Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Electrical and Electronic Engineering

ISSN 2095-2732

ISSN 2095-2740(Online)

CN 10-1028/TM

Front Elect Electr Eng Chin    2011, Vol. 6 Issue (3) : 468-480    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11460-011-0168-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Stochastic systems simulation optimization
Chun-Hung CHEN1(), Leyuan SHI2, Loo Hay LEE3
1. Department of Systems Engineering and Operations Research, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA; 2. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706-1572, USA; 3. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576, Singapore
 Download: PDF(359 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

With the advance of new computational technology, stochastic systems simulation and optimization has become increasingly a popular subject in both academic research and industrial applications. This paper presents some of recent developments about the problem of optimizing a performance function from a simulation model.We begin by classifying different types of problems and then provide an overview of the major approaches, followed by a more in-depth presentation of two specific areas: optimal computing budget allocation and the nested partitions method.

Keywords simulation optimization      discrete-event systems      simulation-based decision making      computing budget allocation      ranking and selection     
Corresponding Author(s): CHEN Chun-Hung,Email:cchen9@gmu.edu   
Issue Date: 05 September 2011
 Cite this article:   
Chun-Hung CHEN,Leyuan SHI,Loo Hay LEE. Stochastic systems simulation optimization[J]. Front Elect Electr Eng Chin, 2011, 6(3): 468-480.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fee/EN/10.1007/s11460-011-0168-5
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fee/EN/Y2011/V6/I3/468
1 Fu M C. Are we there yet? The marriage between simulation & optimization. OR/MS Today , 2007, 16-17
2 Rubinstein R Y, Shapiro A. Discrete Event Systems: Sensitivity Analysis and Stochastic Optimization by the Score Function Method. New York , NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1993
3 Homem-de-Mello T, Shapiro A, Spearman M L. Finding optimal material release times using simulation-based optimization. Management Science , 1999, 45(1): 86-102
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.45.1.86
4 Kleywegt A, Shapiro A, Homem-de-Mello T. The sample average approximation method for stochastic discrete optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization , 2002, 12(2): 479-502
doi: 10.1137/S1052623499363220
5 Barton R R, Meckesheimer M. Metamodel-based simulation optimization. In: Henderson S G, Nelson B L, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation. Chapter 18 . Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006, 535-574
6 Kleijnen J. Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments. New York , NY: Springer, 2008
7 Kushner H J, Yin G G. Stochastic Approximation Algorithms and Applications. 2nd ed. New York , NY: Springer-Verlag, 2003
8 ólafsson S. Metaheuristics. In: Henderson S G, Nelson B L, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation. Chapter 21 . Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006, 633-654
9 Fu M C. Optimization via simulation: A review. Annals of Operations Research , 1994, 53(1): 199-247
doi: 10.1007/BF02136830
10 Fu M C. Optimization for simulation: Theory vs. practice (Feature Article). INFORMS Journal on Computing , 2002, 14(3): 192-215
doi: 10.1287/ijoc.14.3.192.113
11 Andradóttir S. Simulation optimization. In: Banks J, ed. Handbook of Simulation: Principles, Methodology, Advances, Applications, and Practice. Chapter 9. New York , NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1998
12 Andradóttir S. An overview of simulation optimization with random search. In: Henderson S G, Nelson B L, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation. Chapter 20 . Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006, 617-632
13 Fu M C. Gradient estimation. In: Henderson S G, Nelson B L, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation. Chapter 19 . Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006, 575-616
14 Fu M C. What you should know about simulation and derivatives. Naval Research Logistics , 2008, 55(8): 723-736
doi: 10.1002/nav.20313
15 Fu MC. Sample path derivatives for (s, S) inventory systems. Operations Research , 1994, 42(2): 351-364
doi: 10.1287/opre.42.2.351
16 Fu M C, Hu J Q. (s, S) inventory systems with random lead times: Harris recurrence and its implications in sensitivity analysis. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences , 1994, 8(3): 355-376
doi: 10.1017/S0269964800003466
17 Bashyam S, Fu M C. Application of perturbation analysis to a class of periodic review (s, S) inventory systems. Naval Research Logistics , 1994, 41(1): 47-80
doi: 10.1002/1520-6750(199402)41:1<47::AID-NAV3220410105>3.0.CO;2-I
18 Bashyam S, Fu M C. Optimization of (s, S) inventory systems with random lead times and a service level constraint. Management Science , 1998, 44(12): S243-S256
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.44.12.S243
19 Pflug G C, Rubinstein R Y. Inventory processes: Quasiregenerative property, performance evaluation and sensitivity estimation via simulation. Stochastic Models , 2002, 18(3): 469-496
doi: 10.1081/STM-120014222
20 Zhang H, Fu M C. Sample path derivatives for (s, S) inventory systems with price determination. In: Golden B L, Raghavan S, Wasil E A, eds. The Next Wave in Computing, Optimization, and Decision Technologies. Boston , MA: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 2005, 229-246
doi: 10.1007/0-387-23529-9_16
21 Whitt W. What you should know about queuing models to set staffing requirements in service systems. Naval Research Logistics , 2007, 54(5): 476-484
doi: 10.1002/nav.20243
22 Bechhofer R E, Santner T J, Goldsman D M. Design and Analysis of Experiments for Statistical Selection, Screening, and Multiple Comparisons. New York , NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1995
23 Kim S H, Nelson B L. Selecting the best system. In: Henderson S G, Nelson B L, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation. Chapter 17 . Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006, 501-534
24 Chen H C, Chen C H, Dai L, Yücesan E. New development of optimal computing budget allocation for discrete event simulation. In: Proceedings of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference . 1997, 334-341
25 Chen C H, Lin J, Yücesan E, Chick S E. Simulation budget allocation for further enhancing the efficiency of ordinal optimization. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems: Theory and Applications , 2000, 10(3): 251-270
doi: 10.1023/A:1008349927281
26 Chen C H, Yücesan E, Dai L, Chen H C. Optimal budget allocation for discrete-event simulation experiments. IIE Transactions , 2010, 42(1): 60-70
doi: 10.1080/07408170903116360
27 Fu M C, Hu J Q, Chen C H, Xiong X. Simulation allocation for determining the best design in the presence of correlated sampling. INFORMS Journal on Computing , 2007, 19(1): 101-111
doi: 10.1287/ijoc.1050.0141
28 Glynn P, Juneja S. A large deviations perspective on ordinal optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference . 2004, 577-585
doi: 10.1109/WSC.2004.1371364
29 Fu M C, Hu J Q, Chen C H, Xiong X. Optimal computing budget allocation under correlated sampling. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference . 2004, 595-603
doi: 10.1109/WSC.2004.1371366
30 Brantley M W, Lee L H, Chen C H, Chen A. Optimal sampling in design of experiment for simulation-based stochastic optimization. In: Proceedings of 2008 IEEE Conference on Automation Science and Engineering . 2008, 388-393
doi: 10.1109/COASE.2008.4626453
31 Lee L H, Chew E P, Teng S Y, Goldsman D. Optimal computing budget allocation for multi-objective simulation models. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference . 2004, 586-594
32 Chew E P, Lee L H, Teng S Y, Koh C H. Differentiated service inventory optimization using nested partitions and MOCBA. Computers & Operations Research , 2009, 36(5): 1703-1710
doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2008.04.006
33 Lee L H, Chew E P, Teng S Y, Goldsman D. Finding the nondominated Pareto set for multi-objective simulation models. IIE Transactions , 2010, 42(9): 656-674
doi: 10.1080/07408171003705367
34 Chick S E, Wu Y Z. Selection procedures with frequentist expected opportunity cost. Operations Research , 2005, 53(5): 867-878
doi: 10.1287/opre.1040.0187
35 He D, Chick S E, Chen C H. The opportunity cost and OCBA selection procedures in ordinal optimization. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews , 2007, 37(5): 951-961
doi: 10.1109/TSMCC.2007.900656
36 Trailovic L, Pao L Y. Computing budget allocation for efficient ranking and selection of variances with application to target tracking algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control , 2004, 49(1): 58-67
doi: 10.1109/TAC.2003.821428
37 Morrice D J, Brantley M W, Chen C H. An efficient ranking and selection procedure for a linear transient mean performance measure. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference . 2008, 290-296
doi: 10.1109/WSC.2008.4736080
38 Morrice D J, Brantley M W, Chen C H. A transient means ranking and selection procedure with sequential sampling constraints. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference . 2009, 590-600
doi: 10.1109/WSC.2009.5429661
39 Chen C H, He D, Fu M C, Lee L H. Efficient simulation budget allocation for selecting an optimal subset. INFORMS Journal on Computing , 2008, 20(4): 579-595
doi: 10.1287/ijoc.1080.0268
40 Pujowidianto N A, Lee L H, Chen C H, Yep C M. Optimal computing budget allocation for constrained optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference . 2009, 584-589
doi: 10.1109/WSC.2009.5429660
41 Yan S, Zhou E, Chen C H. Efficient simulation budget allocation for selecting the best set of simplest good enough designs. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference . 2010, 1152-1159
doi: 10.1109/WSC.2010.5679075
42 Chick S E, Inoue K. New two-stage and sequential procedures for selecting the best simulated system. Operations Research , 2001, 49(5): 732-743
doi: 10.1287/opre.49.5.732.10615
43 Chick S E, Inoue K. New procedures to select the best simulated system using common random numbers. Management Science , 2001, 47(8): 1133-1149
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.47.8.1133.10229
44 Branke J, Chick S E, Schmidt C. Selecting a selection procedure. Management Science , 2007, 53(12): 1916-1932
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0721
45 Chen C H. A lower bound for the correct subset-selection probability and its application to discrete event system simulations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control , 1996, 41(8): 1227-1231
doi: 10.1109/9.533692
46 Chen C H, Lee L H. Stochastic Simulation Optimization: An Optimal Computing Budget Allocation. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company, 2011
47 Rinott Y. On two-stage selection procedures and related probability inequalities. Communications in Statistics , 1978, 7(8): 799-811
doi: 10.1080/03610927808827671
48 Shi L, ólafsson S. Nested partitions method for global optimization. Operations Research , 2000, 48(3): 390-407
doi: 10.1287/opre.48.3.390.12436
49 Shi L, ólafsson S. Nested partitions method for stochastic optimization. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability , 2000, 2(3): 271-291
doi: 10.1023/A:1010081212560
50 Shi L, ólafsson S. Nested Partitions Optimization: Methodology and Applications. New York , NY: Springer, 2008
51 Shi L, ólafsson S. Nested partitions optimization. In: Tutorials in Operations Research. Chapter 1. Hanover , MD: INFORMS, 2007, 1-22
52 Shi L, ólafsson S, Sun N. New parallel randomized algorithms for the traveling salesman problem. Computers & Operations Research , 1999, 26(4): 371-394
doi: 10.1016/S0305-0548(98)00068-9
53 Ho Y C, Sreenivas R S, Vakili P. Ordinal optimization of DEDS. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems: Theory and Applications , 1992, 2(4): 61-88
54 Ho Y C, Cassandras C G, Chen C H, Dai L. Ordinal optimization and simulation. Journal of the Operational Research Society , 2000, 51(4): 490-500
55 Shi L, Chen C H. A new algorithm for stochastic discrete resource allocation optimization. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems: Theory and Applications , 2000, 10(3): 271-294
doi: 10.1023/A:1017214011352
56 Chen C H, Fu M C, Shi L. Simulation and optimization. In: Tutorials in Operations Research. Chapter 11. Hanover , MD: INFORMS, 2008, 247-260
57 Fu M C, Chen C H, Shi L. Some topics for simulation optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference . 2008, 27-38
doi: 10.1109/WSC.2008.4736053
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed