Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front. Earth Sci.    2018, Vol. 12 Issue (4) : 779-790    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-018-0717-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Multi-sensor image registration by combining local self-similarity matching and mutual information
Xiaoping LIU1, Shuli CHEN1, Li ZHUO1(), Jun LI1, Kangning HUANG2
1. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Urbanization and Geo-simulation, School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
2. School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
 Download: PDF(2286 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Automatic multi-sensor image registration is a challenging task in remote sensing. Conventional image registration algorithms may not be applicable when common underlying visual features are not distinct. In this paper, we propose a novel image registration approach that integrates local self-similarity (LSS) and mutual information (MI) for multi-sensor images with rigid/non-rigid radiometric and geometric distortions. LSS is a well-performing descriptor that captures common, local internal layout features for multi-sensor images, whereas MI focuses on global intensity relationships. First, potential control points are identified by using the Harris algorithm and screened based on the self-similarity of their local surrounding internal layouts. Second, a Bayesian probabilistic model for matching the ensemble of the LSS features is introduced. Third, a particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm is adopted to optimize the point and region correspondences for maximum self-similarity and MI and, ultimately, a robust mapping function. The proposed approach is compared with several conventional image registration algorithms that are based on the sum of squared differences (SSD), scale-invariant feature transforms (SIFT), and speeded-up robust features (SURF) through the experimental registration of pairs of Landsat TM, SPOT, and RADARSAT SAR images. The results demonstrate that the proposed approach is efficient and accurate.

Keywords automatic registration      multi-sensor images      local self-similarity      mutual information      particle swarm optimization     
Corresponding Author(s): Li ZHUO   
Just Accepted Date: 28 August 2018   Online First Date: 09 October 2018    Issue Date: 20 November 2018
 Cite this article:   
Xiaoping LIU,Shuli CHEN,Li ZHUO, et al. Multi-sensor image registration by combining local self-similarity matching and mutual information[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(4): 779-790.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-018-0717-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y2018/V12/I4/779
Fig.1  Flowchart of the proposed method.
Fig.2  (a) Corner points that were extracted from a TM image using the Harris algorithm. (b) Remaining corner points after less useful ones were removed.
Fig.3  Bayesian probabilistic model for matching ensembles of descriptors.
Fig.4  Likelihood maps (b, c) for matching two control points (circled in red) in reference image (a).
Fig.5  Multi-sensor images that were used to evaluate the LSS-MI registration method. (a) The TM (band 4398 × 763) image. (b) The SAR (hv) image (335 × 526). CPs that were extracted from remote-sensing images. (c) CPs that were extracted from the TM image. (d) CPs that were extracted from the SAR image.
Fig.6  Evolution of best solution during the run of PSOs.
Fig.7  (a) Landsat 5 band 4 image (30 m). (b) SPOT band 4 image (10 m). (c) Landsat 5 band 4 image (30 m). (d) SPOT Panchromatic band image (2.5 m).
Fig.8  (a) The aligned image. (b) The reference image. (c) Merged image of the aligned image and the reference image.
Fig.9  Comparison between the SURF-based, SSD-based methods and our proposed method. (a) Matching performance based on SURF. (b) Matching performance based on SSD. (c) Matching performance based on integrated LSS and MI.
Similarity measure Number of obtained matches in the output RMSE (modified)
SSD 15 0.2112
SIFT 0 -
SURF 10 0.3193
LSS 17 0.2082
LSS-MI 25 0.0929
Tab.1  Performances of SSD, SIFT, SURF, LSS and our proposed algorithms
1 AbdelSayed S, Ionescu D, Goodenough D (1995). Matching and registration method for remote sensing images. In: Proceedings of Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. 2, 1029–1031
2 Arévalo V, González J (2008). Improving piecewise linear registration of high-resolution satellite images through mesh optimization. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 46(11): 3792–3803 doi:10.1109/TGRS.2008.924003
3 Atousa T (2011). Local self-similarity as a dense stereo correspondence measure for thermal-visible video registration. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA
4 Bay H, Ess A, Tuytelaars T, Van Gool L (2008). Speeded-up robust features (SURF). Comput Vis Image Underst, 110(3): 346–359
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2007.09.014
5 Belongie S, Malik J, Puzicha J (2002). Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 24(4): 509–522
https://doi.org/10.1109/34.993558
6 Bentoutou Y, Taleb N (2005 a). A 3-D space‒time motion detection for an invariant approach image registration approach in digital subtraction angiography. Comput Vis Image Underst, 97(1): 30–50
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2004.07.002
7 Bentoutou Y, Taleb N (2005 b). Automatic extraction of control points for digital subtraction angiography image enhancement. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci, 52(1): 238–246
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2004.843120
8 Bentoutou Y, Taleb N, Chikr El Mezouar M, Taleb M, Jetto L (2002). An invariant approach for image registration in digital subtraction angiography. Pattern Recognit, 35(12): 2853–2865
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3203(02)00016-X
9 Boiman O, Irani M (2007). Detecting irregularities in images and in video. Int J Comput Vis, 74(1): 17–31
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-006-0009-9
10 Borzi A, Bisceglie M D, Galdi C, Giangregorio G (2009). Robust registration of satellite images with local distortions. In: Proceedings of 2009 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 3: III-251–III-254
11 Bouchiha R, Besbes K (2013). Automatic remote-sensing image registration using SURF. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, 5(1): 88–92
https://doi.org/10.7763/IJCTE.2013.V5.653
12 Brook A, Ben-Dor E (2011). Automatic registration of airborne and spaceborne image topology map matching with SURF processor algorithm. Remote Sens, 3(1): 65–82
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3010065
13 Chen H M, Arora M K, Varshney P K (2003 a). Mutual information-based image registration for remote sensing data. Int J Remote Sens, 24(18): 3701–3706
https://doi.org/10.1080/0143116031000117047
14 Chen H M, Varshney P K, Arora M K (2003 b). Performance of mutual information similarity measure for registration of multitemporal remote sensing images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 41(11): 2445–2454
15 Clerc M, Kennedy J (2002). The particle swarm—explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space. IEEE Trans Evol Comput, 6(1): 58–73
https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.985692
16 Cole-Rhodes A A, Eastman R D (2011). Gradient descent approaches to image registration. In: Moigne J L, Netanyahu N S, Eastman R D, eds. Image Registration for Remote Sensing. Cambridge: Cambridge University,265–276
17 Cole-Rhodes A, Johnson K L, Moigne J L, Zavorin I (2003). Multiresolution registration of remote sensing imagery by optimization of mutual information using a stochastic gradient. IEEE Transactions on Image, 12(12): 1495–1511
18 Cole-Rhodes A, Johnson K, Le Moigne J (2012). Multiresolution registration of remote sensing images using stochastic gradient. In: Szu H H, Buss J R, eds. Wavelet and Independent Component Analysis Applications IX. SPIE Proceedings Vol. 4738, doi:10.1117/12.458727
19 Collignon A, Maes F, Delaere D, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P, Marchal G (1995). Automated multimodality image registration based on information theory. Inf Process Med Imaging, 3: 263–274
20 Farah I R, Boulila W, Ettabaâ K S, Solaiman B, Ahmed M B (2008). Interpretation of multisensor remote sensing images: multiapproach fusion of uncertain information. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 46(12): 4142–4152
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2008.2000817
21 Goshtasby A, Stockman G C, Page C V (1986). A region-based approach to digital image registration with subpixel accuracy. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, GE-24(3): 390–399
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.1986.289597
22 Greenfeld J S (2002). Matching GPS Observation to Location on a Digital Map. In: Proceedings of the 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board,(3): 13
23 Harris C, Felsberg M (1988). A combined corner and edge detector. In: Proceedings of Fourth Alvey Vision Conference,147–151
24 Hasan M, Pickering M R , Jia X(2012). Robust automatic registration of multimodal satellite images using CCRE with partial volume interpolation. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 50(10): 4050–4061
25 Hoyer P O (2004). Non-negative matrix factorization with sparseness n constraints. J Mach Learn Res, 5: 1457–1469
26 Jiao W (2012). Free Viewpoint Action Recognition based on Self-similarities. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Signal Processing (ICSP), 2, 1131–1134
27 Ken C (2009). Efficient Retrieval of Deformable Shape Classes using Local Self-Similarities. In: Proceedings of 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, 264–271
28 Kennedy J, Eberhart R C (1995). Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, 4, 1942–1948
29 Kennedy J, Eberhart R C (2001). Swarm Intelligence. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publisher
30 Kim J, Fessler J A (2004). Intensity-based image registration using robust correlation coefficients. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 23(11): 1430–1444
https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2004.835313
31 Klein L A (2004). Sensor and Data Fusion: A Tool for Information Assessment and Decision Making. Bellingham: SPIE Press,8–10
32 Lee H K, Kim T C (2012). Local self-similarity based backprojection for image upscaling. In: Proceedings of 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), 1215–1218
33 Li H, Manjunath B S, Mitra S K (1995). A contour-based approach to multisensor image registration. IEEE Trans Image Process, 4(3): 320–334
https://doi.org/10.1109/83.366480
34 Liang J, Liu X, Huang K, Li X, Wang D, Wang X (2014). Automatic registration of multisensor images using an integrated spatial and mutual information (SMI) metric. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 52(1): 603–615
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2013.2242895
35 Liu S, Du X Y, Zhang J H (2009). Structure extracting and matching based on similarity-pictorial structure model for microscopic images. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 3: 181–185
36 Lowe D G (2004). Distinctive image features from scale-invariant key points. Int J Comput Vis, 60(2): 91–110
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94
37 Meskine F, Mezouar M C E, Taleb N (2010). A rigid image registration based on the non subsampled contourlet transform and genetic algorithms. Sensors (Basel), 10(9): 8553–8571
https://doi.org/10.3390/s100908553
38 Messerschmidt L, Engelbrecht A P (2004). Learning to play games using a PSO-based competitive learning approach. IEEE Trans Evol Comput, 8(3): 280–288
https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2004.826070
39 Pratt W K (1974). Correlation techniques of image registration. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, AES-10(3): 353–358
https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.1974.307828
40 Ricardo G (2012). Landmark localisation in brain MR images using feature point descriptors based on 3D local self-similarities. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging,1535–1538
41 Richards J A, Jia X (2006). Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis (4th ed). Berlin: Springer-Verlag,56–58
42 Sedaghat A, Ebadi H (2015). Distinctive order based self-similarity descriptor for multi-sensor remote sensing image matching. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 108: 62–71
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.06.003
43 Shechtman E, Irani M (2007). Matching local self-similarities across images and videos. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,1–8
44 Suri S, Reinartz P (2010). Mutual-information-based registration of TerraSAR-X and Ikonos imagery in urban areas. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 48(2): 939–949
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2009.2034842
45 Taleb N, Bentoutou Y, Deforges O, Taleb A (2001). A 3-D space-time motion evaluation for image registration in digital subtraction angiography. Comput Med Imaging Graph, 25(3): 223–233
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-6111(00)00054-9
46 Viola P, Wells W M III (1997). Alignment by maximization of mutual information. Int J Comput Vis, 24(2): 137–154
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007958904918
47 Wachowiak M P, Smolikova R, Zheng Y, Zurada J M, Elmaghraby A S (2004). An approach to multimodal biomedical image registration utilizing particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput, 8(3): 289–301
https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2004.826068
48 Wolberg G, Zokai S (2000). Robust image registration using log-polar transform. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 1: 493–496
49 Wong A, Clausi D A (2007). ARRSI: automatic registration of remote sensing images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 45(5): 1483–1493
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2007.892601
50 Yang H, Hou X (2012). Local self-similarity based texture classification. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing (CISP),795–799
51 Yi Z, Chen Z, Yang X (2008). Multi-spectral remote image registration based on SIFT. Electron Lett, 44(2): 107–108
https://doi.org/10.1049/el:20082477
52 Zhang H G, Bai X, Zheng H X, Zhao H J, Zhou J, Cheng J, Lu H (2013). Hierarchical remote sensing image analysis via graph laplacian energy. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett, 10(2): 396–400
https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2012.2207087
53 Zheng H (2011). A novel approach for satellite image classification using local self-similarity. In: Proceedings of Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2011 IEEE International,2888‒2891
54 Zitová B, Flusser J (2003). Image registration methods: a survey. Image Vis Comput, 21(11): 977–1000
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-8856(03)00137-9
[1] Parham PAHLAVANI, Behnaz BIGDELI. A mutual information-Dempster-Shafer based decision ensemble system for land cover classification of hyperspectral data[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2017, 11(4): 774-783.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed