Please wait a minute...
Frontiers in Energy

ISSN 2095-1701

ISSN 2095-1698(Online)

CN 11-6017/TK

Postal Subscription Code 80-972

2018 Impact Factor: 1.701

Front. Energy    2020, Vol. 14 Issue (4) : 715-725    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0690-3
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Design and application of a novel coal-fired drum boiler using saline water in heavy oil recovery
Junping GU1, Yuxin WU1(), Liping WU2, Man ZHANG1, Hairui YANG1, Junfu LYU1
1. Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
2. Yucheng Thermo Ltd., Karamay 834000, China
 Download: PDF(764 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

In this paper, the design and operation of a novel coal-fired circulating fluidized bed (CFB) drum boiler that can generate superheated steam using saline water were introduced. The natural circulation water dynamics with a drum was adopted instead of the traditional once-through steam generator (OTSG) design, so that superheated steam can be generated for the better performance of the steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) technology in heavy oil recovery. The optimized staged evaporation method was proposed to further decrease the salinity of water in the clean water section of the boiler. The evaporating pipes of the salted water section were rearranged in the back pass of the boiler, where the heat load is low, to further improve the heat transfer safety. A CFB combustion technology was used for coal firing to achieve a uniform heat transfer condition with low heat flux. Pollutant control technologies were adopted to reduce pollutant emissions. Based on the field test, the recommended water standard for the coal-fired CFB drum boilers was determined. With the present technology, the treated recovery wastewater can be reused in steam-injection boilers to generate superheated steam. The engineering applications show that the boiler efficiency is higher than 90%, the blowdown rate is limited within 5.5%, and the superheat of steam can reach up to 30 K. Besides, the heavy oil recovery efficiency is significantly improved. Moreover, the pollutant emissions of SO2, NOx and dust are controlled within the ranges of 20–90 mg/(N·m3), 30–90 mg/(N·m3) and 2–10 mg/(N·m3) respectively.

Keywords drum steam injection boiler      natural circulation      recovery wastewater      staged evaporation      circulating fluidized bed (CFB)     
Corresponding Author(s): Yuxin WU   
Online First Date: 25 September 2020    Issue Date: 21 December 2020
 Cite this article:   
Junping GU,Yuxin WU,Liping WU, et al. Design and application of a novel coal-fired drum boiler using saline water in heavy oil recovery[J]. Front. Energy, 2020, 14(4): 715-725.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/10.1007/s11708-020-0690-3
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/Y2020/V14/I4/715
Terms Oil content/(mg·L–1) Suspended impurity content/(mg·L–1) ∑Fe/(mg·L–1) SiO2/(mg·L–1) Total hardness/(mg·L–1) Total alkalinity/(mg·L–1) Total dissolved solid/(mg·L–1)
Heavy oil wastewater ≤1000 ≤300 ≤0.2 70–100 100–120 ≤1000 >3000
Treated wastewater ≤2.0 ≤2.0 ≤0.05 ≤100 ≤0.1 ≤2000 >3000
Tab.1  Qualities of heavy oil recovery wastewater and treated wastewater
Fig.1  Diagrammatic illustration of salt balance.
Fig.2  Fig. 2 Diagram of staged evaporation technology.
Fig.3  Heating surface design for staged evaporation technology.
Fig.4  Detailed arrangement of the evaporating pipes for salted water sections.
Terms China
(SY/T0027-2007)
Canada American petroleum institute
Dissolved oxygen/(mg·L–1) ≤0.05 0.05 0.1
Total hardness/(mg·L–1)
(CaCO3)
≤0.1 - 1
∑Fe/(mg·L–1) ≤0.05 0.1 0.1
Silica/(mg·L–1) ≤50 50 50*
Suspended impurities/(mg·L–1) ≤2 5 5
Total alkalinity/(mg·L–1)
(CaCO3)
≤2000 ≤2000 ≤2000
Oil and grease/(mg·L–1) ≤2 1 1
Mineralization, mg/L ≤7000 depends on solubility ≤7000
PH level 7.5–11 7.5–9.1 7–12
Tab.2  Feed water quality standards for once-through steam-injection boilers in different countries
Fig.5  Corrosion rate for different alloy steels used in boiler (P is pressure and T is temperature).
Standards Terms Values
Feed water quality standard Dissolved oxygen/(mg·L–1) ≤0.007
Electrical conductivity/(ms·cm–1) ≤2500
Chloride ion/(mg·L–1) ≤1500
HCO3 /(mg·L–1) ≤100
SiO2/(mg·L–1) ≤50
∑Fe/(mg·L–1) ≤0.05
Total hardness/(mg·L–1) ≤0.1
Suspended impurities/(mg·L–1) ≤2
Mineralization/(mg·L–1) ≤2000
PH level 8.0–10.5
Oil and grease/(mg·L–1) ≤2
Boiler water quality standard Phosphate in clean water section/(mg·L–1) 2 ~ 6
Phosphate in salted water section/(mg·L–1) <12
Electrical conductivity in clean water section/(μs·cm–1) <7000
Electrical conductivity in salted water section/(μs·cm–1) <17000
Drum water level/mm 50±20
Deaerator water level/mm –150±50
Hardness of clean water section, salted water section,
saturated steam and superheated steam/(μmol·L–1)
<10
Hardness of cooling tower water/(μmol·L–1) <10
pH level 9.0–12
Blowdown rate, % <5.5
Tab.3  Quality standards for feed water and boiler water of natural-circulation steam-injection boilers
Terms Fengcheng Heavy Oil Field Yucheng Thermo Ltd.
CO 32/(mg·L–1) 80.4
OH /(mg·L–1) 138.2
HCO3/(mg·L–1) 374.6 0.00
Chloride ion/(mg·L–1) 717.9 246.1
Calcium ion/(mg·L–1) 0.00 0.00
Magnesium ion/(mg·L–1) 0.22 0.24
SO 42/(mg·L–1) 281.6 314.3
Na+ + K+/(mg·L–1) 741.4 371.4
Mineralization/(mg·L–1) 2115.8 1150.6
pH level 8.1 12.6
Silica/(mg·L–1) 66.8
Electrical conductivity/(ms·m–1) 762
Tab.4  Feed water qualities of steam-injection boilers for Fengcheng Heavy Oil Field and Yucheng Thermo Ltd.
Fig.6  Heated wall surfaces after a long-time operation.
Terms Test station in Fengcheng Heavy Oil Field Yucheng No. 1 station Yucheng No. 2 station
Steam generation/(t·h–1) 121.9 125.23 126.94
Steam pressure/MPa 7.58 13.2 7.22
Steam temperature/°C 291 359.48 314.58
Steam dryness/% 99.70 100 100
Steam superheat/°C 25 27.3 26.7
Feed water temperature/°C 109.6 104 105
Exhaust gas temperature/°C 115.6 109 111
Blowdown rate/% 8.40 5.32 5.44
Coal consumption per ton steam/(kg·t–1) 106.8 109.28 113.55
Power consumption per ton steam/(kWh·t–1) 17.89 18.08 17.23
Boiler efficiency/% 92.79 90.75
Tab.5  Steam quality and operating data of test station in Fengcheng Heavy Oil Field and steam supply stations of Yucheng Thermo Ltd.
Boilers Oil yield by SAGD/(t·d–1) Oil-gas ratio Production-injection ratio Water content/% Preheating time/d
Coal-fired boilers 8.7 0.161 0.96 82.9 122
Gas-fired boilers 6.8 0.135 0.88 85.2 158
Changes 1.9 0.026 0.08 –2.3 –36
Tab.6  Oil recovery of SAGD in one well group by using coal-fired and gas-fired boilers
Fig.7  Comparison of oil production between coal-fired and gas-fired boilers in one well area.
Boilers Steam injection/(t·d–1) Oil yield/(t·d–1) Oil-gas ratio Production-injection ratio
Coal-fired boilers 430 90 0.21 1.45
Gas-fired boilers 530 65 0.12 1.09
Changes –100 25 0.09 0.36
Tab.7  Oil recovery of VHSD in No. 32 well area by using coal-fired and gas-fired boilers
Terms Test station in Fengcheng Heavy Oil Field Test station inYucheng Thermo Ltd.
Design value Operating data Design value Operating data
NOx emission/(mg·(N·m3)–1) ≤250 32–200 (without SNCR) ≤100 30–90 (with SNCR)
SO2 emission/(mg·(N·m3)–1) ≤400 80–317 ≤100 20–90
Furnace desulfurization efficiency 93.3% 98.5%
Dust/(mg·(N·m3)–1) ≤200 regional standard
≤400 national standard
80–300 ≤30 2–10
Tab.8  Design and operation pollutant emissions of test stations in Fencheng Heavy Oil Field and Yucheng Thermo Ltd.
1 L Wang, Y Tian, X Y Yu, C Wang, B Yao, S Wang, P H Winterfeld, X Wang, Z Yang, Y Wang, J Cui, Y S Wu. Advances in improved/enhanced oil recovery technologies for tight and shale reservoirs. Fuel, 2017, 210: 425–445
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.095
2 S Kumar, A Mandal. A comprehensive review on chemically enhanced water alternating gas/CO2 (CEWAG) injection for enhanced oil recovery. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 2017, 157: 696–715
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.07.066
3 A M M Al Bahlani, T Babadagli. A critical review of the status of SAGD: where are we and what is next? In: SPE western Regional and Pacific Section AAPG Joint Meeting, Bakersfield, California, USA, 2008
4 P Pedenaud, C Goulay, P Michaud. Oily water treatment schemes for steam generation in SAGD heavy oil developments. In: SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 2005
5 N A Elsayed, M A Barrufet, M M El-Halwagi. An integrated approach for incorporating thermal membrane distillation in treating water in heavy oil recovery using SAGD. Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources, 2015, 12: 6–14
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juogr.2015.07.002
6 B Khorshidi, A Bhinder, T Thundat, D Pernitsky, M Sadrzadeh. Developing high throughput thin film composite polyamide membranes for forward osmosis treatment of SAGD produced water. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 511: 29–39
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.03.052
7 G Naidu, X Zhong, S Vigneswaran. Comparison of membrane distillation and freeze crystallizer as alternatives for reverse osmosis concentrate treatment. Desalination, 2018, 427: 10–18
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.10.043
8 B A Farnand, S Coulombe, H Sawatzky. Reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration: production of boiler-feed quality water from bitumen-heavy oil-oil-in-water emulsions by ultrafiltration. ACS Publications, 1985: 261–272
9 Y Zhou, J Hou, Y C Zhao, F Yang. Oil/gas/coal-fired steam generator. Oil Forum, 2017 (S1): 120–123 (in Chinese)
10 B M Ren, Z H Yan, Y Y Li, X W Xiu , W B Dong. SAGD technique and analysis of influential factors in heavy oil recovery. Tuha Oil & Gas, 2012, 17(4): 370–373 (in Chinese)
11 J K Feng, G X Yue, J F Lyu. Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion Boiler. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2003
12 H Bill, X Xie, D C Yan. New technology for heavy oil exploitation wastewater reused as boiler feedwater. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2008, 35(1): 113–117
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(08)60016-6
13 M Salgot, M Folch. Wastewater treatment and water reuse. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 2018, 2: 64–74
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2018.03.005
14 B Dong, Y Xu, S J Jiang, X Dai. Effect of reusing the advanced-softened, silica-rich, oilfield-produced water (ASOW) on finned tubes in steam-injection boiler. Desalination, 2015, 372: 17–25
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.06.015
15 Y Xu, B Dong, X H Dai. Effect of the silica-rich, oilfield-produced water with different degrees of softening on characteristics of scales in steam-injection boiler. Desalination, 2015, 361: 38–45
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.01.027
16 H Zhang, D Yang. Hydrodynamic structure design of natural circulation chain-grate stoker boiler used for steam injection in oil field. Industrial Boiler, 2009, 1: 13–18 (in Chinese)
17 Y Zhai. The analysis on water circulation method of downhole steam generator. Mechanical Management and Development, 2014, 3: 67–69 (in Chinese)
18 J P Gu, Y X Wu, G L Tang, Q Wang, J Lyu. Experimental study of heat transfer and bubble behaviors of NaCl solutions during nucleate flow boiling. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2019, 109: 109907
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2019.109907
19 H R Yang, G X Yue, H Zhang, J Lu. Updated design and operation experience of CFB boilers with energy saving process in China. VGB PowerTech, 2011, 23(7): 49–53
20 Y X Wu, J F Lyu, C R Cai, H Zhang, H R Yang, Q Liu, J S Zhang, Natural-circulation steam-injection boiler with salted feed water and its water circulation method: CN101979917A, 2011
21 Y X Wu, J F Lyu, P Wu, L P Wu, W D Wu, X X Zhao. Study on the new type of coal-fired steam-injection boiler and its application in heavy oil recovery. Oil-Gasfield Surface Engineering, 2017, 36(12): 11–14 (in Chinese)
22 S H Najibi. Heat transfer and heat transfer fouling during subcooled flow boiling for electrolyte solutions. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Guildford: The University of Surrey, 1997
23 P Guraieb, Q W Wang. Trends in Oil and Gas Corrosion Research and Technologies: Production and Transmission. London: Woodhead Publishing, 2017
24 D Ifezue. Chloride pitting of steam generator boiler coils. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2017, 17(5): 831–837
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-017-0328-x
25 W F Bogaerts, H A A Van. Chloride pitting and water chemistry control in cooling or boiler circuits. Corrosion Science, 1985, 25(12): 1149–1161
https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(85)90059-9
26 X Y Wu. The analysis about the effect of water quality on boiler performance. Equipment Manufacturing Technology, 2013(7): 174–175, 182 (in Chinese)
27 G X Yue, J F Lu, P Xu, X K Hu , W Ling, Y Chen, J F Li . The up-to-date development and future of circulating fluidized bed combustion technology. Electric Power, 2016, 49(1): 1–13 (in Chinese)
28 G Yue, R Cai, J Lu, H Zhang. From a CFB reactor to a CFB boiler – the review of R&D progress of CFB coal combustion technology in China. Powder Technology, 2017, 316: 18–28
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.10.062
29 J J Li, X H Yang, S H Zhang, Z S Yang, H R Yang, Q. Liu The in-situ desulphurization with multi-particle-size and multi-flow-state for circulating fluidized bed boilers. Journal of Shenyang Institute of Engineering, 2014, 10(2): 113–117 (in Chinese)
30 R X Cai, H Zhang, M Zhang, H Yang, J Lyu, G Yue. Development and application of the design principle of fluidization state specification in CFB coal combustion. Fuel Processing Technology, 2018, 174: 41–52
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.02.009
31 R X Cai, Y Q Huang, Y R Li, Y Wu, H Zhang, M Zhang, H Yang, J Lyu. Effects of the limestone particle size on the sulfation Reactivity at low SO2 concentrations using a LC-TGA. Materials (Basel), 2019, 12(9): 1496
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12091496
32 R X Cai, X W Ke, Y Q Huang, S Zhu, Y Li, J Cai, H Yang, J Lyu, M Zhang. Application of ultrafine limestone sorbents for the desulfurization process in CFB boilers. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(22): 13514–13523
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04747
33 J P Gu, H R Yang, C L Li, J F Lyu. Design and operation of a MSW and straw co-firing CFB boiler. In: 12th International Conference on Fluidized Bed Technology, 2017: 1057–1063
34 X C Xu, C H Chen, H Y Qi, R He, C You, G Xiang. Development of coal combustion pollution control for SO2 and NOx in China. Fuel Processing Technology, 2000, 62(2–3): 153–160
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(99)00116-2
35 X W Ke, R X Cai, M Zhang, M Miao, J Lyu, H Yang. Application of ultra-low NOx emission control for CFB boilers based on theoretical analysis and industrial practices. Fuel Processing Technology, 2018, 181: 252–258
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.10.001
36 State Environmental Protection Agency. Stationary Source Emission–Determination of Nitrogen Oxides–Fixed Potential by Electrolysis Method (HJ 693–2014). Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2014
37 State Environmental Protection Agency. Stationary Source Emission–Determination of Sulfur Dioxide–Fixed Potential by Electrolysis Method (HJ 57–2017). Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2017
38 State Environmental Protection Agency. Determination of Particulates and Sampling Methods of Gaseous Pollutants Emitted from Exhaust Gas of Stationary Source (GB/T 16157–1996). Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 1996
[1] Zhuo LIU, Jianbo LI, Mingming ZHU, Xiaofeng LU, Zhezi ZHANG, Dongke ZHANG. Effect of oil shale semi-coke on deposit mineralogy and morphology in the flue path of a CFB burning Zhundong lignite[J]. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(1): 26-37.
[2] Yingzhong LU. A perspective of “Nuclear Hot Spring” for long-term sustainable economy of the world[J]. Front Energ, 2011, 5(4): 349-357.
[3] Xuan YAO, Tao WANG, Jia ZHAO, Hairui YANG, Hai ZHANG. Modeling of solids segregation in circulating fluidized bed boilers[J]. Front Energ, 2011, 5(1): 115-119.
[4] WANG Jianjun, YANG Xingtuan, JIANG Shengyao. Simulation of flow excursion and thermal siphon under natural circulation condition with lower pressure and lower quality[J]. Front. Energy, 2008, 2(2): 169-173.
[5] CHENG Leming, WANG Qinhui, SHI Zhenglun, LUO Zhongyang, NI Mingjiang, CEN Kefa. Heat transfer in a large-scale circulating fluidized bed boiler[J]. Front. Energy, 2007, 1(4): 477-482.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed