Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Law in China

ISSN 1673-3428

ISSN 1673-3541(Online)

CN 11-5742/D

Postal Subscription Code 80-981

Front. Law China    2017, Vol. 12 Issue (1) : 57-75    https://doi.org/10.3868/s050-006-017-0004-3
Orginal Article
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION DISCLOSURE IN CHINA: IN THE ERA OF INFORMATIZATION AND BIG DATA
ZHANG Lei1(), Arthur P. J. Mol2(), YANG Shuai3()
1. School of Environment and Natural Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
2. Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
3. School of Environment and Natural Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
 Download: PDF(401 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The past decade has seen remarkable progress made in the field of environmental information disclosure in China. While the overall institutional changes and the motivation/willingness of the government to open up information are important conditions, China’s encounter with revolutionary Information and Communication Technological (ICT) advancement and rapidly emerging big data quickly changed China from an “information poor environment” to an “information complex environment.” While most previous studies centered on those drives/constraints that were recognized in established informational governance framework, recent advancement in ICTs and emerging big data posed new challenges, opportunities and research questions. When increasing information disclosure became a new game changer in environmental governance, China has had to cope with risks and pitfalls in a new technology-empowered information environment as well. This article updated previous studies on legislation/ regulations/policies regarding environmental information disclosure in China and their implementation effectiveness, and paid special attention to China’s recent informatization progress and emerging big data. Information disclosure was treated as a process that includes data/information generation/collection, disclosure, functional pathways of communication, and direct/indirect impacts. Changes in environmental information disclosure should be understood in a broader context of overall changing environmental governance and informatization in China. It is important to understand ICTs and information disclosure as a double-edged sword. Normative, substantive, and instrumental benefits of disclosure as well as collection and reporting costs, the issue of targeted transparency, and the risk of unintended use should be strategically considered. Principles and guidelines need to be developed to avoid pitfalls while maximizing benefits.

Keywords environmental information disclosure      informatization      big data      China     
Issue Date: 04 May 2017
 Cite this article:   
ZHANG Lei,Arthur P. J. Mol,YANG Shuai. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION DISCLOSURE IN CHINA: IN THE ERA OF INFORMATIZATION AND BIG DATA[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(1): 57-75.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flc/EN/10.3868/s050-006-017-0004-3
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flc/EN/Y2017/V12/I1/57
[1] ZHANG Lin, AN Jingjing. The Legal Infrastructure for Creativity in China: A Perspective of Venture Capital[J]. Front. Law China, 2020, 15(4): 452-480.
[2] NA Heya. Between Tradition and Modernity: The Re-trial System of the Beiyang Period in the Early Republic of China (1912-1928)[J]. Front. Law China, 2020, 15(1): 59-83.
[3] HAI Dan. Institutional Reform and Social Changes in Northeast China During the Late Qing: A Case Study of Appeal Trials[J]. Front. Law China, 2020, 15(1): 38-58.
[4] LU Haina. Adding a Gender Perspective to China’s Belt and Road Initiative as an International Human Rights Obligation[J]. Front. Law China, 2019, 14(4): 445-477.
[5] HOU Peng. Using Shields as Weapons: Third-Party Funding Assisting China-Related Arbitration under Belt and Road Investment[J]. Front. Law China, 2019, 14(2): 274-303.
[6] Yuko Nishitani. Coordination of Legal Systems by the Recognition of Foreign Judgments — Rethinking Reciprocity in Sino-Japanese Relationships[J]. Front. Law China, 2019, 14(2): 193-230.
[7] ZHANG Wenxian. Forty Themes on the Innovation and Development of Chinese Legal Research in the Reform and Opening Up Era[J]. Front. Law China, 2019, 14(1): 2-38.
[8] ZHANG Wenliang. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN NON-MONETARY JUDGMENTS IN CHINA[J]. Front. Law China, 2018, 13(2): 218-240.
[9] Yasuhiro OKUDA. UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF RECIPROCITY REQUIREMENT FOR RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS IN JAPAN[J]. Front. Law China, 2018, 13(2): 159-170.
[10] Bruno da Silva. EVOLUTION OF THE BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP CONCEPT: MORE THAN HALF OF CENTURY OF UNCERTAINTY AND WHAT HISTORY CAN TELL US[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(4): 501-523.
[11] Philip Ebow Bondzi-Simpson, Felix Awuah. A REVIEW OF THE CHINA–GHANA BILATERAL INVESTMENT TREATY, 1989[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(3): 372-383.
[12] JIANG Dong. DOES CHINA NEED AN ANTI-FOREIGN BRIBERY STATUTE? SOME LESSONS FROM THE FCPA OF US[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(3): 355-371.
[13] JIN Meirong. ANTI-MONOPOLY PERSPECTIVES OF CHINESE PUBLIC AIR TRANSPORT MARKET[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(1): 138-156.
[14] FU Xin. DOING FIELDWORK ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN CHINA[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(1): 114-137.
[15] Razeen Sappideen. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE WITH CHINESE CHARACTERISTICS: THE CASE OF STATE OWNED ENTERPRISES[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(1): 90-113.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed