Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2021, Vol. 15 Issue (4) : 56    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1348-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Enhanced hydrogen production in microbial electrolysis through strategies of carbon recovery from alkaline/thermal treated sludge
Ling Wang1, Chunxue Yang2, Sangeetha Thangavel3, Zechong Guo4, Chuan Chen1, Aijie Wang1,5, Wenzong Liu5()
1. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
2. Heilongjiang Cold Region Wetland Ecology and Environment Research Key Laboratory, School of Geography and Tourism, Harbin University, Harbin 150086, China
3. Department of Energy and Refrigerating Air-Conditioning Engineering, Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, China
4. School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212013, China
5. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518055, China
 Download: PDF(1912 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

• High hydrogen yield is recovered from thermal-alkaline pretreated sludge.

• Separating SFL by centrifugation is better than filtration for hydrogen recovery.

• The cascaded bioconversion of complex substrates in MECs are studied.

• Energy and electron efficiency related to substrate conversion are evaluated.

The aim of this study was to investigate the biohydrogen production from thermal (T), alkaline (A) or thermal-alkaline (TA) pretreated sludge fermentation liquid (SFL) in a microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) without buffer addition. Highest hydrogen yield of 36.87±4.36 mgH2/gVSS (0.026 m3/kg COD) was achieved in TA pretreated SFL separated by centrifugation, which was 5.12, 2.35 and 43.25 times higher than that of individual alkaline, thermal pretreatment and raw sludge, respectively. Separating SFL from sludge by centrifugation eliminated the negative effects of particulate matters, was more conducive for hydrogen production than filtration. The accumulated short chain fatty acid (SCFAs) after pretreatments were the main substrates for MEC hydrogen production. The maximum utilization ratio of acetic acid, propionic acid and n-butyric acid was 93.69%, 90.72% and 91.85%, respectively. These results revealed that pretreated WAS was highly efficient to stimulate the accumulation of SCFAs. And the characteristics and cascade bioconversion of complex substrates were the main factor that determined the energy efficiency and hydrogen conversion rate of MECs.

Keywords Waste activated sludge (WAS)      Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs)      Hydrogen      Pretreatment      Microbial electrolysis cells (MECs)     
Corresponding Author(s): Wenzong Liu   
Issue Date: 15 October 2020
 Cite this article:   
Ling Wang,Chunxue Yang,Sangeetha Thangavel, et al. Enhanced hydrogen production in microbial electrolysis through strategies of carbon recovery from alkaline/thermal treated sludge[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 56.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-020-1348-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2021/V15/I4/56
Factors SCFAs Carbohydrates Proteins SCOD
(mg COD/L) (mg COD/L) (mg COD/L) (mg /L)
C 0 h 111.32±23.64 51.40±5.47 0 163.93±68.26
72 h 711.98±21.50 38.60±3.09 561.42±99.15 1092.15±113.58
T 60°C for 24 h 2536.36±57.66 125.04±19.65 1320.65±165.94 3989.07±100.17
72 h 3928.26±139.36 201.16±7.31 1023.94±71.08 4682.60±28.96
A pH= 10 for 0 h 107.85±27.94 61.27±5.66 881.40±64.28 688.54±113.58
72 h 1717.00±70.85 88.22±6.94 731.59±29.05 2238.91±116.64
TA pH= 10, 73.7°C for 6 h 1020.45±93.55 61.27±5.66 1581.00±79.54 5678.69±636.03
72 h 5691.66±104.78 307.96±30.42 1237.75±69.04 6744.03±387.10
Tab.1  Characteristics of dissolved organic matter in sludge after pretreatment and 72 h fermentation.
Fig.1  Comparison of the compositions of SCFAs after pretreatment and the maximal accumulation during 72 h fermentation.
Fig.2  Current variation in two cycles of batch tests feeding with (a) CSFL and (b) FSFL.
Fig.3  Gas production in one batch feeding with FSFL (F) and CSFL (C). (a) H2, (b) CH4, (c) CO2, (d) hydrogen production (The error bar was the standard deviation of the results in three parallel reactors).
Type of ?substrate Sludge concentration
(gVSS/L)
Pretreatment
method
Volume
(mL)
Hydrogen yield (mgH2/gVSS) Applied voltage (V) Buffer solution(+/−) CE
(%)
Ref.
Sludge >5.01 No 600 5.67±0.61 0.6 + 28 Lu et al. (2012)
Sludge >2.33 Alkaline 600 15.08±1.41 0.6 + 34 Lu et al. (2012)
SFL 14 SDS 28 8.5 0.8 Wang et al. (2014)
SFL 17 Ultrasonic 28 11 0.8 + Liu et al. (2012)
Sludge 13 FNA+ PAA 200 10.8±0.3 0.8 + Liu et al. (2020)
Sludge 2.81 Fe(III)/PCA/H2O2 550 29.5 1.0 + Hou et al. (2020)
Sludge 12.1 FNA 28 0.11 0.8 + Zhou et al. (2019)
SFL 12 Ultrasonic+ Alkaline 28 46.0±2.0 0.8 97 Xu et al. (2013)
SFL 14 Thermal 28 15.70±0.44 0.8 62 This study
SFL 14 Alkaline 28 7.21±0.67 0.8 51 This study
SFL 14 Thermal-alkaline 28 36.87±4.36 0.8 72 This study
Tab.2  Different substrates related to sludge used in MECs and hydrogen production rate and some important parameters
Fig.4  Soluble organics variety in MECs fed with FSFL and CSFL. (a) SCFAs in FSFL, (b) SCFAs in CSFL, (c) proteins in FSFL, (d) carbohydrates in FSFL.
Fig.5  Removal efficiency of dissolved organic compounds in MECs fed with (a) FSFL and (b) CSFL.
Fig.6  Analysis of energy efficiency, coulombic efficiency and electron recovery efficiency in MECs with (a) CSFL, (b) FSFL.
1 J O Abe, A P I Popoola, E Ajenifuja, O M Popoola (2019). Hydrogen energy, economy and storage: review and recommendation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(29): 15072–15086
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.068
2 M Cai, J Liu, Y Wei (2004). Enhanced biohydrogen production from sewage sludge with alkaline pretreatment. Environmental Science & Technology, 38(11): 3195–3202
https://doi.org/10.1021/es0349204
3 Y Duan, A Zhou, K Wen, Z Liu, W Liu, A Wang, X Yue (2019). Upgrading VFAs bioproduction from waste activated sludge via co-fermentation with soy sauce residue. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 13(1): 3
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1086-7
4 L Feng, Y Yan, Y Chen (2009). Kinetic analysis of waste activated sludge hydrolysis and short-chain fatty acids production at pH 10. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 21(5): 589–594
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62312-8
5 A Ghimire, L Frunzo, F Pirozzi, E Trably, R Escudie, P N L Lens, G Esposito (2015). A review on dark fermentative biohydrogen production from organic biomass: Process parameters and use of by-products. Applied Energy, 144: 73–95
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.045
6 H Guo, Q Guo, F Ye, C F Ma, X Zhu, Q Liao (2019). Three-dimensional two-phase simulation of a unitized regenerative fuel cell during mode switching from electrolytic cell to fuel cell. Energy Conversion and Management, 195: 989–1003
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.05.069
7 Z Guo, L Gao, L Wang, W Liu, A Wang (2018). Enhanced methane recovery and exoelectrogen-methanogen evolution from low-strength wastewater in an up-flow biofilm reactor with conductive granular graphite fillers. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 12(4): 13
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-018-1074-3
8 Z He, W Liu, C Tang, B Liang, Z Guo, L Wang, Y X Ren, A J Wang (2019a). Performance and microbial community responses of anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge to residual benzalkonium chlorides. Energy Conversion and Management, 202: 112211
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112211
9 Z W He, C C Tang, W Z Liu, Y X Ren, Z C Guo, A J Zhou, L Wang, C X Yang, A J Wang (2019b). Enhanced short-chain fatty acids production from waste activated sludge with alkaline followed by potassium ferrate treatment. Bioresource Technology, 289: 121642
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121642
10 H Hou, Z Li, B Liu, S Liang, K Xiao, Q Zhu, S Hu, J Yang, J Hu (2020). Biogas and phosphorus recovery from waste activated sludge with protocatechuic acid enhanced Fenton pretreatment, anaerobic digestion and microbial electrolysis cell. Science of the Total Environment, 704: 135274
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135274
11 X Huang, T Mu, C Shen, L Lu, J Liu (2016). Effects of bio-surfactants combined with alkaline conditions on volatile fatty acid production and microbial community in the anaerobic fermentation of waste activated sludge. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 114: 24–30
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.05.014
12 A Kadier, M S Kalil, P Abdeshahian, K Chandrasekhar, A Mohamed, N F Azman, W Logroño, Y Simayi, A A Hamid (2016). Recent advances and emerging challenges in microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) for microbial production of hydrogen and value-added chemicals. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 61: 501–525
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.017
13 M Z Khan, A S Nizami, M Rehan, O K M Ouda, S Sultana, I M Ismail, K Shahzad (2017). Microbial electrolysis cells for hydrogen production and urban wastewater treatment: A case study of Saudi Arabia. Applied Energy, 185: 410–420
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.005
14 J Kim, Y Yu, C Lee (2013). Thermo-alkaline pretreatment of waste activated sludge at low-temperatures: effects on sludge disintegration, methane production, and methanogen community structure. Bioresource Technology, 144: 194–201
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.115
15 S Li, M Zheng, S Wu, Y Xue, Y Liu, C Wang, X Huang (2019a). The impact of ultrasonic treatment on activity of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in activated sludge. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 13(6): 82
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1166-8
16 Y Li, Y Chen, J Wu (2019b). Enhancement of methane production in anaerobic digestion process: A review. Applied Energy, 240: 120–137
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.243
17 W Liu, S Huang, A Zhou, G Zhou, N Ren, A Wang, G Zhuang (2012). Hydrogen generation in microbial electrolysis cell feeding with fermentation liquid of waste activated sludge. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37(18): 13859–13864
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.090
18 Z Liu, A Zhou, H Liu, S Wang, W Liu, A Wang, X Yue (2020). Extracellular polymeric substance decomposition linked to hydrogen recovery from waste activated sludge: Role of peracetic acid and free nitrous acid co-pretreatment in a prefermentation-bioelectrolysis cascading system. Water Research, 176: 115724
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115724
19 L Lu, D Xing, B Liu, N Ren (2012). Enhanced hydrogen production from waste activated sludge by cascade utilization of organic matter in microbial electrolysis cells. Water Research, 46(4): 1015–1026
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.11.073
20 F Morgan-Sagastume, S Pratt, A Karlsson, D Cirne, P Lant, A Werker (2011). Production of volatile fatty acids by fermentation of waste activated sludge pre-treated in full-scale thermal hydrolysis plants. Bioresource Technology, 102(3): 3089–3097
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.054
21 H Pang, Y Chen, J He, D Guo, X Pan, Y Ma, F Qu, J Nan (2020a). Cation exchange resin-induced hydrolysis for improving biodegradability of waste activated sludge: Characterization of dissolved organic matters and microbial community. Bioresource Technology, 302: 122870
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122870
22 H Pang, L Li, J He, Z Yan, Y Ma, J Nan, Y Liu (2020b). New insight into enhanced production of short-chain fatty acids from waste activated sludge by cation exchange resin-induced hydrolysis. Chemical Engineering Journal, 388: 124235
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124235
23 J Park, B Lee, D Tian, H Jun (2018). Bioelectrochemical enhancement of methane production from highly concentrated food waste in a combined anaerobic digester and microbial electrolysis cell. Bioresource Technology, 247: 226–233
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.021
24 F Rezaei, T L Richard, B E Logan (2009). Analysis of chitin particle size on maximum power generation, power longevity, and Coulombic efficiency in solid–substrate microbial fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources, 192(2): 304–309
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.03.023
25 P A Selembo, J M Perez, W A Lloyd, B E Logan (2009). High hydrogen production from glycerol or glucose by electrohydrogenesis using microbial electrolysis cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34(13): 5373–5381
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.002
26 X Song, Z Shi, X Li, X Wang, Y Ren (2019). Fate of proteins of waste activated sludge during thermal alkali pretreatment in terms of sludge protein recovery. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 13(2): 25
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1114-7
27 R Sun, D Xing, J Jia, Q Liu, A Zhou, S Bai, N Ren (2014a). Optimization of high-solid waste activated sludge concentration for hydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells and microbial community diversity analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39(35): 19912–19920
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.09.163
28 R Sun, A Zhou, J Jia, Q Liang, Q Liu, D Xing, N Ren (2014b). Characterization of methane production and microbial community shifts during waste activated sludge degradation in microbial electrolysis cells. Bioresource Technology, 175C: 68–74
29 R C Wagner, J M Regan, S E Oh, Y Zuo, B E Logan (2009). Hydrogen and methane production from swine wastewater using microbial electrolysis cells. Water Research, 43(5): 1480–1488
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.12.037
30 B Wang, W Liu, Y Zhang, A Wang (2020). Bioenergy recovery from wastewater accelerated by solar power: Intermittent electro-driving regulation and capacitive storage in biomass. Water Research, 175: 115696
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115696
31 H C Wang, D Cui, J L Han, H Y Cheng, W Z Liu, Y Z Peng, Z B Chen, A J Wang (2019a). A2O-MBR as an efficient and profitable unconventional water treatment and reuse technology: A practical study in a green building residential community. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 150: 104418
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104418
32 L Wang, Z He, Z Guo, T Sangeetha, C Yang, L Gao, A Wang, W Liu (2019b). Microbial community development on different cathode metals in a bioelectrolysis enhanced methane production system. Journal of Power Sources, 444: 227306
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227306
33 L Wang, W Liu, L Kang, C Yang, A Zhou, A Wang (2014). Enhanced biohydrogen production from waste activated sludge in combined strategy of chemical pretreatment and microbial electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39(23): 11913–11919
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.06.006
34 S L Wu, J Sun, X Chen, W Wei, L Song, X Dai, B J Ni (2020). Unveiling the mechanisms of medium-chain fatty acid production from waste activated sludge alkaline fermentation liquor through physiological, thermodynamic and metagenomic investigations. Water Research, 169: 115218
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.115218
35 L J Xu, W Z Liu, Y N Wu, A J Wang, S Li, W Ji (2013). Optimizing external voltage for enhanced energy recovery from sludge fermentation liquid in microbial electrolysis cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(35): 15801–15806
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.05.084
36 Y Xue, H Liu, S Chen, N Dichtl, X Dai, N Li (2015). Effects of thermal hydrolysis on organic matter solubilization and anaerobic digestion of high solid sludge. Chemical Engineering Journal, 264: 174–180
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.11.005
37 C X Yang, W Z Liu, J Y Lu, A J Zhou, Y J Zhong, B L Liu, Z W He, A J Wang, H Guo, J Dong, S P Yu (2018). Enhanced short-chain fatty acids production from waste activated sludge by alkaline-associated thermophilic Geobacillus sp. G1 pretreatment. Desalination and Water Treatment, 105: 226–233
https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2018.22027
38 N Yang, H Hafez, G Nakhla (2015). Impact of volatile fatty acids on microbial electrolysis cell performance. Bioresource Technology, 193: 449–455
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.124
39 A Zhou, Z Liu, S Wang, E Chen, Y Wei, W Liu, A Wang, X Yue (2019). Bio-electrolysis contribute to simultaneous bio-hydrogen recovery and phosphorus release from waste activated sludge assisted with prefermentation. Energy, 185: 787–794
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.097
[1] Yang Yang, Qi Zhang, Baiyang Chen, Liangchen Long, Guan Zhang. Toward better understanding vacuum ultraviolet–iodide induced photolysis via hydrogen peroxide formation, iodine species change, and difluoroacetic acid degradation[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(5): 55-.
[2] Keke Xiao, Zecong Yu, Kangyue Pei, Mei Sun, Yuwei Zhu, Sha Liang, Huijie Hou, Bingchuan Liu, Jingping Hu, Jiakuan Yang. Anaerobic digestion of sludge by different pretreatments: Changes of amino acids and microbial community[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(2): 23-.
[3] Milan Malhotra, Anurag Garg. Characterization of value-added chemicals derived from the thermal hydrolysis and wet oxidation of sewage sludge[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 13-.
[4] Yang Li, Yixin Zhang, Guangshen Xia, Juhong Zhan, Gang Yu, Yujue Wang. Evaluation of the technoeconomic feasibility of electrochemical hydrogen peroxide production for decentralized water treatment[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 1-.
[5] Lu Song, Can Wang, Yizhu Wang. Optimized determination of airborne tetracycline resistance genes in laboratory atmosphere[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 95-.
[6] Quan Yuan, Hui Gong, Hao Xi, Kaijun Wang. Aerobic granular sludge formation based on substrate availability: Effects of flow pattern and fermentation pretreatment[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(3): 49-.
[7] Shihao Sun, Tipei Jia, Kaiqi Chen, Yongzhen Peng, Liang Zhang. Simultaneous removal of hydrogen sulfide and volatile organic sulfur compounds in off-gas mixture from a wastewater treatment plant using a two-stage bio-trickling filter system[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 60-.
[8] Tiezheng Tong, Kenneth H. Carlson, Cristian A. Robbins, Zuoyou Zhang, Xuewei Du. Membrane-based treatment of shale oil and gas wastewater: The current state of knowledge[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 63-.
[9] Mengli Wang, Ruying Li, Qing Zhao. Distribution and removal of antibiotic resistance genes during anaerobic sludge digestion with alkaline, thermal hydrolysis and ultrasonic pretreatments[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(3): 43-.
[10] Yanqing Duan, Aijuan Zhou, Kaili Wen, Zhihong Liu, Wenzong Liu, Aijie Wang, Xiuping Yue. Upgrading VFAs bioproduction from waste activated sludge via co-fermentation with soy sauce residue[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(1): 3-.
[11] Giovanni Cagnetta, Kunlun Zhang, Qiwu Zhang, Jun Huang, Gang Yu. Augmented hydrogen production by gasification of ball milled polyethylene with Ca(OH)2 and Ni(OH)2[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(1): 11-.
[12] Kit Wayne Chew, Pau Loke Show, Yee Jiun Yap, Joon Ching Juan, Siew Moi Phang, Tau Chuan Ling, Jo-Shu Chang. Sonication and grinding pre-treatments on Gelidium amansii seaweed for the extraction and characterization of Agarose[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 2-.
[13] Munawar Ali, Junli Zhang, Roberto Raga, Maria Cristina Lavagnolo, Alberto Pivato, Xu Wang, Yuanyuan Zhang, Raffaello Cossu, Dongbei Yue. Effectiveness of aerobic pretreatment of municipal solid waste for accelerating biogas generation during simulated landfilling[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(3): 5-.
[14] Mengqian Lu, Bin-Le Lin, Kazuya Inoue, Zhongfang Lei, Zhenya Zhang, Kiyotaka Tsunemi. PM2.5-related health impacts of utilizing ammonia-hydrogen energy in Kanto Region, Japan[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(2): 13-.
[15] Maocong Hu, Yin Liu, Zhenhua Yao, Liping Ma, Xianqin Wang. Catalytic reduction for water treatment[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(1): 3-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed