Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2024, Vol. 18 Issue (6) : 77    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-024-1837-4
Effects of acid deposition control in China: a review based on responses of subtropical forests
Danni Xie1, Xiaodong Ge2,3, Lei Duan2,3(), Jan Mulder4()
1. School of Land Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
3. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China
4. Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Box 5003, NO-1432, Ås, Norway
 Download: PDF(5412 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

● S and N leaching from forest soils declined due to recent decreases in anthropogenic S and N emissions in China.

● Streamwater chemistry recovery was delayed by at least 5 years after peak S and N deposition.

● N2O–N emission are particularly high in (sub)tropical forests and may amount to 8% of total N deposition from the atmosphere.

● N2O emissions from forest soils declined with reduction in N deposition.

For many decades, acid deposition used to pose a significant regional air pollution challenge in China. After substantial emission control of anthropogenically derived sulfur and nitrogen containing gasses, both sulfur and nitrogen deposition, as well as the acid rain-affected area, have significantly decreased compared to their peak levels. Forests, particularly in the humid subtropics, are sensitive to acid deposition, as evidenced by soil acidification, sulfate and nitrate leaching in stream water, and elevated soil nitrous oxide emission. Reduction in the total deposition of sulfur and nitrogen, caused a significant decline in sulfate and nitrate leaching from subtropical forest and subsequently in sulfate and nitrate concentrations in stream water, although there was about a 5-year delay. This delay may be attributed to the desorption of accumulated sulfate and continued elevated mineralization of accumulated nitrogen pools. Emissions of nitrous oxide, a potent greenhouse gas, also declined in nitrogen-saturated subtropical forest soils, as soil water nitrate concentration decreased. Therefore, subtropical forests in China suffering from elevated acid deposition have begun to recover. Yet, the current levels of sulfur and nitrogen deposition continue to exceed the critical loads, i.e., the assigned threshold levels in accordance with emission control policies, in more than 10% of the country’s land area, respectively, indicating remaining risks of acidification and eutrophication. Thus, further emission reductions are urgently needed, also because they will help achieving goals related to air quality and nitrous oxide emissions.

Keywords Acidification      Critical load      Nitrous oxide      Surface water chemistry      Recovery     
Corresponding Author(s): Lei Duan,Jan Mulder   
Issue Date: 30 May 2024
 Cite this article:   
Danni Xie,Xiaodong Ge,Lei Duan, et al. Effects of acid deposition control in China: a review based on responses of subtropical forests[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(6): 77.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-024-1837-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2024/V18/I6/77
Fig.1  Average annual emissions of SO2–S, NOx–N, and NH3–N (A), average annual wet deposition fluxes of SO42––S, NO3–N, and NH4+–N in China wet deposition (B), and bulk and throughfall deposition fluxes in forests in China, both at the national scale and in the sub-tropics (C). Emission data from 1980 to 2004 are from MEIC (Zheng et al., 2018), and it from 2005 to 2020 are from Zhao et al. (2022). Wet deposition of SO42––S is from Acid Rain Monitoring Network of China Meteorological Administration (CMA, 2023), and wet deposition of NO3–N and NH4+–N are from the Nationwide Nitrogen Deposition Monitoring Network (Li et al., 2019; Wen et al., 2020). Bulk and throughfall deposition fluxes in forests in China are from Du (2018).
Fig.2  Simulated total deposition of SO42––S, NO3–N, and NH4+–N in China. Data are from Zhao et al. (2022).
Fig.3  Critical loads (CL) exceedance for soil acidification and ecosystem eutrophication with the changes in acid deposition in China from 2005 to 2022. Data are from Yu et al. (2024).
Fig.4  Monitoring sites of stream water chemistry in China (A), The relationship between runoff SO42– flux and S deposition (B), and the relationship between runoff NO3 flux and N deposition (C). The sampling sites of headwater streams are from Lv et al. (2023b); The 24 sites in North-west China are from alpine meadow, while the remaining 325 sites were from forest. The comparison of runoff flux is from stream water in south-western China (Xie et al., 2024).
Fig.5  Long-term monitoring and N addition manipulation experiments (A), Ratio of N2O emission to total N deposition in forests in China (B), as well as the relationship between N2O emissions and N input in subtropical forest sites (C). The number in A near each circle or triangle represent the soil N2O emissions (unit: kg N ha−1 yr−1) recorded from monitoring sites or control plots in the N manipulation experiment sites. A positive slope of the arrow in C indicates that N2O emissions increase with increasing N input, while a negative slope indicates that N2O emissions decrease with increasing N input. Data are from Du et al. (2024) and Li et al. (2020a).
  
  
1 D Ackerman, D B Millet, X Chen. (2019). Global estimates of inorganic nitrogen deposition across four decades. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 33(1): 100–107
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB005990
2 S Bernal, L O Hedin, G E Likens, S Gerber, D C Buso. (2012). Complex response of the forest nitrogen cycle to climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(9): 3406–3411
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1121448109
3 C Buchwald, K Grabb, C M Hansel, S D Wankel. (2016). Constraining the role of iron in environmental nitrogen transformations: dual stable isotope systematics of abiotic NO2− reduction by Fe(II) and its production of N2O. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 186: 1–12
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2016.04.041
4 CMA (2023). Annual acid rain monitoring report in China in 2022. Beijing: China Meteorological Administration
5 J Cornut, H Clivot, E Chauvet, A Elger, C Pagnout, F Guerold. (2012). Effect of acidification on leaf litter decomposition in benthic and hyporheic zones of woodland streams. Water Research, 46(19): 6430–6444
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.023
6 M T S D’Amelio, L V Gatti, J B Miller, P Tans. (2009). Regional N2O fluxes in Amazonia derived from aircraft vertical profiles. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 9(22): 8785–8797
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8785-2009
7 W de Vries, G Reinds, E Vel. (2003). Intensive monitoring of forest ecosystems in Europe. Forest Ecology and Management, 174(1–3): 97–115
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00030-0
8 C T Driscoll, K Fallon-Lambert, L Chen (2006). Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences. West Chester: American Cancer Society
9 E Du. (2018). A database of annual atmospheric acid and nutrient deposition to China’s forests. Scientific Data, 5(1): 180223
https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.223
10 E Du, N Xia, R Cai, W Bai, W De Vries (2024). Impacts of nitrogen deposition on soil nitrous oxide emissions in global forests. In: Du E, DeVries, eds. Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition to Global Forests. Amsterdam: Elsevier
11 L Duan, X Chen, X Ma, B Zhao, T Larssen, S Wang, Z Ye. (2016). Atmospheric S and N deposition relates to increasing riverine transport of S and N in Southwest China: implications for soil acidification. Environmental Pollution, 218: 1191–1199
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.075
12 L Duan, S Xie, Z Zhou, J Hao. (2000a). Critical loads of acid deposition on soil in China. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 118(1/2): 35–51
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005197414074
13 L Duan, J Hao, S Xie, K Du. (2000b). Critical loads of acidity for surface waters in China. Science of the Total Environment, 246(1): 1–10
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00347-2
14 L Duan, X Ma, T Larssen, J Mulder, J Hao. (2011). Response of surface water acidification in Upper Yangtze River to SO2 emissions abatement in China. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(8): 3275–3281
https://doi.org/10.1021/es1038672
15 N Eickenscheidt, R Brumme, E Veldkamp. (2011). Direct contribution of nitrogen deposition to nitrous oxide emissions in a temperate beech and spruce forest: a 15N tracer study. Biogeosciences, 8(3): 621–635
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-621-2011
16 K N Eshleman, R D Sabo, K M Kline. (2013). Surface water quality is improving due to declining atmospheric N deposition. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(21): 12193–12200
https://doi.org/10.1021/es4028748
17 FAO (2020). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020. Geneva: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
18 M K Firestone, E A Davidson. (1989). Microbiological basis of NO and N2O production and consumption in soil. Exchange of trace gases between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere, 47: 7–21
19 K J Flynn, J C Blackford, M E Baird, J A Raven, D R Clark, J Beardall, C Brownlee, H Fabian, G L Wheeler. (2012). Changes in pH at the exterior surface of plankton with ocean acidification. Nature Climate Change, 2(7): 510–513
https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1489
20 J N Galloway, Z Dianwu, X Jiling, G E Likens. (1987). Acid rain: China, United States, and a remote area. Science, 236(4808): 1559–1562
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.236.4808.1559
21 X Ge, Q Yu, L Duan, Y Zhao, M Posch, J Hao. (2023). High-resolution maps of critical loads for sulfur and nitrogen in China. Scientific Data, 10(1): 339
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02178-z
22 F S Gilliam, D A Burns, C T Driscoll, S D Frey, G M Lovett, S A Watmough. (2019). Decreased atmospheric nitrogen deposition in eastern North America: predicted responses of forest ecosystems. Environmental Pollution, 244: 560–574
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.135
23 T L Greaver, T J Sullivan, J D Herrick, M C Barber, J S Baron, B J Cosby, M E Deerhake, R L Dennis, J J B Dubois, C L Goodale, et al. (2012). Ecological effects of nitrogen and sulfur air pollution in the US: What do we know? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(7): 365–372 10.1890/110049
24 J Hao, X Ye, L Duan, Z Zhou (2001). Calculating Critical Loads of Sulfur Deposition for 100 Surface Waters in China Using the Magic Model. New York: Springer
25 X He, Y Sheng, J Xie (2020). Study on N2O and NO emission characteristics of ground cover under forest in Beijing: a case study of Carex giraldiana. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 33(1): 146–153 (in Chinese)
26 Y Huang, R Kang, J Mulder, T Zhang, L Duan. (2015). Nitrogen saturation, soil acidification, and ecological effects in a subtropical pine forest on acid soil in southwest China. Journal of Geophysical Research. Biogeosciences, 120(11): 2457–2472
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JG003048
27 IPCC (2013). Climate Change 2013: the physical science basis. In: TFD, Stocker, Qin G K, Plattner M, et al. eds. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK & New York, NY, USA Cambridge University Press
28 IPCC (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. In: Core Writing Team, Pachauri R K, . Meyer L A. eds. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK & New York, NY, USA Cambridge University Press
29 IPCC (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai A, Pirani S L, et al. eds. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK & New York, NY, USA Cambridge University Press
30 R Kang, K Huang, T Gao, J Mulder, L Duan, C Wang, P Ke, M Yao, C Su, J Li. et al.. (2023). Forest Canopy acts as an atmospheric NOx sink: results from micrometeorological flux measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 128(19): e2022JD037729
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037729
31 D M Kool, J Dolfing, N Wrage, J W Van Groenigen. (2011). Nitrifier denitrification as a distinct and significant source of nitrous oxide from soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 43(1): 174–178
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.09.030
32 T Larssen, L Duan, J Mulder. (2011). Deposition and leaching of sulfur, nitrogen and calcium in four forested catchments in China: implications for acidification. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(4): 1192–1198
https://doi.org/10.1021/es103426p
33 L Li, Z Zheng, W Wang, J A Biederman, X Xu, Q Ran, R Qian, C Xu, B Zhang, F Wang. et al.. (2020a). Terrestrial N2O emissions and related functional genes under climate change: a global meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 26(2): 931–943
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14847
34 R Li, L Cui, Y Zhao, Z Zhang, T Sun, J Li, W Zhou, Y Meng, K Huang, H Fu. (2019). Wet deposition of inorganic ions in 320 cities across China: spatio-temporal variation, source apportionment, and dominant factors. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 19(17): 11043–11070
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11043-2019
35 Z Li, Z Zeng, D Tian, J Wang, Z Fu, F Zhang, R Zhang, W Chen, Y Luo, S Niu. (2020b). Global patterns and controlling factors of soil nitrification rate. Global Change Biology, 26(7): 4147–4157
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15119
36 B Liu, P T Morkved, A Frostegard, L R Bakken. (2010). Denitrification gene pools, transcription and kinetics of NO, N2O and N2 production as affected by soil pH. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 72(3): 407–417
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00856.x
37 M Liu, X Huang, Y Song, J Tang, J Cao, X Zhang, Q Zhang, S Wang, T Xu, L Kang. et al.. (2019). Ammonia emission control in China would mitigate haze pollution and nitrogen deposition, but worsen acid rain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(16): 7760–7765
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814880116
38 W Liu, L Yu, T Zhang, R Kang, J Zhu, J Mulder, Y Huang, L Duan. (2017). In situ 15N labeling experiment reveals different long-term responses to ammonium and nitrate inputs in N-saturated subtropical forest. Journal of Geophysical Research. Biogeosciences, 122(9): 2251–2264
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JG003963
39 D Lv, Q Yu, D Xie, J Zhang, X Ge, G Si, B Zhao, S Wang, T Larssen, L Duan. (2022). Critical loads of headwater streams in China using SSWC model modified by comprehensive F-factor. Science of the Total Environment, 802: 149780
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149780
40 D Lv, Q Wu, D Ouyang, M Wen, G Zhang, S Wang, L Duan. (2023). Differentiated emission control strategy based on comprehensive evaluation of multi-media pollution: case of mercury emission control. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 123: 222–234
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.03.028
41 A R Mosier. (1998). Soil processes and global change. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 27(3): 221–229
https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050424
42 J Mulder, A Stein. (1994). The solubility of aluminum in acidic forest soils−long-term changes due to acid deposition. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 58(1): 85–94
https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(94)90448-0
43 J Mulder, N Vanbreemen, H C Eijck. (1989). Depletion of soil aluminum by acid deposition and implications for acid neutralization. Nature, 337(6204): 247–249
https://doi.org/10.1038/337247a0
44 J Nilsson, P Grennfelt (1988). Critical loads for sulphur and nitrogen. In: Mathy P, eds. Air Pollution and Ecosystems. New York: Springer
45 A R Ravishankara, J S Daniel, R W Portmann. (2009). Nitrous oxide (N2O): the dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st Century. Science, 326(5949): 123–125
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1176985
46 K C Rice, T M Scanlon, J A Lynch, B J Cosby (2014). Decreased atmospheric sulfur deposition across the southeastern US−When will watersheds release stored sulfate? Environmental Science & Technology, 48(17): 10071–10078 10.1021/es501579s
47 K A Ryan, G B Lawrence. (2024). Recent, widespread nitrate decreases may be linked to persistent dissolved organic carbon increases in headwater streams recovering from past acidic deposition. Science of the Total Environment, 906: 167646
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167646
48 A Schmitz, T G M Sanders, A Bolte, F Bussotti, T Dirnböck, J Johnson, J Peñuelas, M Pollastrini, A K Prescher, J Sardans. et al.. (2019). Responses of forest ecosystems in Europe to decreasing nitrogen deposition. Environmental Pollution, 244: 980–994
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.101
49 H M Seip, P Aagaard, V Angell, O Eilertsen, T Larssen, E Lydersen, J Mulder, I P Muniz, A Semb, D G Tang. et al.. (1999). Acidification in China: assessment based on studies at forested sites from Chongqing to Guangzhou. Ambio, 28(6): 522–528
50 R S Stelzer, T B Parr, M Coulibaly. (2020). A ten year record of nitrate retention and solute trends in a Wisconsin sand plains stream: temporal variation at multiple scales. Biogeochemistry, 147(2): 125–147
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-019-00631-z
51 J L Stoddard, D S Jeffries, A Lükewille, T A Clair, P J Dillon, C T Driscoll, M Forsius, M Johannessen, J S Kahl, J H Kellogg. et al.. (1999). Regional trends in aquatic recovery from acidification in North America and Europe. Nature, 401(6753): 575–578
https://doi.org/10.1038/44114
52 J Tan, J S Fu, F Dentener, J Sun, L Emmons, S Tilmes, K Sudo, J Flemming, J E Jonson, S Gravel. et al.. (2018). Multi-model study of HTAP II on sulfur and nitrogen deposition. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18(9): 6847–6866
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6847-2018
53 B Ulrich (1983). Soil acidity and its relations to acid deposition. In: Ulrich B, Pankrath J, eds. Effects of Accumulation of Air Pollutants in Forest Ecosystems. Amsterdam: Springer
54 N van Breemen, J Mulder, C T Driscoll. (1983). Acidification and alkalinization of soils. Plant and Soil, 75(3): 283–308
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02369968
55 R Vet, R S Artz, S Carou, M Shaw, C U Ro, W Aas, A Baker, V C Bowersox, F Dentener, C Galy-Lacaux. et al.. (2014). A global assessment of precipitation chemistry and deposition of sulfur, nitrogen, sea salt, base cations, organic acids, acidity and pH, and phosphorus. Atmospheric Environment, 93: 3–100
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.060
56 J Vuorenmaa, A Augustaitis, B Beudert, W Bochenek, N Clarke, Wit H A de, T Dirnböck, J Frey, H Hakola, S Kleemola. et al.. (2018). Long-term changes (1990–2015) in the atmospheric deposition and runoff water chemistry of sulphate, inorganic nitrogen and acidity for forested catchments in Europe in relation to changes in emissions and hydrometeorological conditions. Science of the Total Environment, 625: 1129–1145
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.245
57 J Vuorenmaa, A Augustaitis, B Beudert, N Clarke, Wit H A de, T Dirnbock, J Frey, M Forsius, I Indriksone, S Kleemola. et al.. (2017). Long-term sulphate and inorganic nitrogen mass balance budgets in European ICP Integrated Monitoring catchments (1990–2012). Ecological Indicators, 76: 15–29
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.040
58 Y Wang, J Guo, R D Vogt, J Mulder, J Wang, X Zhang. (2018). Soil pH as the chief modifier for regional nitrous oxide emissions: new evidence and implications for global estimates and mitigation. Global Change Biology, 24(2): e617–e626
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13966
59 S A Watmough, C J Whitfield, M E Fenn. (2014). The importance of atmospheric base cation deposition for preventing soil acidification in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region of Canada. Science of the Total Environment, 493: 1–11
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.110
60 Z Wen, W Xu, Q Li, M Han, A Tang, Y Zhang, X Luo, J Shen, W Wang, K Li. et al.. (2020). Changes of nitrogen deposition in China from 1980 to 2018. Environment International, 144: 106022–106022
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106022
61 D Xie, L Duan, G Si, W Liu, T Zhang, J Mulder. (2021). Long-term 15N balance after single-dose input of 15N-labeled NH4+ and NO3– in a subtropical forest under reducing N deposition. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 35(7): e2021GB006959
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GB006959
62 D Xie, G Si, T Zhang, J Mulder, L Duan. (2018b). Nitrogen deposition increases N2O emission from an N-saturated subtropical forest in southwest China. Environmental Pollution, 243: 1818–1824
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.113
63 D Xie, T Zhang, Q Yu, Y Huang, J Mulder, L Duan. (2018a). A sharp decline in nitrogen input in a N-saturated subtropical forest causes an instantaneous reduction in nitrogen leaching. Journal of Geophysical Research. Biogeosciences, 123(10): 3320–3330
https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JG004322
64 D Xie, B Zhao, R Kang, X Ma, T Larssen, Z Jin, L Duan. (2024). Delayed recovery of surface water chemistry from acidification in subtropical forest region of China. Science of the Total Environment, 912: 169126
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169126
65 X Xu, X Wu, W Xu, Y Sun, L Zhang, Z Yang. (2022). Water acidification weakens the carbon sink capacity of mixotrophic organisms. Science of the Total Environment, 865: 161120–161120
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161120
66 X Ye, J Hao, L Duan, Z Zhou. (2002). Acidification sensitivity and critical loads of acid deposition for surface waters in China. Science of the Total Environment, 289(1–3): 189–203
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(01)01046-4
67 L Yu, R Kang, J Mulder, J Zhu, P Dörsch. (2017b). Distinct fates of atmogenic NH4+ and NO3− in subtropical, N-saturated forest soils. Biogeochemistry, 133(3): 279–294
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0332-y
68 L Yu, J Zhu, J Mulder, P Dorsch. (2016). Multiyear dual nitrate isotope signatures suggest that N-saturated subtropical forested catchments can act as robust N sinks. Global Change Biology, 22(11): 3662–3674
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13333
69 Q Yu, L Duan, J Hao. (2021). Acid deposition in China: sources, effects and control. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 41(3): 731–746
70 Q Yu, X Ge, H Zheng, J Xing, L Duan, D Lv, D Ding, Z Dong, Y Sun, M Posch. et al.. (2024). A probe into acid deposition mitigation path in China over the last four decades and beyond. National Science Review, 11(4): nwae007
https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwae007
71 Q Yu, J Mulder, G Si, L Yu, R Kang, K Liu. (2023). Prominent role of sulfate reduction in considerable sulfur retention in a subtropical soil. Journal of Geophysical Research. Biogeosciences, 128: e2023JG007572
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JG007572
72 Q Yu, T Zhang, Z Cheng, B Zhao, J Mulder, T Larssen, S Wang, L Duan (2017a). Is surface water acidification a serious regional issue in China? Science of the Total Environment, 584: 783–790 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.116
73 Y Zhao, M Xi, Q Zhang, Z Dong, M Ma, K Zhou, W Xu, J Xing, B Zheng, Z Wen. et al.. (2022). Decline in bulk deposition of air pollutants in China lags behind reductions in emissions. Nature Geoscience, 15(3): 190–200
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00899-1
74 B Zheng, D Tong, M Li, F Liu, C Hong, G Geng, H Li, X Li, L Peng, J Qi. et al.. (2018). Trends in China’s anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18(19): 14095–14111
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018
75 J Zhu, J Mulder, L P Wu, X X Meng, Y H Wang, P Dörsch. (2013). Spatial and temporal variability of N2O emissions in a subtropical forest catchment in China. Biogeosciences, 10(3): 1309–1321
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1309-2013
76 Q Zhuang, Y Lu, M Chen. (2012). An inventory of global N2O emissions from the soils of natural terrestrial ecosystems. Atmospheric Environment, 47: 66–75
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.036
[1] Jiuhui Qu, Jiaping Chen. Pathways toward a pollution-free planet and challenges[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(6): 67-.
[2] Zhihao Xian, Jun Yan, Jingyi Dai, Hao Wu, Xin Zhang, Wenbo Nie, Fucheng Guo, Yi Chen. Simultaneous enhanced ammonia and nitrate removal from secondary effluent in constructed wetlands using a new manganese-containing substrate[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(4): 47-.
[3] Min Yang, Xianghui Li, Weixiang Chao, Xiang Gao, Huan Wang, Lu Lu. Renewable biosynthesis of isoprene from wastewater through a synthetic biology approach: the role of individual organic compounds[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(3): 28-.
[4] Kui Zou, Hongyuan Liu, Bo Feng, Taiping Qing, Peng Zhang. Recovery of cyanophycin granule polypeptide from activated sludge: carbon source dependence and aggregation-induced luminescence characteristics[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(2): 16-.
[5] Xin Yuan, Xianguo Zhang, Yuqi Yang, Xuan Li, Xin Xing, Jiane Zuo. Emission of greenhouse gases from sewer networks: field assessment and isotopic characterization[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(10): 119-.
[6] Wei Zhang, Huaqiang Chu, Libin Yang, Xiaogang You, Zhenjiang Yu, Yalei Zhang, Xuefei Zhou. Technologies for pollutant removal and resource recovery from blackwater: a review[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(7): 83-.
[7] Donglin Wang, Jie Zhou, Hui Lin, Junwen Chen, Jing Qi, Yaohui Bai, Jiuhui Qu. Impacts of backwashing on micropollutant removal and associated microbial assembly processes in sand filters[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(3): 34-.
[8] Runyao Huang, Jin Xu, Li Xie, Hongtao Wang, Xiaohang Ni. Energy neutrality potential of wastewater treatment plants: A novel evaluation framework integrating energy efficiency and recovery[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(9): 117-.
[9] Xinxia Tian, Hui Yu, Jun Yang, Xiaotai Zhang, Man Zhao, Yang Yang, Wei Sun, Yangyang Wei, Yin Zhang, Jian Wang, Zhun Ma. Preparation of reverse osmosis membrane with high permselectivity and anti-biofouling properties for desalination[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(7): 89-.
[10] Xiaoyuan Zhang, Jun Gu, Shujuan Meng, Yu Liu. Dissolved methane in anaerobic effluent: Emission or recovery?[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(4): 54-.
[11] Tao Liu, Yudong Song, Zhiqiang Shen, Yuexi Zhou. Inhibition character of crotonaldehyde manufacture wastewater on biological acidification[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 119-.
[12] Guoliang Zhang, Liang Zhang, Xiaoyu Han, Shujun Zhang, Yongzhen Peng. Start-up of PN-anammox system under low inoculation quantity and its restoration after low-loading rate shock[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(2): 32-.
[13] Kuo Fang, Fei Peng, Hui Gong, Huanzhen Zhang, Kaijun Wang. Ammonia removal from low-strength municipal wastewater by powdered resin combined with simultaneous recovery as struvite[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 8-.
[14] Xiling Li, Tianwei Hao, Yuxin Tang, Guanghao Chen. A “Seawater-in-Sludge” approach for capacitive biochar production via the alkaline and alkaline earth metals activation[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 3-.
[15] Lingchen Kong, Xitong Liu. Emerging electrochemical processes for materials recovery from wastewater: Mechanisms and prospects[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 90-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed