Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front Earth Sci    2013, Vol. 7 Issue (3) : 361-374    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-013-0356-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Application of Basin Morphometry Laws in catchments of the south-western quadrangle of south-eastern Nigeria
A.O AISUEBEOGUN1, I.C EZEKWE2()
1. Department of Geography and Environmental Management, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island 560001, Nigeria; 2. Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt 500001, Nigeria
 Download: PDF(510 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The relationship between process and form has been at the core of research in fluvial geomorphology. Form-process relationships of a natural river basin are strongly influenced by its hydrologic and sedimentologic processes as basin morphometric properties of length, shape, and relief, change in response to various hydrologic stimuli from the environment, but usually in line with well established laws. In the four river basins (Orashi, Otamiri, Sombreiro, New Calabar) examined in this study, however, empirical evidence does not conform neatly with theoretical postulates. Remarkable variations are noted in the morphometric properties of the catchments, when compared with established morphometric laws. The most varied in conformity are the Orashi and New Calabar basins, although the Sombreiro and Otamiri catchments also show some level of variation. Prime explanation for the morphometric and topographic non-conformity is caused by the nature of surficial material and the profoundly shallow relief of much of the study area, especially the alluvial flood and deltaic plains to the south and south-west of the study area.

Keywords catchments      watershed morphology      morphometric analysis      Nigeria      Africa     
Corresponding Author(s): EZEKWE I.C,Email:clidnelson@yahoo.com   
Issue Date: 05 September 2013
 Cite this article:   
A.O AISUEBEOGUN,I.C EZEKWE. Application of Basin Morphometry Laws in catchments of the south-western quadrangle of south-eastern Nigeria[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2013, 7(3): 361-374.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-013-0356-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y2013/V7/I3/361
Fig.1  Geology of study area
Fig.2  Aspects of the geomorphology of the study area
Measured parametersMeaning/Derivation
1HmaxHighest contour elevation of the ridge forming the boundary of the basin
2HminElevation at the gauging station (contour value at gauging point)
3Rr (Schumm, 1956).(Hmax - Hmin)/ maximum basin length
3Mean length of Streams (Schumm,1956)Total length of Streams / No. of streams
4Dd (Schumm, 1956)Length of stream channel per unit area of drainage basin. Dd = Lμ/Aμ
5Fs (Morisawa, 1968).Total stream length/basin area(A)
6IdDd ×Fs
7Rc (Miller, 1953).Ratio of basin area to the area of a circle having the same perimeter as the basin
8Er (Schumm, 1956),Diameter of a circle of the same area as the basin to maximum basin length
9Lemniscate ratio (k) (Chorley et al., 1957)The basin length2 / A4
10Ff (Horton, 1945)A /Length of the basin2
11CcPerimeter of the basin divided by circumference of equivalent circular area.
12LoReciprocal of two times the drainage density
13Axial widthMaximum width of the basin
14Axial lengthMaximum length of the basin
15Order of basin or stream segment (Horton, 1945)μ
16Number of streams of order ‘μ’ (Horton, 1945)Nμ
17Stream length (Horton, 1945)Lμ/ Lμ + 1
18Bifurcation ratio (Ru) (Horton, 1945;Strahler, 1952)Nμ / Nμ + 1
19Ruggedness number (Horton, 1945;Strahler, 1952)(HmaxHmin) × Dd
20Relative relief (Horton, 1945;Strahler, 1952)(HmaxHmin)/Basin perimeter
Tab.1  Description of measured morphometric parameters
CharacteristicsOrashiOtamiriSombreiroNew Calabar
Area/km21,473.02,287.5484.0208.0
Basin perimeter/km140.6212.581.4852.65
Basin length/km46.5485.7539.619.3
Max. basin relief/m269.421310.734
Relative relief0.0020.0010.00010.0006
Catchment order5432
Drainage density0.360.350.180.18
Tab.2  Topographical characteristics of catchments
Fig.3  The Orashi catchment area
Fig.4  The Otamiri catchment area
Fig.5  The Sombreiro catchment area
Fig.6  The New Calabar catchment area
Stream orderOrashiOtamiriSombreiroNew Calabar
NuRbNuRbNuRbNuRb
1.26928134
2.693.8983.534.314
3.203.4524.013
4.45.012.0
5.14.00
Tab.3  Stream segments and bifurcation ratios in catchments
Number of streamsLength of stream segments/km
Stream orderBy Topo MapBy equation Nu=rb(k-u)By Topo MapMean stream length (Lu)Cumulative (Lu)By equation Lu=L1(u-1)
1269277.1200.90.743o.7430.743
26967.9151.52.192.9334.07
32016.6579.53.976.90322.31
444.0819.84.9911.893122.27
51179.479.491.293670.05
Rb = 4.08 (Rb = 4.07 from regression analysis)R1 = 5.48 (R1 = 3.02 from regression analysis)
Tab.4  Observed and computed stream segments and stream length for Orashi catchment
Number of streamsLength of stream segments/km
Stream orderBy Topo MapBy equation Nu=rb(k-u)By Topo MapMean stream length (Lu)Cumulative (Lu)By equation Lu=L1?R1(u-1)
12831.8142.55.095.095.09
2810.05302.537.8142.921.58
323.17156.2578.12121.0291.5
411193.75193.75314.77387.98
Rb = 3.17 (Rb = 3.16 from regression analysis)R1 = 4.24 (R1 = 3.8 from regression analysis)
Tab.5  Observed and computed stream segments and stream length for the Otamiri catchment
Number of streamsLength of stream segments/km
Stream orderBy Topo MapBy equation Nu=rb(k-u)By Topo MapMean stream length (Lu)Cumulative (Lu)By equation Lu=L1?R1(u-1)
11313.330.22.322.322.32
233.659.553.185.519.02
31147.8547.8553.35155.00
Rb = 3.65 (Rb = 3.63 from regression analysis)R1 = 8.2 (R1 = 4.79 from regression analysis)
Tab.6  Observed and computed stream segments and stream length for Sombreiro catchment
Number of streamsLength of stream segments/km
Stream orderBy Topo MapBy equation Nu=rb(k-u)By Topo MapMean stream length (Lu)Cumulative (Lu)By equation Lu=L1?R1(u-1)
14420.65.155.155.15
21117.117.122.2517.1
Rb = 4.00R1 = 3.32
Tab.7  Observed and computed stream segments and stream length for new Calabar catchment.
Fig.7  Number of streams (log) against stream order
Fig.8  Cumulative mean stream length (log) against stream order
Basin measureOrashiOtamiriSombreiroNew Calabar
Form factor0.680.30.310.6
Circularity ratio0.940.640.910.95
Elongation ratio0.930.630.630.84
Lemniscate ratio0.370.800.810.45
Drainage density0.360.350.180.18
Relief ratio0.0060.00250.000270.0006
Ruggedness number96.9874.551.936.12
Geometry number1.080.830.030.07
Tab.8  Catchments shape and relief measures.
1 Agboola A A (1979). Soils of the Nigerian forest zone and their response to cultivation. In: Okali D U U, ed. Nigerian Rainforest Ecosystem . Ibadan: M.A.B,.
2 Allen J R L (1970). Sediments of the modern Niger delta: a summary and review. In: Morgan J P, ed. Deltaic Sedimentation: Modern and Ancient. Oklahoma. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists .
3 Al-Sulaimi J, Khalaf F J, Mukhopadhyay A (1997). Geomorphological analysis of paleo drainage systems and their environmental implications in the desert of Kuwait. Environ Geol (Berl) , 29(1-2): 94-111
doi: 10.1007/s002540050108
4 Chorley R J, Malm D EG, Pogorzelski H A (1957). A new standard for estimating drainage basin shape. Am J Sci , 255(2): 138-141
doi: 10.2475/ajs.255.2.138
5 Chorley R J, Schumm S A, Sugden D E (1984). Geomorphology. London: Methuen.
6 Cooke R U, Doornkamp J C (1978). Geomorphology in Environmental Management. Oxford: OUP
7 Dangana L B (1980) Hydro-Geomorphological controls of the mangrove environment in parts of the Rivers State. In: Inter-faculty Seminar Paper . University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt. Nigeria
8 Doornkamp J C, King C A M (1971). Numerical Analysis in Geomorphology. London: Arnold.
9 Ebisemiju F S (1976). Morphometric work with Nigeria topographical maps. Nigerian Geographical. Journal (Ibadan; Nigeria) , 19(1): 65-77
10 Ebisemiju F S (1979). Analysis of drainage density and similar parameters in relation to soil and vegetation characteristics, Nigerian Geographical. Journal (Ibadan; Nigeria) , 22(1): 33-43
11 Eze B E, Efiong J (2010). Morphometric parameters of the Calabar River basin: implication for hydrologic processes. Journal of Geography and Geology , 2(1): 18-26
12 Faniran A, Jeje L K (1983). Humid Tropical Geomorphology. New York: Longman Group Press
13 Gardener V (1990) Drainage basin morphometry. In: Goudie A, ed. Geomorphological Techniques . London: George Allen and Unwin.
14 Gregory K J, Walling D E (1973). Drainage Basin Form and Process: a Geomorphological Approach. New York: Wiley
15 Haggett P, Chorley R J (1969). Network Analysis in Geography. Arnold, London
16 Horton, R E(1932). Drainage basin characteristics. Transaction of American Geological Union , 13: 350-361
17 Horton R E (1945). Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Bulletin. Geol Soc Am , 56(3): 275-370
doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1945)56[275:EDOSAT]2.0.CO;2
18 Igbozurike M U (1975). Vegetation types. In: Ofomata G E K, ed. Nigeria in Maps: Eastern States . Benin-City: Ethiope Press
19 Izeogu C V, Aisuebeogun A (1989). Relief and drainage. In: Alagoa E J, ed. Lands and Peoples of Nigeria, Rivers State . Port Harcourt: Riverside Communications.
20 Jamieson S S R, Sinclair H D, Kirstein L A, Purves R S (2004). Tectonic forcing of longitudinal valleys in the Himalaya: morphological analysis of the Ladakh Batholith, North India. Geomorphology , 58(1-4): 49-65
doi: 10.1016/S0169-555X(03)00185-5
21 Langbein W B (1947). Topographic characteristics of drainage basins. US Geol Surv Water Supply Pap , 968-C: 125-157
22 Lanka R P, Hubert W A, Wesche T A (1987). Relations of geomorphology to stream habitat and trout standing stock in small Rocky Mountain streams. Trans Am Fish Soc , 116(1): 21-28
doi: 10.1577/1548-8659(1987)116<21:ROGTSH>2.0.CO;2
23 Liébault F, Clement P, Piegay H, Rogers C F, Kondolf G M, Landon N (2002). Contemporary channel changes in the Eygues basin, southern French Prealps: the relationship of sub-basin variability to watershed characteristics. Geomorphology , 45 (1): 53-66, 14
24 Melton M A (1959). A derivation of Strahler’s channel - Ordering System. J Geol , 67(3): 345-346
doi: 10.1086/626588
25 Miller, V C (1953). A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee. Columbia University, Department of Geology, Technical Report , No.3, Contract N6 ONR 271-300
26 Morisawa M E (1962). Quantitative geomorphology of some watersheds in the Appalachian plateau. Geol Soc Am Bulletin , 73(9): 1025-1046
27 Morisawa M E (1968). Streams: Their Dynamics and Morphology. New York: McGraw-Hill
28 Morisawa M E (1976).Geomorphology Laboratory Manual. New York: John Wiley
29 Muoghalu P C (1975). Temperature and Sunshine. In: Ofomata G E K, ed. Nigeria in Maps: Eastern States . Benin-City: Ethiopia Press
30 Nigerian Meteorological Agency (2003). National Meteorological Report. NMA , Lagos, Nigeria
31 Ofomata G E K (1975). Nigeria in Maps: Eastern States. Benin-City: Ethiopia Press,
32 Ofomata G E K (1983). Geomorphic and geological evidence of the quaternary in West Africa. In: Plenary Session, 9th Congress of the Pan African Association in Prehistory and Related Studies , Jos, Nigeria
33 Okonny I P, Braide J O, Isirimah N.O (1989). Geology and soils. In: Alagoa and Tamuno, eds. Lands and Peoples of Nigeria, Rivers State . Port Harcourt, Nigeria: Riverside Communications.
34 Omernik J M (1987). Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Map Suppliment . Ann Assoc Am Geogr, 77(1): 118-125
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00149.x
35 Patton P C, Baker V R (1976). Morphometry and floods in small drainage basins subject to diverse hydrogeomorphic controls. Water Resour Res , 12(5): 941-952 Article first published online: 19 DEC 2012
doi: 10.1029/WR012i005p00941
36 Potter K M, Cubbage F W, Blank G B, Schaberg R H (2004). A watershed-scale model for predicting nonpoint pollution risk in North Carolina. Environ Manage , 34(1): 62-74
doi: 10.1007/s00267-004-0117-7 pmid:15156350
37 Ritter D F, Kochel R C, Miller J R(2002). Process Geomorphology. New York: Mcgraw Hill.
38 Schumm S A (1956). The evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geol Soc Am Bull , 67(5): 597-646
doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1956)67[597:EODSAS]2.0.CO;2
39 Schumm S A (1977). The Fluvial System. New York: John Wiley and Sons
40 Short K C, Stauble A J (1967). Outline of the geology of the Niger delta. AAPG Bull , 51: 761-779
41 Singh V P (1992). Elementary hydrology. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs.
42 Splinter D K (2006). Spatial patterns in the fluvial system: comparisons among three eastern Oklahoma ecoregions. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK .
43 Splinter D K, Dauwalter D C, Marston R A, Fisher W L (2011). Watershed morphology of highland and mountain ecoregions in eastern Oklahoma. Prof Geogr , 63(1): 1-13
doi: 10.1080/00330124.2010.533575
44 Strahler A N (1952). Hypsometric (area-attitude) analysis of erosional topography. Geol Soc Am Bull , 63(11): 1117-1142
doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1952)63[1117:HAAOET]2.0.CO;2
45 Strahler A N (1956), Quantitative slope analysis. Geological Society of America , Bulletin:67: 571-596 .
46 Strahler A N(1957). Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions of American Geophysical Union , 38: 913-920
47 Strahler A N (1958). Dimensional analysis applied to fluvial eroded landforms. Geological Society of America , Bulletin, 69(3): 279-300 :
doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1958)69(279: DATFE) 2.0.CO; 2.
48 Strahler A N (1964). Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. In: Chow V T, ed. Handbook of Applied Hydrology . New York: McGraw Hill,
doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1952)63[1117:HAAOET]2.0.CO;2
49 Strahler A N (1975). Physical Geography. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley
50 Weber K J (1987). Hydrocarbon distribution patterns in Nigerian growth faults structures controlled by structural style and stratigraphy. J Petrol Sci Eng , 1(2): 91-104
doi: 10.1016/0920-4105(87)90001-5
51 Werre J L R (2013). Tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forests. World wildlife Fund . www.worldwildlife.org/ecoregions/at0106
52
53 Wong S T (1963). A multivariate statistical model for predicting mean annual flood in New England. Ann Assoc Am Geogr , 53(3): 298-311
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1963.tb00451.x
[1] Kaixuan AN, Hanlin CHEN, Xiubin LIN, Fang WANG, Shufeng YANG, Zhixin WEN, Zhaoming WANG, Guangya ZHANG, Xiaoguang TONG. Major transgression during Late Cretaceous constrained by basin sediments in northern Africa: implication for global rise in sea level[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2017, 11(4): 740-750.
[2] I. C. EZEKWE, E. ODUBO, G. N. CHIMA, I. S. ONWUCHEKWA. Groundwater occurrence and flow patterns in the Ishiagu mining area of southeastern Nigeria[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2012, 6(1): 18-28.
[3] I. C. EZEKWE, A. O. AISUBEOGUN, G. N. CHIMA, E. ODUBO. TDS-Eh graph analysis: a new water quality index and rural water supply implications of a river affected by mining in south-eastern Nigeria[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2012, 6(1): 66-74.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed