Revisiting solar hydrogen production through photovoltaic-electrocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting

doi:10.1007/s11708-021-0745-0

Front. Energy

2021, Vol. 15

Issue (3) : 596-599 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-021-0745-0

MINI REVIEW

Revisiting solar hydrogen production through photovoltaic-electrocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting

Zhiliang WANG(

), Yuang GU, Lianzhou WANG(

)

Nanomaterials Centre, School of Chemical Engineering and Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia

Download: PDF(217 KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract

Photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting is regarded as a promising way for solar hydrogen production, while the fast development of photovoltaic-electrolysis (PV-EC) has pushed PEC research into an embarrassed situation. In this paper, a comparison of PEC and PV-EC in terms of efficiency, cost, and stability is conducted and briefly discussed. It is suggested that the PEC should target on high solar-to-hydrogen efficiency based on cheap semiconductors in order to maintain its role in the technological race of sustainable hydrogen production.

Keywords hydrogen production photovoltaic electrocatalysis photoelectrocatalysis water splitting

Corresponding Author(s): Zhiliang WANG,Lianzhou WANG

Online First Date: 18 May 2021 Issue Date: 09 October 2021

Cite this article:

Zhiliang WANG,Yuang GU,Lianzhou WANG. Revisiting solar hydrogen production through photovoltaic-electrocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting[J]. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(3): 596-599.

URL:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/10.1007/s11708-021-0745-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/Y2021/V15/I3/596

Fig.1 Two pathways for solar hydrogen production by PEC and PV-EC water splitting.

Tab.1 Comparison of PEC and PV-EC targeted on practical solar hydrogen production

1	W H Brattain, C G B Garrett. Experiments on the interface between germanium and an electrolyte. Bell System Technical Journal, 1955, 34(1): 129–176 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1955.tb03766.x
2	H Jr Letaw, J Bardeen. Electrolytic analog transistor. Journal of Applied Physics, 1954, 25(5): 600–606 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1721697
3	L M Peter. Semiconductor electrochemistry. In: Giménez S, Bisquert J, eds. Photoelectrochemical Solar Fuel Production. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016: 3–40
4	F Williams, A J Nozik. Solid-state perspectives of the photoelectrochemistry of semiconductor–electrolyte junctions. Nature, 1984, 312(5989): 21–27 https://doi.org/10.1038/312021a0
5	A B Ellis, S W Kaiser, J M Bolts, et al.. Study of n-type semiconducting cadmium chalcogenide-based photoelectrochemical cells employing polychalcogenide electrolytes. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1977, 99(9): 2839–2848 https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00451a001
6	N R de Tacconi, N Myung, K Rajeshwar. Overlayer formation in the n-CdSe/[Fe(CN)6]4−/3− photoelectrochemical system as probed by laser Raman spectroscopy and electrochemical quartz crystal microgravimetry. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1995, 99(16): 6103–6109 https://doi.org/10.1021/j100016a054
7	R Memming. Solar energy conversion by photoelectrochemical processes. Electrochimica Acta, 1980, 25(1): 77–88 https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4686(80)80054-5
8	A J Nozik. Photoelectrochemistry: applications to solar energy conversion. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, 1978, 29(1): 189–222 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pc.29.100178.001201
9	H Gerischer, C W Tobias. Advances in Electrochemistry and Electrochemical Engineering. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1978
10	A J Bard. Photoelectrochemistry. Science, 1980, 207(4427): 139–144 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.207.4427.139
11	S R Morrison. Applications of semiconductor electrodes. In: Electrochemistry at Semiconductor and Oxidized Metal Electrodes. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1980: 335–357
12	A Fujishima, K Honda. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature, 1972, 238(5358): 37–38 https://doi.org/10.1038/238037a0
13	NRER. National Best research—cell efficiency chart. 2020–04–06, available at website of nrel.gov
14	M F Lagadec, A Grimaud. Water electrolysers with closed and open electrochemical systems. Nature Materials, 2020, 19(11): 1140–1150 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-0788-3
15	K Ayers, N Danilovic, R Ouimet, et al.. Perspectives on low-temperature electrolysis and potential for renewable hydrogen at scale. Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 2019, 10(1): 219–239 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060718-030241
16	J Luo, J H Im, M T Mayer, et al.. Water photolysis at 12.3% efficiency via perovskite photovoltaics and earth-abundant catalysts. Science, 2014, 345(6204): 1593–1596 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258307
17	O Khaselev, J A Turner. A monolithic photovoltaic-photoelectrochemical device for hydrogen production via water splitting. Science, 1998, 280(5362): 425–427 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5362.425
18	J Jia, L C Seitz, J D Benck, et al.. Solar water splitting by photovoltaic-electrolysis with a solar-to-hydrogen efficiency over 30%. Nature Communications, 2016, 7(1): 13237 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13237
19	L Pan, J H Kim, M T Mayer, et al.. Boosting the performance of Cu2O photocathodes for unassisted solar water splitting devices. Nature Catalysis, 2018, 1(6): 412–420 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-018-0077-6
20	P Zhai, S Haussener, J Ager, et al.. Net primary energy balance of a solar-driven photoelectrochemical water-splitting device. Energy & Environmental Science, 2013, 6(8): 2380 https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee40880a
21	K Sivula, R van de Krol. Semiconducting materials for photoelectrochemical energy conversion. Nature Reviews. Materials, 2016, 1(2): 15010 https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2015.10
22	S Zhang, Y He. Analysis on the development and policy of solar PV power in China. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 21: 393–401 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.002
23	Y Alajlani, A Alaswad, F Placido, et al.. Inorganic thin film materials for solar cell applications. In: Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering. Amsterdam: Elsevier B. V., 2018
24	D Feldman, G Barbose, R Margolis, et al.. Photovoltaic (PV) pricing trends: historical, recent, and near-term projections. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), 2012
25	R J Detz, J N H Reek, B C C van der Zwaan. The future of solar fuels: when could they become competitive? Energy & Environmental Science, 2018, 11(7): 1653–1669 https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EE00111A
26	A Grimm, W A de Jong, G J Kramer. Renewable hydrogen production: a techno-economic comparison of photoelectrochemical cells and photovoltaic-electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(43): 22545–22555 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.092
27	Z Wang, L Wang. Photoelectrode for water splitting: materials, fabrication and characterization. Science China Materials, 2018, 61(6): 806–821 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-018-9240-y
28	E Kabir, P Kumar, S Kumar, et al.. Solar energy: potential and future prospects. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 82: 894–900 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.094
29	Y Kuang, Q Jia, G Ma, et al.. Ultrastable low-bias water splitting photoanodes via photocorrosion inhibition and in situ catalyst regeneration. Nature Energy, 2017, 2(1): 16191 https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.191
30	K P Bhandari, J M Collier, R J Ellingson, et al.. Energy payback time (EPBT) and energy return on energy invested (EROI) of solar photovoltaic systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 47: 133–141 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.057

[1]	Yuqi LIU, Yitong LIU, Yue YU, Chengzhan LIU, Shuangxi XING. Facile route to achieve MoSe₂-Ni₃Se₂ on nickel foam as efficient dual functional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting[J]. Front. Energy, 2022, 16(3): 483-491.
[2]	Zhi JIANG, Zhen YE, Wenfeng SHANGGUAN. Recent advances of hydrogen production through particulate semiconductor photocatalytic overall water splitting[J]. Front. Energy, 2022, 16(1): 49-63.
[3]	Hongmei WU, Feng LI, Yanqi YUAN, Jing LIU, Liping ZHAO, Peng ZHANG, Lian GAO. Enhancing the photoelectrochemical performance of p-silicon through TiO₂ coating decorated with mesoporous MoS₂[J]. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(3): 772-780.
[4]	Ziwei ZHAO, Kaiyi CHEN, Jingwei HUANG, Lei WANG, Houde SHE, Qizhao WANG. Enhanced performance of NiF₂/BiVO₄ photoanode for photoelectrochemical water splitting[J]. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(3): 760-771.
[5]	Jiali DONG, Xuqiang ZHANG, Gongxuan LU, Chengwei WANG. Generation of enhanced stability of SnO/In(OH)₃/InP for photocatalytic water splitting by SnO protection layer¹[J]. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(3): 710-720.
[6]	Junying LIU, Zhidong WEI, Wenfeng SHANGGUAN. Enhanced photocatalytic water splitting with surface defective SrTiO₃ nanocrystals[J]. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(3): 700-709.
[7]	Bing LUO, Yuxin ZHAO, Dengwei JING. State-of-the-art progress in overall water splitting of carbon nitride based photocatalysts[J]. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(3): 600-620.
[8]	Yan ZHANG, Yukun ZHU, Yanhua PENG, Xiaolong YANG, Jian LIU, Wei JIAO, Jianqiang YU. Spontaneous polarization enhanced bismuth ferrate photoelectrode: fabrication and boosted photoelectrochemical water splitting property[J]. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(3): 781-790.
[9]	Saket MATHUR, Benjamin ROGERS, Wei WEI. Organic conjugated polymers and polymer dots as photocatalysts for hydrogen production[J]. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(3): 667-677.
[10]	Yuichi YAMAGUCHI, Akihiko KUDO. Visible light responsive photocatalysts developed by substitution with metal cations aiming at artificial photosynthesis[J]. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(3): 568-576.
[11]	Haoxuan MA, Chunli LIU. A mini-review of ferrites-based photocatalyst on application of hydrogen production[J]. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(3): 621-630.
[12]	Zekun LIU, Shuang YUAN, Yi YUAN, Guojian LI, Qiang WANG. A thermoelectric generator and water-cooling assisted high conversion efficiency polycrystalline silicon photovoltaic system[J]. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(2): 358-366.
[13]	Xueqing LIU, Xiaodong ZHAO, Luyi LU, Jianlan LI. Influence mechanism of dynamic and static liquid bridge forces on particle deposition behaviors in solar photovoltaic mirrors[J]. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(2): 499-512.
[14]	Shiquan SHAN, Chuyang CHEN, Peter G. LOUTZENHISER, Devesh RANJAN, Zhijun ZHOU, Zhuomin M. ZHANG. Spectral emittance measurements of micro/nanostructures in energy conversion: a review[J]. Front. Energy, 2020, 14(3): 482-509.
[15]	Hilal ÇELİK KAZICI, Şakir YILMAZ, Tekin ŞAHAN, Fikret YILDIZ, Ömer Faruk ER, Hilal KIVRAK. A comprehensive study of hydrogen production from ammonia borane via PdCoAg/AC nanoparticles and anodic current in alkaline medium: experimental design with response surface methodology[J]. Front. Energy, 2020, 14(3): 578-589.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed