| ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT THEORIES AND METHODOLOGIES |
|
|
|
Are Relational Contracting Approaches Applicable to Public Projects in China? |
Wei-ya Hao1,2,Hui-ping Ding3,Yong-jian Ke4,*( ),Ying-ying Wang5 |
1. School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
2. Beijing Infrastructure Investment Co., LTD, Beijing 100101, China
3. School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
4. School of Architecture and Built Environment, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan NSW 2308, Australia
5. Beijing Infrastructure Investment Co., LTD, Beijing 100101, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Rising complexities in construction projects management has boosted the importance of relational contracting (RC) in the field. RC is based on recognition of mutual benefits and win-win scenarios gained through more cooperative relationships between contracting parties. There have been a range of RC initiatives across many countries towards deeper collaborative relationships; however, such formal RC approaches are not yet well established in China. In this paper, the feasibility of implementing RC in the China’s public construction projects is investigated. The results indicate that RC is highly feasible for implementation in China due to its theoretical benefits, its alignment to Chinese culture, and its behaviors in past public construction projects. Three strategies for facilitating the implementation of RC in China are proposed.
|
| Keywords
relational contracting
public construction
relationship
|
|
Corresponding Author(s):
Yong-jian Ke
|
|
Online First Date: 21 April 2015
Issue Date: 07 May 2015
|
|
| 1 |
American Institute of Architects. 2007. Integrated Project Delivery: A Guide. Washington D C: American Institute of Architects
|
| 2 |
Association of Consultant Architects. 2008. PPC2000: ACA Standard Form of Contract for Project Partnering. UK: Association of Consultant Architects
|
| 3 |
Blois, K. 2002. Business to business exchanges: a rich descriptive apparatus derived from Macneil’s and Menger’s analyses. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 523–551
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.t01-1-00302
|
| 4 |
Cheng, R., Dale, K., Aspenson, A., & Salmela, K. 2011. IPD Case Studies. Minnesota: AIA Minnesota and School of Architecture University
|
| 5 |
Construction Industry Institute. 1991. In Search of Partnering Excellence. USA: Construction Industry Institute
|
| 6 |
Cox, A., & Ireland, P. 2002. Managing construction supply chains: the common sense approach. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 9, 409–418
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-232X.2002.00273.x
|
| 7 |
Davis, P. R., & Love, P. E. D. 2011. Alliance contracting: adding value through relationship development. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 18, 444–461
https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981111165167
|
| 8 |
Department of Infrastructure and Transport. 2011. National Alliance Contracting Guidelines: Guide to Alliance Contracting. Australia: Department of Infrastructure and Transport
|
| 9 |
Kwan, A. Y., & Ofori, G. 2001. Chinese culture and successful implementation of partnering in Singapore’s construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 19, 619–632
https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190110062087
|
| 10 |
Lahdenper?, P. 2012. Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery. Construction Management and Economics, 30, 57–79
https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.648947
|
| 11 |
Ling, F. Y. Y., Ke, Y., Kumaraswamy, M. M., & Wang, S. 2014. Key relational contracting practices affecting performance of public construction projects in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140, 04013034
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000781
|
| 12 |
Ling, F. Y. Y., Ning, Y., Ke, Y., & Kumaraswamy, M. M. 2013. Modeling relational transaction and relationship quality among team members in public projects in Hong Kong. Automation in Construction, 36, 16–24
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.08.006
|
| 13 |
Ling, F. Y. Y., Ong, S. Y., Ke, Y., Wang, S., & Zou, P. X. W. 2014. Drivers and barriers to adopting relational contracting practices in public projects: comparative study of Beijing and Sydney. International Journal of Project Management, 32, 275–285
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.04.008
|
| 14 |
Love, P. E. D., Mistry, D., & Davis, P. R. 2010. Price competitive alliance projects: identification of success factors for public clients. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136, 947–956
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000208
|
| 15 |
Lu, S., & Yan, H. 2007. An empirical study on incentives of strategic partnering in China: views from construction companies. International Journal of Project Management, 25, 241–249
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.004
|
| 16 |
Macneil, I. R. 1974. The many futures of contracts. Southern California Law Review, 47, 691–816
|
| 17 |
Macneil, I. R. 1978. Contracts: adjustment of long-term economic relations under classical, neoclassical, and relational contract law. Northwest University Law Review, 72, 854–906
|
| 18 |
Macneil, I. R. 1983. Values in contract: internal and external. Northwest University Law Review, 78, 340–347
|
| 19 |
Macneil, I. R. 2000. Contracting worlds and essential contract theory. Social & Legal Studies, 9, 431–438
https://doi.org/10.1177/096466390000900307
|
| 20 |
Rahman, M. M., & Kumaraswamy, M. M. 2002. Joint risk management through transactionally efficient relational contracting. Construction Management and Economics, 20, 45–54
https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190110089682
|
| 21 |
Rahman, M. M., & Kumaraswamy, M. M. 2004. Contracting relationship trends and transitions. Journal of Management in Engineering, 20, 147–161
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2004)20:4(147)
|
| 22 |
Rahman, M. M., & Kumaraswamy, M. M. 2008. Relational contracting and teambuilding: assessing potential contractual and noncontractual incentives. Journal of Management in Engineering, 24, 48–63
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2008)24:1(48)
|
| 23 |
Tang, W., Duffield, C. F., & Young, D. M. 2006. Partnering mechanism in construction: an empirical study on the Chinese construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132, 217–229
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:3(217)
|
| 24 |
Tookey, J. E., Murray, M., Hardcastle, C., & Langford, D. 2001. Construction procurement routes: redefining the contours of construction procurement. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 8, 20–30
|
| 25 |
Walker, D. H. 1998. The contribution of the client representative to the creation and maintenance of good project inter-team relationships. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 5, 51–57
https://doi.org/10.1108/eb021060
|
| 26 |
Walker, D. H. T., Hampson, K., & Peters, R. 2002. Project alliancing vs. project partnering: a case study of the Australian National Museum Project. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 7, 83–91
https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540210425830
|
| 27 |
Xu, T., Smith, N. J., & Bower, D. A. 2005. Forms of collaboration and project delivery in Chinese construction markets: probable emergence of strategic alliances and design/build. Journal of Management in Engineering, 21, 100–109
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2005)21:3(100)
|
| 28 |
Yeung, J. F. Y., Chan, A. P. C., & Chan, D.W.M. 2012. Defining relational contracting from the Wittgenstein family-resemblance philosophy. International Journal of Project Management, 30, 225–239
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.06.002
|
| 29 |
Zuo, J., Chan, A. P. C., Zhao, Z., Zillante, G., & Xia, B. 2013. Supporting and impeding factors for partnering in construction: a China study. Facilities, 31, 468–488
https://doi.org/10.1108/F-05-2012-0038
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
