Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Electrical and Electronic Engineering

ISSN 2095-2732

ISSN 2095-2740(Online)

CN 10-1028/TM

Front Elect Electr Eng Chin    2009, Vol. 4 Issue (2) : 227-233    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11460-009-0023-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Finite element analysis of temperature distribution of polycrystalline silicon thin film transistors under self-heating stress
Huaisheng WANG, Mingxiang WANG(), Zhenyu YANG
Department of Microelectronics, Soochow University, Suzhou 215021, China
 Download: PDF(406 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The temperature distribution of typical n-type polycrystalline silicon thin film transistors under self-heating (SH) stress is studied by finite element analysis. From both steady-state and transient thermal simulation, the influence of device power density, substrate material, and channel width on device temperature distribution is analyzed. This study is helpful to understand the mechanism of SH degradation, and to effectively alleviate the SH effect in device operation.

Keywords finite element analysis (FEA)      temperature distribution      thin film transistors      self-heating      steady-state      transient state     
Corresponding Author(s): WANG Mingxiang,Email:Mingxiang_wang@suda.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 05 June 2009
 Cite this article:   
Huaisheng WANG,Mingxiang WANG,Zhenyu YANG. Finite element analysis of temperature distribution of polycrystalline silicon thin film transistors under self-heating stress[J]. Front Elect Electr Eng Chin, 2009, 4(2): 227-233.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fee/EN/10.1007/s11460-009-0023-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fee/EN/Y2009/V4/I2/227
Fig.1  Schematic illustration of cross section of TFT
Fig.2  Transfer characteristic degradation of n-channel MILC TFT under SH stress
Fig.3  Single device finite element model used for TFT thermal analysis
substrateFEA modelsself-heating electrical stress conditionstransient simulation
VD/VVG /VVT/VID/mA
silicon wafer(W/L)/(μm/μm)A1∶10/6B1∶20/6C1∶40/6D1∶100/6E1∶200/618305.11.17
16354.71.42
20304.61.25
18354.81.41
18354.551.55yes
17355.31.74
20354.71.58
24305.91.35
18354.91.83
22304.051.51
saturation: 10/625304.851.39
Corning 1737A2–E210/6–200/68.5204.550.485yes
Tab.1  Electrical stress conditions simulated in thermal analysis models with different / and substrate types
materialsdensity/(kg?m-3)specific thermal capacity/(J?kg-1?K-1)thermal conductivity/(W?m-1?K-1)
Al2700900237
polysilicon (undoped in Refs. [7,8])2330716.215
polysilicon (doped in Refs. [7,8])2330716.245
Si in Ref. [9]233070027°C156
127°C105
227°C80
327°C64
SiO2 in Ref. [10]2200100027.71°C1.3
59.7°C1.35
93.62°C1.39
129.2°C1.42
151.3°C1.47
177.9°C1.5
204.8°C1.53
Corning 1737glass in Ref. [11]254023°C707.623°C0.91
50°C736.950°C0.95
100°C795.5100°C1.03
200°C891.8200°C1.14
300°C971.3300°C1.22
Tab.2  Table 2 Thermal parameters of different materials used in simulation
Fig.4  Channel temperature distribution simulated in /=10 μm/6 μm TFT model on Si substrate with stress power=27.9 mW
Fig.5  Channel temperature distribution crossing peak temperature point in linear and saturation regions simulated in /=10 μm/6 μm TFT model on Si substrate. (a) Along channel length direction; (b) along channel width direction; (c) along thickness direction from the bottom SiO to device surface
Fig.6  Fig. 6 Channel temperature distribution crossing peak temperature point simulated in TFT models on Si substrate with different /. (a) Along channel length direction; (b) along the relative position in channel width
Fig.7  Channel peak temperature dependent on stress power density simulated in TFT models on Si substrate with different /
Fig.8  Channel temperature distribution crossing peak temperature point simulated in /=10 μm/6 μm TFT model on glass substrate. (a) Along channel length direction; (b) along channel width direction; (c) along thickness direction from the bottom SiO to device surface
Fig.9  Transient rising and falling temperature curves simulated in TFT model with /=200 μm/6 μm on Si substrate
Fig.10  Falling time constant dependent on from TFT models with different / on Si or glass substrate
1 Wang W, Meng Z G, Guo H C. High performance metal-induced unilaterally crystallized polycrystalline silicon thin-film transistors: technology and applications. Chinese Journal of Liquid Crystals and Displays , 2002, 17(5): 323–330 (in Chinese).
2 Inoue S, Ohshima H, Shimoda T. Analysis of degradation phenomenon caused by self-heating in low-temperature-processed polycrystalline silicon thin film transistors. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics , 2002, 41(11): 6313–6319
doi: 10.1143/JJAP.41.6313
3 Fuyuki T, Kitajima K, Yano H, Hatayama T, Uraoka Y, Hashimoto S, Morita Y. Thermal degradation of low temperature poly-Si TFT. Thin Solid Films , 2005, 487(1-2): 216–220
doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.01.068
4 Wang H S, Wang M X, Yang Z Y, Hao H, Wong M. Stress power dependent self-heating degradation of metal induced laterally crystallized n-type polycrystalline silicon thin film transistors. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices , 2007, 54(12): 3276–3284
doi: 10.1109/TED.2007.908907
5 Jomaah J, Ghibaudo G, Balestra F. Analysis and modeling of self-heating effects in thin-film SOI MOSFETs as a function of temperature. Solid-State Eleclronics , 1995, 38(3): 615–618
doi: 10.1016/0038-1101(94)00130-8
6 Sameshima T, Sunaga Y, Kohno A. Measurements of temperature distribution in polycrystalline thin film transistors caused by self-heating. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics , 1996, 35(3A): 308–310
doi: 10.1143/JJAP.35.L308
7 Cahill D G, Ford W K, Goodson K E, Mahan G D, Majumdar A, Maris H J, Merlin R, Phillpot S R. Nanoscale thermal transport. Journal of Applied Physics , 2003, 93(2): 793–818
doi: 10.1063/1.1524305
8 McConnell A D, Uma S, Goodson K E. Thermal conductivity of doped polysilicon Layers. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems , 2001, 10(3): 360–369
doi: 10.1109/84.946782
9 Glassbrenner C J, Slack G A. Thermal conductivity of silicon and germanium from 3 K to the melting point. Physical Review , 1964, 134(4A): A1058–A1069
doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.134.A1058
10 Cahill D G. Thermal conductivity measurement from 30 to 750 K: the 3ωmethod. Review of Scientific Instruments , 1990, 61(2): 802–808
doi: 10.1063/1.1141498
11 Corning Incorporated. Corning 1737 AMLCD Glass Substrates Material Information. 2004, MIE 101
12 Sze S M, Kwok K NG. Physics of Semiconductor Devices. 3rd ed. American: John Wiley & Sons, 2007, 303–306
13 Tummala R R. Fundamentals of Microsystems Packaging. American: McGraw-Hill Companies, 2001, Chapter 6.4
[1] Majid Ghasemi KAHRISANGI, Arash Hassanpour ISFAHANI, Sadegh VAEZ-ZADEH, Mohammad Rajabi SEBDANI. Line-start permanent magnet synchronous motors versus induction motors: A comparative study[J]. Front Elect Electr Eng, 2012, 7(4): 459-466.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed