Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Electrical and Electronic Engineering

ISSN 2095-2732

ISSN 2095-2740(Online)

CN 10-1028/TM

Front Elect Electr Eng    2012, Vol. 7 Issue (4) : 438-446    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11460-012-0212-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE
DSP based fuzzy controller for series parallel resonant converter
M. MADHESWARAN, C. NAGARAJAN()
Centre for Advanced Research, Muthayammal Engineering College, Rasipuram-637408, Tamilnadu, India
 Download: PDF(564 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

In this paper, digital signal processor (DSP) based fuzzy controller for series parallel resonant converter (SPRC) has been estimated, and the performance of the converter is analyzed by using state space model. The method to predict the steady-state and dynamic performance of the converter with load independent operation has been presented. The proposed converter has been analyzed with the closed-loop and open-loop conditions. The simple form of transfer function for SPRC is developed, and it is used to analyze the stability of the converter with closed-loop operation. The stability analysis of the converter is carried out by using frequency response plan. The fuzzy controller regulates the output voltage with change supply voltage and load disturbance. The controller performance of inductance capacitance inductance – T network (LCL-T) SPRC is compared with inductance inductance capacitance – T network (LLC-T) SPRC through simulation and experimental studies using TMS320F2407 processor.

Keywords power electronics      DC-DC power converters      fuzzy control      system analysis and design     
Corresponding Author(s): NAGARAJAN C.,Email:nagaraj2k1@gmail.com   
Issue Date: 05 December 2012
 Cite this article:   
M. MADHESWARAN,C. NAGARAJAN. DSP based fuzzy controller for series parallel resonant converter[J]. Front Elect Electr Eng, 2012, 7(4): 438-446.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fee/EN/10.1007/s11460-012-0212-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fee/EN/Y2012/V7/I4/438
Fig.1  Series parallel resonant converter
Fig.1  Series parallel resonant converter
Fig.1  Series parallel resonant converter
Fig.1  Series parallel resonant converter
Fig.1  Series parallel resonant converter
Fig.2  Equivalent circuit model of LCL-T SPRC
Fig.2  Equivalent circuit model of LCL-T SPRC
Fig.2  Equivalent circuit model of LCL-T SPRC
Fig.2  Equivalent circuit model of LCL-T SPRC
Fig.2  Equivalent circuit model of LCL-T SPRC
Fig.3  Equivalent circuit model for LLC-T SPRC
Fig.3  Equivalent circuit model for LLC-T SPRC
Fig.3  Equivalent circuit model for LLC-T SPRC
Fig.3  Equivalent circuit model for LLC-T SPRC
Fig.3  Equivalent circuit model for LLC-T SPRC
change in error (ce)error (e)
NHNNSZPLPPH
NBNHNHNHNHNNLZ
NNHNHNNNLZPL
NLNHNNLNLZPLP
ZNHNNLZPLPPH
PLNNLZPLPLPPH
PNLZPLPPPHPH
PHZPLPPHPHPHPH
Tab.1  Fuzzy rules
Fig.4  Resonant current and resonant voltage for = 100 V
Fig.4  Resonant current and resonant voltage for = 100 V
Fig.4  Resonant current and resonant voltage for = 100 V
Fig.4  Resonant current and resonant voltage for = 100 V
Fig.4  Resonant current and resonant voltage for = 100 V
Fig.5  Voltages across parallel capacitor ()
Fig.5  Voltages across parallel capacitor ()
Fig.5  Voltages across parallel capacitor ()
Fig.5  Voltages across parallel capacitor ()
Fig.5  Voltages across parallel capacitor ()
Fig.6  Current through inductance (LLC-T SPRC with FLC fed RLE load)
Fig.6  Current through inductance (LLC-T SPRC with FLC fed RLE load)
Fig.6  Current through inductance (LLC-T SPRC with FLC fed RLE load)
Fig.6  Current through inductance (LLC-T SPRC with FLC fed RLE load)
Fig.6  Current through inductance (LLC-T SPRC with FLC fed RLE load)
Fig.7  Output voltage for step change in supply at = 0.05 ms
Fig.7  Output voltage for step change in supply at = 0.05 ms
Fig.7  Output voltage for step change in supply at = 0.05 ms
Fig.7  Output voltage for step change in supply at = 0.05 ms
Fig.7  Output voltage for step change in supply at = 0.05 ms
Fig.8  Output voltage for step change in load at = 0.05 ms
Fig.8  Output voltage for step change in load at = 0.05 ms
Fig.8  Output voltage for step change in load at = 0.05 ms
Fig.8  Output voltage for step change in load at = 0.05 ms
Fig.8  Output voltage for step change in load at = 0.05 ms
Fig.9  Resonant current and resonant voltage for = 100 V (LCL-T SPRC with FLC fed RLE load)
Fig.9  Resonant current and resonant voltage for = 100 V (LCL-T SPRC with FLC fed RLE load)
Fig.9  Resonant current and resonant voltage for = 100 V (LCL-T SPRC with FLC fed RLE load)
Fig.9  Resonant current and resonant voltage for = 100 V (LCL-T SPRC with FLC fed RLE load)
Fig.9  Resonant current and resonant voltage for = 100 V (LCL-T SPRC with FLC fed RLE load)
Fig.10  Voltages across parallel capacitor () (LCL-T SPRC with FLC fed RLE load)
Fig.10  Voltages across parallel capacitor () (LCL-T SPRC with FLC fed RLE load)
Fig.10  Voltages across parallel capacitor () (LCL-T SPRC with FLC fed RLE load)
Fig.10  Voltages across parallel capacitor () (LCL-T SPRC with FLC fed RLE load)
Fig.10  Voltages across parallel capacitor () (LCL-T SPRC with FLC fed RLE load)
Fig.11  Current through inductance (LCL-T SPRC with FLC fed RLE load)
Fig.11  Current through inductance (LCL-T SPRC with FLC fed RLE load)
Fig.11  Current through inductance (LCL-T SPRC with FLC fed RLE load)
Fig.11  Current through inductance (LCL-T SPRC with FLC fed RLE load)
Fig.11  Current through inductance (LCL-T SPRC with FLC fed RLE load)
Fig.12  Output voltage for step change in supply at = 0.05 ms
Fig.12  Output voltage for step change in supply at = 0.05 ms
Fig.12  Output voltage for step change in supply at = 0.05 ms
Fig.12  Output voltage for step change in supply at = 0.05 ms
Fig.12  Output voltage for step change in supply at = 0.05 ms
Fig.13  Output voltage for step change in load at = 0.05 ms
Fig.13  Output voltage for step change in load at = 0.05 ms
Fig.13  Output voltage for step change in load at = 0.05 ms
Fig.13  Output voltage for step change in load at = 0.05 ms
Fig.13  Output voltage for step change in load at = 0.05 ms
resonant topologiessettling time/msovershoot%steady-state error/V
LCL-T0.0110.001
LLC-T0.02530.004
Tab.2  Comparative evaluation of transient and steady-state performances by using FLC
Fig.14  Frequency response of LLC-T SPRC
Fig.14  Frequency response of LLC-T SPRC
Fig.14  Frequency response of LLC-T SPRC
Fig.14  Frequency response of LLC-T SPRC
Fig.14  Frequency response of LLC-T SPRC
Fig.15  Frequency response of LCL-T SPRC
Fig.15  Frequency response of LCL-T SPRC
Fig.15  Frequency response of LCL-T SPRC
Fig.15  Frequency response of LCL-T SPRC
Fig.15  Frequency response of LCL-T SPRC
Fig.16  CH1: resonant voltage [volt scale: 40 V/div], CH2: resonant current [ampere scale: 0.5 A/div] for LLC-T SPRC
Fig.16  CH1: resonant voltage [volt scale: 40 V/div], CH2: resonant current [ampere scale: 0.5 A/div] for LLC-T SPRC
Fig.16  CH1: resonant voltage [volt scale: 40 V/div], CH2: resonant current [ampere scale: 0.5 A/div] for LLC-T SPRC
Fig.16  CH1: resonant voltage [volt scale: 40 V/div], CH2: resonant current [ampere scale: 0.5 A/div] for LLC-T SPRC
Fig.16  CH1: resonant voltage [volt scale: 40 V/div], CH2: resonant current [ampere scale: 0.5 A/div] for LLC-T SPRC
Fig.17  Output voltage for LLC-T SPRC with load and supply disturbance at = 0.05 ms (CH1: volt scale: 50 V/div)
Fig.17  Output voltage for LLC-T SPRC with load and supply disturbance at = 0.05 ms (CH1: volt scale: 50 V/div)
Fig.17  Output voltage for LLC-T SPRC with load and supply disturbance at = 0.05 ms (CH1: volt scale: 50 V/div)
Fig.17  Output voltage for LLC-T SPRC with load and supply disturbance at = 0.05 ms (CH1: volt scale: 50 V/div)
Fig.17  Output voltage for LLC-T SPRC with load and supply disturbance at = 0.05 ms (CH1: volt scale: 50 V/div)
Fig.18  CH1: resonant voltage [volt scale: 40 V/div]. CH2: resonant current [ampere scale: 0.5 A/div] for LCL-T SPRC.
Fig.18  CH1: resonant voltage [volt scale: 40 V/div]. CH2: resonant current [ampere scale: 0.5 A/div] for LCL-T SPRC.
Fig.18  CH1: resonant voltage [volt scale: 40 V/div]. CH2: resonant current [ampere scale: 0.5 A/div] for LCL-T SPRC.
Fig.18  CH1: resonant voltage [volt scale: 40 V/div]. CH2: resonant current [ampere scale: 0.5 A/div] for LCL-T SPRC.
Fig.18  CH1: resonant voltage [volt scale: 40 V/div]. CH2: resonant current [ampere scale: 0.5 A/div] for LCL-T SPRC.
Fig.19  Output voltage for LCL-T SPRC with load and supply disturbance at = 0.05 ms (CH1:volt scale: 50 V/div)
Fig.19  Output voltage for LCL-T SPRC with load and supply disturbance at = 0.05 ms (CH1:volt scale: 50 V/div)
Fig.19  Output voltage for LCL-T SPRC with load and supply disturbance at = 0.05 ms (CH1:volt scale: 50 V/div)
Fig.19  Output voltage for LCL-T SPRC with load and supply disturbance at = 0.05 ms (CH1:volt scale: 50 V/div)
Fig.19  Output voltage for LCL-T SPRC with load and supply disturbance at = 0.05 ms (CH1:volt scale: 50 V/div)
resonant topologiesload disturbancesupply disturbance
simulation studiesexperimental studiessimulation studiesexperimental studies
settling time/msovershoot/%settling time/msovershoot/%settling time/msovershoot/%settling time/msovershoot/%
LLC-T SPRC0.040.160.30.750.0320.150.61
LCL-T SPRC0.02510.20.90.0250.090.10.8
Tab.3  Performance measures of theoretical and simulation results
1 Raju G S N, Doradla S. An LCL resonant converter with PWM control-analysis, simulation, and implementation. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics , 1995, 10(2): 164–174
doi: 10.1109/63.372601
2 Bhat A K S. Analysis and design of LCL-type series resonant converter. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Telecommunications Energy Conference (INTELEC’90) . 1990, 172–178
doi: 10.1109/INTLEC.1990.171244
3 Borage M, Tiwari S, Kotaiah S. LCL-T resonant converter with clamp diodes: A novel constant-current power supply with inherent constant-voltage limit. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics , 2007, 54(2): 741–746
doi: 10.1109/TIE.2007.892254
4 Borage M B, Nagesh K V, Bhatia M S, Tiwari S. Characteristics and design of an asymmetrical duty-cycle-controlled LCL-T resonant converter. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics , 2009, 24(10): 2268–2275
5 Borage M, Tiwari S, Kotaiah S. Analysis and design of an LCL-T resonant converter as a constant-current power supply. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics , 2005, 52(6): 1547–1554
doi: 10.1109/TIE.2005.858729
6 Belaguli V, Bhat A K S. Series-parallel resonant converter operating in discontinuous current mode-analysis, design, simulation, and experimental results. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications , 2000, 47(4): 433–442
doi: 10.1109/81.841845
7 Mattavelli P, Rossetto L, Spiazzi G, Tenti P, General-purpose fuzzy controller for DC-DC converters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics , 1997, 12(1): 79–86
doi: 10.1109/63.554172
8 Correa J M, Hutto E D, Farret F A, Simoes M G. A fuzzy-controlled pulse density modulation strategy for a series resonant inverter with wide load range. In: Proceedings of the 34th IEEE Annual Power Electronics Specialist Conference . 2003, 4: 1650–1655
9 Lakshminarasamma N, Masihuzzaman M, Ramanarayanan V. Steady state stability of current mode active clamp ZVS DC-DC converter. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics , 2010, 25(6): 1546–1555
10 Arun S, Rama Raddy S. PSPICE simulation and implementation of closed loop controlled ZVS LCL push-pull DC-DC converter. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security , 2008, 8(6): 67–73
11 Foster M P, Gould C R, Gilbert A J, Stone D A, Bingham C M. Analysis of CLL voltage-output resonant converters using describing function. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics , 2008, 23(4): 1772–1781
12 Sivakumaran T S, Natarajan S P. Development of fuzzy control of series-parallel loaded resonant converter-simulation and experimental evaluation. In: Proceedings of India International Conference on Power Electronics . 2006, 360–364
13 Arulselvi S,Govindarajan U, Saminath V. Development of simple fuzzy logic controller (SFLC) for ZVS quasi-resonant converter: Design, simulation and experimentation. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science , 2006, 86: 215–233
14 Arulselvi S, Uma G, Chidambaram M. Design of PID controller for boost converter with RHS zero. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Power Electronics and Motion Control . 2004, 2: 532–537
15 Kaithamalai U, Ponnusamy L, Kandasamy B. Hybrid posicast controller for a DC-DC buck converter. Serbian Journal of Electrical Engineering , 2008, 5(1): 121–138
doi: 10.2298/SJEE0801121K
16 Nagarajan C, Madheswaran M. Performance analysis of LCL-T resonant converter with fuzzy/PID using state space analysis. Electrical Engineering , 2011, 93(3): 167–178
doi: 10.1007/s00202-011-0203-9
17 Nagarajan C, Madheswaran M. Stability analysis of series parallel resonant converter with fuzzy logic controller using state space techniques. Electric Power Components and Systems , 2011, 39(8): 780–793
doi: 10.1080/15325008.2010.541746
[1] Moulay Rachid DOUIRI, Mohamed CHERKAOUI. Learning fuzzy controller and extended Kalman filter for sensorless induction motor robust against resistance variation[J]. Front Elect Electr Eng, 2012, 7(3): 347-355.
[2] Fei GAO, Xuesong QIU, . A feedback control mechanism for adaptive SLO maintenance in dynamic service level management[J]. Front. Electr. Electron. Eng., 2010, 5(2): 188-196.
[3] XIAO Xiang-ning, JIANG Xu, LIU Hui-wei, LIU Hao, KONG Sheng-li. Study on the SVPWM algorithm of N-level inverter in the context of non-orthogonal coordinates[J]. Front. Electr. Electron. Eng., 2006, 1(2): 199-204.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed