Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of History in China

ISSN 1673-3401

ISSN 1673-3525(Online)

CN 11-5740/K

Postal Subscription Code 80-980

Front. Hist. China    2023, Vol. 18 Issue (4) : 421-442    https://doi.org/10.3868/s020-012-023-0026-8
On the Formation, Continuation, and Contemporary Enlightenment of the Centralized System in Ancient China
Li Wencai
School of Social Development, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225002, China
 Download: PDF(799 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The centralized system in ancient China originated from patriarchal cooperative agriculture in the pre-national era. The centralized system of government was established in the Xia, Shang, and Zhou “kingship power” era. In the “imperial power” era from the Qin Dynasty to the Qing Dynasty, the authoritarian centralized system with imperial power as the core was increasingly strengthened. The evolution from “kingship power” to “imperial power” was an inevitable trend of China’s historical development, and the centralized power system had also been strengthened. As a dominant ideology, the thought of “Great Unity” provided a theoretical cornerstone for the centralized system in ancient China; the centralized system in ancient China provided the institutional guarantee for the official status of the idea of “Great Unity.” The system of centralization has been continuous in Chinese history, perfectly adaptable to Chinese traditional society, and interchangeable with the idea of “Great Unity,” providing an ideological basis and institutional guarantee for the formation, continuation, and development of a unified multi-ethnic country in China. The thought of “Great Unity” and centralization are the common values of the Chinese nation, which can provide useful reference for the current road of modernization.

Keywords centralized system      “Great Unity”      kingship power era      imperial power era      modernization     
About author:

Lei Wang and Yingqiu Xie contributed equally to this work.

Issue Date: 31 January 2024
 Cite this article:   
Li Wencai. On the Formation, Continuation, and Contemporary Enlightenment of the Centralized System in Ancient China[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2023, 18(4): 421-442.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fhc/EN/10.3868/s020-012-023-0026-8
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fhc/EN/Y2023/V18/I4/421
[1] Jie Gao. United with the Countrymen: Folklore Studies at Peking University, 1918–26[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2020, 15(4): 552-578.
[2] Fu Zheng. Shifting Narratives: Modern Chinese History since the Economic Reform and a Critique of Popular Opinion[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2018, 13(4): 577-604.
[3] Xin ZHANG. Changing Conceptions of the Opium War as History and Experience[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2018, 13(1): 28-46.
[4] HE Ping. Ideas of revolution in China and the West[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2008, 3(1): 139-148.
[5] WANG Tiangen. Construction of Yan Fu’s view on social history and the turning of modern history[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2007, 2(4): 547-565.
[6] Dong Zhenghua. The modernization paradigm based on monistic multi-linear theory: a response to some comments[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2006, 1(2): 159-198.
[7] Wu Songdi, Fan Rusen. The impact of the opening of Tianjin on economic changes in its hinterland[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2006, 1(2): 307-327.
[8] Wei Guangqi, Ding Haixiu. Township/Village Administration from the Late Qing to the Warlord Period[J]. Front. Hist. China, 2006, 1(1): 97-123.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed