Quantitative assessment of the supply, demand and flows of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Basin, China

doi:10.1007/s11707-024-1114-1

Front. Earth Sci.

2024, Vol. 18

Issue (2) : 422-445 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-024-1114-1

Quantitative assessment of the supply, demand and flows of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Basin, China

Dongjie GUAN(

), Xiaofeng FAN, Lilei ZHOU, Kangwen ZHU

School of Smart City Institute, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China

Download: PDF(28269 KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract

Ecosystem service flow is essential for transporting, transforming, and maintaining ecosystem services and connecting supply and demand. This study attempted to quantitatively assess the supply and demand flows of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Basin in 2000, 2010, and 2020; assess the evolution of the spatial patterns of ecosystem service flow at the provincial, watershed and urban agglomeration scales; and design a zoning standard for ecosystem service flow. The results showed as follows. 1) Between 2000 and 2020, the Yangtze River had a progressive drop in its freshwater supply, water conservation service and carbon sequestration service flows. The decline rates for these services were measured at 10.90%, 11.11%, and 5.17%, respectively. The climate regulation service flow exhibited a pattern of initial fall followed by a subsequent increase, characterized by a decline rate of 35.53%. 2) The lowest was the ecosystem service flow in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River and the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration. Freshwater supply service flow and water conservation service flow were the highest in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River and the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration. Carbon sequestration service flow and climate regulation service flow were the highest in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River Basin and the urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. 3) From 2000 to 2020, the change ratios of the area proportion of the confluence, flow, and outflow areas in the Yangtze River Basin were 1.06, 3.17, and 0.86, respectively. The results of this research could offer decision support for regulating ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Basin, promoting sustainable regional development and achieving rational use of the basin resources.

Keywords Yangtze River Basin ecosystem services supply and demand service flow quantitative assessment spatial matching

Corresponding Author(s): Dongjie GUAN

Online First Date: 03 July 2024 Issue Date: 19 July 2024

Cite this article:

Dongjie GUAN,Xiaofeng FAN,Lilei ZHOU, et al. Quantitative assessment of the supply, demand and flows of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Basin, China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2024, 18(2): 422-445.

URL:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-024-1114-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y2024/V18/I2/422

Fig.1 Study area.

Tab.1 Summary of the primary data

Tab.2 Water consumption index of provinces in the Yangtze River Basin

Tab.3 Water allocation table of land type

Fig.2 Ecosystem service supply in the YRB in 2000, 2010, and 2020.

Fig.3 Ecosystem service demand in the YRB in 2000, 2010, and 2020.

Fig.4 Ecosystem service flows in the YRB in 2000, 2010, and 2020.

Fig.5 The supply, demand and flow of ecosystem services at the provincial scale of YRB.

Fig.6 The flow of ecosystem services at the watershed scale of YRB.

Fig.7 The division of the upper, middle and lower reaches of the YRB and freshwater supply service flows in different provinces.

Fig.8 The division of the upper, middle and lower reaches of the YRB and water conservation service flows in different regions.

Fig.9 The division of the upper, middle and lower reaches of the YRB and carbon sequestration service flows in different regions.

Fig.10 The division of the upper, middle and lower reaches of the YRB and climate regulation service flows in different regions.

Fig.11 The flow of ecosystem services at urban agglomeration scale of YRB.

Fig.12 The division of urban agglomerations of the YRB and freshwater supply service flows in different years.

Fig.13 The division of urban agglomerations of the YRB and water conservation service flows in different years.

Fig.14 The division of urban agglomerations of the YRB and carbon sequestration service flows in different years.

Fig.15 The division of urban agglomerations of the YRB and climate regulation service flows in different years.

Fig.16 Optimization zoning of comprehensive supply and demand ratio of ecosystem services in the YRB in 2000, 2010 and 2020.

1	H A, Abdelrhman T A, Almaleeh I M M Elshareef (2022). Economic valuation of ecosystem services provided by Dellanj Forest using contingent valuation methods.J Economics Public Finance, 8(4): 58 https://doi.org/10.22158/jepf.v8n4p58
2	J C, Assis C, Hohlenwerger J P, Metzger J R, Rhodes G T, Duarte Silva R A, Da A L, Boesing P R, Prist M C Ribeiro (2023). Linking landscape structure and ecosystem service flow.Ecosyst Serv, 62: 101535 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101535
3	E B, Brooks J W, Coulston K H, Riitters D N Wear (2020). Using a hybrid demand-allocation algorithm to enable distributional analysis of land use change patterns.PLoS One, 15(10): e0240097 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240097
4	L, Cao F, Kong C Xu (2022). Exploring ecosystem carbon storage change and scenario simulation in the Qiantang River source region of China.Sci Prog, 105(3): 1–26 https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504221113186
5	D, Chen J, Li X, Yang Z, Zhou Y, Pan M Li (2020). Quantifying water provision service supply, demand and spatial flow for land use optimization: a case study in the Yanhe watershed.Ecosyst Serv, 43: 101117 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101117
6	K B, Dang B, Burkhard V B, Dang K C Vu (2020). Potential, flow and demand of rice provisioning ecosystem services – case study in Sapa district, Vietnam.Ecol Indic, 118: 106731 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106731
7	C, Deng D, Zhu Y, Liu Z Li (2022). Spatial matching and flow in supply and demand of water provision services: a case study in Xiangjiang River Basin.J Mt Sci, 19(1): 228–240 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-021-6855-7
8	H, Du L, Zhao P, Zhang J, Li S Yu (2023). Ecological compensation in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region based on ecosystem services flow.J Environ Manage, 331: 117230 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117230
9	H, Duan N Xu (2022). Assessing social values for ecosystem services in rural areas based on the SolVES Model: a case study from Nanjing, China.Forests, 13(11): 1877 https://doi.org/10.3390/f13111877
10	L, Fang L, Wang W, Chen J, Sun Q, Cao S, Wang L Wang (2021). Identifying the impacts of natural and human factors on ecosystem service in the Yangtze and Yellow River Basins.J Clean Prod, 314: 127995 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127995
11	M, Feurer H, Rueff E, Celio A, Heinimann J, Blaser A M, Htun J G Zaehringer (2021). Regional scale mapping of ecosystem services supply, demand, flow and mismatches in Southern Myanmar.Ecosyst Serv, 52: 101363 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101363
12	B, Fisher R K, Turner P Morling (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making.Ecol Econ, 68(3): 643–653 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014
13	Y, Gao Z, Wang F Xu (2023). Geospatial characteristics and the application of land use functions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China: perspectives on provinces and urban agglomerations.Ecol Indic, 155: 110969 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110969
14	W, Geng Y, Li P, Zhang D, Yang W, Jing T Rong (2022). Analyzing spatio-temporal changes and trade-offs/synergies among ecosystem services in the Yellow River Basin, China.Ecol Indic, 138: 108825 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108825
15	R, Granado-Díaz J A, Gómez-Limón M, Rodríguez-Entrena A J Villanueva (2020). Spatial analysis of demand forsparsely located ecosystem services using alternative index approaches.Eur Rev Agric Econ, 47: 752–784
16	C, Gu L, Hu X, Zhang X, Wang J Guo (2011). Climate change and urbanization in the Yangtze River Delta.Habitat Int, 35(4): 544–552 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.03.002
17	D, Guan Z, Deng L L, Zhou X, Fan W, Yang G, Peng X, Zhu L J Zhou (2023). How can multiscenario flow paths of water supply services be simulated? A supply-flow-demand model of ecosystem services across a typical basin, in China..Sci Total Environ, 893: 164770 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164770
18	D, Guan L, Wu L, Cheng Y, Zhang L Zhou (2022). How to measure the ecological compensation threshold in the upper Yangtze River basin, China? An approach for coupling InVEST and grey water footprint..Front Earth Sci (Lausanne), 10: 988291 https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.988291
19	M, Hochmalová R C, Purwestri Y, Jian V, Jarský M, Riedl Y, Dian M Hájek (2022). Demand for forest ecosystem services: a comparison study in selected areas in the Czech Republic and China.Eur J For Res, 141(5): 867–886 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-022-01478-0
20	N, Hu D, Xu N, Zou S, Fan P, Wang Y Li (2023). Multi-scenario simulations of land use and habitat quality based on a PLUS-InVEST Model: a case study of Baoding, China.Sustainability (Basel), 15(1): 557 https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010557
21	Y, Hu Y, Liu C Li (2022). Multi-scenario simulation of land use change and ecosystem service value in the middle reaches of Yangtze River urban agglomeration.Sustainability, 14(23): 15738 https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315738
22	M, Huang Y, Xiao J, Xu J, Liu Y, Wang S, Gan S, Lv G Xie (2022). A review on the supply-demand relationship and spatial flows of ecosystem services.J Resour Ecol, 13: 925–935
23	Q, Jia L, Jiao X, Lian W Wang (2023). Linking supply-demand balance of ecosystem services to identify ecological security patterns in urban agglomerations.Sustain Cities Soc, 92: 104497 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104497
24	W, Jiang B, Fu G, Gao Y, Lv C, Wang S, Sun K, Wang S, Schüler Z Shu (2023). Exploring spatial-temporal driving factors for changes in multiple ecosystem services and their relationships in West Liao River Basin, China.Sci Total Environ, 904: 166716 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166716
25	Y, Jiang D, Guan X, He B, Yin L, Zhou L, Sun D, Huang Z, Li Y Zhang (2022). Quantification of the coupling relationship between ecological compensation and ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China.Land Use Policy, 114: 105995 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.105995
26	Z, Li D, Guan L, Zhou Y Zhang (2022). Constraint relationship of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 29(9): 12484–12505 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13845-2
27	J, Lin J, Huang C, Prell B A Bryan (2021). Changes in supply and demand mediate the effects of land-use change on freshwater ecosystem services flows.Sci Total Environ, 763: 143012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143012
28	Y, Lin M, Zhang M, Gan L, Huang C, Zhu Q, Zheng S, You Z, Ye A R, Shahtahmassebi Y, Li J, Deng J, Zhang L, Zhang K Wang (2022). Fine identification of the supply–demand mismatches and matches of urban green space ecosystem services with a spatial filtering tool.J Clean Prod, 336: 130404 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130404
29	H, Liu W, Xiao J, Zhu L, Zeng Q Li (2022a). Urbanization intensifies the mismatch between the supply and demand of regional ecosystem services: a large-scale case of the Yangtze River economic belt in China.Remote Sens (Basel), 14(20): 5147 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14205147
30	J, Liu X, Chen W, Chen Y, Zhang A, Wang Y Zheng (2023a). Ecosystem service value evaluation of saline—alkali land development in the Yellow River Delta—the example of the Huanghe Island.Water, 15(3): 477 https://doi.org/10.3390/w15030477
31	M, Liu Y, Xiong A Zhang (2023b). Multi-scale telecoupling effects of land use change on ecosystem services in urban agglomerations –A case study in the middle reaches of Yangtze River urban agglomerations.J Clean Prod, 415: 137878 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137878
32	Q, Liu X, Sun W, Wu Z, Liu G, Fang P Yang (2022b). Agroecosystem services: a review of concepts, indicators, assessment methods and future research perspectives.Ecol Indic, 142: 109218 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109218
33	Z, Liu L, Rong W Wei (2023c). Impacts of land use/cover change on water balance by using the SWAT model in a typical loess hilly watershed of China.Geogr Sustain, 4(1): 19–28 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2022.11.006
34	T, Luo J, Zeng W, Chen Y, Wang T, Gu C Huang (2023). Ecosystem services balance and its influencing factors detection in China: a case study in Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomerations.Ecol Indic, 151: 110330 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110330
35	Y, Lyu C Wu (2023). Managing the supply-demand mismatches and potential flows of ecosystem services from the perspective of regional integration: a case study of Hangzhou, China.Sci Total Environ, 902: 165918 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165918
36	Z, Ma J, Gong C, Hu J Lei (2023). An integrated approach to assess spatial and temporal changes in the contribution of the ecosystem to sustainable development goals over 20 years in China.Sci Total Environ, 903: 166237 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166237
37	Q, Meng L, Zhang H, Wei E, Cai D, Xue M Liu (2021). Linking ecosystem service supply–demand risks and regional spatial management in the Yihe River Basin, Central China.Land (Basel), 10(8): 843 https://doi.org/10.3390/land10080843
