Impact of dams on flood occurrence of selected rivers in the United States

doi:10.1007/s11707-016-0592-1

Front. Earth Sci.

2017, Vol. 11

Issue (2) : 268-282 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-016-0592-1

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Impact of dams on flood occurrence of selected rivers in the United States

Xuefei MEI^1,², P.H.A.J.M. VAN GELDER², Zhijun DAI¹, Zhenghong TANG³(

)

¹. State Key Laboratory of Estuarine & Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
². Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, 2628BX Delft, the Netherlands
³. Community and Regional Planning Program, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0105, USA

Download: PDF(1475 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract

A significant large number of dams have been constructed in the past two centuries in the United States. These dams’ ability to regulate downstream flooding has received world-wide attention. In this study, data from 38 rivers distributed over the entire conterminous Untied States with extensive pre- and post-dam annual peak discharge records, were collected to research the impacts of various dams on the flood behaviors at a national scale. The results indicate that dams have led to significant reductions in flood magnitude for nearly all of the sites; the decrease rate in the mean of annual peak discharge varies between 7.4% and 95.14%, except for the Dead River, which increased by 1.46%. Because of dams’ effectiveness, the probability density curve of annual peak flow changes from a flat to peaked shape because both the range and magnitude of high discharges are decreased. Moreover, the potential impact of dams on flood characteristics were closely related to the dam’s geographic location and function, the ratio of the storage capacity of the dam to the mean annual runoff of the river (C/R), and the ratio of reservoir storage capacity to the area of its drainage (C/D). Specifically, the effects of dams on annual peak flows were more related to latitude than longitude. Compared with dams built for other purposes, the dam exclusively used for flood management cut off more flood peaks. Increases in the ratios of C/R and C/D increased the degree of modification of annual maximum discharge.

Keywords flood characteristics river discharge dam flood modification

Corresponding Author(s): Zhijun DAI

Online First Date: 10 October 2016 Issue Date: 19 May 2017

Cite this article:

Xuefei MEI,P.H.A.J.M. VAN GELDER,Zhijun DAI, et al. Impact of dams on flood occurrence of selected rivers in the United States[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2017, 11(2): 268-282.

URL:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-016-0592-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y2017/V11/I2/268

Table A1

Critical levels (T₉₀, T₉₅, and T_97.5) of the SNHT test for single shift

1	A Ahmed J, A K Sarma (2005). Genetic algorithm for optimal operating policy of a multipurpose reservoir. Water Resour Manage, 19(2): 145–161 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-005-2704-7
2	H Akaike (1992). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Kotz S, Johnson NL, eds. Breakthroughs in Statistics, vol 1. London: Springer-Verlag, 610–624
3	H Alexandersson, A Moberg (1997). Homogenization of Swedish temperature data, Part I: homogeneity test for linear trends. Int J Climatol, 17(1): 25–34 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0088(199701)17:1<25::AID-JOC103>3.0.CO;2-J
4	S T Ashley, W S Ashley (2008). Flood fatalities in the United States. J Appl Meteorol Climatol, 47(3): 805–818 https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAMC1611.1
5	A A Assani, E Stichelbout, A G Roy, F Petit (2006). Comparison of impacts of dams on the annual maximum flow characteristics in three regulated hydrologic regimes in Québec (Canada). Hydrol Processes, 20(16): 3485–3501 https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6150
6	M Barros, F Tsai, S L Yang, J Lopes, W W G Yeh (2003). Optimization of large-scale hydropower system operations. J Water Resour Plan Manage, 129(3): 178–188 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2003)129:3(178)
7	R J Batalla, C M Gomez, G M Kondolf (2004). Reservoir-induced hydrological changes in the Ebro River basin (NE Spain). J Hydrol (Amst), 290(1-2): 117–136 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.002
8	M A Benson (1968). Uniform flood-frequency estimating methods for federal agencies. Water Resour Res, 4(5): 891–908 https://doi.org/10.1029/WR004i005p00891
9	H A Biria, M A L Neshaei, A Ghabraei, M A Mehrdad (2015). Investigation of sediment transport pattern and beach morphology in the vicinity of submerged groyne (case study: Dahane Sar Sefidrood). Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 9(1): 82–90 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-014-0275-5
10	H Bormann, N Pinter, S Elfert (2011). Hydrological signatures of flood trends on German rivers: flood frequencies, flood heights and specific stages. J Hydrol (Amst), 404(1-2): 50–66 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.04.019
11	V Capparelli, C Franzke, A Vecchio, M P Freeman, N W Watkins, V Carbone (2013). A spatiotemporal analysis of U.S. station temperature trends over the last century. J Geophys Res, D, Atmospheres, 118(14): 7427–7434 https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50551
12	S A Changnon, K E Kunkel (1995). Climate-related fluctuation in Midwestern floods during 1921–1985. J Water Resour Plan Manage, 121(4): 326–334 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1995)121:4(326)
13	Z Y Chen, J F Li, H T Shen, Z H Wang (2001). Yangtze River of China: historical analysis of discharge variability and sediment flux. Geomorphology, 41(2-3): 77–91 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(01)00106-4
14	Z J Dai, J Z Du, J F Li, W H Li, J Y Chen (2008). Runoff characteristics of the Changjiang River during 2006: effect of extreme drought and the impounding of the Three Gorges Dam. Geophys Res Lett, 35(7): L07406 https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033456
15	Z J Dai, J T Liu (2013). Impacts of large dams on downstream fluvial sedimentation: an example of the Three Gorges Dam (TGD) on the Changjiang (Yangtze River). J Hydrol (Amst), 480: 10–18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.003
16	E M Douglas, R M Vogel, C N Kroll (2000). Trends in floods and low flows in the United States: Impact of spatial correlation. J Hydrol (Amst), 240(1-2): 90–105 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00336-X
17	F Frances, J D Salas, D C Boes (1994). Flood frequency analysis with systematic and historical or paleoflood data based on the two parameter general extreme value models. Water Resour Res, 30(6): 1653–1664 https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR00154
18	W L Graf (1999). Dam nation: A geographic census of American dams and their large-scale hydrologic impacts. Water Resour Res, 35(4): 1305–1311 https://doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900016
19	W L Graf (2006). Downstream hydrologic and geomorphic effects of large dams on American rivers. Geomorphology, 79(3-4): 336–360 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.06.022
20	P Y Groisman, R W Knight, T R Karl (2001). Heavy precipitation and high streamflow in the contiguous United States: trends in the 20th century. Bull Am Meteorol Soc, 82(2): 219–246 https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<0219:HPAHSI>2.3.CO;2
21	P Y Groisman, R W Knight, T R Karl (2012). Changes in intense precipitation over the central United States. J Hydrometeorol, 13(1): 47–66 https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-039.1
22	P Y Groisman, R W Knight, T R Karl, D R Easterling, B Sun, J H Lawrimore (2004). Contemporary changes of the hydrological cycle over the contiguous United States: Trends derived from in situ observations. J Hydrometeorol, 5(1): 64–85 https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2004)005<0064:CCOTHC>2.0.CO;2
23	I M Held, B J Soden (2006). Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J Clim, 19(21): 5686–5699 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3990.1
24	A Hess, H Iyer, W Malm (2001). Linear trend analysis: a comparison of methods. Atmos Environ, 35(30): 5211–5222 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00342-9
25	W Huang (2010). Hydrodynamic modeling and eco-hydrological analysis of river inflow effects on apalachicola Bay, Florida, USA. Estuaries, Coastal, and Shell Science, 86(3): 526–534 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2009.07.032
26	E Janssen, D J Wuebbles, K E Kunkel, S C Olsen, A Goodman (2014). Observational- and model-based trends and projections of extreme precipitation over the contiguous United States. Earths Futur, 2(2): 99–113 https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EF000185
27	P F Juckem, R J Hunt, M P Anderson, D M Robertson (2008). Effects of climate and land management change on streamflow in the driftless area of Wisconsin. J Hydrol (Amst), 355(1-4): 123–130 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.03.010
28	T R Karl, R W Knight (1998). Secular trends of precipitation amount, frequency, and intensity in the United States. Bull Am Meteorol Soc, 79(2): 231–241 https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0231:STOPAF>2.0.CO;2
29	J Kelman, J Stedinger, L A Cooper, E Hsu, S Q Yuan (1990). Sampling stochastic dynamic programming applied to reservoir operation. Water Resour Res, 26(3): 447–454 https://doi.org/10.1029/WR026i003p00447
30	M G Kendall (1975). Rank Correlation Methods (4th Edition). London: Charles Griffen, ISBN: 0195205723
31	J M Kileshye Onema, D Mazvimavi, D Love, M L Mul (2006). Effects of selected dams on river flows of Insiza River, Zimbabwe. Phys Chem Earth, 31(15-16): 870–875 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2006.08.022
32	G M Kondolf (1997). Hungry water: effects of dams and gravel mining on river channels. Environ Manage, 21(4): 533–551 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002679900048
33	K E Kunkel, K Andsager, D R Easterling (1999). Long-term trends in extreme precipitation events over the conterminous United States and Canada. J Clim, 12(8): 2515–2527 https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<2515:LTTIEP>2.0.CO;2
34	K E Kunkel, D R Easterling, K Redmond, K Hubbard (2003). Temporal variations of extreme precipitation events in the United States: 1895–2000. Geophys Res Lett, 30(17): 1900
35	K E Kunkel, L E Stevens, S E Stevens, L Q Sun, E Janssen, D Wuebbles, J G Dobson (2013). Regional Climate Trends and Scenarios for the U.S. National Climate Assessment. Part 9. Climate of the contiguous United States. NOAA Technical Report NESDIS 142-9.
36	D J Leathers, D R Kluck, S Kroczynski (1998). The severe flooding event of January 1996 across north-central Pennsylvania. Bull Am Meteorol Soc, 79(5): 785–797 https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0785:TSFEOJ>2.0.CO;2
37	H F Lins, J R Slack (1999). Streamflow trends in the United States. Geophys Res Lett, 26(2): 227–230 https://doi.org/10.1029/1998GL900291
38	D P Loucks, J R Stedinger, D A Haith (1981). Water Resource Systems Planning and Analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
39	Q Q Lu, R Lund, L Seymour (2005). An update of U.S. temperature trends. J Clim, 18(22): 4906–4914 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3557.1
40	R Lund, L Seymour, K Kafadar (2001). Temperature trends in the United States. Environmetrics, 12(7): 673–690 https://doi.org/10.1002/env.468
41	F J Magilligan, K H Nislow, B E Graber (2003). Scale-independent assessment of discharge reduction and riparian disconnectivity following flow regulation by dams. Geology, 31(7): 569–572 https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2003)031<0569:SAODRA>2.0.CO;2
42	B D Malamud, D L Turcotte (2006). The applicability of power-law frequency statistics to floods. J Hydrol (Amst), 322(1-4): 168–180 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.02.032
43	H B Mann (1945). Nonparametric test against trend. Econometrica, 13(3): 245–259 https://doi.org/10.2307/1907187
44	F J Massey Jr (1951). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for goodness of fit. J Am Stat Assoc, 46(253): 68–78 https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1951.10500769
45	G Mathias Kondolf, R J Batalla (2005). Hydrological effects of dams and water diversions on rivers of Mediterranean-climate regions: examples from California. Developments in Earth Surface Processes, 7: 197–211 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-2025(05)80017-3
46	R A McManamay (2014). Quantifying and generalizing hydrologic responses to dam regulation using a statistical modeling approach. J Hydrol (Amst), 519: 1278–1296 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.08.053
47	P C D Milly, R T Wetherald, K A Dunne, T L Delworth (2002). Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate. Nature, 415(6871): 514–517 https://doi.org/10.1038/415514a
48	C Nilsson, C A Reidy, M Dynesius, C Revenga (2005). Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world’s large river systems. Science, 308(5720): 405–408 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1107887
49	T B M J Ouarda, F Ashkar, E Bensaid, I Hourani (1994). Statistical distributions used in hydrology. Transformations and asymptotic properties, Scientific Report, Department of Mathematics, University of Moncton, 1–31
50	L Perreault, J Bernier, B Bobée, E Parent (2000). Bayesian change-point analysis in hydrometeorological time series. Part 2. Comparison of change-point models and forecasting. J Hydrol (Amst), 235(3-4): 242–263 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00271-7
51	A R Rao, K H Hamed (2000). Flood Frequency Analysis. Boca Raton: CRC Press
52	J Reeves, J Chen, X L Wang, R Lund, Q Lu (2007). A review and comparison of change point detection techniques for climate data. J Appl Meteorol Climatol, 46(6): 900–915 https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2493.1
53	B D Richter, J V Baumgartner, J Powell, D P Braun (1996). A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conserv Biol, 10(4): 1163–1174 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10041163.x
54	J R Stedinger, R M Vogel, E Foufoula-Georgiou (1993). Frequency analysis of extreme events. In: Maidment D R, ed. Handbook of Hydrology. New York: McGraw Hill
55	P H J M Van Gelder, N M Neykov (1998). Regional frequency analysis of extreme water levels along the Dutch coast using L-moments: a preliminary study. Stochastic models of hydrological processes and their applications to problems of environmental preservation, 14–20
56	G Villarini, J A Smith, F Serinaldi, A Ntelekos (2011). Analyses of seasonal and annual maximum daily discharge records for central Europe. J Hydrol (Amst), 399(3-4): 299–312 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.01.007
57	R M Vogel, I Wilson (1996). Probability distribution of annual maximum, mean, and minimum streamflows in the United States. J Hydrol Eng, 1(2): 69–76 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1996)1:2(69)
58	D E Walling (2006). Human impact on land–ocean sediment transfer by the world’s rivers. Geomorphology, 79(3-4): 192–216 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.06.019
59	W Wang, X G Wang, X Zhou (2011). Impacts of Californian dams on flow regime and maximum/minimum flow probability distribution. Hydrology Research, 42(4): 275–289 https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2011.137
60	World Commission on Dams 2000. Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision Making. London: Earthscan Publications
61	Y Xie, X Lv, R Liu, L Mao, X Liu (2015). Research on port ecological suitability evaluation index system and evaluation model. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 9(1): 65–70 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-014-0258-6
62	Q Zhang, C Xu, S Becker, T Jiang (2006). Sediment and runoff changes in the Yangtze River basin during past 50 years. J Hydrol (Amst), 331(3-4): 511–523 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.05.036

[1]	Fan CHEN, Li CHEN, Wei ZHANG, Jing YUAN, Kanghe ZHANG. Variations in the effective and bankfull discharge for suspended sediment transport due to dam construction[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2022, 16(2): 446-464.
[2]	Huijun LU, Ru ZHANG, Li REN, Anlin ZHANG, Yiming YANG, Xiaopeng LI. Damage characterization of shale under uniaxial compression by acoustic emission monitoring[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2021, 15(4): 817-830.
[3]	Shan LIU, Fengli ZHANG, Shiying WEI, Qingbo LIU, Na LIU, Yun SHAO, Steven J. BURIAN. Building damage mapping based on Touzi decomposition using quad-polarimetric ALOS PALSAR data[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(2): 401-412.
[4]	Guowei PANG, Qinke YANG, Chunmei WANG, Rui LI, Lu ZHANG. Quantitative assessment of the influence of terrace and check dam construction on watershed topography[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(2): 360-375.
[5]	Hongjie WANG, Yi ZHOU, Shixin WANG, Futao WANG. Coupled model constructed to simulate the landslide dam flood discharge: a case study of Baige landslide dam, Jinsha River[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(1): 63-76.
[6]	Yuanfang CHAI, Yitian LI, Yunping YANG, Sixuan LI, Wei ZHANG, Jinqiu REN, Haibin XIONG. Water level variation characteristics under the impacts of extreme drought and the operation of the Three Gorges Dam[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2019, 13(3): 510-522.
[7]	Soheila SAFARYAN, Mohsen TAVAKOLI, Noredin ROSTAMI, Haidar EBRAHIMI. Evaluation of climate change effects on extreme flows in a catchment of western Iran[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2019, 13(3): 523-534.
[8]	Jianqiao HAN, Wei ZHANG, Jing YUAN, Yongyang FAN. Channel evolution under changing hydrological regimes in anabranching reaches downstream of the Three Gorges Dam[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(3): 640-648.
[9]	Haihai HOU, Longyi SHAO, Yonghong LI, Zhen LI, Wenlong ZHANG, Huaijun WEN. The pore structure and fractal characteristics of shales with low thermal maturity from the Yuqia Coalfield, northern Qaidam Basin, northwestern China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(1): 148-159.
[10]	T. STOICHEV, J. ESPINHA MARQUES, C.M. ALMEIDA, A. DE DIEGO, M.C.P. BASTO, R. MOURA, V.M. VASCONCELOS. Simple statistical models for relating river discharge with precipitation and air temperature—Case study of River Vouga (Portugal)[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2017, 11(2): 203-213.
[11]	Cui DU,Lingkan YAO,Yidan HUANG,Jiahong YAN,Subhashsagar SHAKYA. Effects of seismic surge waves and implications for moraine-dammed lake outburst[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2016, 10(3): 570-577.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed