Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2021, Vol. 15 Issue (6) : 119    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1403-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Inhibition character of crotonaldehyde manufacture wastewater on biological acidification
Tao Liu1,2,3, Yudong Song1,2, Zhiqiang Shen1,2(), Yuexi Zhou1,2,3()
1. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
2. Research Center of Environmental Pollution Control Engineering Technology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
3. School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
 Download: PDF(1359 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

• The inhibition of the main organic pollutions in CMW was demonstrated.

• Variations of AK and BK showed a high correlation with the SAA of Ac and n-Bu.

• The inhibitory degree was in the order of Ac>n-Bu for individual toxicants.

• Biodegradation products of the main toxicants were analyzed.

This work aims to investigate the inhibitory effect of crotonaldehyde manufacture wastewater (CMW) on biological acidification. To reveal the inhibitory effect of wastewater to the anaerobic granular sludge (AnGS), variations of the specific acidogenic activity (SAA) and activities of key enzymes were investigated. The results indicated that the dosage of CMW causing a 50% effect concentration (EC50) on the activity of total volatile fatty acids (TVFA) production was 380 mg COD/g VSS. The inhibitory effect of individual toxicants in CMW on the activity of TVFA production were in the order of crotonaldehyde>ethyl sorbate>(E,E)-2,4-hexadienal, and their inhibitory degrees on individual VFA products were acetic acid (Ac)>n-butyric acid (n-Bu), which could correspond to the variations in the activities of acetate kinase (AK) and butyrate kinase (BK). Furthermore, the combined effect of three toxicants on the activity of TVFA production was significantly higher than that of any individual toxicant, and the contribution of the relative toxicity to CMW was 77.27%. Additionally, the biodegradation products of the main toxicants indicated that the removal of crotonaldehyde and (E,E)-2,4-hexadienal was primarily due to the hydrogenation of alkene and aldehyde and the oxidation of aldehyde. Nevertheless, the removal of ethyl sorbate was primarily based on adsorption. In conclusion, biological acidification has a limited ability to treatment CMW, therefore, a further pretreatment technology should be used to remove the main toxicant of wastewater.

Keywords Crotonaldehyde manufacture wastewater      Biological acidification      Volatile fatty acids      Inhibition      Toxic units     
Corresponding Author(s): Zhiqiang Shen,Yuexi Zhou   
Issue Date: 02 March 2021
 Cite this article:   
Tao Liu,Yudong Song,Zhiqiang Shen, et al. Inhibition character of crotonaldehyde manufacture wastewater on biological acidification[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 119.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-021-1403-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2021/V15/I6/119
Fig.1  Variations in TVFA concentrations (a) and inhibition ratio to SAA (b) in the presence of CMW at different levels.
Groups a EC50 (%) TU
TVFA Ac n-Bu TVFA Ac n-Bu
Group-1 1.70 1.75 1.90 58.82 57.14 52.63
Group-2 3.48 3.18 4.12 28.74 31.45 24.27
Group-3 6.74 6.47 7.35 14.84 15.46 13.61
Group-4 6.30 6.03 6.34 15.87 16.58 15.77
Group-5 3.00 2.91 5.37 33.33 34.36 18.62
Group-6 3.54 3.61 3.64 28.25 27.70 27.47
Group-7 6.95 6.87 7.25 14.39 14.56 13.79
Group-8 2.20 2.26 2.15 45.45 44.25 46.51
Tab.1  Effects of CMW, individual toxicants or the mixture of toxicants on the activities of TVFA, Ac and n-Bu production
Fig.2  Composition of VFAs under different toxicant levels from 8 to 24 h: (a) CMW; (b) crotonaldehyde; (c) (E,E)-2,4-hexadienal; (d) ethyl sorbate.
Fig.3  Variations in the enzyme activity of AK, BK and acetyl-CoA at different crotonaldehyde, (E,E)-2,4-hexadienal and ethyl sorbate levels.
Fig.4  Removal ratios of crotonaldehyde, (E,E)-2,4-hexadienal and ethyl sorbate after 24 h in the biological acidification process.
Fig.5  GC-MS chromatogram of (a) crotonaldehyde, (b) (E,E)-2,4-hexadienal and e (c) ethyl sorbate in the effluents at 1 d and 5d: (1) propanoic acid; (2) iso-butyric acid; (3) n-butyric acid; (4) isovaleric acid; (5) 2-methyl butyric acid; (6) pentanoic acid; (7) hexanoic acid; (A) crotonaldehyde; (B) 1-butanol; (C) crotonyl alcohol; (D) (E)-4-hexen-1-ol; (E) (Z)-4-hexen-1-ol; (F) (E,E)-2,4-hexadienal; (G) trans-2,4-hexadien-1-ol; (H) 4-hexenoic acid; (I) trans-3-hexenoic acid; (J) trans-2-hexenoic acid; (K) sorbic acid; (L) ethyl sorbate.
1 L Bollans, J Bacsa, J A Iggo, G A Morris, V S Stachulski (2009). The acyl nitroso Diels–Alder (ANDA) reaction of sorbate derivatives: An X-ray and 15N NMR study with an application to amino-acid synthesis. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, 7(21): 4531-4538
https://doi.org/10.1039/b912963d
2 D H Cha, T Adams, H Rogg, P J Landolt (2012). Identification and field evaluation of fermentation volatiles from wine and vinegar that mediate attraction of spotted wing drosophila, drosophila suzukii. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 38(11): 1419–1431
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-012-0196-5
3 J L Chen, R Ortiz, T W J Steele, D C Stuckey (2014). Toxicants inhibiting anaerobic digestion: A review. Biotechnology Advances, 32(8): 1523–1534
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.10.005
4 Y Chen, J Cheng, K Creamer (2008). Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: A review. Bioresource Technology, 99(10): 4044–4064
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.057
5 EPA-Ireland. (1998). Wastewater treatment manuals: characterisation of industrial wastewaters. Dublin: Environmental Protection Agency, Ireland
6 S Hartmans, J A M D Bont, W Harder (1989). Microbial metabolism of short-chain unsaturated hydrocarbons. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 63(3): 235–264
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1989.tb03399.x
7 Y Hwang, P Sivagurunathan, M K Lee, Y Yun, Y Song, D Kim (2019). Enhanced hydrogen fermentation by zero valent iron addition. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(6): 3387–3394
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.06.015
8 L A Ioannou, G L Puma, D Fatta-Kassinos (2015). Treatment of winery wastewater by physicochemical, biological and advanced processes: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 286: 343–368
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.043
9 X Kong, Y Wei, S Xu, J Liu, H Li, Y Liu, S Yu (2016). Inhibiting excessive acidification using zero-valent iron in anaerobic digestion of food waste at high organic load rates. Bioresource Technology, 211: 65–71
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.078
10 C Y Lin (1993). Effect of heavy metals on acidogenesis in anaerobic digestion. Water Research, 27(1): 147–152
https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(93)90205-V
11 T Liu, Z Shen, C Zhang, Y Song, J Li, Z Yang, G Song, Z Han, Y Zhou (2019). Effect of influent pH on hydrolytic acidification performance and bacterial community structure in EGSB for pretreating CMW after ozonation. Water Science and Technology, 79(6): 1174–1183
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2019.118
12 L Neves, R Oliveira, M M Alves (2006). Anaerobic co-digestion of coffee waste and sewage sludge. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 26(2): 176–181
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2004.12.022
13 T Ohtsuki, K Sato, N Sugimoto, H Akiyama, Y Kawamura (2012). Absolute quantitative analysis for sorbic acid in processed foods using proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Analytica Chimica Acta, 734(734): 54–61
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2012.04.033
14 S V W B Oliveira, E M Moraes, M A T Adorno, E F Vareche, M Zaiat (2004). Formaldehyde degradation in an anaerobic packed-bed bioreactor. Water Research, 38(7):1685–1694
15 W F Owen, D C Stuckey, J B Healy Jr, L Y Young, P L McCarty (1979). Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Research, 13(6): 485–492
https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(79)90043-5
16 T Renner, M Baerkoetzle, G Scherer (1999). Determination of sorbic acid in urine by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography. A, 847(1–2): 127–133
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(98)01035-8
17 G Q Song, H B Xi, X M Sun, Y D Song, Y X Zhou (2018). Effect of 2-butenal manufacture wastewater to methanogenic activity and microbial community. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 12(5): 10
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-018-1056-5
18 G Q Song, H B Xi, Y X Zhou, L Y Fu, X Xing, C Y Wu (2017). Influence of organic load rate (OLR) on the hydrolytic acidification of 2-butenal manufacture wastewater and analysis of bacterial community structure. Bioresource Technology, 243: 502–511
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.162
19 G Q Song, Y Yu, T Liu, H B Xi, Y X Zhou (2019). Performance of microaeration hydrolytic acidification process in the pretreatment of 2-butenal manufacture wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 369: 465–473
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.02.034
20 State Environmental Protection Administration of China (SEPA) 2002. Water and wastewater monitoring methods, 4th ed. Chinese Environmental Science Press, Beijing, China.
21 X M Tian, Y D Song, H B Xi, Z Q Shen, Y X Zhou (2020). Inhibition and removal of trichloroacetaldehyde by biological acidification with glucose co-metabolism. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 386:121796
22 Y L Wang, D B Wang, F Chen, Q Yang, Y F Li, X M Li, G M Zeng (2019). Effect of triclocarban on hydrogen production from dark fermentation of waste activated sludge. Bioresource Technology, 279: 307–316
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.02.016
23 Y L Wang, D B Wang, Y W Liu, Q L Wang, F Chen, Q Yang, X M Li, G M Zeng, H L Li (2017). Triclocarban enhances short-chain fatty acids production from anaerobic fermentation of waste activated sludge. Water Research, 127: 150–161
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.09.062
24 C Winkler, B Frick, K Schroecksnadel, H Schennach, D Fuchs (2006). Food preservatives sodium sulfite and sorbic acid suppress mitogen-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 44(12): 2003–2007
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2006.06.019
25 C Wu, Y Zhou, Q Sun, L Fu, H Xi, Y Yu, R Yu (2016). Appling hydrolysis acidification-anoxic-oxic process in the treatment of petrochemical wastewater: from bench scale reactor to full scale wastewater treatment plant. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 309: 185–191
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.02.007
26 Y Wu, W Ren, Z Liang, Z Liu, G Wu (2013). Liquid-phase aldol condesation of acetaldehyde and its kinetics. Chemical Reaction Engineering and Technology, 29: 75–80 (in Chinese)
27 J M Wyatt, C J Knowles (1995). The development of a novel strategy for the microbial treatment of acrylonitrile effluents. Biodegradation, 6(2): 93–107
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00695340
28 Y Y Xiao, C D Araujo, C C Sze, D Stuckey (2015). Toxicity measurement in biological wastewater treatment processes: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 286: 15–29
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.033
29 X Xin, Y Yu, H Xi, G Song, Y Wang, J Zuo, Y Zhou (2018). Reduction of wastewater toxicity and change of microbial community in a hydrolysis acidification reactor pre-treating trimethylolpropane wastewater. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 12(6): 12
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-018-1055-6
30 Q Yuan, H Gong, H Xi, K J Wang (2020). Aerobic granular sludge formation based on substrate availability: Effects of flow pattern and fermentation pretreatment. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14(3): 49
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1226-0
[1] FSE-20181-OF-LT_suppl_1 Download
[1] Shuhan Li, Xin Zhou, Xiwei Cao, Jiabo Chen. Insights into simultaneous anammox and denitrification system with short-term pyridine exposure: Process capability, inhibition kinetics and metabolic pathways[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 139-.
[2] Jinjin Fu, Quan Zhang, Baocheng Huang, Niansi Fan, Rencun Jin. A review on anammox process for the treatment of antibiotic-containing wastewater: Linking effects with corresponding mechanisms[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 17-.
[3] Madhavaraj Lavanya, Ho-Dong Lim, Kong-Min Kim, Dae-Hyuk Kim, Balasubramani Ravindran, Gui Hwan Han. A novel strategy for gas mitigation during swine manure odour treatment using seaweed and a microbial consortium[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(3): 53-.
[4] Yanqing Duan, Aijuan Zhou, Kaili Wen, Zhihong Liu, Wenzong Liu, Aijie Wang, Xiuping Yue. Upgrading VFAs bioproduction from waste activated sludge via co-fermentation with soy sauce residue[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(1): 3-.
[5] Ping He, Guangxue Wu, Rui Tang, Peilun Ji, Shoujun Yuan, Wei Wang, Zhenhu Hu. Influence of arsanilic acid, Cu2+, PO43 and their interaction on anaerobic digestion of pig manure[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(2): 9-.
[6] Shunan Shan, Yuting Zhang, Yining Zhang, Lanjun Hui, Wen Shi, Yongming Zhang, Bruce E. Rittmann. Comparison of sequential with intimate coupling of photolysis and biodegradation for benzotriazole[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(6): 8-.
[7] Yuyao ZHANG,Huan LI,Can LIU,Yingchao CHENG. Influencing mechanism of high solid concentration on anaerobic mono-digestion of sewage sludge without agitation[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9(6): 1108-1116.
[8] Baohua TANG, Lingyan ZHU, Qixing ZHOU. Joint effects of Penta-BDE and heavy metals on Daphnia magna survival, its antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng Chin, 2011, 5(1): 99-110.
[9] Weihao ZHANG, Fuqing XU, Wei HE, Xing ZHENG, Chen YANG. Inhibitive effects of three compositae plants on Microcystis aeruginosa[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng Chin, 2009, 3(1): 48-55.
[10] HE Yiliang, ZHAO Bin, HUGHES Joseph B., HAN Sung Soo. Fenton oxidation of 2,4- and 2,6-dinitrotoluene and acetone inhibition[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2008, 2(3): 326-332.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed