ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT REPORTS |
|
|
|
Managing Coordination Complexity in the Remanufacturing of Aircraft Engines |
Qing Yang(),Lu Zheng |
School of Economics and Management, University of Science & Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China |
|
|
Abstract The complexity of communication and coordination stemming from teams responsible for adjusting interdependent parameters of components is a fundamental feature in the aircraft engine remanufacturing engineering project. To manage coordination complexity, the features of the remanufacturing process of aircraft engine are analyzed and a systematic method is presented to measure and optimize the dependency between coupled components. Furthermore, quantitative models are built based on Design Structure Matrix (DSM) models to measure dependency strengths related to the parameter features of the components. Also, a two-stage DSM clustering criteria is used to reduce the complexity of an organization. An industrial example is provided to illustrate the proposed models. The results showed that the proposed approach can reduce total coordination complexity.
|
Keywords
remanufacturing engineering project
aircraft engine
coordination complexity
organization optimization
design structure matrix (DSM)
|
Corresponding Author(s):
Qing Yang
|
Online First Date: 13 September 2016
Issue Date: 22 September 2016
|
|
1 |
Browning, T. (1999). Designing system development projects for organizational integration. Systems Engineering, 2, 217–225.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6858(1999)2:4<217::AID-SYS4>3.0.CO;2-9
|
2 |
Eppinger, S. (2001). Innovation at the speed of information. Harvard Business Review, 79, 149–158.
|
3 |
Eppinger, S., & Browning, T. (2012). Design structure matrix methods and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
|
4 |
McCord, K., & Eppinger, S. (1993). Managing the integration problem in concurrent engineering, MIT Sloan School of Management. Working Paper, 3594.
|
5 |
Steward, D. (1981). Design structure system: a method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 28, 71–74. .
https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1981.6448589
|
6 |
Thebeau, R. (2001). Knowledge management of system interfaces and interactions for product development processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
|
7 |
Xiang, Q. (2013). . Engineering management of aircraft engine maintenance. Beijing: China Machine Press.
|
8 |
Yang, Q., Kherbachi, S., Hong, Y., & Shan, C. (2015). Identifying and managing coordination complexity in global product development project. International Journal of Project Management, 33, 1464–1475.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.06.011
|
9 |
Yang, Q., & Tang, E. (2014). Cross-domain integration and optimization of the process and product architecture in product development project. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 34, 1525–1532.
|
10 |
Yang, Q., Yao, T., Lu, T., & Zhang, B. (2014). An overlapping-based design structure matrix for measuring Interaction strength and clustering analysis in product development project. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 61, 159–170. .
https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2013.2267779
|
11 |
Yassine, A., Chidiac, R., & Osman, I. (2013). Simultaneous optimisation of products, processes, and people in development projects. Journal of Engineering Design, 24, 272–292. .
https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2012.727206
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|