Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of History in China

ISSN 1673-3401

ISSN 1673-3525(Online)

CN 11-5740/K

Postal Subscription Code 80-980

Front. Hist. China    2014, Vol. 9 Issue (1) : 83-101    https://doi.org/10.3868/s020-003-014-0004-0
research-article
Policy Blending, Fuzzy Chronology, and Local Understandings of National Initiatives in Early 1950s China
Neil J. Diamant()
Department of East Asian Studies, Dickinson College, Carlisle, PA 17013, USA
 Download: PDF(269 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

This article proposes the concept of policy blending to improve our understanding of the densely interactive quality of political initiatives in early 1950s China. Using three cases studies, I argue that policy blending, defined as the process by which previous political experiences shaped the implementation and interpretation of those subsequent to them (sometimes in ways contrary to the government’s intentions), occurred frequently during this period, to the extent that people’s understanding of the first years of Chinese Communist Party rule cannot be separated from this phenomenon. Using examples from marriage registration, the Marriage Law and the national discussion of the 1954 draft Constitution, I advance the historiographical argument that the early 1950s should not be demarcated by, or taught mainly with reference to, “temporally encapsulated” policies with clear beginnings and ends (i.e., policy “a” occurred in year “b,” followed by policy “c” in year “d”). Rather, policies seeped into each other, producing a blurry—but sometimes accurate—“impression” of state power. I further suggest that the concept of policy blending can be helpful in understanding subsequent political initiatives as well.

Keywords 1950s      political campaigns      historiography      Marriage Law      constitution     
Issue Date: 16 May 2014
 Cite this article:   
Neil J. Diamant. Policy Blending, Fuzzy Chronology, and Local Understandings of National Initiatives in Early 1950s China[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2014, 9(1): 83-101.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fhc/EN/10.3868/s020-003-014-0004-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fhc/EN/Y2014/V9/I1/83
[1] Huaiyin Li. The Formation of the Qing State in Global Perspective: A Geopolitical and Fiscal Analysis[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2018, 13(4): 437-472.
[2] Charles W. Hayford. New Chinese Military History, 1839–1951: What’s the Story?[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2018, 13(1): 90-126.
[3] Stephen R. Halsey. Warfare, Imperialism, and the Making of Modern Chinese History: A Review Essay[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2018, 13(1): 47-72.
[4] Roger Des Forges. China’s Roles in World History and Historiography[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2016, 11(2): 177-246.
[5] Ming-kin Chu. The Making of Iconic Disloyalty: The Evolution of Liu Mengyan’s (1219 - ca. 1295) Image since the Thirteenth Century[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2015, 10(1): 1-37.
[6] Jake Werner. Global Fordism in 1950s Urban China[J]. Front Hist Chin, 2012, 7(3): 415-441.
[7] Antonia Finnane. Tailors in 1950s Beijing: Private Enterprise, Career Trajectories, and Historical Turning Points in the Early PRC[J]. Front Hist Chin, 2011, 6(1): 117-137.
[8] Marián Gálik. Hebrew Deuteronomistic and Early Chinese Confucian Historiography: A Comparative Approach[J]. Front Hist Chin, 2010, 5(3): 343-362.
[9] SANG Bing, . The boundary of source materials for recent Chinese history and the integrity of historiography: With reference to the compilation and publication of relevant historical materials[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2009, 4(4): 510-536.
[10] LUO Zhitian, . Change and continuity in the recent 30 years of research on modern Chinese history: Some unsystematic reflective thoughts[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2009, 4(4): 479-509.
[11] QU Lindong. The development of Chinese ethnic minority historiography and the formation of the concept of a united multiethnic nation[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2008, 3(2): 165-172.
[12] SUN Lin. Textual discourses and behavior criterion: The historiographic significance of Tibetan biographies of the religious figures[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2008, 3(2): 173-194.
[13] WANG Tiangen. Construction of Yan Fu’s view on social history and the turning of modern history[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2007, 2(4): 547-565.
[14] MEI Xueqin. From the history of the environment to environmental history: A personal understanding of environmental history studies[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2007, 2(2): 121-144.
[15] Chen Xin. Experimental history: the appeal of postmodernism in historiography[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2006, 1(2): 199-213.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed