Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Engineering Management

ISSN 2095-7513

ISSN 2096-0255(Online)

CN 10-1205/N

Postal Subscription Code 80-905

Front. Eng    2014, Vol. 1 Issue (3) : 304-307    https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FEM-2014039
ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT THEORIES AND METHODOLOGIES
Neural Operation Management: A New Avenue for Productive and Military Operations
Qing-guo Ma()
Department of Management Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
 Download: PDF(690 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

An important effect of technological progress is the increasing replacement of manual labor by mental labor in productive and military operations. The variation of the operator’s capabilities in cognition, judgment and decision-making has drawn much attention from operation management researchers. Monitoring and evaluation of these capabilities is especially significant in conditions such as long-time operation, operation with special properties and operation under special circumstances. The military power and economic power are both the key concerns for a nation. The military power depends not only on the weapon system, but also the operators’ capabilities of manipulating the system. Similarly, the economic power is not only dependent on advanced machine system, but also the operational capability of the operators. Thus it has become a hot field of research and practice to monitor and assess the operator’s physiological and psychological states online based on neural measurement technology, and then to give real time intervention, so as to reduce the occurrence of accidents and increase the operation performance.

Keywords operation management      productive operation      military operation      neural operation management      neuromanagement     
Corresponding Author(s): Qing-guo Ma   
Issue Date: 04 February 2015
 Cite this article:   
Qing-guo Ma. Neural Operation Management: A New Avenue for Productive and Military Operations[J]. Front. Eng, 2014, 1(3): 304-307.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/10.15302/J-FEM-2014039
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/Y2014/V1/I3/304
1 Ayaz, H., Shewokis, P. A., Bunce, S., Izzetoglu, k., Willems, B., & Onaral, B. (2012). Optical brain monitoring for operator training and mental workload assessment. Neuroimage, 59(1), 36-47
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.023
2 Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 9-64
https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051053737843
3 Dussault, C., Jouanin, J. C., Philippe, M., & Cuezennec, C.Y. (2005). EEG and ECG changes during simulator operation reflct mental workload and vigilance. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 76(4), 344-351.
4 Gopalsamy, C., Park, S., Rajamanickam, R., & Jayaraman, S. (1999). The Wearable Motherboard?: The first generation of adaptive and responsive textile structures (ARTS) for medical applications. Virtual Reality, 4(3), 152-168
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01418152
5 Hoyt, R. W., Reifman, J., Coster, T. S., & Buller, M.J. (2002). Combat medical informatics: Present and future. In Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium. American Medical Informatics Association, 335.
6 Ma, Q. G. (2012). The framework of engineering management and neuro-engineering management. Science &Technology Progress and Policy, 29(18), 9-12.
7 Ma, Q., & Wang, X. (2006). Cognitive neuroscience, neuroeconomics and neuromanagement. Management World, 10, 139-149.
8 Ma, Q., Fu, H., & Bian, J. (2012). Neuro-industrial engineering: the new stage of industrial engineering. Management World, 6, 163-168, 179.
9 Ma, Q., Shang, Q., Fu, H., Chen, F. (2012). Mental workload analysis during the production process: EEG and GSR activity. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 220, 193-197.
10 Ma, Q., Sun, X., Fu, H., Zhao, D., & Guo, J. (2013). Manufacturing process design based on mental and physical workload analysis. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 345, 482-485
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.345.482
11 Ma, Q., Jin, J., & Wang, L. (2010). The neural process of hazard perception and evaluation for warning signal words: Evidence from event-related potentials. Neuroscience Letters, 483(3), 206-210
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2010.08.009
12 Parasuraman, R., & Rizzo, M. (2008). Neuroergonomics: The Brain at Work. Oxford University Press, Inc.
13 Parasuraman, R., & Wilson, G. F. (2008). Putting the brain to work: Neuroergonomics past, present, and future. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50(3), 468-474
https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288349
14 Park, B., Kim, J. I., Lee, D., Jeong, S.O., & Park, H.J. (2012). Are brain networks stable during a 24-hour period. Neuroimage, 59(1), 456-466
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.049
15 Smith, M. E., Gevins, A., Brown, H., Kamik, A., & Du, R. (2001). Monitoring task loading with multivariate EEG measures during complex forms of human-computer interaction. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 43(3), 366-380
https://doi.org/10.1518/001872001775898287
16 John St., M., Kobus, D. A., Morrison, J. G., & Schmorrow, D. (2004). Overview of the DARPA augmented cognition technical integration experiment. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17(2), 131-149
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1702_2
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed