
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13190-5_28
|
17 |
Agrawal S, Boneh D, Boyen X. Lattice basis delegation in fixed dimension and shorter-ciphertext hierarchical IBE. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2010, 6223: 98-115
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14623-7_6
|
18 |
Guang Y, Gu C X, Zhu Y F, Zheng Y H, Fei J L. Certificateless fully homomorphic encryption based on LWE problem. Journal of Electronics and Information Technology, 2013, 35(4): 988-993
https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1146.2012.01102
|
19 |
Gentry C. Fully homomorphic encryption using ideal lattices. In: Proceedings of STOC2009, 169-178
|
20 |
Gentry C. Toward basing fully homomorphic encryption on worst-case hardness. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2010, 6223: 116-137
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14623-7_7
|
21 |
Brakerski Z, Vaikuntanathan V. Fully homomorphic encryption from ring-LWE and security for key dependent messages. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2011, 6841: 505-524
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22792-9_29
|
22 |
Brakerski Z, Vaikuntanathan V. Efficient fully homomorphicencryption from (standard) LWE. In: Proceedings of 2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. 2011, 97-106
https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS.2011.12
|
23 |
Zhang G Y. Fuzzy certificateless identity-based encryption protocol from lattice. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, 380: 2262-2266
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.380-384.2262
|
24 |
Lyubashevsky V. Lattice signatures without trapdoors. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2012, 7237: 738-755
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29011-4_43
|
25 |
Gordon D, Katz J, Vaikuntanathan V. A group signature scheme from lattice assumptions. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2010, 6477: 395-412
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17373-8_23
|
26 |
Rückert M. Lattice-based blind signatures. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2010, 6477: 413-430
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17373-8_24
|
27 |
Rückert M. Strongly unforgeable signatures and hierarchical identitybased signatures from lattices without random oracles. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2010, 6061: 182-200
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12929-2_14
|
28 |
Micciancio D, Regev O. Worst-case to average-case reductions based on gaussian measures. SIAM Journal on Computing, 2007, 37(1): 267-302
https://doi.org/10.1137/S0097539705447360
|
29 |
Alwen J, Peiker C. Generating shorter bases for hard random lattices. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2009, 75-86
|
30 |
Regev O. On lattices, learning with errors, random linear codes, and cryptography. Journal of the ACM, 2009, 56(6): Article No.34
https://doi.org/10.1145/1568318.1568324
|
31 |
Peikert C. Public-key cryptosystems from the worst-case shortest vector problem. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. 2009, 333-342
|
32 |
Boneh D, Freeman D. Linearly homomorphic signatures over binary fields and new tools for lattice-based signatures. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2011, 6571: 1-16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19379-8_1
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|