38	F, Müller S, Bicking K, Ahrendt Bac D, Kinh I, Blindow C, Fürst P, Haase M, Kruse T, Kruse L, Ma M, Perennes I, Ruljevic G, Schernewski C G, Schimming A, Schneiders H, Schubert J, Schumacher U, Tappeiner P, Wangai W, Windhorst J Zeleny (2020). Assessing ecosystem service potentials to evaluate terrestrial, coastal and marine ecosystem types in Northern Germany – an expert-based matrix approach.Ecol Indic, 112: 106116 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106116
39	I, Palomo B, Martín-López M, Potschin R, Haines-Young C Montes (2013). National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: mapping ecosystem service flows.Ecosyst Serv, 4: 104–116 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.001
40	Z, Pan G, Gao B Fu (2022). Spatiotemporal changes and driving forces of ecosystem vulnerability in the Yangtze River Basin, China: quantification using habitat-structure-function framework.Sci Total Environ, 835: 155494 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155494
41	L, Peng L, Zhang X, Li P, Wang W, Zhao Z, Wang L, Jiao H Wang (2022). Spatio-temporal patterns of ecosystem services provided by urban green spaces and their equity along urban–rural gradients in the Xi’an Metropolitan Area, China.Remote Sens (Basel), 14(17): 4299 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14174299
42	K, Qin J, Liu L, Yan H Huang (2019). Integrating ecosystem services flows into water security simulations in water scarce areas: present and future.Sci Total Environ, 670: 1037–1048 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.263
43	I, Sauter F, Kienast J, Bolliger B, Winter R Pazúr (2019). Changes in demand and supply of ecosystem services under scenarios of future land use in Vorarlberg, Austria.J Mt Sci, 16(12): 2793–2809 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-5124-x
44	U, Schirpke Vigl L, Egarter E, Tasser U Tappeiner (2019). Analyzing spatial congruencies and mismatches between supply, demand and flow of ecosystem services and sustainable development.Sustainability (Basel), 11(8): 2227 https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082227
45	N, Schuwirth F, Borgwardt S, Domisch M, Friedrichs M, Kattwinkel D, Kneis M, Kuemmerlen S D, Langhans J, Martínez-López P Vermeiren (2019). How to make ecological models useful for environmental management.Ecol Modell, 411: 108784 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108784
46	H M, Serna-Chavez C, Schulp Bodegom P M, Van W, Bouten P H, Verburg M D Davidson (2014). A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services.Ecol Indic, 39: 24–33 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.024
47	K, Shaad N J, Souter D, Vollmer H M, Regan M O Bezerra (2022). Integrating ecosystem services into water resource management: an indicator-based approach.Environ Manage, 69(4): 752–767 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01559-7
48	J, Shen S C, Li H, Wang S, Wu Z, Liang Y T, Zhang F, Wei S, Li L, Ma Y, Wang L, Liu Y J Zhang (2023). Understanding the spatial relationships and drivers of ecosystem service supply-demand mismatches towards spatially-targeted management of social-ecological system.J Clean Prod, 406: 136882 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136882
49	J, Sheng D, Rui X Han (2022). Governmentality and sociotechnical imaginary within the conservation-development nexus: China’s Great Yangtze River Protection Programme.Environ Sci Policy, 136: 56–66 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.05.018
50	Y, Shi D, Shi L, Zhou R Fang (2020). Identification of ecosystem services supply and demand areas and simulation of ecosystem service flows in Shanghai.Ecol Indic, 115: 106418 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106418
51	J, Song Z, Liang Q, Guo C Wang (2023). Current situation, dilemmas and measures to improve horizontal ecological compensation coordination mechanisms in river basins.Sustainability (Basel), 15(2): 1504 https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021504
52	J, Stürck A, Poortinga P H Verburg (2014). Mapping ecosystem services: the supply and demand of flood regulation services in Europe.Ecol Indic, 38: 198–211 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.010
53	J, Tan L, Peng W, Wu Q Huang (2023a). Mapping the evolution patterns of urbanization, ecosystem service supply–demand, and human well-being: a tree-like landscape perspective.Ecol Indic, 154: 110591 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110591
54	L, Tan G, Yang Q, Zhu R, Wan K Shi (2023b). Optimizing payment for ecosystem services in a drinking water source watershed by quantifying the supply and demand of soil retention service.J Environ Manage, 331: 117303 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117303
55	Y, Tao Q, Tao X, Sun J, Qiu S G, Pueppke W, Ou J, Guo J Qi (2022). Mapping ecosystem service supply and demand dynamics under rapid urban expansion: a case study in the Yangtze River Delta of China.Ecosyst Serv, 56: 101448 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101448
56	Y, Tian Q Mao (2022). The effect of regional integration on urban sprawl in urban agglomeration areas: a case study of the Yangtze River Delta, China.Habitat Int, 130: 102695 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102695
57	S, Tindale V, Vicario-Modroño R, Gallardo-Cobos E, Hunter S, Miškolci P N, Price P, Sánchez-Zamora M, Sonnevelt M, Ojo K, McInnes L Frewer (2023). Citizen perceptions and values associated with ecosystem services from European grassland landscapes.Land Use Policy, 127: 106574 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106574
58	M, Vergarechea R, Astrup C, Fischer K, Øistad C, Blattert M, Hartikainen K, Eyvindson Fulvio F, Di N, Forsell D, Burgas A, Toraño-Caicoya M, Mönkkönen C Antón-Fernández (2023). Future wood demands and ecosystem services trade-offs: a policy analysis in Norway.For Policy Econ, 147: 102899 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102899
59	C, Wang M, Zhao Y, Xu Y, Zhao X Zhang (2023). Ecosystem service synergies promote ecological tea gardens: a case study in Fuzhou, China.Remote Sens (Basel), 15(2): 540 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15020540
60	H, Wang L, Wang X, Fu Q, Yang G, Wu M, Guo S, Zhang D, Wu Y, Zhu H Deng (2022a). Spatial-temporal pattern of ecosystem service supply-demand and coordination in the Ulansuhai Basin, China.Ecol Indic, 143: 109406 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109406
61	L, Wang H, Zheng Y, Chen Z, Ouyang X Hu (2022b). Systematic review of ecosystem services flow measurement: main concepts, methods, applications and future directions.Ecosyst Serv, 58: 101479 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101479
62	R, Wang Y, Zhang H, Zhang H Yu (2022c). Social value assessment and spatial expression of national park ecosystems based on residents’ perceptions.Sustainability (Basel), 14(7): 4206 https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074206
63	J, Wu X, Fan K, Li Y Wu (2023). Assessment of ecosystem service flow and optimization of spatial pattern of supply and demand matching in Pearl River Delta, China.Ecol Indic, 153: 110452 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110452
64	J, Wu Y, Huang W Jiang (2022). Spatial matching and value transfer assessment of ecosystem services supply and demand in urban agglomerations: a case study of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay area in China.J Clean Prod, 375: 134081 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134081
65	W, Wu H, Tang P, Yang L, You Q, Zhou Z, Chen R Shibasaki (2011). Scenario-based assessment of future food security.J Geogr Sci, 21(1): 3–17 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-011-0825-x
66	H, Xia S, Yuan A V Prishchepov (2023). Spatial-temporal heterogeneity of ecosystem service interactions and their social-ecological drivers: implications for spatial planning and management.Resour Conserv Recycling, 189: 106767 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106767
67	P, Xia B, Chen B, Gong Z, Liu C, He Y Wang (2022). The supply and demand of water purification service in an urbanizing basin on the Tibetan Plateau.Landsc Ecol, 37(7): 1937–1955 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-022-01455-3
68	H, Xiang J, Zhang D, Mao Z, Wang Z, Qiu H Yan (2022). Identifying spatial similarities and mismatches between supply and demand of ecosystem services for sustainable northeast China.Ecol Indic, 134: 108501 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108501
69	D, Xu Y Zhang (2022). Identifying the flow paths and beneficiary ranges of the sand fixation service: a case-study in Xilingol League, China.Land Degrad Dev, 33(3): 413–424 https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4127
70	Z, Xu J Peng (2022). Ecosystem services-based decision-making: a bridge from science to practice.Environ Sci Policy, 135: 6–15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.04.010
71	C, Xue X, Chen L, Xue H, Zhang J, Chen D Li (2023). Modeling the spatially heterogeneous relationships between tradeoffs and synergies among ecosystem services and potential drivers considering geographic scale in Bairin Left Banner, China.Sci Total Environ, 855: 158834 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158834
72	D, Xue Z, Wang Y, Li M, Liu H Wei (2022). Assessment of ecosystem services supply and demand (Mis)matches for urban ecological management: a case study in the Zhengzhou–Kaifeng–Luoyang cities.Remote Sens (Basel), 14(7): 1703 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14071703
73	X, Yan L Li (2023). Spatiotemporal characteristics and influencing factors of ecosystem services in Central Asia.J Arid Land, 15(1): 1–19 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-022-0074-0
74	X, Yan C, Liu Z, Han X, Li J Zhong (2023). Spatiotemporal assessment of ecosystem services supply–demand relationships to identify ecological management zoning in coastal city Dalian, China.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 30(23): 63464–63478 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26704-z
75	H, Yang X, Zhong S, Deng S Nie (2022a). Impact of LUCC on landscape pattern in the Yangtze River Basin during 2001–2019.Ecol Inform, 69: 101631 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101631
76	M, Yang X, Zhao P, Wu P, Hu X Gao (2022b). Quantification and spatially explicit driving forces of the incoordination between ecosystem service supply and social demand at a regional scale.Ecol Indic, 137: 108764 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108764
77	D, Yin H, Yu Y, Shi M, Zhao J, Zhang X Li (2023). Matching supply and demand for ecosystem services in the Yellow River Basin, China: a perspective of the water-energy-food nexus.J Clean Prod, 384: 135469 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135469
78	H, Yu W, Xie L, Sun Y Wang (2021). Identifying the regional disparities of ecosystem services from a supply-demand perspective.Resour Conserv Recycling, 169: 105557 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105557
79	Y, Yuan Z, Bai J, Zhang Y Huang (2023). Investigating the trade-offs between the supply and demand for ecosystem services for regional spatial management.J Environ Manage, 325: 116591 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116591
80	J, Zhang C, He Q, Huang J, Li T Qi (2022a). Evaluating the supply and demand of cultural ecosystem services in the Tibetan Plateau of China.Landsc Ecol, 37(8): 2131–2148 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-022-01467-z
81	L, Zhang J Li (2022). Identifying priority areas for biodiversity conservation based on Marxan and InVEST model.Landsc Ecol, 37(12): 3043–3058 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-022-01547-0
82	S, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Wang Z, Li Y Hou (2023). Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing mechanisms of ecosystem service value in the Tarim River Basin, northwest China.Remote Sens (Basel), 15(3): 591 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030591
83	X, Zhang P, Chen S, Dai Y Han (2022b). Assessment of the value of regional water conservation services based on SWAT model.Environ Monit Assess, 194(8): 559 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10247-w
84	X, Zhang G, Zhang X, Long Q, Zhang D, Liu H, Wu S Li (2021). Identifying the drivers of water yield ecosystem service: a case study in the Yangtze River Basin, China.Ecol Indic, 132: 108304 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108304
85	Y, Zhao N, Wang Y, Luo H, He L, Wu H, Wang Q, Wang J Wu (2022). Quantification of ecosystem services supply-demand and the impact of demographic change on cultural services in Shenzhen, China.J Environ Manage, 304: 114280 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114280
86	L, Zheng H, Liu Y, Huang S, Yin G Jin (2020). Assessment and analysis of ecosystem services value along the Yangtze River under the background of the Yangtze River protection strategy.J Geogr Sci, 30(4): 553–568 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-020-1742-7
87	L, Zhou D, Guan X, Yuan M, Zhang W Gao (2021). Quantifying the spatiotemporal characteristics of ecosystem services and livelihoods in China’s poverty-stricken counties.Front Earth Sci, 15(3): 553–579 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-020-0832-2
88	L, Zhou H, Zhang G, Bi K, Su L, Wang H, Chen Q Yang (2022). Multiscale perspective research on the evolution characteristics of the ecosystem services supply-demand relationship in the Chongqing section of the three gorges reservoir area.Ecol Indic, 142: 109227 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109227
89	Y Zhu (2022). Social value evaluation of ecosystem services in global geoparks based on SolVES model.Math Probl Eng, 2022: 9748880 https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9748880
90	W, Zou Y, He B, Ye X, Zhao D, Xu R, Xiao Y Duan (2021). Study on carbon storage of ecosystem in Qianjiangyuan national park based on InVEST model.J Cent South Univ, 41: 120–128
91	Z Y, Zou Y, Xiao Z Y, Ouyang C S, Song K L Wang (2019). Evaluation of the effectiveness of ecological protection in Qiandongnan Miao-Dong Autonomous Prefecture.Acta Ecol Sin, 39(4): 1407–1415

[1]	Lilei ZHOU, Dongjie GUAN, Xingzhong YUAN, Mengjie ZHANG, Weijun GAO. Quantifying the spatiotemporal characteristics of ecosystem services and livelihoods in China’s poverty-stricken counties[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2021, 15(3): 553-579.
[2]	Xujun HU, Huiyuan ZHANG, Haiguang HAO, Danyang FENG, Haiyan LIU, Qiang ZHANG. Understanding the relationships between poverty alleviation and ecosystem conservation: empirical evidence from western China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(1): 209-220.
[3]	Yuanfang CHAI, Yitian LI, Yunping YANG, Sixuan LI, Wei ZHANG, Jinqiu REN, Haibin XIONG. Water level variation characteristics under the impacts of extreme drought and the operation of the Three Gorges Dam[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2019, 13(3): 510-522.
[4]	Junyong AI, Lan FENG, Xiaowei DONG, Xiaodong ZHU, Yangfan LI. Exploring coupling coordination between urbanization and ecosystem quality (1985–2010): a case study from Lianyungang City, China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2016, 10(3): 527-545.
[5]	Wujun WEN, Geng XU, Xingjie WANG. Spatial transferring of ecosystem services and property rights allocation of ecological compensation[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2011, 5(3): 280-287.
[6]	Stephen J. MORREALE, Kristi L. SULLIVAN, . Community-level enhancements of biodiversity and ecosystem services[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2010, 4(1): 14-21.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed