Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front. Earth Sci.    2020, Vol. 14 Issue (1) : 201-208    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-019-0760-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Grey water footprint for global energy demands
Jing MING1,2,3, Xiawei LIAO4,5(), Xu ZHAO6
1. Chengdu University of Information Technology, School of Atomospheic Sciences, Chengdu 610225, China
2. Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
4. School of Environment and Energy, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China
5. College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
6. Key Laboratory of Integrated Regulation and Resource Development on Shallow Lake of Ministry of Education, College of Environment, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
 Download: PDF(1534 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

With a Multi-Regional Input-Output model, this study quantifies global final energy demands’ grey water footprint (GWF) based on the latest available data. In 2009, 9.10 km3 of freshwater was required to dilute the pollutants generated along the life-cycle supply chain of global energy final demands to concentrations permitted by relevant environmental regulations. On a national level, final energy demands in China, USA, India, Japan, and Brazil required the largest GWF of 1.45, 1.19, 0.79, 0.51, and 0.45 km3 respectively, while European countries have the highest energy demands GWF per capita. From the producer perspective, the largest GWF was generated in BRIC countries, i.e., Russia (1.54 km3), China (1.35 km3), India (0.92 km3) and Brazil (0.56 km3) to support global final energy demands. Because of global trading activities, a country or region’s final energy demands also give rise to water pollutants beyond its territorial boundaries. Cyprus, Greece, Luxembourg, and Malta almost entirely rely on foreign water resources to dilute water pollutants generated to meet their final energy demands. Energy demands in BRIC countries have the least dependency on external water resources. On a global average, 56.9% of GWF for energy demands was generated beyond national boundaries. Energy demands in the global north are inducing water pollutions in the global south.

Keywords water-energy nexus      water pollution      water footprint      multi-regional input-output analysis     
Corresponding Author(s): Xiawei LIAO   
Just Accepted Date: 19 July 2019   Online First Date: 23 September 2019    Issue Date: 24 March 2020
 Cite this article:   
Jing MING,Xiawei LIAO,Xu ZHAO. Grey water footprint for global energy demands[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(1): 201-208.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-019-0760-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y2020/V14/I1/201
Fig.1  National (per capita) Energy Demands GWF
Fig.2  Sectoral distribution of energy demands GWF by destination and origin country/region
Fig.3  External GWF for national energy demands
Fig.4  International GWF transfers for final energy demands
Number Sector Name
1 Agriculture, Hunting, Forestry and Fishing
2 Mining and Quarrying
3 Food, Beverages and Tobacco
4 Textiles and Textile Products
5 Leather, Leather and Footwear
6 Wood and Products of Wood and Cork
7 Pulp, Paper, Paper, Printing and Publishing
8 Coke, Refined Petroleum and Nuclear Fuel
9 Chemicals and Chemical Products
10 Rubber and Plastics
11 Other Non-Metallic Mineral
12 Basic Metals and Fabricated Metal
13 Machinery, Nec
14 Electrical and Optical Equipment
15 Transport Equipment
16 Manufacturing, Nec; Recycling
17 Electricity, Gas and Water Supply
18 Construction
19 Sale, Maintenance and Repair of Motor Vehicles and Motorcycles; Retail Sale of Fuel
20 Wholesale Trade and Commission Trade, Except of Motor Vehicles and Motorcycles
21 Retail Trade, Except of Motor Vehicles and Motorcycles; Repair of Household Goods
22 Hotels and Restaurants
23 Inland Transport
24 Water Transport
25 Air Transport
26 Other Supporting and Auxiliary Transport Activities; Activities of Travel Agencies
27 Post and Telecommunications
28 Financial Intermediation
29 Real Estate Activities
30 Renting of M&Eq and Other Business Activities
31 Public Admin and Defense; Compulsory Social Security
32 Education
33 Health and Social Work
34 Other Community, Social and Personal Services
35 Private Households with Employed Persons
  
1 B M Cai, B Zhang, J Bi, W J Zhang, (2014). Energy’s thirst for water in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 11760–11768
2 B Cai, C Wang, B Zhang (2017). Worse than imagined: unidentified virtual water in China. J Clean Prod, 196: 681–691
3 A K Chapagain, A Y Hoekstra, H H G Savenije, R Gautam (2006). The water footprint of cotton consumption: an assessment of the impact of worldwide consumption of cotton products on the water resources in the cotton producing countries. Ecol Econ, 60(1): 186–203
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.027
4 V Fthenakis, H C Kim (2010). Life-cycle uses of water in U.S. electricity generation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 14(7): 2039–2048
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.03.008
5 W Gerbens-Leenes, A Y Hoekstra, T H van der Meer (2009). The water footprint of bioenergy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 106(25): 10219–10223
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812619106
6 P Gleick (1994). Water and Energy. Annu Rev Energy Environ, 19(1): 267–299
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.eg.19.110194.001411
7 A Y Hoekstra, A K Chapagain, M M Aldaya, M M Mekonnen (2011) The water footprint assessment manual: Setting the global standard. Earthscan. London, UK
8 R A Holland, K A Scott, M Florke, G Brown, R M Ewers, E Farmer, V Kapos, A Muggeridge, J P W Scharlemann, G Taylor, J Barrett, F Eigenbrod (2015). Global impacts of energy demand on the freshwater resources of nations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 112(48): E6707–E6716
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1507701112
9 International Energy Agency (IEA) (2012). World energy outlook. Paris, France
10 W Leontief (1941) The Structure of the American Economy, 1919–1939 (2nd Edition). New York: Oxford University Press
11 Q M Liang, Y Fan, Y M Wei (2007). Multi-regional input-output model for regional energy requirements and CO2 emissions in China. Energ Policy, 35(3): 1685–1700
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.04.018
12 X Liao, J W Hall, N Eyre (2016). Water use in China’s thermoelectric power sector. Glob Environ Change, 41: 142–152
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.09.007
13 C Liu, C Kroeze, A Y Hoekstra, W Gerbens-Leenes (2012). Past and future trends in grey water footprints of anthropogenic nitrogen and phosphorus inputs to major world rivers. Ecol Indic, 18: 42–49
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.10.005
14 W Liu, M Antonelli, X Liu, H Yang (2017). Towards improvement of grey water footprint assessment: with an illustration for global maize cultivation. J Clean Prod, 147: 1–9
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.072
15 J Macknick, R Newmark, G Heath, K C Hallett (2012). Operational water consumption and withdrawal factors for electricity generating technologies: a review of existing literature. Environ Res Lett, 7(4): 045802
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/045802
16 D M Marsh (2008) The water-energy nexus: a comprehensive analysis in the context of New South Wales. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Sydney: University of Technology
17 M M Mekonnen, P W Gerbens-Leenes, A Y Hoekstra (2015). The consumptive water footprint of electricity and heat: a global assessment. Environ Sci Water Res Technol, 1(3): 285–297
https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EW00026B
18 M M Mekonnen, A Y Hoekstra (2010a) The green, blue and grey water footprint of farm animals and animal products, Value of Water Research Report Series No.48, Volume I and II. UNESCO-IHE, Delft, the Netherlands
19 M M Mekonnen, A Y Hoekstra (2010b) The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Value of Water Research Report Series No.47, Volume I and II. UNESCO-IHE, Delft, the Netherlands
20 M M Mekonnen, A Y Hoekstra (2011a) National water footprint accounts: the green, blue and grey water footprint of production and consumption. Value of Water Research Report Series No.50, Volume I and II. UNESCO-IHE, Delft, the Netherlands
21 M M Mekonnen, A Y Hoekstra (2011b) The water footprint of electricity from hydropower. Value of Water Research Report Series No.51. UNESCO-IHE, Delft, the Netherlands
22 M M Mekonnen, A Y Hoekstra (2012) The blue water footprint of electricity from hydropower. Hydrol. Earth Sys. Sci. 16: 179–187
23 M.M. Mekonnen, , A.Y Hoekstra, . (2015) Global gray water footprint and water pollution levels related to anthropogenic nitrogen loads to fresh water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49. 12860–12868
24 J Meldrum, S Nettles-Anderson, G Heath, J Macknick (2013). Life cycle water use for electricity generation: a review and harmonization of literature estimates. Environ Res Lett, 8(1): 015031
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015031
25 E Mielke, L D Anadon, V Narayanamurti (2010) Water Consumption of Energy Resource Extraction, Processing, and Conversion. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School: Cambridge, MA, US
26 V K Mishra, A R Upadhyaya, S K Pandey, B D Tripathi (2008). Heavy metal pollution induced due to coal mining effluent on surrounding aquatic ecosystem and its management through naturally occurring aquatic macrophytes. Bioresour Technol, 99(5): 930–936
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.03.010
27 F F Nerini, J Tomei, L S To, I Bisaga, P Parikh, M Black, A Borrion, C Spataru, V C Broto, G Anandarajah, B Milligan, Y Mulugetta (2018). Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat Energ, 3(1): 10–15
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0036-5
28 L Y Pan, P Liu, L W Ma, Z Li (2012). A supply chain based assessment of water issues in the coal industry in China. Energy Policy, 48: 93–102
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.063
29 F Pellicer-Martínez, J M Martínez-Paz (2016). Grey water footprint assessment at the river basin level: accounting method and case study in the Segura River Basin, Spain. Ecol Indic, 60: 1173–1183
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.032
30 G P Peters, E G Hertwich (2008). CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. Environ Sci Technol, 42(5): 1401–1407
https://doi.org/10.1021/es072023k
31 A M Rio Carrillo, C Frei (2009). Water: a key resource in energy production. Energ Policy, 37(11): 4303–4312
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.074
32 A Serrano, D Guan, R Duarte, J Paavola (2016). Virtual water flows in the EU27: a consumption-based approach. J Ind Ecol, 20(3): 547–558
https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12454
33 E S Spang, W R Moomaw, K S Gallagher, P H Kirshen, D H Marks (2014). The water consumption of energy production: an international comparison. Environ Res Lett, 9(10): 105002
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/10/105002
34 United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, Geneva
35 S Vassolo, P Doll (2005). Global-scale gridded estimates of thermoelectric power and manufacturing water use. Water Resour Res, 41(4): W04010
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003360
36 L Wang, X Ding, X Wu (2013). Blue and grey water footprint of textile industry in China. Water Sci Technol, 68(11): 2485–2491
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.532
37 T Wiedmann (2009). A review of recent multi-region input-output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecol Econ, 69(2): 211–222
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.026
38 Z Zeng, J Liu, H H Savenije (2013). A simple approach to assess water scarcity integrating water quantity and quality. Ecol Indic, 34: 441–449
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.06.012
39 C Zhang, L D Anadon (2013). Life cycle water use of energy production and its environmental impacts in China. Environ Sci Technol, 47(24): 14459–14467
https://doi.org/10.1021/es402556x
40 Z Zhang, H Yang, M Shi (2011). Analyses of water footprint of Beijing in an interregional input-output framework. Ecol Econ, 70(12): 2494–2502
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.08.011
41 X Zhao, J Liu, Q Liu, M R Tillotson, D Guan, K Hubacek (2015). Physical and virtual water transfers for regional water stress alleviation in China. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 112(4): 1031–1035
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404130112
42 X Zhao, J Liu, H Yang, R Duarte, M R Tillotson, K Hubacek (2016). Burden shifting of water quantity and quality stress from megacity Shanghai. Water Resour Res, 52(9): 6916–6927
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018595
43 Y Zhi, Z Yang, X Yin, P B Hamilton, L Zhang (2015). Using gray water footprint to verify economic sectors’ consumption of assimilative capacity in a river basin: model and a case study in the Haihe River Basin, China. J Clean Prod, 92: 267–273
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.058
[1] Ying LIU, Xudong WU, Xudong SUN, Chenghe GUAN, Bo ZHANG, Xiaofang WU. Exports-driven primary energy requirements and the structural paths of Chinese regions[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(4): 803-815.
[2] Yintao LU, Xinghua ZANG, Hong YAO, Shichao ZHANG, Shaobin SUN, Fang LIU. Assessment of trace metal contamination in groundwater in a highly urbanizing area of Shenfu New District, Northeast China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(3): 569-582.
[3] Bo ZHANG,Z. M. CHEN,L. ZENG,H. QIAO,B. CHEN. Demand-driven water withdrawals by Chinese industry: a multi-regional input-output analysis[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2016, 10(1): 13-28.
[4] Jinjian LI,Xiaojie MENG,Yan ZHANG,Juan LI,Linlin XIA,Hongmei ZHENG. Analysis of the temporal and spatial distribution of water quality in China’s major river basins, and trends between 2005 and 2010[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2015, 9(3): 463-472.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed