Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Engineering Management

ISSN 2095-7513

ISSN 2096-0255(Online)

CN 10-1205/N

Postal Subscription Code 80-905

Front. Eng    2021, Vol. 8 Issue (1) : 17-31    https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0091-7
REVIEW ARTICLE
System dynamics analytical modeling approach for construction project management research: A critical review and future directions
Xiaoxiao XU1, Patrick X. W. ZOU2()
1. Department of Civil and Construction Engineering and Centre for Smart Infrastructure and Digital Construction, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn Victoria 3122, Australia; Office of Projects Victoria, East Melbourne 3002, Australia
2. Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China
 Download: PDF(587 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Building and infrastructure construction projects can be viewed as a complex system consisting of many subsystems. Over the last two decades, considerable researches that use system dynamics (SD) as an analytical and modeling approach exist to address construction project management issues. However, only few critical reviews have been conducted to provide an in-depth understanding of SD application in construction project management. Moreover, many studies have failed to apply SD accurately. Therefore, the present study aims to gain an understanding of the current state of play and future directions in applying SD method in construction project management research, by undertaking a comprehensive review of 105 relevant articles published from 1994 to 2018. These articles are analyzed in terms of annual publication rate, key papers and their contribution, critical issues in SD application, and research topics. A significant increase in the number of publications in the last five years has been observed. When applying SD method to model construction system, the following aspects must be carefully considered: Model boundary, model development, model test, and model simulation. In addition, SD has been applied in a wide range of research topics, including (1) sustainable construction; (2) design error, rework, and change management; (3) risk management; (4) resource management; (5) decision making; (6) hybrid modeling; (7) safety management; (8) PPP project; and (9) organization performance. Based on the review findings, this study discusses three future research directions, namely, integration of SD with other methods, uncertainty analysis, and human factor analysis. This study can help researchers gain an in-depth understanding of the critical issues in the application of SD in construction management and the state-of-the-art of SD research.

Keywords system dynamics      construction management      problem and recommendation      research directions      literature review      human factor     
Corresponding Author(s): Patrick X. W. ZOU   
Just Accepted Date: 06 January 2020   Online First Date: 11 March 2020    Issue Date: 15 January 2021
 Cite this article:   
Xiaoxiao XU,Patrick X. W. ZOU. System dynamics analytical modeling approach for construction project management research: A critical review and future directions[J]. Front. Eng, 2021, 8(1): 17-31.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/10.1007/s42524-019-0091-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/Y2021/V8/I1/17
Fig.1  Schematic illustration of complex interactions between fatigue and schedule delay in a construction project.
Fig.2  Schematic of causal loop.
Fig.3  Schematic of feedback loop.
Building block Symbol Description
Stock (level) The level of any variable in the system (Akhwanzada and Tahar, 2012; Ahmad et al., 2016)
Flow (rate) The rate of changes in stock, which can cause the increase or decrease of a stock (Jin et al., 2016)
Auxiliary (convertor) It connects stock and a flow in a complex setting, used for intermediate calculations (Akhwanzada and Tahar, 2012)
Connector It denotes connection and control between system variables, showing the causality (Li et al., 2014a)
Tab.1  Basic blocks used in SD with icons
Fig.4  Sample stock-flow diagram.
Fig.5  Number of SD-based construction management articles published annually from 1994 to 2018.
Journals Number
JCEM 15
IJPM 11
JME 10
CME 9
JCP 7
ECAM 6
AC 5
Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 5
Resources Conservation and Recycling (RCR) 4
International Journal of Civil Engineering 4
Safety Science 4
Accident Analysis and Prevention 3
Waste Management (WM) 3
Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 2
Mathematical and Computer Modeling 2
Building and Environment 1
Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 1
EJOR 1
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 1
Interfaces 1
Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 1
Journal of Enterprise Information Management 1
Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management 1
Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management 1
Journal of Operations Management 1
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 1
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 1
Production Planning & Control 1
Scientia Iranica 1
Technics Technologies Education Management (TTEM) 1
Total 105
Tab.2  Number of SD-related articles in the construction management field published in different journals from 1994 to 2018
Ranking Author (year) Journal Document title
1 Yuan et al. (2012) WM A dynamic model for assessing the effects of management strategies on the reduction of construction and demolition waste
2 Zhang et al. (2014) IJPM A prototype system dynamic model for assessing the sustainability of construction projects
3 Love et al. (2002) IJPM Using systems dynamics to better understand change and rework in construction project management systems
4 Yuan et al. (2011) RCR A model for cost-benefit analysis of construction and demolition waste management throughout the waste chain
5 Yuan (2012) WM A model for evaluating the social performance of construction waste management
6 Rodrigues and Bowers (1996) IJPM The role of system dynamics in project management
7 Motawa et al. (2007) AC An integrated system for change management in construction
8 Love et al. (1999) CME Determining the causal structure of rework influences in construction
9 Lee et al. (2006b) AC Dynamic planning and control methodology for strategic and operational construction project management
10 Love et al. (2008) TTEM Forensic project management: An exploratory examination of the causal behavior of design-induced rework
Tab.3  Most-frequently cited papers
Fig.6  Causality and correlativity (Sterman 2000).
Tested item Number Percentage (of 97)
Structure-confirmation test 50 51.55%
Parameter-confirmation test 45 46.39%
Boundary adequacy test 47 48.45%
Dimensional consistency test 44 45.36%
Extreme-condition test 43 44.33%
Integral error test 32 32.99%
Behavior sensitivity test 44 45.36%
Behavior test 64 65.98%
Tab.4  Issues related to SD model test
Research topic 1994–1999 2000–2005 2006–2011 2012–2018 Total
Sustainable construction (and waste management) 0 0 2 18 20
Design error, rework, and change management 1 3 4 7 15
Risk management 0 0 4 10 14
Resource management 2 1 3 8 14
Decision making, planning, and control 0 3 6 5 14
Hybrid modeling 0 0 3 8 11
Safety management 0 1 0 8 9
PPP project 0 0 0 4 4
Organization performance 0 2 0 1 3
Total 3 10 22 69 104
Tab.5  Research topics and their trends
Fig.7  Relationship among research topics.
Fig.8  Summary of future research directions of SD in construction project management.
1 S Ahmad, R Mat Tahar, F Muhammad-Sukki, A B Munir, R Abdul Rahim (2016). Application of system dynamics approach in electricity sector modelling: A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56: 29–37
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.034
2 S A Akhwanzada, R M Tahar (2012). Strategic forecasting of electricity demand using system dynamics approach. International Journal of Environmental Sciences and Development, 3(4): 328–333
3 O Balci (1994). Validation, verification, and testing techniques throughout the life cycle of a simulation study. Annals of Operations Research, 53(1): 121–173
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02136828
4 Y Barlas (1996). Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 12(3): 183–210
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199623)12:3<183::AID-SDR103>3.0.CO;2-4
5 M Barratt, T Y Choi, M Li (2011). Qualitative case studies in operations management: Trends, research outcomes, and future research implications. Journal of Operations Management, 29(4): 329–342
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.06.002
6 L Chen, P S Fong (2013). Visualizing evolution of knowledge management capability in construction firms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(7): 839–851
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000649
7 R M Choudhry, M A Aslam, J W Hinze, F M Arain (2014). Cost and schedule risk analysis of bridge construction in Pakistan: Establishing risk guidelines. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(7): 04014020
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000857
8 R G Coyle (1996). System Dynamics Modelling: A Practical Approach. Boca Raton: CRC Press
9 Q Cui, M Hastak, D Halpin (2010). Systems analysis of project cash flow management strategies. Construction Management and Economics, 28(4): 361–376
https://doi.org/10.1080/01446191003702484
10 Z Ding, W Gong, S Li, Z Wu (2018). System dynamics versus agent-based modeling: A review of complexity simulation in construction waste management. Sustainability, 10(7): 2484–2497
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072484
11 C Fang, F Marle (2012). A simulation-based risk network model for decision support in project risk management. Decision Support Systems, 52(3): 635–644
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.021
12 C M Feng, C H Hsieh (2009). Effect of resource allocation policies on urban transport diversity. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 24(7): 525–533
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2009.00608.x
13 B H W Guo, T W Yiu, V A González (2015). Identifying behaviour patterns of construction safety using system archetypes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 80: 125–141
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.008 pmid: 25909389
14 S Han, S Lee, F Peña-Mora (2012). Identification and quantification of non-value-adding effort from errors and changes in design and construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(1): 98–109
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000406
15 S Han, P Love, F Peña-Mora (2013). A system dynamics model for assessing the impacts of design errors in construction projects. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 57(9–10): 2044–2053
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2011.06.039
16 S Han, F Saba, S Lee, Y Mohamed, F Peña-Mora (2014). Toward an understanding of the impact of production pressure on safety performance in construction operations. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 68: 106–116
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.007 pmid: 24184131
17 M Ibrahim Shire, G T Jun, S Robinson (2018). The application of system dynamics modelling to system safety improvement: Present use and future potential. Safety Science, 106: 104–120
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.010
18 X Jin, X Xu, X Xiang, Q Bai, Y Zhou (2016). System-dynamic analysis on socio-economic impacts of land consolidation in china. Habitat International, 56: 166–175
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.05.007
19 K I A Khan, R Flanagan, S L Lu (2016). Managing information complexity using system dynamics on construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 34(3): 192–204
https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2016.1190026
20 M Khanzadi, F Nasirzadeh, M Alipour (2012). Integrating system dynamics and fuzzy logic modeling to determine concession period in BOT projects. Automation in Construction, 22: 368–376
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.09.015
21 S Lee (2017). Applying system dynamics to strategic decision making in construction. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 4(1): 35–40
https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FEM-2017002
22 S Lee, S Han, F Peña-Mora (2009). Integrating construction operation and context in large-scale construction using hybrid computer simulation. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 23(2): 75–83
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2009)23:2(75)
23 S Lee, F Peña-Mora, M Park (2005). Quality and change management model for large scale concurrent design and construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(8): 890–902
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:8(890)
24 S Lee, F Peña-Mora, M Park (2006a). Web-enabled system dynamics model for error and change management on concurrent design and construction projects. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 20(4): 290–300
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2006)20:4(290)
25 S H Lee, F Peña-Mora, M Park (2006b). Dynamic planning and control methodology for strategic and operational construction project management. Automation in Construction, 15(1): 84–97
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2005.02.008
26 N Leveson, N Dulac, K Marais, J Carroll (2009). Moving beyond normal accidents and high reliability organizations: A systems approach to safety in complex systems. Organization Studies, 30(2–3): 227–249
https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608101478
27 Y Li, T R Taylor (2014). Modeling the impact of design rework on transportation infrastructure construction project performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(9): 04014044
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000878
28 Z Li, G Q Shen, M Alshawi (2014a). Measuring the impact of prefabrication on construction waste reduction: An empirical study in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 91: 27–39
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.07.013
29 Z Li, G Q Shen, X Xue (2014b). Critical review of the research on the management of prefabricated construction. Habitat International, 43: 240–249
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.04.001
30 X Liang, G Q Shen, S Bu (2016). Multiagent systems in construction: A ten-year review. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 30(6): 04016016
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000574
31 W Lo, C Lin, M Yan (2007). Contractor’s opportunistic bidding behavior and equilibrium price level in the construction market. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(6): 409–416
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:6(409)
32 P Love, G D Holt, L Y Shen, H Li, Z Irani (2002). Using systems dynamics to better understand change and rework in construction project management systems. International Journal of Project Management, 20(6): 425–436
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00039-4
33 P E Love, D J Edwards, Z Irani (2008). Forensic project management: An exploratory examination of the causal behavior of design-induced rework. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(2): 234–247
https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2008.919677
34 P E Love, P Mandal, H Li (1999). Determining the causal structure of rework influences in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 17(4): 505–517
https://doi.org/10.1080/014461999371420
35 T K Mbiti, N Blismas, R Wakefield, R Lombardo (2011). System archetypes underlying the problematic behaviour of construction activity in Kenya. Construction Management and Economics, 29(1): 3–13
https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2010.529924
36 I Motawa, C Anumba, S Lee, F Peña-Mora (2007). An integrated system for change management in construction. Automation in Construction, 16(3): 368–377
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2006.07.005
37 F Nasirzadeh, A Afshar, M Khanzadi (2008). Dynamic risk analysis in construction projects. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 35(8): 820–831
https://doi.org/10.1139/L08-035
38 F Nasirzadeh, H Mazandaranizadeh, M Rouhparvar (2016). Quantitative risk allocation in construction projects using cooperative-bargaining game theory. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 14(3): 161–170
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0011-8
39 F Nasirzadeh, P Nojedehi (2013). Dynamic modeling of labor productivity in construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 31(6): 903–911
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.11.003
40 S O Ogunlana, H Li, F A Sukhera (2003). System dynamics approach to exploring performance enhancement in a construction organization. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(5): 528–536
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:5(528)
41 N C Onat, G Egilmez, O Tatari (2014). Towards greening the US residential building stock: A system dynamics approach. Building and Environment, 78: 68–80
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.03.030
42 G Ozcan-Deniz, Y Zhu (2016). A system dynamics model for construction method selection with sustainability considerations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 121: 33–44
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.089
43 M Park (2005). Model-based dynamic resource management for construction projects. Automation in Construction, 14(5): 585–598
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2004.11.001
44 M Park, S H Ji, H S Lee, W Kim (2009). Strategies for design-build in Korea using system dynamics modeling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11): 1125–1137
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000095
45 K Parvan, H Rahmandad, A Haghani (2015). Inter-phase feedbacks in construction projects. Journal of Operations Management, 39–40: 48–62
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2015.07.005
46 F Peña-Mora, M Li (2001). Dynamic planning and control methodology for design/build fast-track construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(1): 1–17
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:1(1)
47 F Peña-Mora, M Park (2001). Dynamic planning for fast-tracking building construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(6): 445–456
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:6(445)
48 A J Perrenoud, J B Smithwick, K C Hurtado, K T Sullivan (2016). Project risk distribution during the construction phase of small building projects. Journal of Management Engineering, 32(3): 04015050
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000417
49 T Prasertrungruang, B Hadikusumo (2008). System dynamics modelling of machine downtime for small to medium highway contractors. Engineering, Construction, and Architectural Management, 15(6): 540–561
https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980810916988
50 A Rodrigues, J Bowers (1996). The role of system dynamics in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 14(4): 213–220
https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(95)00075-5
51 P M Senge, J W Forrester (1980). Tests for building confidence in system dynamics models. System Dynamics, TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, 14: 209–228
52 A Shadpour, A J Unger, M A Knight, C T Haas (2015). Numerical DAE approach for solving a system dynamics problem. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 29(3): 04014054
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000349
53 M Shin, H S Lee, M Park, M Moon, S Han (2014). A system dynamics approach for modeling construction workers’ safety attitudes and behaviors. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 68: 95–105
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.019 pmid: 24268437
54 J D Sterman (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. New York: McGraw-Hill Education
55 Y H Tang, S O Ogunlana (2003). Modelling the dynamic performance of a construction organization. Construction Management and Economics, 21(2): 127–136
https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619032000079699
56 S K Wan, M Kumaraswamy, D T Liu (2013). Dynamic modelling of building services projects: A simulation model for real-life projects in the Hong Kong construction industry. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 57(9–10): 2054–2066
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2011.06.070
57 F Wang, L Ding, P E Love, D J Edwards (2016). Modeling tunnel construction risk dynamics: Addressing the production versus protection problem. Safety Science, 87: 101–115
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.01.014
58 J Wang, Z Li, V W Tam (2015). Identifying best design strategies for construction waste minimization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 92: 237–247
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.076
59 J Wang, H Yuan (2016). System dynamics approach for investigating the risk effects on schedule delay in infrastructure projects. Journal of Management Engineering, 33(1): 04016029
60 T M Williams (2000). Safety regulation changes during projects: The use of system dynamics to quantify the effects of change. International Journal of Project Management, 18(1): 23–31
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00063-5
61 C K Wing (1997). The ranking of construction management journals. Construction Management and Economics, 15(4): 387–398
https://doi.org/10.1080/014461997372953
62 B Xiong, M Skitmore, B Xia (2015a). A critical review of structural equation modeling applications in construction research. Automation in Construction, 49: 59–70
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.09.006
63 W Xiong, J F Yuan, Q Li, M J Skibniewski (2015b). Performance objective-based dynamic adjustment model to balance the stakeholders’ satisfaction in PPP projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 21(5): 539–547
https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.895409
64 X Xu, J Wang, C Z Li, W Huang, N Xia (2018). Schedule risk analysis of infrastructure projects: A hybrid dynamic approach. Automation in Construction, 95: 20–34
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.07.026
65 Y Xu, C Sun, M J Skibniewski, A P Chan, J F Yeung, H Cheng (2012). System dynamics (SD)-based concession pricing model for PPP highway projects. International Journal of Project Management, 30(2): 240–251
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.06.001
66 G Ye, H Yuan, L Shen, H Wang (2012). Simulating effects of management measures on the improvement of the environmental performance of construction waste management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 62: 56–63
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.01.010
67 H Yuan (2012). A model for evaluating the social performance of construction waste management. Waste Management, 32(6): 1218–1228
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.01.028 pmid: 22377363
68 H Yuan, A R Chini, Y Lu, L Shen (2012). A dynamic model for assessing the effects of management strategies on the reduction of construction and demolition waste. Waste Management, 32(3): 521–531
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.11.006 pmid: 22197665
69 H Yuan, L Shen (2011). Trend of the research on construction and demolition waste management. Waste Management, 31(4): 670–679
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.10.030 pmid: 21169008
70 H Yuan, L Shen, J J Hao, W Lu (2011). A model for cost-benefit analysis of construction and demolition waste management throughout the waste chain. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(6): 604–612
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.06.004
71 H Yuan, J Wang (2014). A system dynamics model for determining the waste disposal charging fee in construction. European Journal of Operational Research, 237(3): 988–996
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.034
72 X Zhang, Y Wu, L Shen, M Skitmore (2014). A prototype system dynamic model for assessing the sustainability of construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 32(1): 66–76
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.01.009
73 X Zheng, Y Le, A P Chan, Y Hu, Y Li (2016). Review of the application of social network analysis (SNA) in construction project management research. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7): 1214–1225
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.06.005
74 P X W Zou, G Zhang, J Wang (2007). Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China. International Journal of Project Management, 25(6): 601–614
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.03.001
[1] Jun DU, Fangwen WENG. Construction management and technology innovation for main projects of Quanzhou Bay Bridge[J]. Front. Eng, 2021, 8(1): 151-155.
[2] Elodie HOCHSCHEID, Gilles HALIN. Generic and SME-specific factors that influence the BIM adoption process: An overview that highlights gaps in the literature[J]. Front. Eng, 2020, 7(1): 119-130.
[3] Sujesh F. SUJAN, Arto KIVINIEMI, Steve W. JONES, Jacqueline M. WHEATHCROFT, Eilif HJELSETH. Common biases in client involved decision-making in the AEC industry[J]. Front. Eng, 2019, 6(2): 221-238.
[4] Yang YU, Jiafu TANG. Review of seru production[J]. Front. Eng, 2019, 6(2): 183-192.
[5] Hongtao ZHOU, Hongwei WANG, Wei ZENG. Smart construction site in mega construction projects: A case study on island tunneling project of Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge[J]. Front. Eng, 2018, 5(1): 78-87.
[6] SangHyun LEE. Applying system dynamics to strategic decision making in construction[J]. Front. Eng, 2017, 4(1): 35-40.
[7] Ting Gong,Jian Yang,Hao Hu,Feng Xu. Construction Technology of Off-Site Precast Concrete Buildings[J]. Front. Eng, 2015, 2(2): 122-124.
[8] Burcu Akinci. Situational Awareness in Construction and Facility Management[J]. Front. Eng, 2014, 1(3): 283-289.
[9] Mao-run Feng,Zheng-song Zhao. Rational Understanding about Renaissance Path of China's Road and Bridge Engineering[J]. Front. Eng, 2014, 1(1): 42-51.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed